Consider a bifilar 1:1 transformer/coil:
each winding is 50 turns
inductance factor is 0.2 mH/turn²
resistance factor is 0.01 Ohm/turn
Two batteries in parallel
If the windings are in series we have when saturated:
12 V, 2 H, 1 Ohm, 12 A, 24 Wb, 144 J, 144 W
If the windings are in parallel we have when saturated:
12 V, 0.5H, 0.25 Ohm, 48 A, 24 Wb, 576 J, 576 W
But now we put one battery on one winding and one on the other!
Is it like having 24 V on the windings in series?
Or is it like having 12 V on the windings in parallel?
If its like the windings are in series we have when saturated:
24 V, 2 H, 1 Ohm, 24 A, 48 Wb, 576 J, 576 W
/Hob
each winding is 50 turns
inductance factor is 0.2 mH/turn²
resistance factor is 0.01 Ohm/turn
Two batteries in parallel
If the windings are in series we have when saturated:
12 V, 2 H, 1 Ohm, 12 A, 24 Wb, 144 J, 144 W
If the windings are in parallel we have when saturated:
12 V, 0.5H, 0.25 Ohm, 48 A, 24 Wb, 576 J, 576 W
But now we put one battery on one winding and one on the other!
Is it like having 24 V on the windings in series?
Or is it like having 12 V on the windings in parallel?
If its like the windings are in series we have when saturated:
24 V, 2 H, 1 Ohm, 24 A, 48 Wb, 576 J, 576 W
/Hob
It's like the Lenz effect Ufopolitics mentioned in the other thread. In modeling these fields folks neglect anything they are not specifically measuring for. NOT the best idea. On Ufopolitic's design. KUDOS! WELL DONE AND WOooo HOOO! No joke folks. Beautiful. And it agrees with what I have have been trying to communicate for a few years now. The universe is ever full of the field. When we shove massive free electrons into a conductor we caus an "artificial" field. What we have neglected is the fact that the field was already present. We have to force inversion of an existing field. Thus when the field "relaxes" the result is what we put in plus the previously existing field. Thus approximately 1.5935 times field value.
to EF.
Comment