Walter Russell - Understanding and applying his work

[dambit]

Hi All,

This image means absolutely nothing to me. It just looks like a broken clock. I have no idea what it represents and I have been unable to find an explanation for it. Can someone kindly educate me on this?

Also, no actual build progress yet on the coils as actual work is quite busy at the moment. I will get them started soon though.

Cheers,

Steve

[petar113507]

With another picture from MM to build on the concept of the inertial planes walter russell talked about in The Universal One.

http://i1206.photobucket.com/albums/...eurM/16ccc.jpg

because those red/blue from the coral castle picture look an awful lot like the "recessive opposite"...



I think that russell shows us -- if we connect the dots between his drawings, how he visualized the "inertial planes"...



The commonality of the positives being on the left side, and the negatives on the right in two is enough to indicate the common angle -- viewed instead in a shift in perspective.

Russell's inertial plane was the stable position in which the opposite (+/-) forces could cancel out.

I think that if we can move the inertial plane (plus heating/cooling) it can "lock" and cool in that (modified) potential position.

Has anyone seen EFTV 18 "Transmutation", or given serious thought to John Milewski's "Growing gold from glass"?

I know I can't be the only one out there thinking that they're very similar processes accomplishing "transmutation" using similar processes...

Hope to spark discussion about the inertial planes...
(sorry it took this long to join it )

==Romo

[StweenyA]

Great posts all, so much to wrap my mind around.

Haven't posted in awhile, because work has been keeping me very busy, and anyway, I try to only post when I feel I have something to add, and not just to break the silence. I hope I'm not thought of as "half dedicated" because of that...

anyway..

I was just thinking about the so-called "anti gravity" inventions (ufo's too), that have to rotate around the Y axis in order to take off...

Well, gravity according to WR is centripetal... spinning in the one direction.... so if you spin the anti-gravity device (magnet maybe?) in the other direction, wouldn't you be able to counter gravity?

[Dave45]

The various Aether Theories, Electric Universe Models, Fractal Cosmologies, Digital Physics Theories about Holographic Universes, Spherical Standing-Wave Models of Matter, etc. all find their convergence in Music. Even a cursory glance of each of these things yields an understanding of their Interconnectedness.

Electrical phenomena are scalable in nature; their patterns show up self-similarly, on every level of scale, and are thus fractal. Recursion is a simple process and leads to complex organic patterns (like in Life Game). And whether sound waves or electrical waves, all wave phenomena follows musical patterns.

Power Laws (Harmonic Series, Inverse-Square, Surface Area:Volume, etc.).

I feel that the term "Music of the Spheres" refers to the various "Spheres" (or planes of existence), rather than just the motion of the bodies of the solar system.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

My conception of Aether may seem more philosophical in nature, somewhat akin to the ancient concept of it being the "One substance" out of which all manifest things find their Birth and Rebirth. However, to call it "substance" does not mean it is "material" per se, but that it is Reality itself.

Not an inert medium for that transmission of waves (although waves can travel through it), but also a generator of waves. It is the only thing that is Self-Creating, and The Creation Process happens from every Point of it Infinitely and Eternally. It is Reality itself.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

The note document has been updated as well.

So very true, and when we realize this aether is energy that our Creator put in motion that is still reverberating throughout our universe still creating, we are starting to wake up.
This is a very interesting thread I cant believe I havent been keeping up with it, I'll catch up when I have time.

[MonsieurM]

I don't know if you read about him:

Leon Sprink - Antigravity - patents

some of the experiments you propose resemble the experiments he ran

Instead of the expensive and time consuming chemical method of obtaining free
nitrogen in LIMITED quantities, Nature's method would produce free nitrogen
cheap, quickly, and in UNLIMITED quantities. It is not necessary to call attention
to the value of commerce and to agriculture, not to mention soil regeneration, that
this method of obtaining nitrogen would be to the world.
In September, 1927, I demonstrated this principle of dual polarity control by
arranging two pairs of solenoids - one pair with more windings than the other - in
such a manner that the dual polarity of Nature was simulated.
With a steel or glass disc for an equator and a steel rod for amplitude, I adjusted my
solenoids approximately to a plane angle where I roughly calculated oxygen
belonged in its octave. I improvised an adjustment apparatus which would enable
me to fasten any adjustment securely at any angle I chose.
I then inserted a few cubic centemeters of water in an evacuated quartz tube which
had electrodes at each end for spectrum analysis readings.

[MonsieurM]

As I read your notes, patterns start to match up:

For Instance the following image:




seem to match with:

[MonsieurM]

The note document has been updated as well.

Started reading your Notes ...they are quite an eye opener...thank you

just on observation...Your notes became Crystal Clear when I Applied the First Principle: Principle of Mentalism: Universe is all Wave

the following animation also helped:



you can find the picture of this animation in this folder: called it Time Warp of a Standing Wave

time warp standing wave pictures by MonsieurM - Photobucket

also this:

[Kali__ma__Amar]

Hello,

I'm happy to see some new interest in Dr's cosmology.
I also ran upon it some years ago, and it got me in it's grips since then...
A journey for your life...

Unfortunately on the net, there seems to be very few students of his cosmology. So a profound exchange isn't possible.
There wasn't (and IMHO still isn't) a good Wikipedia-page about him and his cosmology. Back then I at least made a list of all the books, to make the introduction easier for new students.
There was a time, when the philosophy forum was still there, where some deeper discussions were possible. Unfortunately it has been sold to the able2know forums and then it simply died...

If some of you are interested in it. Here is a better picture of Dr's coil in the magnets-article (I also don't know, why exactly this pic is in such a bad quality in the pdf that is available online):



It's not exactly from the magnets article, but from the IECEC-article. But they are anyway the same...

I personally am a quite intuitive person. This is why I always immediately feel inside myself, if I read anything, and look if it resonates within me. If it does, it is the truth or at least is currently meant for me. If it doesn't, then I simply drop it. (E.g. this is why I was never interested in the TPU/Bedini/...-stuff)
But IMHO the works of Dr (Russell), Schauberger, Keely and Schappeller belong to the same realm.
Also Reich had some interesting discoveries and findings, but IMHO he never got the picture complete.
Also especially the work of Karl von Reichenbach profoundly gives Dr's cosmology a firm experimental proof.
But of these, IMHO Schappeller is closest in his description to Dr's cosmology. So if people are interested, then maybe they can get some inspiration from him.

Although I studied all his books, and the important ones, several times over now, I'm still far from understanding his cosmology. As he said, the truth doesn't come by reading the books. The books just inspire you and get you into the right vibratory realm of consciousness, but the truth has to come from within.

Anyways. I personally think, although things like the table of elements are a nice optical feature to look at, at the beginning, the more profound basic questions are much more interesting.
This is why I like so much the small book "The Russell Genero-Radiative Concept". In it he explains his cosmology with several practical experiments.
IMHO if you can really understand them, you will have a much more solid ground to go further in his cosmology.
But as I said: I cannot claim myself to really understand all of them. I had a very thorough technical education, so this maybe blocks my view now from the real truth...
Example:
One of the statements I still do not get is: Why do two electrically positive charged bodies repel (as they are both in a preponderantly charging state)?
His explanation always goes into a magnetic explanation. I know, for him they are equals. But you don't see any magnetic field around a charged body. Or does the polarization arise due to the potential drop of the environment and therefore they get equally polarized in the same environment and then therefore they get repelled?

The basic question some may have: Is Russell right?

As I said, for me, I have the feeling it is the truth.
But even if I wouldn't have it. During the last years more and more unusual observations, which were made, which completely puzzled mainstream science, were exactly predicted like that by Dr a long time ago.
Just a recent example:
When a few months ago the new space probe for Mercury delivered it's data, scientist were baffled. It obviously looked as if mercury had somehow shrinked in it's size.
Well Dr told this a long time ago, as long as a planet is nearing the sun's equatorial plane, on it's spiral journey outside, it will shrink due to the higher potential pressure in this region. This happens for quite newly born planets. Planets like the earth e.g. are already through this and now only expand and expand and expand until they disappear into insignificance to become later regenerated.

[Farmhand]

Using same terms but the idea is the different as Russell's writing ;
Sorry MonsieurM, I had to twist your phrase (above) to make a point



In my opinion, with regard to WR's definitions, often the terms like Back Electromotive Force (BEMF) and Couter Electromotive Force are misunderstood reflecting the area of education. These words pass as a slang on different professions and often may look even contradictory.
Dr. Lindemann will describe it as it manifests in electric motors. A counter motive force (which in my opinion is different than BEMF) which will generate an opposing magnetic field, yada, yada, yada....
John Bedini will describe it as the spike generated when a current is suddenly interrupted while flowing through a coil. As a friend pointed out a long time ago, Tesla considered the spike not being BEMF, nor counter EMF (CEMF). Better quote the master when talking about radiant energy.



Walter Russell defined radiative action as the return to the Source, fulfilling the desire for rest. Radiating away from the compressed action which forms also matter. Integrating event (EMF) vs. disintegrating event (BEMF). The so called "radiative spike" in Bedini terminology, is in fact just pure EMF. dI/dt in this case is INFINITE and an oscilloscope cannot display it. Not in amplitude, nor in duration. A later spike... yes, but that is the effect of radiant event.

Yes, the collapsing magnetic field of an inductor produces forward "emf" not
back "emf" , the "emf" from the magnetic field collapse is opposed by it's own
back emf . Back emf cannot be harvested, it exists only to oppose the flow of
current in a wire, as far as I can tell. In my opinion it is like a shadow, it can't
be caught.

To me it makes no sense when people say they are capturing Back emf. If the
BEMF was removed when emf is applied almost unrestricted current flow would
occur in a low resistance coil. When there is no emf there is no BEMF so I
can't see how it could possibly be harnessed or captured, but it is used all the
time when we apply emf. Electricity wouldn't make much sense without it.

P.S. When people say the are breaking or beating Lenz's law are also kind of
saying they have beaten BEMF or found a way to capture it, but they are
mistaken in my opinion. It would be like trying not to cast a shadow standing
in the sunlight, or like grabbing the shadow and holding it, it can't be done.

We just should accept that we cast a shadow when we stand in the sun.

Cheers

[MonsieurM]

All of Reality is now open to us. What are we doing with that knowledge?

Grow up maybe

The real mystery of life is not a problem to be solved, it is a reality to be experienced.' - J.J. Van der Leeuw .

[MonsieurM]

Indeed. This cuts right to the very core of what our existence is all about. "The Great Work" is to first become aware of, and then operate from, one's Center. "Gnosis" is a knowing of Oneness. Today, I had written a short post at another forum describing this very thing:



Levitation, Interstellar Travel, Teleportation, Transmutation, Materialization, and all other such "technologies" are connected in principle. And it seems very likely that all of them are about to enter into human awareness in a very real (and possibly even dramatic) way simultaneously. Whether that way is constructive or destructive is up to the choices of every individual.

Further, the understanding of the operation of these technologies requires a particular way of thinking. When we think more in terms of potentials and energies (i.e.: vibrations) all seemingly "paranormal" phenomena are automatically given a plausible scientific explanation as well:

*"Psychic Abilities" (e.g.: "Precognition", "Clairvoyance", "Auric Sight", "Telepathy", "Telekinesis", etc.),
*"Pre-Birth" and "After-Death" Experiences, "Past Lives" and "Reincarnation",
*"Ghosts" and other "Bodiless" Entities,
Etc.

All of Reality is now open to us. What are we doing with that knowledge?

just had to say thank you ...could not have said it any better

[barbosi]

Thanks for not letting derail this thread.

The scope, as I see it, is far beyond lighting a bulb in a poor household and applications are limited only by one's imagination.

All this is not a far event, nor a SciFi one. Is happening right under our very eyes:



Russell's lenses are right there in that picture (attached also for safe keeping). This article explains also in its core the Philadelphia Experiment, which the gossip says it was designed and directed for a while by Tesla himself.

It's a shame that the picture disappeared from the original web site:
Pentagon-backed 'time cloak' stops the clock (Update)

The point is that Russell's Science is applied nowadays to alter the perception of reality or after others, the hologram we all live. If I could do just that, I personally would quit my poor household when I feel cold and jump right on a sunny beach. I won't have to worry about food or lack of any material possessions. I would just live the joy of love for all life. And if I could do that, imagine what kind of world we all could create to live in.

And for that, Russell himself (and I quoted him) tells us that we have to take only the inspiration from our teachers and work to achieve our desires for the purpose of regiving. Copy/paste of one's individual work has not much value, unless it serves as inspiration for greater work. And when I say that, I say it with great respect towards all individuals who had in the past and still have nowadays some of their work to offer.

As an old Chinese (I believe) saying warns us, "The finger pointing to the moon, is not the moon". (Try to show to your pet dog the moon and see how he directs all his attention to your finger.)
Same, the teachings of our teachers (or our peers) are not the knowledge. But just inspiration for our own work to create through the knowledge.

I believe it is no mistake that Russell's Home Study Course starts with what is and how to do "Meditation". It's a pity that nowadays, not many discuss, it is almost like we should be ashamed about it. It's like we are ashamed of our nakedness and we need to cover ourselves with the cloth of our Ego.
Russell teaches us how to meditate, which when properly done, delivers all the answers we desire from the infinite reservoir of knowledge.

Regards.

PS With this I hope I explained somehow the nature of my frustration and I apologise if I offended someone with my impatience. It appears to me we cannot rush the time. Oh! Wait a minute, what was all the fuss about cloaking time? Can we alter time? Well... That's all folks...

[dambit]

I think in that diagram the object labeled ++ is the heating element and does not rotate. All of this, in my opinion, would be submerged in water or have water channels cut into it (like in an engine block) to generate steam. The second device in the PDF posted earlier is the rotary device.

As far as the positioning of the bifilar coil, I'm not sure yet.

Cheers,

Steve

[dambit]

I don't know why, maybe it's too early in the morning for me, but your description just blew my mind.

It seems so simple now. I really need to start building soon.

Cheers,

Steve

[dambit]

Hi All,

I've been thinking about the power supply issue with regards to the optical generator coils. I have modified the diagram from the pdf to illustrate my changes.

I have isolated each conical coil and each winding of the bi-filar coil (Black & Blue). At this stage I'm not sure which way the bi-filar windings are connected, but this is the only way I can think of to power the coils properly.

Cheers,

Steve