Walter Russell - Understanding and applying his work

[grizli]

========================

The concepts to take away here -- was that russell understood a relationship between magnetism and the elements evolution that I would like to investigate.

This ionization (I might go further, and say dielectric breakdown), when subjected to magnetic feilds in very precise ways -- results in transmutation.

With the goal in mind -- to understand the potential practical application of transmutation by understanding the mechanics behind russell's cosmogony -- we can begin by examining magnetism.

Again, I'm not perfect, but this should give you some ideas....

But there was NO magnet field present in proces of ionisation !?
Was not quartz tube heated ionised to porduce plasma, measured and that subjected to magnet fieds and that all repeated !!

There was no inosied gas presend when magnet fiel was present in the same time ?

Also Kovac did real experiemnts using 4 coil at certain position..

[Russellreader]

And finally, a better way to look at the same scenario would be like this:


.

Lancelot35 this diagram you drew is very helpful to me. Suppose we added vortices from the voids shown on figure 64. (in your drwaing if 1a is above and 2a is below etc. the path is 1a, 2a etc.) Then if you also added the anode wave which is the missing blue path in the missing cubes. Does the combined result match the triple helix spiral of DNA? I suspect the drawing has to be modified slightly so they do match so the principle of correspondence is met.

The other problem to understanding for me is that the cathode wave and anode wave travel in reverse directions like in a battery don't they? But if the dipole is far apart do we see a cathode wave moving simultaneously with the anode wave from far apart in reverse directions? I suspect this is what occurs. If we don't see it perhaps we don't see it because of the illusion in our frame of reference that time proceeds forwards.

I think the voids correspond to the 9 of 3 6 9 and drives the cathode and anode waves and the waves from the void are instant unlike the anode and cathode waves. WR draws voids above and below the sun and beside it in all four quadrants. His drawings of the sun suggest voids above and below attached to the polar vortices he draws. He does not draw the equatorial voids but Isn't the sun one foci of the ellipse of earth's orbit and the other foci a void?

Finally I think it is a mistake to think of the electricity and magnetism as separate or electricity as electrons or particles. Instead you drawing shows a wave which passes through four quadrants 2 predominantly magnetic and two predominantly electric like the round periodic table chart. I suspect it corresponds to the sun with a void above and below with scalar vortices from the poles which are the predominantly magnetic portion and that the predominantly electric vortices coming in and out of the equator travelling to the equatorial voids found at the 2nd foci of each planet. I think wires should be made with three pathways like DNA and Birkland currents. I think it is necessary to form an easy path for both the anode and cathode waves in order to form the easy path for the third scalar wave. Maybe the material to form an easy path changes for each quadrant.

These are my own fallible conclusions and I welcome both comments and criticisms. They are not really my ideas as they come to me in my dreams after reading and considering his works. I also found it useful to study hermetic teachings which help teach the logical tools to help to understand the images. Russell didn't mention scalar and he teaches parts of the whole in separate lessons and images but I suspect this is only because the word did not yet exist and you have to simplify it to teach the complexity..

[warrensk]

Applying Walter Russell's opposing vortexes...Through Asymmetry

Here is a video of what I have been working on lately. Implementing asymmetric motors/generators with Tesla style Rodin coils. The radiant field will excite a coil into resonance with the earth. If the coil is not tuned to the environment around it, it will not resonate. A vortex is great at resonating with the environment. Once in resonance with the environment stimulated by a radiant field, a coil can then offer a path of matching impedance for the energy to travel from the ground into the sky. The electron recombines with a charged particle of opposing charge raining down from the cosmos.

This is cold electricity/radiant electricity/earth ions/the energy of the cosmos.

Output of Asymmetric Motor into Tesla Style Rodin Coil - YouTube

Energy Transformation through Asymmetric Sytems - YouTube

I appreciate all criticisms and questions.

[NoName2]

Someone, who has got a paper book "The Universal One", please, scan the page 143 of the book and post it here. Thank you!

[NoName2]

Page 13?

Hello, everyone.

I'm interested in Walter Russell's works, but I haven't bought any of his paper books yet. I will buy a real book as soon as I am able to do it. I have just downloaded PDFs with scanned pages, and they are not of the highest quality. Especially the charts with small letters.

I have encountered a problem and hope that you can help me in this.
In the scanned PDF of the book "The Universal One" I cannot see any page between 12'th and 14'th (12 & 14 according to numeration on the sheet, not the PDF's sheet numeration). However, in the PDF file there is a chart on a page before "paper-page-1".

I wonder, what there really is on the page "13" in the dark blue paper book with hard cover. Would be good if someone could post a scanned image of it here.

Thank you for help.

P.S.

I hope all this is true and together we will make it

[petar113507]

Disclaimer: This is not fact -- this is my interpertation

Hello again, friends.
I am pleased that I got a new job, so that working will allow me to save up to buy a spectroscope to pursue these experiments.

After we have outlined some upcomming core concepts, I would like to discuss the best way to test them -- what kind of spectroscope to buy/what would be the pros/cons of each type of analysis, as well as a bottom line price tag.

I do not like the time sucked out to the job, and that it has delayed me this week in posting again. But, on the bright side -- I am working towards a good goal.

I am also very excited that some discussion has gone on since the last time I had posted. I was drawing diagrams this week, that it looks like you guys beat me to it.

Considering that's an excellent "problem" to have....

Sometimes it really feels like we're apart of the same brain unit -- and that the ideas I have -- can also simultaneously pop into other people's heads.

Lance,
I am glad that you realized that Russell's drawings are in 3-D.



Above he illustrates the "light wave" wrapping around the cyllinder, shows me that he meant for his drawings to be implicitly interperted in 3-D. It is there, where our work here is cut out for us. We're meant to "translate" shakespear into modern terms we can grapple with.

It was around the end of last year when I realized this, and resolved to lay out some of these ideas. I do not feel afraid of sharing these ideas "open source" because they are not mine to hold back.

I beleive people are roughly "the same" at heart, but have different methods of carrying out their intents. What I mean by that -- is that we all tend to do the best we can, with what we have at our disposal. Walter and Lao included.

Russell was limited by the tools he had for expression. I think that he could have used 3-D modeling (wireframe animation) to great effect, as well as utilizing the conceptual understanding (which we now know) as a "fractal".

Lance, If I could add to your thoughts with my own, I would note that "anti matter", like "electrons" has only been stabilized in magnetic feilds to be viewed as an isolated "substance". It is not the "electrons" or "anti-matter" which as a substance, posess any properties of their own.

If It is the surrounding environment conditions which give to crystals, their crystalization patterns -- give to matter, its relative density and hardness -- and give to space its evacuated tenuity. (If you haven't thought it yet -- what is surrounding the "space" vacuum condition?)

Example, It is the surrounding atmospheric pressure and density which give to water its liquid state. Put water in a vacuum, and it boils at low temperatures.

Same idea.

To briefly interject a seed of the larger idea of dense matter transmutation -- in order to accumulate mass of greater density, you will likely need higher pressure intensities. Reactions get inversely higher intensity the smaller they go on a nanoscale -- therefore, the layering of individual atoms into lattices -- crystallography and crystallization must be reconciled in order to understand one possible method of matter transformation.

The surrounding crystal lattice, might stress the nucleus at just the correct angles and "fuse" or "Wind together" the nuclei -- accumulating a larger mass. The surrounding environment of crystal lattice, will produce the conditions for denser mass accumulation.

Let me re-state that with relation to your pondering.

It is the magnetic fields which allow us to "stabilize" electrons and view their rapid "orbital motion". It is the magnetic fields which allow us to "stabilize" or "freeze frame" and see anti-matter in its respective "frame" in the process of depolarization.

It only briefly exists when created in particle accelerators. I think the magnetic fields are stalling the process of depolarization.

I see it, something like this:
Smoke Rings Collide - YouTube

Let the two colors represent opposite conditions of motion - and the transparent center represent the universal "vacuum" condition of rest when the two rings collide.

"Anti-matter" depolarizes "solid/dense matter" when the two come into contact. It therefore, must be the inverse of dense matter, as north is the inverse of the south.

I think that antimatter is a part of the process of depolarization, while "space matter" is more evacuated, tenuous.

Poodles will help me with this thought. All poodles are dogs, but not all dogs are poodles. All antimatter is space matter, but not all space matter is antimatter. The distinction between the two is in the degree of stability -- antimatter being more unstable, and being "on the way out" in its return to the universal vacuum condition of rest/balance.

This brings me to the point E).
Those cube corners are not "antimatter" but are evacuated space. The distinction being, that it is a stable state of vacuity, as long as its oppsite condition/mate remains solid in a densely wound up rapid state of motion..
The inert "noble" gases are a stable state of vacuity.

In your point D) -- I do not think of those black voids as "antimatter" but the opposite mate of matter -- Space.

The difference can be imagined in the difference in two rooms with a single duct between them of equal pressure and volume. In order to compress the "air" in one, you must evacuate the air from the other side.

Are "antimatter" and "black holes" the same thing? No. I do not think so, because the way that they are produced.

Black holes are where the opposite condition of "space" is centered in its wave feilds. This is stable, as long as their opposite mates -- sun centers -- remain stable, and opposed to it.

If black holes and hot suns were brought into contact with each other -- they would depolarize just like opposite ends of a bar magnet -- or like "anti hydrogen" when it comes into contact with "hydrogen". "Silence" overcomes the two conditions.

Let us examine the two mates of Sodium and chlorine -- when they come into contact with each other, they form a stable salt. Sodium is the stable-in-motion, but imbalanced body mate to chlorine. Chlorine is the "space" mate -- also stable through motion, but imbalanced.

I will re state -- Are "antimatter" and "black holes" the same thing? No. I do not think so, because the way that they are produced.

Anti-matter is "stablized" by magnetic feilds -- like a slow motion camera "stablizes" and suspends a bullet's discharge from a pistol -- but does not remove that it is "Moving" towards an end goal. That end goal for anti matter, is the condition of rest -- upon beginning wave axis 90 degrees off vertical.

The difference between anti-matter and "space mate" is the axis which the elements will revert to. Sodium chloride will bond on the 90 Degree vertical wave axis, and simulate stability. Anti-hydrogen and hydrogen will reduce each other to their "beginnings" of the wave axis -- which is in dead center of the plane of the inert gases -- which is 90 degrees off vertical.

To me that means that space is the opposite mate to the dense body of a "foreward" time cycle -- where "anti matter" is the "reverse" time wave

The distinction is the time "direction" they are headed in -- and the end goal (axis angle) of that "direction".

=============
With respect to F) I would not concern myself with "parallel universes". Those cube corners do have a function in russell's cosmology -- in that those cube corners serve to illustrate where different dimensions (or attributes) of matter will compress or expand and lock, to give matter its different attributes. The position of those eighteen dimensions, I am not yet sure -- but I do intend on outlining the

I think that russell called them "cubes of space" not only as a means of visualizing the nucleus of matter, or the space body of matter -- but also as a way to see how different "planes" of E feilds/B feilds intersect with each other at different angles to form birkenland currents in paths going in or out of the nucleus.


Some of these dimensions, while outside our range of perception -- do not need to imply parallel universes.

I mean that while those "dimensions" may be outside our sense range -- they are still comprehensible to me.

If I am already apart of the one mind, in this one universe -- where would I need another "source" mind? Of what function would that "parallel universe" have, if this universe is already universal mind thinking out countless life forms on innumerable planets?

My imagination already spins with the notion of how tiny and insignificant I am -- but a parallel universe makes me feel lost. Not to rain on your parade, if you like grappling with something that feels unfathomable or incomprehensible... In terms of what I can use, I can grapple with "dimensions" -- while another universe, I cannot.

Please do not take what I say as a "bible" -- I am a student, just like you. I hope sharing my thinking process helps your comprehension.
===================

Now lance, with respect to your pictures, I would say you're adding to this very nicely.

Thank you for playing with me, and allowing me to introduce the next two points I would like to solidly go over. The magnetic position of carbon, and the position of inert gases.





Purelyconstructive -- you're next buddy.

You're launching me right into the next ideas, where I was before wondering how I was to introduce them....

[StweenyA]

Lancelot35, I think I see what you're saying.... If looked at from above, then the wrong image is going off at a diagonal direction, but the correct image is going in a perpendicular direction!

IE:

\--
-\-
--\

vs

-|-
-|-
-|-

[Lancelot35]

Discovering the true wave form

Let me try and answer the first part of my own post. I have done some thinking and have arrived at a place of peace and acceptance - I am reasonably sure that the following image is wrong - and I explain the best way I can - with additional images.

Here is the wrong picture:



The explanation only makes sense when one makes the effort to look at the wave in three dimensions because, being vortexual, a two dimensional aspect simply makes no sense. Here is a series of waves - winding themselves around a wave shaft - in typical DNA fashion ...



This would be similar to Dr. Binder's representation shown here:



And finally, a better way to look at the same scenario would be like this:



I have numbered the maximum yellow compression points as 3, 4 and 5 but could also have numbered them 1, 2 and 3. Evidently, Dr. Russell's leftmost red compression point should be in position 1 or 3 and not where he shows it (at the red position).

The reason why I have expended so much energy explaining this is because this single picture had me confused for DECADES! It was a major stumbling block in the comprehension of Dr. Russell's teachings.

Thanks for giving this your consideration.

[cplouffe]

Hello Romo. Looks like lots of info to go over. Glad to speak to others with like minds. I'll take a look in depth at your posts soon.

[Lancelot35]

Missing Expressions

Hi, Romo:

Please accept my gratitude (as new member) for your informative posts and for sharing your knowledge.

While I am not exactly a newcomer to the Russell teachings (I started my immersion in 1959!), I still have an issue with a couple of concepts that keep me from making progress in my learning efforts. Please lend me your ear ...

My query concerns the wave motion within the cube.

a.) My confusion started on page 155 of The Universal One (reprinted in 1974) where Dr. Russell shows the position of the wave crest in respect to the cube containing the motion. This page shows "maturity foci" or "maximum solidity" in opposite diagonal cube corners - here is the image:



b.) Pages 157, 165 and 177 are similar as represented by this image:



c.) Then I peruse The Secret of Light (reprinted 1971) and see on page 278 (Fig. 76) the following picture:



which only deepened my confusion because it is supported by the exact same image in "In the Wave lies the Secret of Creation" (Edition 1995, Page 43, Diagram 25). You see, the left cube shows the old diagonal cube corner-to-corner arrangement and the right cube shows the wave twisting forward.

d.) From that point on, I can see the representation of the wave within the cube as shown in Fig. 64, page 255 of Atomic Suicide, First Edition 1957 like this:



You show this concept the same way:



and it is supported by "In the Wave lies the Secret of Creation", page 89.



My question is whether this is an improvement in W. Russell's ability to show on a two-dimensional page what is essentially a three-dimensional concept that cannot very well be shown the old way as explained in a.). I can see that Dr. Binder has succeeded admiringly well to show how the wave undulates cyclically through the inert gases, as bounded by a seemingly linear and endless series of cube wave fields. He even seems to indicate that matter is inexorably intertwined with antimatter (see f. below) as shown by his blue wave shaft and as possibly indicated by the black compression points (anti-suns) on page 255 of Atomic Suicide. Does this mean that black holes (antimatter) are created simultaneously with compressed suns? In Dr. Russell's "A New Concept of the Universe" (page 15) he says: "...there are as many black evacuated holes in space for the reborning of suns as there are compressed suns for the reborning of evacuated black holes ...". Again I ask: Does this mean that "black holes" are synonymous with "antimatter"?

These concepts are difficult enough to grasp for me because they relate to the movement of energy through in a vortexual manner, like electricity in a copper conductor or the twists and turns of DNA strands, but here is where I am confused even more ...

e.) For me, the above-pictured and described wave fields account for the matter/antimatter relationships as extended from their fulcrum of rest (the inert gases) - I understand that quite well - but I can see it being valid (and illustrated) only for half the wave cube. If energy is what fills all of creation and is extended in all directions simultaneously, where does the second set of matter/antimatter expressions so eloquently shown in Fig. 64 of Atomic Suicide fit in? I am referring to the cube corner positions A, B, C, and D as shown in this image:



f.) I somehow remember reading a statement in Dr. Russell's "The Universal One" (or was it the Home Study Course?) that the Creator gives "Power of Expression" to only half of his creation at a time - but I don't remember where I read it. If the Creator creates everything in nines (9) - then this would have to include all four points A,B,C and D referenced in e.) above and just maybe these four compression points are a parallel universe? Could someone please expand on these points?

Please accept my gratitude for any constructive comments you might be able to offer.

Lancelot

[MonsieurM]

Good reading you Romo

the following may interest you :

Crossed E and B fields (Velocity Selector)

[petar113507]

Beginning with the offices of the magnetic poles...


























I've gotta get some sleep tonight.

I look foreward to bringing this to life with YOU

==Romo

[petar113507]

White Light's frequency - Classical Physics - Science Forums

White light (using addative synthesis) is made of the 3 basic colors Red, Green and Blue.

File:Catenoid.svg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sphere:




What would a BALANCED ZERO magnetic feild arrangement look like?


It would probably be a ZERO in its BALANCE between the two polarities.
That does not nescessarialy mean that the poles be equal in gaussian intensity -- but could infer that the magnetic polarities are returning the central focal point to a ZERO (A feild?) by means of E/W poles....

This point is up for discussion.

[petar113507]

[petar113507]