Who reached cop over 1

[boguslaw]

solar panels work, right ?

now imagine solar panel capturing many more energy from sun using various wavelengths : infrared,uv,radio,x-ray,gamma, whatever
now multiply by billions of suns in nearby
we only need proper radio receiver

[toranarod]

Hello,

I have spent the last 10 years of my life looking for what we call OU I have yet to find anyone who can prove it. I know people out there say they have reached this but no one has ever come up with a working self running device that can easily be replicated.

Think about it like this. If one was to have a self runner that powered even 1 watt 24/7 with no energy input they would be famous over night and extremely wealthy.

-Altrez

or dead

[altrez]

or dead

Perhaps, One thing is for sure if I ever do find it I will post it on every forum and website I can all at once.

-Altrez

[Muon]

PhysicsProf Steven Jones at OUR.com posted this definition for new energy:

I would define a "novel energy" (NE) device that has merit for science and for society as follows -- here are my criteria at this time:

1. Energy from a non-conventional source. This excludes: fossil fuels and biomass burning, solar (including wind and wave power), geothermal, nuclear fission or fusion (although I should not exclude cold fusion -- but see point 3). It does not exclude: earth's gravitational or magnetic fields, galactic magnetic fields. Even currently unknown sources are allowable -- and sought.

2. More power out than in (that is, COP = Pout/Pin > 1), also known as "overunity" (OU). This does not mean that principles of physics such as conservation of energy are (necessarily) violated. It does imply a novel energy source. Multiple methods of measurement are preferable, but the experimental method and the measurements must bear scrutiny (e.g., a peer-reviewed paper would be great!)

3. The observation of OU must be repeatable. A device must work every time specified conditions are met. Successful replication must be demonstrated also.

4. The power output must be capable of scaling up. (Unlike extracting tiny currents from a magnet or iron pyrite, for example.) To be more than a curiosity, a scaled-up working device should produce at least tens of watts.

5. I would prefer that results and inventions be freely available worldwide, and not controlled by some big corporation or government entity. A benefit to humanity is sought, not beaucoup-bucks for an elite few.

6. If a theoretical model is claimed, the basis of that model needs to be empirically demonstrated. For example, if a proton-nickel --> radioactive copper isotope production is claimed (as in a recent Bologna, Italy claim), then demonstration of copper isotope production is required. This could be done by detecting the decay products of the produced radioisotopes, which should not be difficult to measure quantitatively.

I welcome comments on the stated criteria...
I would like to see SOMETHING work definitively. The prizes for OU have been sitting there for too long!

[ztec2002]

ou dont know

the only circuit that i built that i like, not that others arent worth tyring is the jeule thief. this is the only circuit that i use for camping and as a night light in my house. i'am going to try to make a meg using this tec to see if there is any ou. hope this helps.

cheers ztec2002

[Powers]

While I built the Bedini SSG and SSG multistrand (5 strand) enjoy it to restore the battery
Here are my experiences
NiCd-good

Classic Car-good

AGM technology-poor (they are mostly small stations batteries used in alarm from the experience of much of anything last. I tried to 1AH-20ah to life in their nepreberem)

Li-ion - not much
NIMH - little better than Li-ion

No overunity but not more than 1 cop I did not reach
claimed that the mind is I have to build anew

Miller dynamo ... the cop reached over 1 except romeroUK

Tesla switch? work??