Why Einstein's relativity theory is plain wrong

[lamare]

Tiny Neutrinos May Have Broken Cosmic Speed Limit

Interesting article now in the New York Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/23/science/23speed.html?_r=1

The physics world is abuzz with news that a group of European physicists plans to announce Friday that it has clocked a burst of subatomic particles known as neutrinos breaking the cosmic speed limit — the speed of light — that was set by Albert Einstein in 1905.

If true, it is a result that would change the world. But that “if” is enormous.

According to scientists familiar with the paper, the neutrinos raced from a particle accelerator at CERN outside Geneva, where they were created, to a cavern underneath Gran Sasso in Italy, a distance of about 450 miles, about 60 nanoseconds faster than it would take a light beam. That amounts to a speed greater than light by about 0.0025 percent (2.5 parts in a hundred thousand).

“If it is true, then we truly haven’t understood anything about anything,” he said, adding: “It looks too big to be true. The correct attitude is to ask oneself what went wrong.”

That's right, fellow. You haven't understood anything!

And what went wrong is that you guys never bothered to correct the Maxwell equations after you discovered the particle-wave duality principle, as I posted at the beginning of this thread:

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/8501-why-einsteins-relativity-theory-plain-wrong.html#post146726

The root of the error can be found in the Maxwell equations in their currently accepted form. These equations are the foundation for our current understanding of the electro-magnetic fields. Maxwell, a mathematician, formulated his theory on electromagnetic phenomena based on the experimental results by Faraday. At some point, he postulated that the fields he was describing mathematically were being caused by so-called charge carriers, matter. The essential mistake with that is that this assumes that the electric and magnetic fields cannot exist without being caused by some kind of particle, while we now know for decades that is not the case, because from QM we know that particles and electro-magnetic waves are one and the same thing and are nothing more than alternating/vibrating electric and magnetic fields.

So, essentially the error is that the same fields that cause electromagnetic waves (and thus particles when alternating/vibrating in a certain way) supposedly cannot exist without being caused by some kind of electromagnetic waves (particles). Or, the Maxwell equations say electromagnetism and thus electromagnetic waves are caused by particles while at the same time QM says particles are nothing but electromagnetic waves.

And you simply cannot have it both ways at the same time. Either particles cause the electro-magnetic fields, or the electro-magnec fields cause the particles, but not both.

Another quote from the NYT aricle:

John Learned, a neutrino astronomer at the University of Hawaii, said that if the results of the Opera researchers turned out to be true, it could be the first hint that neutrinos can take a shortcut through space, through extra dimensions. Joe Lykken of Fermilab said, “Special relativity only holds in flat space, so if there is a warped fifth dimension, it is possible that on other slices of it, the speed of light is different.”

And remember, Tesla already had it right in 1937:

Tuks DrippingPedia : Tesla Prepared Statement80st Birthday

According to the relativists, space has a tendency to curvature owing to an inherent property or presence of celestial bodies. Granting a semblance of reality to this fantastic idea, it is still self-contradictory. Every action is accompanied by an equivalent reaction and the effects of the latter are directly opposite to those of the former. Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curvature of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies and, producing the opposite effects, straighten out the curves. Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible.

[MonsieurM]

I think you guys should listen to this: starting at 9 min

‪Project Camelot interviews Joseph Farrell‬‏ - YouTube

at 29:13 min , he talks about topology (when you watch that part think of a fractal construct... see post: http://www.energeticforum.com/148864-post100.html )

Topology in Fractals

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.104.436&rep=rep1&type=pdf

--------

At the time of his death, Gabriel Kron was arguably the greatest electrical scientist ever produced by the United States.

The Tom Bearden Website

Open Minds Forum - === The men who stole the future ===

James Clerk Maxwell was the pioneer in Electromagnetic and EM theory. Another man much less known is Charles Wheatstone whose experiment discovered the speed of electrostatic waves. Some might say that Maxwell was the greater of the two contributors but who can weigh such contributions as they seem to be equally important in the grand scheme of things. Dr Wheatsone was better known for a device he created called the Wheatstone Bridge which pales in its significance as compared to the measurement of Electrostatic Waves. His measurement of electrostatic waves yielded a speed of 288,000 miles per second. We realize that modern physics says that C or light speed, 186,000 miles per second is a limit. In truth, C is just a ratio of energy to mass as Einstein's formula stipulates E=MC^2. At the time of Wheatstone's discovery, no one knew or believed that C was a limit. It wasn't until Einstein and General Relativity did C become a limit, a limit which Nicola Tesla and Dr Wheatstone and Whittaker did not agree with.

when a distinguished but old scientist says that something is possible, he's certainly right, but when he says something isn't possible, he's probably wrong - Arthur Charles Clarke -

[MonsieurM]

Thanks for the thumbs up and the link to the video MonsieurM, my connection is slow but I'm downloading it to watch later today.

I find it very difficult to follow the technical aspects of things like this (so I find this thread a bit daunting!) but I recently met Ron through a mutual acquaintance and was very excited by his understandings.

Myself and fellow builder, Andrew, took our Bedini SG round to Ron's house last week, something that he knew nothing of before, and Ron is now set on building one after observing it for four hours and measuring this and that in his careful and systematic way. It was an inspiring afternoon for all of us!

Cross discipline learning is alive and well at the grass root, of course :-)

Welcome tonyrambler, and Thank you joining F.R.E.E (Free Energy for Everyone), although i'm sure you have been a member for a long time, and also for adding a new piece to this puzzle we are all trying to solve and getting someone as great as Mr Ron Pearson to join the Bedini Wagon ...

Believe me when I say you probably have more knowledge in electrical Engineering than i do, my specialty is data mining, searching for the hidden pattern, and sharing with you the info. You are free to do whatever you want with it as long as you share with the rest This is my Fractal principle or tree of knowledge (a very small tree ) if may say so

Nature has so much to teach us, we just have to know how to read it...

spiderweb example: see post http://www.energeticforum.com/148212-post41.html

[tonyrambler]

Thanks for the thumbs up and the link to the video MonsieurM, my connection is slow but I'm downloading it to watch later today.

I find it very difficult to follow the technical aspects of things like this (so I find this thread a bit daunting!) but I recently met Ron through a mutual acquaintance and was very excited by his understandings.

Myself and fellow builder, Andrew, took our Bedini SG round to Ron's house last week, something that he knew nothing of before, and Ron is now set on building one after observing it for four hours and measuring this and that in his careful and systematic way. It was an inspiring afternoon for all of us!

Cross discipline learning is alive and well at the grass root, of course :-)

[MonsieurM]

Here is a little speculation on my part:

As Rodin has been saying, "everything is a coil".
That is a pretty profound statement.

which pretty much is the same think as saying everything is a fractal antenna (rodin's coil rated high in military test for antennas ).

If it is so, we should consider the whole universe as a cosmic antenna/coil, logic
now everything inside that cosmic coil is also a coil, so you have star coil, planet coil etc... and they all resonate to this "cosmic Schumann resonance"
or in other words we are all in direct harmonic relations with the rest of the universe, right?

now read this:

John W. Keely

...When these harmonics form unisons or direct harmonic relations the two vibrating aggregates and their chords of vibration are said to be sympathetic to each other. This unison of frequency dictates that what happens to one vibratorily happens to the other simultaneously.

i let you ponder on that...

hint: think of cosmic communication, or Tesla's mars transmission

for illustration purpose:



if you prefer i could give another illustration of the universe, and it also shows you the role played by water

The Universe



water is present everywhere



WATER IN THE UNIVERSE

The Paper

[MonsieurM]

Hello all, I've been a bit of a lurker here (although I am a Bedini builder), but seeing the title of this thread I had to add this.

Do any of you know of the Big Breed theory by Ron Pearson? Ron is an English engineer who created this theory. It resolves the internal contradictions of relativity and the big bang, and has been published and lauded by the Russian Academy of Sciences (but not in the west, where after 25 years he still cannot get published, always for irrelevant reasons, it seems - no PHD, no University, not maintaining the status quo, once even due to grammar! Western publications - quote "do not recognise the Russian Academy of Sciences"!)

The Big Breed theory not only ties into quantum theory, which relativity doesn't, but also solves the cosmological constant problem present in the big bang theory. It makes the search for dark energy irrelevant, as this is only happening in order to patch up the errors in the established theories. The Big Breed theory doesn't need this.

If anyone is interested in the details, you can check it out here:
Untitled Document

Ron is a meticulous fellow, and is, understandably, frustrated by the amount of time he has been sidelined, and the impossibility of cross-discipline collaboration, which he initially thought would be welcomed by physicists but seems, in fact, to be outlawed.

‪The Science Of Eternity (Part1)‬‏ - YouTube

death and dying. Do we simply cease to exist or do we pass quite naturally into the next world? Astounding personal encounters with supposedly dead relatives coupled with new scientific evidence based on quantum physics - the study of the invisible part of the universe - suggests that WE ALL SURVIVE death.

Written and presented by Alan Pemberton this 60 minute video features:

Ronald Pearson - This scientist's papers linking survival after death with subatomic physics have been peer-refereed and published by physicists in Russia and the USA.

on a side note:

the interview below is quite interesting

‪akcijak's Channel‬‏ - YouTube

[tonyrambler]

Big Breed Theory

Hello all, I've been a bit of a lurker here (although I am a Bedini builder), but seeing the title of this thread I had to add this.

Do any of you know of the Big Breed theory by Ron Pearson? Ron is an English engineer who created this theory. It resolves the internal contradictions of relativity and the big bang, and has been published and lauded by the Russian Academy of Sciences (but not in the west, where after 25 years he still cannot get published, always for irrelevant reasons, it seems - no PHD, no University, not maintaining the status quo, once even due to grammar! Western publications - quote "do not recognise the Russian Academy of Sciences"!)

The Big Breed theory not only ties into quantum theory, which relativity doesn't, but also solves the cosmological constant problem present in the big bang theory. It makes the search for dark energy irrelevant, as this is only happening in order to patch up the errors in the established theories. The Big Breed theory doesn't need this.

If anyone is interested in the details, you can check it out here:
Untitled Document

Ron is a meticulous fellow, and is, understandably, frustrated by the amount of time he has been sidelined, and the impossibility of cross-discipline collaboration, which he initially thought would be welcomed by physicists but seems, in fact, to be outlawed.

[MonsieurM]

"Think not of what you see, but what it took to produce what you see.” -

Benoit Mandelbrot.

[MonsieurM]

I believe this. I have believed this ever since I read this electric universe related post a few years ago:

Newton’s Electric Clockwork Solar System

indeed, and so is the human body....

from within so without
-------

think of the universe as an Xbox game in which you evolve, electricity/gravity (all the electromagnetic spectrum and all the forces governing the universe) are your rendering (i'm not a programmer so please correct me if i'm wrong ) but you'll need an engine to render all this: that is where fractal engine comes into play..... (btw this analogy is a self similarity to how the universe works...hmmmm )

[7imix]

You know what?

Gravity and the electric field is one and the same thing!

Will post more tomorrow, posting this from my mobile.

There is an experiment in which you charge a capacitor using a long wire hung up in the air, which can deliver kVs of potential, IIRC. And Tesla once had the idea of generating high voltage power using balloons. So, apparantly there is a huge static potential difference between the ground and any point above it, which reaches millions of Volts at cloud hights, which is what actually powers lightning!

This is so obvious I can't believe I didn't think of this before.


And that also explains the TT Brown effect....

I believe this. I have believed this ever since I read this electric universe related post a few years ago:

Newton’s Electric Clockwork Solar System

[MonsieurM]

You know what?

Gravity and the electric field is one and the same thing!




And that also explains the TT Brown effect....

Exactly, they belong to the same fractal engine... and water is its fuel....

see post: http://www.energeticforum.com/147525-post99.html

Biefeld–Brown effect - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

for illustration purpose:



Behind every apparent law that governs the universe is a fractal/constructal system, and i would add that water is its fuel

Fractals.Similarities. Patterns. Design.the.Hidden.Dimension

‪Benoit Mandelbrot - Hunting the Hidden Dimension Nova (2008)‬‏ - YouTube

[lamare]

You know what?

Gravity and the electric field is one and the same thing!

Will post more tomorrow, posting this from my mobile.

There is an experiment in which you charge a capacitor using a long wire hung up in the air, which can deliver kVs of potential, IIRC. And Tesla once had the idea of generating high voltage power using balloons. So, apparantly there is a huge static potential difference between the ground and any point above it, which reaches millions of Volts at cloud hights, which is what actually powers lightning!

This is so obvious I can't believe I didn't think of this before.


And that also explains the TT Brown effect....

[boguslaw]

lamare

I have almost identical thoughts. Gravitation is difference of pressure in ether while magnetic field is vortex of flow in ether.
Don't know yet what is electric field but it tend to be just magnetic flow when not yet curled.

I may add that mass is empty space in ether - bubble but not static - oscillating like heart. I fully agree here with dynamic wave theory of matter. Basic particle is standing wave-bubble formed by two opposite ether flow (in and out).

Or rather ether is not flowing but there are waves in ether which do that all.

Prana i Akasha.

All MUST be simple, because God will not fool us. He want this knowledge to be available to ALL of us. Remember what happened in the Eden Garden ?

[MonsieurM]

side note: I have been talking about fractal for quite a while now, and hopefully convinced some of you, I just wanted your opinion for i think that Carl Sagan was already talking about the universe being fractal, just watch the first 10 min of this video.... pay attention to the choice of words

‪Cosmos: A Personal Voyage - Episode 1 (Carl Sagan)‬‏ - YouTube

Btw: it was made in the 80's

[lamare]

I posted this on another thread a few days back:

What I meant to say is that up to a certain degree, you can describe electro-magnetism using basically the same things as used in hydraulics. Some "thing", a fluid, flows trough some other "thing", a tube or water hose, a pump, etc. And actually 99% of electrical engineering uses this hydraulic analogy, where you can safely neglect the fact that underneath the surface, everything is really a wave (pattern), a very dynamic system.

And yes, you are right, you can also explain wave dynamics such that they can be understood to a degree without being too complicated, but only once you completely understand what is going on yourself.

What is very confusing with the current theory and thus the accompaning vizualisations is that we have been taught the electric field, the magnetic field and the gravitation field are three completely separate phenomena, which are connected in mysterious ways. In actual fact, they are not. This cymatic picture has told me very much:

You see some clear structure being formed as a result of just one phenomenon: sound waves in a liquid. If you imagine the little ball in the middle of the left picture being the earth and you know that the highlighted area's that form the structure in the cymatic picture are some kind of grains of some kind of material, it is clear that gravity must be a result of ether waves and not something mysterious. Of course, most of the structure is invisible in the real world, because you can only "see" the structure because of the grains in the liquid, but I am convinced the same kind of structure as seen on the picture actually surrounds the earth in the ether.

Finally, one comes to the following conclusion:

1. The gravity field is the pressure-variation of the ether
2. The electric field is the speed of the uni-directional movement of the ether
3. The magnetic field is the speed of the rotational movement of the ether
   

Then I remembered this post by Eric Dollard:

...for those who’s minds have been polluted by the prevalent quantum goddess reality:

[...]

Example:

The air in the room; the room is filled with air and has atmospheric pressure of 2998 mB, your stereo is blasting away, the speakers are creating longitudinal waves having length and frequency and exert a oscillating force centered on 2998 mB (+ or – 10 mB)

RG is the air pressure, a scalar
XB is the sound of the stereo, a longitudinal wave

XG = RB, thus no transverse waves exist (XG – RB) = ZERO

Hence (RG + XB) is what is going on in the room, the disinformers have convinced you that this whole quantity (RB + XB) is scalar, RG is the only scalar component.

It is DC and has NO FREQUENCY, no WAVELENGTH and thus NO WAVE!

SCALER = NO WAVE - GET IT???

If people don’t get this fundamental concept – my time is better spent talking to my pet Coyote… I have nothing further to say…

And I was intrigued by this little problem put forth by Harold Aspden:
LESSON 02

In Lesson No. 1 we discussed the principles governing the motion of a particle of mass m when acted upon by a force. In this Lesson No. 2 the same approach based on energy conservation will be applied to the collision of two particles. We are, however, going to complicate the problem by declaring that all particles of matter are, at the truly fundamental level, not just something having a mass we can denote as m and then proceed by using Newtonian principles. Instead, we shall see them in their true form as being minute particles of electric charge concentrated into a small volume of space so as to have an energy which we know governs their mass.

Eventually we will need to explain how charge derives its polarity in terms of energy, space and time, in order to justify our master plan of reducing everything in fundamental physics to these three dimensions. However, we are obliged to proceed step by step and so we will accept that those fundamental charges each have the unitary charge e equal in magnitude to that of the electron. Indeed, I admit that I cannot, as yet, solve the riddle of charge polarity. It lies in unexplored territory and, apart from a few brief excursions into that territory, I see it as uncharted ground.

Though electricity is everywhere in us and around us, just as is the aether, the question of what determines whether an electric charge is positive or negative and why like polarity charges repel and unlike polarity charges attract is a mystery. Note that I could say that the measure of energy density is the square of field strength, that the polarity of the charge is the direction of that field and that, since there are positive and negative square roots to a positive energy density expressed as the square of field strength, so there must be two polarities of opposite sign. If that level of explanation satisfies your curiosity then we can move on without concern but, if you share my thoughts, you would still wonder whether there is an oscillation mode at the universal Compton electron frequency and whether phase relationships are the governing factor.

Indeed, I see that question of charge polarity as a challenge and possibly the final frontier of our conquest of physics. It surprises me that the subject is not even mentioned by physicists as something warranting research investigation. It seems that it is easier to explore what happened in the first moments of the 'Big Bang' than to look into what is happening within us and all around us here and now on Earth.

First back to my conclusion that gravity is the variation of pressure in the ether and the electric field is the speed of uni-directional movement of the ether. I think these are not completely accurate, but I am not sure how and why. I think we have to remember that there is a DC "pressure" component in the pressure of the ether as well as in the flows going trough it, so the difference between gravity and the electric field may be DC/steady flow vs. "vibration"/"waves".


Now if you look back to the left image of the cymatic pucture, you see some small highligted area's that look like some kind of channels. So, I'm beginning to think that if matter on a small scale as well as solar systems at a large scale are formed by wave phenomena and form these kind of "channels", then it could be that there is not only a flow in the ether because of the vibration, but also a DC flow.

If that is the case, you could have two kinds of charges. One where there is a DC flow in trough the "channels" and out trough the area's in between the "channels" and one the other way around.

Of course, this is just a hypothesis, but it makes sense to me, so I share the idea to see what you guys think.