This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Seminar/Workshop for United Nations?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Seminar/Workshop for United Nations?

    These Seminars/Workshops will be the first ones that will guarantee that every participant will be able to bring a working overunity prototype home.Any recommendations from the forum members???We shall demonstrate that the FLEET with its multiple LCR circuits can be tuned to resonance and achieve overunity. The three Divine Revelations will be shown to the World. Amen.
    Last edited by ltseung888; 04-13-2011, 01:50 AM.

  • #2
    I personally would not trust anything connected with the UN. The outcome will not be a good one.

    Comment


    • #3
      First reply from Hong Kong

      First reply from Hong Kong

      Show the joule ringer. It is more impressive than FLEET as no battery is required after starting. It is definitely a multi-LCR resonance circuit.
      I shall email or PM Lasersaber to see if he wants to be a speaker at the Seminar/Workshop. If the reply is positive, I shall inform the organizers or sponsors. This will certainly give a boost to the Workshop.

      Do you know that you can wind a second identical secondary coil on FLEET? At resonance, both secondary LCR circuits will show standing waves. You can then remove the primary battery. The LEDs on the secondary circuits will still be on for sometime.
      I did not realize that. But now you mentioned it, I believe it is logical and worth a try. This will give the multiple tuning forks scenario a much bigger importance. We may be able to produce the Steven Mark type Device. Please continue and improve your experiments. You have earned your place as an important speaker and an inventor.

      God provides Angels. Amen.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Shamus View Post
        I personally would not trust anything connected with the UN. The outcome will not be a good one.
        Hi Shamus
        I agree with you completely!!!! I would NEVER trust anything connected with the UN.
        Bizzy
        Smile it doesn't hurt!

        Jesus said,"...all things are possible through God." Mk10:27

        Comment


        • #5
          Group who can produce FLEET now.

          How many groups can produce FLEET now?

          The confirmed groups with actual working FLEET prototypes include:

          1. Myself with a few working prototypes in Irvine including a COP >200 demo version.
          2. Dr. Raymond Ting. The first air core FLEET was produced at his office/workshop. He still has two oscilloscopes, signal generators, DC power supplies etc. He is a key link to the Officials in Beijing.
          3. The Student Helpers. The five student helpers introduced by Ms Forever Yuen all produced Joule Thief and FLEET prototypes from basic components. They all have one working FLEET prototypes.
          4. Mr. Tong Po Chi. Mr. Tong has two oscilloscopes at his home. His son, Miller, is one of my best helpers.
          5. Mr. Aaron Quant. He has my oscilloscopes while I am in USA. He has successfully replicated the Joule Ringer.
          6. Dr. James Wong and team. His team was funded by the third richest family in Hong Kong. Their funder, Mr. Cheng, also funded the initial two-oscilloscope demonstration.
          7. Hong Kong University. The main contact is Prof. Dennis Leung of the Mechanical Engineering department. Two seminars/workshops were conducted in 2010 with his help.
          8. The Hong Kong Invention Association. Many members saw and helped in the Inno Tech Expo 2009 and 2010. A few participated in the Hong Kong University Workshops and produced working FLEET prototypes.
          9. Dr. Patrick Tsang and team. Dr. Tsang had his technical people built a working FLEET from the breadboard at my home.
          10. Mr. Chan and team. Mr. Chan helped since 2008 and his shop produced the Mechanical Parts of the Tong Wheel.
          11. Ms. Chan and friends in Shenzhen. She was one of the helpers and helped to produce a few early FLEET prototypes while I was in Shenzhen.
          12. The Physics Society in Beijing. Raza and friend introduced me to that group. They have a working FLEET prototype sent by myself.
          13. The many contacts in Irvine. They saw my presentations and prototypes without the oscilloscopes. One group saw the waveform pictures and remarked that the Output Power Curve was a classic standing wave. That woke me up!
          14. There are many indirect groups who did not learn FLEET directly from me. Many learned from Mr. Lee Cheung Kin who is consultant to the Chinese Military. Their resources are vastly superior to all others combined.

          God has protected me with the larger number of Angels. Killing me now will serve no purpose. Many in the forum will draw inspiration from the resonance waveforms now. Amen.

          Comment


          • #6
            UN is a BIG part of the problem...

            Not the solution!

            Comment


            • #7
              Working with experts from United Nations

              Working with experts from United Nations

              I do not mind working together with the Experts from United Nations (happens to be Chinese for this project). They can at least recognize what is a standing wave!

              Some self claimed expert in the Internet Forums saw the same waveform and proclaimed that they were wrong and useless.

              Which group should I work with?
              Attached Files

              Comment


              • #8
                Feedback from Engineers in Irvine, CA, USA.

                Feedback from Engineers in Irvine, USA
                From http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...gn-review.html

                Switching on the coil when the magnet situated on the rotor was in the exact location (as pictured below) and turning off the drive pulse at the exact time when no longer required were the crucial principles that achieved the long sought after phenomenon (i.e. better known as the cold current reversal technique) and it appeared that any slight deviation away from these electrical characteristics would render over unity impossible.
                Your FLEET with the standing waveform is sufficient evidence for the scientific community. The Divine Revelations are to benefit all. Amen.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Comments from a Christian Scientist

                  Comments from a Christian Scientist None of them, including all the top academics, claim that energy can be brought-in.The standing wave is a good testimonial The Lord sends HIS angels. The man-made nuclear reactor disasters will not happen again. Abundant, pollution-free, cheap and safe energy will be with us in the near future. Amen.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    More on the standing wave

                    More on the standing wave

                    Now that we know the Power Output Curve is a Standing Wave. We can go into the analysis further. A standing wave can be produced by two identical waves travelling in the opposite direction. Or it can be produced by the reflection of a wave at the right time.

                    When we see a standing wave, we can use Fourier analysis to break it down or turn it back into two separate waves. These two waves will be identical but travel in opposite directions. The node (maximum amplitude) is equal to the peak-to-peak of a single wave. The antinode (minimum amplitude) is zero as the two cancel out exactly. The wavelength is the length between two nodes or two antinodes.

                    If the standing wave represents Power verses Time, the positive or the negative area (same for an ideal standing wave) will be equal to the energy of that wave.

                    This is the classic interpretation of any standing wave. It is standard textbook material.

                    If someone interpret the waveform in a different way, they are most likely WRONG. One suggested interpretation on the Internet was to use the mean Power Curve value. The mean power of a standing wave is zero. Thus the energy (Power x Time) of a standing wave is also zero. Can a scientist really interpret a standing wave has NO Power and NO Energy?

                    Standing wave is a property of resonance. The peak-to-peak value of the Output Power Waveform is very large. In the standing wave interpretation, that should be twice the peak-to-peak value of one separated wave. Thus the FLEET waveforms with the original Instantaneous Power Curve (Instantaneous Voltage x Instantaneous Current) are correct. The peak-to-peak value of the Power Curve is very meaningful as it represents twice the peak-to-peak Power value of the separated wave.

                    Hopefully, we all learn something from this lesson or Divine Revelation. FLEET with the standing waveform is an overunity device. Amen.
                    Attached Files
                    Last edited by ltseung888; 04-16-2011, 12:26 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      The UN have already had Hidro a working proven deploy-able solution presented to them in 2009.

                      Hidro FREE renewable energy

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by ashtweth View Post
                        The UN have already had Hidro a working proven deploy-able solution presented to them in 2009.

                        Hidro FREE renewable energy
                        That Divine Revelation cannot be wrong. Overunity can be demonstrated by these FLEET prototypes with material cost less than US$3 each! I now firmly believe the Steven Mark Device is not a hoax. It is theoretically possible. When every participant in the UN sponsored seminars/workshops has a working overunity device, the momentum in investing in overunity research and development will be unstoppable. Products will mushroom to benefit the World. Working inventions such as Hidro will not suffer because of lack of funding.

                        I shall talk to the Seminar/Workshop organizers to see if a Hidro demonstration is possible (or at least a video presentation if the actual device is too big to transport).

                        Thank you once more for your excellent input.

                        Lawrence

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by ltseung888 View Post

                          When we see a standing wave, we can use Fourier analysis to break it down or turn it back into two separate waves. These two waves will be identical but travel in opposite directions.
                          What are you trying to do Mr. Tseung. Separating a conservative force? An AV plug can do this.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Standing wave analysis

                            Originally posted by quantumuppercut View Post
                            What are you trying to do Mr. Tseung. Separating a conservative force? An AV plug can do this.
                            The purpose is to compare the Output Power with the Input Power. The Output Power waveform is a standing wave. The Peak-to-peak Output voltage can be more than 10 times that of Input. The Peak-to-peak Output current can be 50% of Input. That results in overunity.

                            The analysis of waveforms also confirmed that. This means that the FLEET prototypes are overunity devices.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              From what I understand, the circuit is a transformer with primary and secondary. Primary is the input, secondary is the output. Suppose the typical formula for transformer is like this

                              IV = iv for IV is primary side iv is secondary

                              Conventionally if the voltage is double on the secondary, the current is halved. You claimed that the IV = iv relationship does not hold? Meaning

                              IV (primary)= .5I * 2.3V (secondary) for example

                              Am I correct?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X