Permanent Magnets

[Dean2]

causing imbalance...

In the tracks shown in the video, a magnetic rotor moves through multiple magnetic fields. Specific multiple induced currents can prevent magnetic lockup and eliminate the magnetic back-drag when correctly applied. When this occurs there are virtually equal and opposite forces, multiple electric fields that coexist in space.

Conventional thinking says they combine to eliminate each other. The presence of the magnetic field suggests that the fact the electric fields of individual charges in fact coexist. When the charge moves, the electric field moves with it. When an electric current flows in a conductor, there is an imbalance in the random thermal velocities of the conduction band electrons.

This is felt in the region beyond the conductor in the relative movement of the coexisting electric fields of the conduction band electrons and of the other charges of the crystal lattice of the conductor. It is this relative movement of the electric fields, which generates the magnetic field.

The static electromagnetic field even of permanent magnets is thermodynamically a non-equilibrium steady-state system. The two dipoles, one electric and one magnetic, tell us clearly that something previously virtual has become observable, because of the proven broken symmetry of the opposite charges.

[Dean2]

fields within...

The relative motion is quite a significant factor. A time varying magnetic field creates an electric field, and the induced current within the electric field creates a magnetic field. This electromagnetic field interacts with the permanent just as another PM would. The moving magnet assemblies create a virtual electromagnet, when it moves within the correct proximity of a conductor.

[Dean2]

[Dean2]

Electric & Magnetic

The magnetic field and electric field are inseparable. I would go so far as to say they are virtually the same entity, yet they do coexist. It's another dichotomy that stretches the limitations of the human mind (at least my limitations). Duality of energetic matter allows formations to simultaneously occupy two different realms.

Two mutually exclusive characteristics. Using Special Relativity, the electric and magnetic fields are two aspects of the same thing. A changing magnetic field is mathematically the same as a moving magnetic field. So part of it is manifested as an electric field component. It's apparent this multiple existence is not limited to two only fields of energy, but many fields simultaneously.

[Dave45]

Very interesting experiments.
The magnetic field seeks order and if left alone it will find that order, but if we oscillate that field we can collect it or use it to do work.
There are three fields north field, south field and the electric field. I think some over complicate things, you just have to look at the way their moving and interaction with each other and their surroundings.

[Dean2]

RestFrame.jpg

[Dean2]

[Dean2]

[Dean2]

Track Layout

A simple static look at the PM and Flux layout of a small section of a trackStaticView.jpg

[Dean2]

YouTube - Is Magnet Transportation Possible?

[broli]

In that design where the roller goes over and below the track, is there a reason why it comes to a full stop at the middle of the bottom of the track?

[Dean2]

[Dean2]

self-sustaining

The structures of electron, proton and atoms are a perpetually rotating system at the very basic level of the universe. The universal vacuum is the most fundamental dynamic entity. Therefore, achieving self-sustaining motive force through magnetic methods seems totally possible, since the ratio of energy-output versus energy- input has already exceeded unity. A principle that could be tapped if better understood. IMO YouTube - Is Magnet Transportation Possible?

[broli]

Your thoughts?

The circular version would be useful on so many levels besides proving overunity without a doubt. It would be a practical model to harness usable energy. I think you'll become very popular once you show one, so be prepared from good and bad.

[Dean2]

Thoughts on energy and magnetics...

Accepting the premise that energy cannot be created or destroyed. It certainly can be reused over and over again. Energy is often not thought of in this fashion, it's never consumed or "used up". When you use energy to perform work, you either diverge or spread it out, change its form, or a combination of both.

You still have all the energy remaining, after the work has been accomplished. So by simply capturing and recycling that energy, you can re-use it again, it does re-converge. The Law of Entropy and classical Thermodynamics without reservation assume single-pass energy collection. This activity then would not violate the law; it would just violate an assumption. It would not apply to the collecting and reusing process.

A magnetic system can quite naturally collect energy from the same space simultaneously and over and over again. The emitted energy from the multi-collection process can be of a higher density than the operator is inputting. A coefficient-of-performance then would obviously be greater than one (COP>1) as measured by conventional means. The COP method of energy measurement is often confused with efficiency, which is inappropriate, and fails to correctly identify the performance.

We continue to use terms like "apparent" input of energy, which now should be reconsidered. Does a wind turbine or solar panel have no apparent input of energy?
Green Energy 211 (Reference for magnetic track theory & video)