Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wikileaks: Here to Save Democracy!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by sebosfato View Post
    ... the church (Vatican), joined with Hitler for managing to kill their eternal enemy.
    History is really quite different from what we have been told.

    But who dares to research it? Almost nobody.

    I won't say anymore about this topic cause most people get mad at the sole mention but the information is out there (jewish historian David Cole, etc).

    Comment


    • #17
      Hi Silver,

      It is true that we are A Republic of Laws. The problem is, the "Of Laws" part has been flushed down the toilet in recent years.... and the corporate oligarchy and banks consider themselves "above the Law", and have corrupted the government to see that it's true.

      We no longer are Ruled By Law... we are

      Ruled By The Lawless.

      Comment


      • #18
        Jib,Hob,Aaron /ALL

        Did any one ever read about how the founder of Wiki leaks said 911 was NOT an inside job? I bet its just face book BS,i heard that from there,just wanted to see if any one remembers reading that some where?.

        Ash

        Comment


        • #19
          Hi all,

          Once again some great posts here! Good to see both for and against arguments, I am hoping to cut through a bit of the mainstream media smear campaign against Jullian and Wikileaks.

          Bugler & Ash,
          It would be suicide to release anything regarding Jews or Israel at the beginning, wikileaks is obviously been cautious at the beginning and attacking America first. I believe the 5th April announcement and documentary will show 9/11 was not an inside job - but the work of a group of coercive international individuals. Hence the comment on facebook.

          Seth,
          My understanding is that his lawyers are working pro bono, they are not been paid but are interested in the human rights angle of Jullian's case.
          What have we found out? We have now got evidence for all those human rights abuses, that were assumed by conspiracy theorists, but could never be proved up until now. There is a lot of really good stuff on wikileaks that was never known before, unfortunately, you won't find most of it been reported by mainstream media. They are sill too scared of their financiers.

          Sebosfao,
          I also laugh when people say Julian Assange is an idiot, he has an IQ of over 170, he was able to hack in to NASA and stop the space shuttle launch in back in the 90s. He has managed to release information that no one has ever been able to release successfully, he did this by having a sound plan, he released everything first in a encrypted file - the password will be released, if the governments stops wikileaks.
          What ever happens we the public are going to find out the truth!



          Thanks for all your input folks, keep it coming!

          Red

          Comment


          • #20
            Well i'm not using paypal till this is sorted out. How dare they ? You don't freeze peoples funds for alledged stuff. The charges against him seem to be very minor and not worthy of all the fuss, beside's the fact the charges have nothing to do with the leaks, which is itself a bit telling.

            To all the people being outed by Wikileaks, STOP doing stuff that is wrong wrong wrong. Stop ripping people off, stop hurting people for no reason, stop polluting and stop trying to control everything and everyone.

            What does wikileaks do. Tell the truth as they find it, or as it is shown to them. Most of the stuff disclosed by wikileaks i'm not overly interested in, I know it go's on, i've got my eye's open. But I do believe that the truth should never be stiffled, or hidden or sanitized. It is what it is and thats how it should be looked at.

            Regards all

            Comment


            • #22
              Thanks Ash!

              These are two great articles. Well worth the read everyone!


              Red

              Comment


              • #23
                The way I see it, Julian Assange could be fighting for a good cause and is truly standing up for free speech--or this whole Wikileaks propaganda is CIA co-op. You'll know it's CIA and the government if sometime in the near future they pass a new law to shut down websites, internet radio or anyone who speaks against the system. Ironically Alex Jones's Prison Planet channel on Youtube got blacklisted recently from Google; it seems to fit the theme.

                Question: Why is Assange labeled a hero when Bradley Manning was the one who stole the documents? It seems like they've buried this brave soldier's story already and I guess we'll see "Free Assange" protests instead of Bradley Manning? That would be shameful.

                So far there has been nothing extremely interesting that exposes US diplomats. It seems like the cables were selected to target opposing countries or diplomats with distant relations to the Us. (Russia, Iran, China, Pakistan, Yemen,..)

                Question: Will we see any cables about Israel? It seems like they've been sitting nice and quite throughout this whole thing.

                I hope he's real and this isn't another staged operation of the elite. If we lose our free speech we're finished.

                Only time will tell what Julian Assange really stands for. Stay tuned...

                Ecoman
                Last edited by Ecoman11; 12-09-2010, 07:38 AM.

                Comment


                • #24
                  Originally posted by Aaron View Post
                  Not America - SOME people in America.
                  True...... but then the retoric from some US politicians is pretty bad

                  Comment


                  • #25
                    Originally posted by RedRightHand View Post


                    P.S. Wikileaks is all over the newspapers and TV because these reporters can finally report the actual news! No longer is their only source the government script! But beware, these reporters still have the same bias and secret motives they had before Wikileaks came along!
                    In my opinion this doesn't make any sense.

                    What about journalism? You are saying that journalists are people sitting on a desk waiting for info to come to them. That is currently journalism cause the system doesn't want the truth exposed.

                    Journalists don't need wikileaks at all. If they wanted to unconver the truth they would do very much that by themsellved. The information is out there.

                    Journalists are not exposing 911 as a mossad job, the federal reserve scam, the medicine scam, the dual citizens in US governemnt, etc. They don't expose really anything but BS.

                    I don't just sit in my ass. I have a blog in Spanish trying to make people learn reality. The problema is that most sheeple don't want to know. Knowing the truth would force them take action and they are too lazy for that.

                    Cheers.

                    Comment


                    • #26
                      Originally posted by RedRightHand View Post
                      Hi all,


                      Seth,
                      My understanding is that his lawyers are working pro bono, they are not been paid but are interested in the human rights angle of Jullian's case.
                      What have we found out? We have now got evidence for all those human rights abuses, that were assumed by conspiracy theorists, but could never be proved up until now. There is a lot of really good stuff on wikileaks that was never known before, unfortunately, you won't find most of it been reported by mainstream media. They are sill too scared of their financiers.

                      Hi Red Right Hand.

                      Nice of Rothschilds lawyer to work pro bono wiuth Julian. Maybe someone could ask him if he has heard of Gary Mckinnon - another hacker who seems to be having problems with extradition etc.......

                      The main human rights abuse story that wikileaks published was ''collateral damage'' - the video which showed the US killing reuters reporters and children. And it is absolutely right that this video managed to get leaked - shows us what the horror of war is all about. But should we be thanking Julian Assange, or the seageant who is now in prison (maybe for the rest of his life) for leaking the documents to wikileaks? His name is Bradley Manning. A true hero. And for that reason, his courageous act (which was clearly done in complete altruism, i.e with no advantage for himself....in fact, quite the opposite) will undoubtedly remain unsung in the mainstream media, who will focus on Assange.

                      Wikileaks, as far as i can see, have done very little in the way of ''whistleblowing''. Did they whistleblow 911? Did they whistleblow the swine flu deception? How about the manipulation of the precious metals markets? What interesting info have they provided OTHER THAN that which was provided by Bradley Manning? As far as I can see, most of the documents they leak are just ''embarrassing'', but hardly new news.

                      Credit where credit is due. Bradley Manning - the kind of man Julian aspires to be, but fails.

                      Comment


                      • #27
                        wikileaks

                        Originally posted by faramog View Post
                        True...... but then the retoric from some US politicians is pretty bad
                        I agree, but I have to say the politicians do NOT represent the will of
                        the American people. Most Americans are good people like everyone
                        else in the world. The politicians are self serving and care less about
                        the people they are supposed to be serving.

                        When you see whatever policy, etc... they are pushing, it doesn't
                        represent the interests of the American people - it represents the interests
                        of the multinational corporations that are mostly owned by foreigners
                        who have the money and influence to use the American government as their
                        puppets.

                        And I agree with the comment on democracy vs republic.

                        Thomas Jefferson said democracy is nothing more than mob rule where
                        51% of the people take away the rights of the other 49% and anyone
                        pushing "democracy" has no idea what the true spirit of freedom even
                        means.

                        A constitutional republic is where freedom rings and I think that
                        Julian Assange is simply posting facts and what he is doing isn't supporting
                        a "free" democracy because there is no free democracy - it is supporting
                        the spirit of a constitutional republic whether anyone wants to admit
                        it or not. Obviously in my opinion.

                        "Democracy is indispensable to socialism." - Lenin
                        And of course socialism is the expressway to communism when it gets out
                        of hand.

                        What Julian Assange is doing is completely in the spirit of the American
                        Founding Fathers.

                        And a great quote by JFK:

                        "The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know."

                        Is it possible that the whole wikileaks thing is a big psyops program?
                        Of course it is possible but if anyone thinks so, at least post EVIDENCE
                        about it when making the claims. I look forward to having the criminal
                        banks exposed for what they are and all those crooks should be
                        imprisoned to the fullest extent of the law.

                        I want to see leaks on:

                        free energy technologies
                        ufo's
                        medical cure coverups
                        chemtrails
                        global warming
                        9/11

                        All the hysteria about stopping wikileaks is from the very crooks that
                        don't want their own satanic crimes to be exposed.
                        Sincerely,
                        Aaron Murakami

                        Books, Videos, ESTC Conference Info, Blog, etc. https://emediapress.com

                        Comment


                        • #28
                          wikileaks

                          Originally posted by seth View Post
                          Credit where credit is due. Bradley Manning - the kind of man Julian aspires to be, but fails.
                          I don't think Julian Assange is trying to be Bradley Manning and I think
                          Bradley Manning has a HUGE contribution that will probably cost him the
                          rest of his years. Assange said that his position is to take the heat for
                          wikileaks so I think keeping it in perspective is necessary.

                          They have two completely different roles. There are the ones that provide
                          info and then wikileaks has the role of posting it as it is and I think to
                          put words into Julian's mouth by speaking his intentions for him isn't
                          doing him justice.

                          I scanned through some of the cables and other items in the older
                          archives and there is some very damaging info there - anyone that
                          sees it as just being stuff they knew anyway or whatever simply hasn't
                          taken the time to comprehend the significance. Much of it, I don't
                          think is a big deal but a small percentage are gems that are extremely
                          damaging.
                          Sincerely,
                          Aaron Murakami

                          Books, Videos, ESTC Conference Info, Blog, etc. https://emediapress.com

                          Comment


                          • #29
                            Originally posted by Aaron View Post
                            I don't think Julian Assange is trying to be Bradley Manning and I think
                            Bradley Manning has a HUGE contribution that will probably cost him the
                            rest of his years. Assange said that his position is to take the heat for
                            wikileaks so I think keeping it in perspective is necessary.

                            They have two completely different roles. There are the ones that provide
                            info and then wikileaks has the role of posting it as it is and I think to
                            put words into Julian's mouth by speaking his intentions for him isn't
                            doing him justice.

                            I scanned through some of the cables and other items in the older
                            archives and there is some very damaging info there - anyone that
                            sees it as just being stuff they knew anyway or whatever simply hasn't
                            taken the time to comprehend the significance. Much of it, I don't
                            think is a big deal but a small percentage are gems that are extremely
                            damaging.
                            Would Julian be so kind as to offer Bradley the services of Rothschilds lawyer?

                            I agree they have different roles - one had to break the law in order to demonstrate to the world an injustice. The other had to put it on his website. Who took the risks? Not Julian, thats for sure.

                            Please elaborate on the damaging information. I havent heard ANY, except what Bradley provided.

                            Comment


                            • #30
                              @Seth

                              Originally posted by seth View Post
                              Would Julian be so kind as to offer Bradley the services of Rothschilds lawyer?

                              I agree they have different roles - one had to break the law in order to demonstrate to the world an injustice. The other had to put it on his website. Who took the risks? Not Julian, thats for sure.

                              Please elaborate on the damaging information. I havent heard ANY, except what Bradley provided.
                              1. You can contact the Julian Assange defense page yourself and ask
                              if they will provide legal services to Bradley.

                              2. Julian's life is in danger and has quite a risk.

                              3. You're waiting for someone to bring it to you? Why don't you do
                              what I did - go spend hours all by yourself pouring through the data and
                              cables and make up your own mind. There is not one person in the world
                              who could have read everything by now.

                              These are just my opinions but you responded to my post. Someone
                              else may have something else to say.
                              Sincerely,
                              Aaron Murakami

                              Books, Videos, ESTC Conference Info, Blog, etc. https://emediapress.com

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X