Wesley Gary Magnetic Motor revisited

[Duncan]

Wesley Gary's Magnetic Motorhttp://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/my_inventions.pdf

[boguslaw]

Don Smith used Wesley Gary concept and build a device with assumed output power level around 50kW (hard to believe,yes!)

read here : http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/DonSmith.html

http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/DonSmith/Fig34.jpg

[Duncan]

[freeweaver]

this might help

Hi Duncan,

I think this might be of interest

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/2790-no-bemf-motor.html

I believe AC has replicated this device. Perhaps you could ask him for some guidence?

I will be joining you in a replication attempt very soon.

Good luck!

peace

[GSM]

This invention is still awaiting development (as well you know Duncan) -

[GSM]

Wesley Gary's Magnetic Motor

Hi Duncan.

We could equally say that a magnet keeper is only a conduit, though of course a 'permanent' magnet is different from a keeper due to the 'permanent' axial alignment of its atomic/molecular electron orbits in a manner which a keeper normally cannot maintain.

In figure 5 of your reference is the drawing of Wesley's magnetic motor/generator.

That overwound armature 'C' in his design is yet another conduit, though it never touches the magnet 'B'. This again is a field conduit via the internal alignment of atomic/molecular electron orbits.

When the armature is close to the magnet, then the field polarity of the armature becomes parallel with that of the magnet, exactly as it would be when attracted into contact with the magnet as its keeper.
When the armature is slightly further away from the magnet (past the neutral line explained by Wesley) the armature field suddenly becomes reversed as if it is in series with the field of the magnet.

From an armature field point of view, this is as like rotating the magnet through 180 degrees with respect to the armature, yet the only physical motion required is but a fractional closer-farther movement of the armature with respect to the horseshoe poles.

Now powerful horseshoe magnets are really quite expensive, and yet they may be so cheaply and easily substituted by a length of iron/steel bar with a neodi at each end clipped on at 90 degrees !

Also the permanent force of magnetic attraction between the armature and magnet is easily countered using springs as Wesley did, or by a modern foam between pole faces and the armature or coil (coil - if with longer overwind and neodi magnets) -

with the result that even the most extremely *gentle* and slow motional back-and-forth effort renders an overwound armature capable of brightly illuminating first one and then the other of a pair of opposite polarity connected LEDS.

Wesley used reversing switches to provide a constant DC capable of empowering an electric motor, where maybe we could use low voltage diodes with a capacitor to empower equipment plus control electronics capable of automating the armature's magnetic field reversals within an entirely static equipment ?

I wonder what happened to Wesley's designs all those years ago ?
Did he sell them into obscurity, as did Hendershot his first invention ?

Cheers ............ Graham.

[GSM]

Hi Duncan.

I have just read your new thread -

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/16424-lets-start-new-year-bang.html#post247893

plus your Christmas card reference -

http://dnp.s3.amazonaws.com/b/b5/Duncan's%20real%20doughnut.pdf

I do not wish to take anyone down a path different to that which you wish within your new thread, and where clearly you have made so much effort, so I am replying within this thread because the main point relevent to your new one remains the same modus operandii employed by Wesley Gary way back in the 1870s, though of course with further development.

Sudden series-parallel field direction reversals throughout a length of iron due to external field magnetisation via both *ends* of that length of iron, especially by a permanent magnet, may be induced in it *without* the source field of the induction being physically (mechanically) reversed.
Also, that induced field reversal is similarly equally transducible (as is the case when a magnet or field is rotated within a conventional efficiency<100% generator) also without any mechanical movement.

Having seen your new link I note it tries to take a reader straight into a final design (not unlike the 4 quadrant or flip-flop possibilities like Lester Hendershot's ring magnet related work?), but it does not directly cover the basic and *essential fundamental concepts* related to the field reversals plus the electrical overwind alternating current inductions possible in direct relationship to the Field-Current formula 3/4 down your own new page.

The secret of magnetic motors - YouTube

Imagine the iron armature in this video being overwound exactly as Wesley Gary did, or, it being but one of the quadrants in the magnetic circle as per the drawing in your latest Christmas Card link.


Cheers ................. Graham

[Duncan]

Hi Graham I rather view these machines as having ' common source' that there is one source of energy that has remained undetected is an amazing thing, except it hasn't remained undetected has it ? Its been intentionally hidden and the whole education system slewed in order to keep it hidden .
As soon as this is seen

Attraction vs Repulsion in Magnetic Fields - YouTube

[gene gene]

Hi Duncan, Thanks for all you share here. I'm hoping not to distract here but I came across this video showing a detailed step by step build of what appears to me as a Wesley Gary type motor working. Video - Видеоурок по сборке генератора Хендершота - Mondemp3.com
It's rather long at about 2hr 30min but I skipped thru it not knowing the language, there is some English translation in the back ground but my bad hearing did not allow me to hear well. Perhaps someone here could translate or at-least gain some knowledge or inspiration from it.

Wishing all here the best of luck with replications and a happy new year.

Regards, Gene

[GSM]

I came across this video showing a detailed step by step build of what appears to me as a Wesley Gary type motor working.
Regards, Gene

Hi Gene,
That is not the Wesley Gary design.
It is however purported to be the Hendershot generator; though really it is no more than a CON to take people's money.
(No sleeve cores are shown; no core-caps either; also the electrolytic values are totally different to what Lester used.)

Do not believe everything you find on the big WorldWideWeb, especially anyone supposedly selling 'Free-Energy' plans !!!!!

Plans for Free Energy can never be anything but *free*, so just keep reading the latest here on the energeticforum.com.

Cheers ........... Graham.
.

[GSM]

Hi Graham I rather view these machines as having 'common source' that there is one source of energy that has remained undetected is an amazing thing, except it hasn't remained undetected has it ? Its been intentionally hidden and the whole education system slewed in order to keep it hidden .
cheers:

We could no doubt say more about other HIDDEN technologies too, but I just want to agree with your above comment.
Also to Thank You for your continuing effort ..

Cheers ........... Graham.

[gene gene]

OK Graham, Thanks for the heads up. I'm not that sharp with electronics but I'm learning by reading here at energetic forum. I really like mechanical and magnets so will be watching this thread closely.

Thanks, Gene

[john_g]

Hi

Looking at the QEG, and thinking of using a tuning fork to stimulate a transformer case to generate a current:

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/16761-quantum-energy-generator-2.html#post253924

made me think, could a tuning fork form the basis of a generator?

It so happens that this idea was patented and maybe the magnets in the Gary machine were not only magnets but tuned, vibrating legs - which would bring in another dimension to understand how it worked.

Patent US1909414 - Tuning fork generator - Google Patents

Regards

John