Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The ultimate secret of free energy: Split the postive AND the negative

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • lamare
    replied
    Originally posted by philopolymath View Post
    Wow lots of excellent posts and links to serious insight...

    Thanks to Lamaire. Your PESwiki info was awesome!
    Thanks!

    You may also want to take a look at my document archive:
    Bestandsoverzicht van /pdf/
    Index of /Spice
    Bestandsoverzicht van /img/


    Aaron seems to really have the Aether nailed as is very bright and articulate.
    Further he seems to understands the role of Mind and consciouness well also.
    I have not seen such an understanding since W.Russell.
    Of course this is partly because Aaron is omnipresent and so vocal.
    But can he Polka?
    I don't know. I guess the both of us are still missing some pieces here and there. But together with all the guys on this forum we will get free energy that is non-polluting whatsoever. And that's all that matters.

    KNOWING that we WILL get free energy.



    If only there were a way to collect the greatest hits from these threads on the most salient points.

    Gleaning tidbits at randon from so many posts is daunting and inefficient.

    Maybe a new thread titled Aether-secrets Greatest Hits.
    With posts subject to popular vote?
    I once had the idea that anyone would be free to edit the article over at Peswiki and make something nice out of it.

    That's why it has a particular license, for example.

    Leave a comment:


  • philopolymath
    replied
    Greatest Hits

    Wow lots of excellent posts and links to serious insight...

    Thanks to Lamaire. Your PESwiki info was awesome!

    Aaron seems to really have the Aether nailed as is very bright and articulate.
    Further he seems to understands the role of Mind and consciouness well also.
    I have not seen such an understanding since W.Russell.
    Of course this is partly because Aaron is omnipresent and so vocal.
    But can he Polka?

    If only there were a way to collect the greatest hits from these threads on the most salient points.
    Gleaning tidbits at randon from so many posts is daunting and inefficient.

    Maybe a new thread titled Aether-secrets Greatest Hits.
    With posts subject to popular vote?

    Just wish there was a better way to separate the wheat from the chaff, so that we could make progress faster and more efficient.

    We all seem so eager and co-operative to acheive something spectacular.
    Shame we can't co-ordinate our efforts better.

    Leave a comment:


  • boguslaw
    replied
    Please return back to Tesla article from 1900 about increasing human energy.
    Investigate Tesla example with huge lake and empty container.
    It is very simple.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jbignes5
    replied
    hmmm...

    Originally posted by sebosfato View Post
    Hello man I did some further tests on another transformer and din't got the same effect or not as pronounced as on that video i showed...I think that was because the primary was wound with more turns and more distributed on the core... ( i also tried again and found that the effect didn't happened, the only thing that was different was the diode witch was a irfp250 on the video) i got a new multimeter and soon i will be able to play with that again, i have changed the setup entirely... So i'm a little busy constructing two new transformers one with silicon iron laminations and other using a flyback core...
    i will try that with all the cores and setups i will try from now... when i get a good one i shot a new video...

    Look that the voltage of the cell was greater and thus doing more electrolisis.. it was about 14 and i could get up to 18 i than tried to use 110 v and the mosfet got blowed and since than ...

    To be very clear the polarity mode that made the voltage output to be higher was the one witch wasn't changing the amperage.. the one witch changed the amperage was raising still a little bit the voltage while reducing amp consume by a factor of 4. .

    Thank you for your interest...

    try it if you can too and make me know your results...


    Best Regards
    The best explanation of the effect would be like using a bigger hammer to nail with. Although it costs more to lift the hammer the hammer does more work then a lighter one. Also one might think that the speed of the charges going around the torus core is probably the culprit with the right components. Many people have experienced big boosts in work done but those all included bucking forces. I think this is akin to using different sizes of trampoline. Using the same weight on both will give you different results like how high the weight would be thrown. In crease the size of the trampoline gives more movement or rebound capability to the weight used.

    Leave a comment:


  • sebosfato
    replied
    Originally posted by Jbignes5 View Post
    When I reexamined the video you provided there is a problem I think. If you could make another one with the mag in voltage boost mode then only switch the meter to read the amps. Please try to do them in pairs. What I mean is boost mode voltage reading then amp reading. Then do an un-boosted pair measurements for me.

    If what I am seeing is right then you are getting more action for less cost. But I want to see it in the pair reading first.

    So boost mode voltage then amps then non boosted mode voltage and amps.


    Hello man I did some further tests on another transformer and din't got the same effect or not as pronounced as on that video i showed...I think that was because the primary was wound with more turns and more distributed on the core... ( i also tried again and found that the effect didn't happened, the only thing that was different was the diode witch was a irfp250 on the video) i got a new multimeter and soon i will be able to play with that again, i have changed the setup entirely... So i'm a little busy constructing two new transformers one with silicon iron laminations and other using a flyback core...
    i will try that with all the cores and setups i will try from now... when i get a good one i shot a new video...

    Look that the voltage of the cell was greater and thus doing more electrolisis.. it was about 14 and i could get up to 18 i than tried to use 110 v and the mosfet got blowed and since than ...

    To be very clear the polarity mode that made the voltage output to be higher was the one witch wasn't changing the amperage.. the one witch changed the amperage was raising still a little bit the voltage while reducing amp consume by a factor of 4. .

    Thank you for your interest...

    try it if you can too and make me know your results...


    Best Regards

    Leave a comment:


  • Jbignes5
    replied
    On second thought...

    Originally posted by sebosfato View Post
    When I reexamined the video you provided there is a problem I think. If you could make another one with the mag in voltage boost mode then only switch the meter to read the amps. Please try to do them in pairs. What I mean is boost mode voltage reading then amp reading. Then do an un-boosted pair measurements for me.

    If what I am seeing is right then you are getting more action for less cost. But I want to see it in the pair reading first.

    So boost mode voltage then amps then non boosted mode voltage and amps.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jbignes5
    replied
    interesting read..

    Besides all the bashing he gives I find it interesting but there are some problems. What we are seeing with the earth and all solar bodies is the fact that they are connected. Not only on that scale but on our scale as well. Might I refer back to the 1 magnet no bearing bedini thread...

    I will keep reading it but it sounds a little out there to far. The aether theory seems to still hold besides his ramblings just from the proof we have on earth. Both in what we live in and from experimental data I have collected it has merit.

    Leave a comment:


  • lamare
    replied
    Jetijs posted a very interesting book over here:

    Originally posted by Jetijs View Post
    It can't be explained in one post, you have to read his book on this stuff. I read it and shared with many and it turned out to be one of the most fascinating and straight forward book that I have ever read on how the universe works in micro and macro scale. It also covers the topic on what is wron with the current scientific understanding of universe. So don't say it is nonsence if you even haven't read the book. You don't even need to buy the book, you can get it here in pdf.
    Seems like a really interesting read to me. I quickly looked into it and at least he got it right about Einstein.

    I have uploaded it to my website, http://www.tuks.nl/, but not on any of the usual places, because this book is copyrighted pretty recently. So, you can find it if you go to the subdirectory called cache7471. It will be there for some time. Please don't spread any direct links to that directory on the net, cause if it turns up on search engines, I will have to remove it.

    Enjoy!

    Leave a comment:


  • Slovenia
    replied
    PESwiki Document

    Lamare,

    Your PESwiki doc is looking very very nice!! There is a lot of information there to digest.

    Best Regards,
    Slovenia

    Leave a comment:


  • Jbignes5
    replied
    A few notes about the oil transformer.

    One note of interest that I have had an ah ha moment over is the design is a big layden jar. With the internal conductors or transformer guts being the tap of the static charge potential that gets tossed on it from the traditional layden jar and spark gap setup. This setup is made to be able to move the static potential in such a way that the antennas through surface area differences attract charges in between those antennas.

    This transformer needs to be built and extensively tested as I am gonna do myself. Others need to join in this experiment as well. I am fully convinced this is the motivator unit he used to move massive amounts of charges into the system and used the real power of that movement to induce movement in his load.

    I am in the process of trying to figure out the voltages needed to run a smaller version of this transformer if that is possible. One problem I see is the warning that going beyond the limits of the wire used in the transformer could be explosive as per his experiments with exploding wires with very high tensions of voltage. This means that there might be limits to when this effect starts to happen and that dictates the thickness of the material as well.

    I think that if we understand the nature of this process and we could see all the disadvantages like has been provided that we could make an effective bypass if it goes out of tolerance. Although I think he used two collection and one broadcaster antenna from his pierce arrow car we can conclude that he did include this bypass in his design. Tubes were used in the switching mechanism to do this. As to how I don't know but I do know it involved a diode tube to protect the source. It would then have to have some sort of bypass antenna that it could throw the extra charges into to radiate them back into the collection process.

    If anyone has any ideas to the tube setup I would be grateful to have some input here. Although I don't have extensive experience with tubes I am quickly learning about tubes and how they operate. I can see why he needed to use them..

    There are some clues to the tubes that he did get. Although they give us a direction I don't know how much of that is the truth and what is thought to have happened. The source of the report is quite credible in my honest opinion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jbignes5
    replied
    Lamare and others...

    I wanted to touch on the positive and negative potentials again.

    When we have a potential it must be related to another position or reference point. But it does not change the fact that all potentials are in fact positive. But when we reference a potential to another position we must designate the relationship between the two.

    Now some people have taken this simple method of comparison and made it that there are negative potentials or it can be seen as a negative particle. That is not entirely correct. Lets look at the entire scale of temperatures for example.

    We know that there is a spot called absolute zero. This absolute means it can not go any further down on the scale. Lets relate that to the absolute negative or the lowest charge level of a particle that is actually a +. If the particle looses any more it would fall apart and stop adhering to itself. Was it truely negative, Absolutely not. But it would be considered negative based on the scale if another particle or reference point was related to.

    When we look at particles in the ambient environment they can be considered negative based on a comparison that the particle is lower in charge then the ambient environment. The ambient being the base from what we are comparing to the particle. Does that make the particle negative. Well no.

    This little problem of looking at the reference points and not completely understanding the method of reference points is making us determine there is actually a negative value for that particle when it is actually all positive charges. When we separate two points from each other yes they have specific values when referenced to each other but it does not mean there is a difference in the actual single point.

    This is exactly why I always try to relate to the binding charges inside of matter. With the matter being a static shield of some kind only passing the potential of the inside charges to the outside environment. This allows shells of charges to self organize based on the available charges in the environment to the internal potential provided through the static shielding of matter. This shielding is not perfect though and has well established connections to the outside environment in it's natural state. We can inject more charge into the internal charges through those connections but they have a resistance to that and can act very strangely when you do compared to the laxed state they normally reside in. This event is called excited state or being energized.

    When comparing two references we should not change the scale we are using. Meaning that even if the negative is less then the positive it is still a positive potential when referenced to something lower. There should not be a distinction between the two other then the relationship on the same scale.
    Last edited by Jbignes5; 09-22-2010, 03:30 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • DrStiffler
    replied
    Originally posted by lamare View Post
    Just been on a little quest trying to figure out your circuit. Found the little fellow over at your site, which has some more info, so now I understand the circuit. You are not so much modulating the oscillator around M1, but switching the load on and off using the 555, while Cp is being charged during "off" time...
    @lamare
    Incorrect, (partial). Yes the load is being switched, but what is the effect of RLC on a tuned circuit? Change R and Q changes and it is hard to avoid a change in C as a result. The circuit is both switching the load and frequency modulation the output. Not as simple as you might think.

    Leave a comment:


  • lamare
    replied
    Originally posted by DrStiffler View Post
    @lamare
    Your idea of modulation was tried a few years back (see the diagram). It was less complicated on balanced coils and did not require an AGC. It proved a concept bu was limited by the design to a few watts.
    Just been on a little quest trying to figure out your circuit. Found the little fellow over at your site, which has some more info, so now I understand the circuit. You are not so much modulating the oscillator around M1, but switching the load on and off using the 555, while Cp is being charged during "off" time...

    Leave a comment:


  • Jbignes5
    replied
    Yes. Yes. Yes.

    Phi is an intrinsic part of the equation. Life in fact grows for matter either being attracted to the source or grown around the source branches.

    Lets take a seed for instance. It has the solid engine part(matter) and the essence of the source as well locked into that complex configuration. This essence is the fractal but in a smaller form. It could be that it is the exact starting point that gets modified as it grows. This growth is determined on the collection of matter to build on the frame work of the essence.

    If you look back to the plate 4 of the corona discharge one can see that in fact if matter formed around the lines then it would in fact be a flower and it is guided by that invisible lines that reach outward from the tips.

    I am leaning twords this fractal being a 3d fractal and hence why a plant grows the way that it does from each maturity level it passes.

    The problem is that we age. This aging is due to the cells ability to reproduce itself or the inability to reproduce without errors. like a fax machine the fractal gets error prone after billions of times reproducing itself. This is due to a natural process called environmental conditioning. Meaning you are a product of your environment. It is a feedback to the self and reflects the environment that the subject grows in.

    I would assume the effect of the environment also effects long lines of generations as well. If one looked back in history to the earliest man there would be a major difference in our fractal code. With theirs being the purest non effected code that might hold keys to longevity or clues as to what we need to fix in our code from all the fractal errors. Just as much as we should be able to rejuvinate our youth we should be able to rollback the evolutionary clock and return to the days of 600 year lifespans that were said to be had by the oldest in the bible. Since they were the beginning in the fractal they would have had the most purest of code.

    This goes way out of the spectrum of this thread though.

    Leave a comment:


  • lamare
    replied
    nvisser posted an interesting document over here:

    Originally posted by nvisser View Post
    Some of you might find this document interesting.
    I always wondered how it could be used and it looks like this is it.
    This is definately an interesting read and food for thought. Uploaded a pdf version here:


    Is the Phi distribution of frequencies/wavelengths analogous
    to the growth patterns of trees and other living things... because it is optimal for
    accumulating and translating energy from across the frequency spectrum? This
    question led to a brainstorm which resulted in the following illustration of what
    living things might be doing, and what we might need to do to construct a
    "coherer" of PHI-related frequencies and energies

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X