Kapagen Theories, Replications, Winding Diagrams, Circuits & Schematics. KAPAGEN ONLY

[vidbid]

Kapagen : TomB455 Version : The Deadly Kapagen



Schematic based on Diagram Below.



Disclaimer: For Informational and Educational Purposes Only. Use at Your Own Risk.

[tutanka]

I think both sides of the JLN spark gap are copper rivets it's just that one of them has carbonized or sooted up from the reaction...

Probably because COPPER is an vector for RADIANT ENERGY!!

[tutanka]

Also, JLN notes that his input power input requirement has decreased to about 150 Watts in order to operate fourteen 150 Watt halogen bulbs.

ARC GAP is primitive method for increase frequency into process and for agitated the electrons .. can anyone ask me if touching Kapagen output you obtain an shock? Tesla have started study ARC GAP and after have start test on aluminum transmutation.. WHY THAT?? probably because arc spark isn't suffiecient for obtain more output power electrical energy .. Regards

[everwiser]

...

But im gonna get that 40W bulb lit by trying the following changes

a) Spark gap. I think JL Naudin is using carbon and copper. I want to try the same, and perhaps some other variations....maybe even a bit of quenching and cooling...well see.

Good luck everyone

I think both sides of the JLN spark gap are copper rivets it's just that one of them has carbonized or sooted up from the reaction...

[seth]

I like the power supply you have and I think people need to work toward that to power this type of setup but is it lighting much wattage in tungsten filament lighting or is it primarily being used on the CFL's I see in the pic? As we know it doesn't take much to light some CFL's since Joule thief circuits have been doing that quite well. Are you using the two grounds for this also?

Ive managed to get 2 filaments glowing, but i cant really say the bulbs are even half lit Im honest about these things. No FE....yet.....Just lots of CFLs off a 12V battery

Yes - 2 grounds. It doesnt work with only 1.

I tried first with my NST and got 3 filament bulbs well lit. Ill be doing some more NST work at some point, but for the moment i wanna try and keep at it with the 12V battery. I agree that without getting at least one 40 W bulb lit it looks like a fun experiment, but not much more. But im gonna get that 40W bulb lit by trying the following changes

a) Spark gap. I think JL Naudin is using carbon and copper. I want to try the same, and perhaps some other variations....maybe even a bit of quenching and cooling...well see.

b) Various ground locations and ground materials.....might even be worth trying a few buried coils.....again, well see.

Good luck everyone

[vidbid]

Kapagen : JLN v3.3 : PlasmaCloud Spark Gap

JLN is using different spark gap points. The one on the left looks like it is made of iron. The one on the right appears to be copper.



After about 15 seconds, the tip of iron point to the left of the plasma field appears to be starting to change color from heating.



Also, JLN notes that his input power input requirement has decreased to about 150 Watts in order to operate fourteen 150 Watt halogen bulbs.

[ewizard]

my circuit is the same as J L Naudins circuit. But with the following exceptions:


a) 24/80/6 turn coil.

b) No MOT (or steel plate under it). No NST. No Mains. Just a 12V (7ah) battery powering a 25kv power supply. Im guessing its drawing about half an amp at 12V....6W...but maybe less. Any ideas on how i measure consumption....spark gap plays havoc with my multimetre

c) I use an iron rod which goes through the centre of my PVC (Naudin uses thick strands of wire)

see photos below....

Sorry about the poor quality of my video! I certainly do get shocks...look at 1.05 in the video. That packed quite a punch!

I like the power supply you have and I think people need to work toward that to power this type of setup but is it lighting much wattage in tungsten filament lighting or is it primarily being used on the CFL's I see in the pic? As we know it doesn't take much to light some CFL's since Joule thief circuits have been doing that quite well. Are you using the two grounds for this also?

[seth]

my circuit is the same as J L Naudins circuit. But with the following exceptions:


a) 24/80/6 turn coil.

b) No MOT (or steel plate under it). No NST. No Mains. Just a 12V (7ah) battery powering a 25kv power supply. Im guessing its drawing about half an amp at 12V....6W...but maybe less. Any ideas on how i measure consumption....spark gap plays havoc with my multimetre

c) I use an iron rod which goes through the centre of my PVC (Naudin uses thick strands of wire)

see photos below....

Sorry about the poor quality of my video! I certainly do get shocks...look at 1.05 in the video. That packed quite a punch!

[tutanka]

I certainly cant.

But i can show you my 12V kapagen rep - im very pleased with how many bulbs its lighting. Dont know about ''free energy'' - will have to do some more tests

Do you have any results you wish to share?

YouTube - 12V-kapagen.flv

12V??? All black and is impossible see nothing of circuit used. If you touch wires you have a shock?? At this time any news.. maybe in the next days..

[everwiser]

And the semantics continue.

Being that the output devices are all in series and most of these replications are using resistance lamps, all we need is a high current shunt installed at the end of the line between the devices and the ground connection. Before powering the system, get a resistance reading of the entire string of lights and the shunt (it will be necessary to use lamps with elements; not lamps that ionize gas for conduction). Once the system is powered, use an oscilloscope to get a voltage and frequency reading across the shunt (measured on the end of the shunt closest to the lamps). Being that it's a series circuit, the voltage at the head of the shunt will have been divided down to a level the oscope should be able to handle. Once you have the voltage, you can calculate the current across the shunt which is the same current for the entire string of lamps. Once you have current, you can get your power out.

Now can we get back to the main topic?

[patmac]

@ren

I agree with you, but look is possible use a rated fuse to proof. if is burned then the power input is higher or not?

[seth]

Good photos.. but you casn send me real informations ? IN /OUT ENERGY? Not number of ignited light bulb but REAL power wattage IN / power wattage OUT. Regards

I certainly cant.

But i can show you my 12V kapagen rep - im very pleased with how many bulbs its lighting. Dont know about ''free energy'' - will have to do some more tests

Do you have any results you wish to share?

YouTube - 12V-kapagen.flv

[tutanka]

DENIED. I resent the inference. You're attempting to put your words into my mouth. Those are your words. I never made the above statement that you are editorializing on.

I said in response to your statement of "A simple luxmeter measurement comparison test series as suggested on overunity would wipe away all doubt or someone closing the loop." that, and I quote myself here,



Now a word about evidence:



Then you proceed to quote the following members: Barotoulogos, Aether22, and E2Matrix. I have nothing against these members or what they say, but you quoting their opinions is not presenting evidence.

Good photos.. but you casn send me real informations ? IN /OUT ENERGY? Not number of ignited light bulb but REAL power wattage IN / power wattage OUT. Regards

[vidbid]

Kapagen : Misquoted

Okay you want evidence, that the assumption that just because a lamp is rated at 150 watt that it will also use the full 150 Watt of power when wired in series is not always true:

DENIED. I resent the inference. You're attempting to put your words into my mouth. Those are your words. I never made the above statement that you are editorializing on.

I said in response to your statement of "A simple luxmeter measurement comparison test series as suggested on overunity would wipe away all doubt or someone closing the loop." that, and I quote myself here,

Spectulative at best. You're making a supposition that the luxmeter would support your view without actually providing the evidence.

Now a word about evidence:

Evidence: Quoting an authority is not evidence. Quoting a majority opinion is not evidence. Any argument that starts with, "According to Einstein..." is not based on objective evidence. Any argument that starts with, "Most biologists believe..." is not based on objective evidence. Saying, "The Bible says..." is not evidence. Authorities and majorities can be wrong and frequently have been.

reference

Then you proceed to quote the following members: Barotoulogos, Aether22, and E2Matrix. I have nothing against these members or what they say, but you quoting their opinions is not presenting evidence.

[vidbid]

Kapagen : This is science.

No one likes having the rallying cry "This is science." thrown at them or to be used against them. It's a cop out. No one has the right to tell another what science is when the phrase is being used as a rallying cry. No one here is denying the importance of being unbiased and/or being scientific in whatever endeavor we choose to undertake either individually or collectively.