Yes, I've many time reading & working and searching FE.
@tantric & everybody
The first diagram republished by calvs speak by himself is OPEN LOOP but
this schematic is more like Don Smith circuit correct me if I wrong.
The kapagen is close loop because the Ground Rod's is closing the loop. Groundings can to help extract energy (using the earth like a battery in series?) additional but Hey!; look the output on Naudin's Kapagen is very very low impedance, if the impedance implemented here is lower than impedance between the Grounds then the energy is burned there.
Possible Solution: Using a Grounding bigger?. Or reducing the distance between grounds?
If we take two resistors the first 10 ohm and the second 1 ohm in series connected on the battery, We can see how 10 ohm resistor burn energy in heat form. Now we change 1 ohm resistor by 100 ohm resistor then 100 ohm resistor burn energy in heat form but 10 ohm resistor is colder.
If we analyze more deeper last test of Naudins we can see is illogical reach 96% only the cap implemented on ordinary circuit can waste the 80%. But look Naundins has recovered 96% this is only explained by Fundaun, we tested very circuits based on Fundaun theory, I've perfectly recovered 90% from one cap. Fundaun explains that capacitor charged directly by 12 volts battery for example the differential of potential between the battery and capacitor is burned so we can avoid this waste by charge the capacitor only with a little volts over the cap (charging it with oscillators too is possible)
More about this: http://puhep1.princeton.edu/~mcdonal...60_1047_92.pdf
Conventional theory suggest that capacitors burn energy because needs current to be charged. Fundaun explains that is possible avoid the entropy when is charged.
Bearden talk about capacitors need current because plates makes mechanical forces between them so needs Joules to makes this movement. But Bearden explains how capacitors with parallel plates very solid plates can be charged without current. This is deeply explained on Energy from the Vaccum Pt 5 DVD. HV can help to use less current to charge the cap. And implementing Spark Gaps is useful to produces negative current thanks to low width pulses like explains Bearden & Peter Lindemann.
Conclusion: This part in the circuit is useful to reach OU.
Explaining the schematic:
Going to back again schematic publish by calvs we can see the parallel plates capacitors apparently like a explanation added to the output below the main schematic. And by using only a Ground then this is more like a TEP (Time Energy Pump) in the output. (Parametric...)
The input is like a conventional Bedini Solid state for example or conventional oscillator used for voltage elevator (self oscillator), the coil can be a TV CRT Flyback coil, coil car too but modern solid coil car because oil filled are very high impedance then only works in lower frequency. C1 speaks by himself L1 is undoubtedly low impedance then C1 stabilize the current on each pulse. C2 can control the Pulse Width some very important this save energy, I've tested this method on oscillators increasing the voltage works more with volts than current. R1 controls the frequency maybe using a Potentiometer here we can change the freq is useful because this can control the frequency on the output too.
RS: I think is for security this guarantee the capacitor is discharged some time after disconnect the circuit. Good thing. (Or internal impendance?)
C3: 750 Volts X 0.25 uf, Hmm this max voltage is telling me that Spark gap is only a little millimeters like Naudins test, 1000 volts = 10 mm. With spark gap more separated we can get lower frequency too, but higher voltage on each discharge but this cap rated on 750 speak by himself too, SG is only the needed to make pulsations the lower SG is better I think.
Now look how the cap is discharged in total open loop, and the second transformer T2 meanwhile is a LC resonator, interesting more caps then can get lower frequency?. T2 is a AC oscillator.
When LC circuit reach voltage necessary then discharge in SG2. Only nanoseconds after spark is activated then is when the Ground can gives extra energy.
But there is some important here this curious AB coil sends his own BEMF to the bulbs too. If A is 12 turns and B 220 then produces voltage on half cycle and reconvert voltage to current the BEMF. Because are two coils in the same time if each one are polarized correctly (CW or CCW) then is possible reconvert his own BEMF and use it like current?. Conventionally this coils is unnecessary because the energy is burned on the bulbs. Another theory is this AB coil is only a impedance matching like used on big audio systems.
But looking in the second schematic hand writing version this coil is a wall transformer for self power the devices.
Wow this is a little complex.
The SG2 and the coil is very curious, when the energy past to the another side the SG form + polarity can be cached like - polarity on the another side of Spark Gap (negative energy?)..
Then ground rod seems a Antenna-Ground system, I think. Yes, it's possible this can help to stabilize the spark gap at same time when the cap is charged before SG discharge ground help to the system like Tesla Energy from the air.
If my thoughts are correct then Naudins is trying to create a coil-capacitor using a rod in the middle or like antenna to get same effect and making it simplest.
My conclusions are:
- This circuit vs kapagen is better because produces the HV more efficiently.
- This circuit seems self-tuned thanks to AB coil. (recycle wastes for self power like second schematic?)
Sorry by the length for my post. (Here is all my opinion about this circuit and Kapagen )
Regards.
please give news about the brovin, i tryed to replicate it, but soon as i connect the output of L1 to the positive the circuit stops!! 
Leave a comment: