Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

gravity waves found

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • david lambright
    replied
    optics

    this wave form mimics every wave form.it must reflect, refract, focus etc....cody try a mirror , a concave mirror and a flash light reflector[parabola] ....spin your rig ...hold mirrors near rig..if you imagine yourself directing light...when you feel a push away...stay there, the push should stronger...tricky eyes is what i noticed first....try the mirror.......
    Last edited by david lambright; 05-16-2010, 02:22 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • cody
    replied
    when you had the camera in the over head view with the quartz, i "think" i could see what you were talking about, however, it might have been the spinning pipes sections playing tricks on my eyes....
    I agree, the spinning pipes playing tricks on my eyes is the only effect i have seen so far from my rig and this effect should be eliminated for proper study.

    What I wonder now. David hasn't had to re-energize his device for several days he says. Would there be a way to energize it to a greater degree, or is there only so much a locking magnet can take? Like a maximum capicity? If the device could handle higher current, it migh give off greater visual effect?
    I agree with teslaprojects comments because there will be a saturation point for the givin thickness of metal in the device. However i would like to add that in most of the devices i have seen the magnetic current limit is usually a factor of how much surface area you have in contact between your pieces of metal. Davids curved pipes offer a very small contact surface area so there will be a small limit of this magnetic current. My ring has the surfaces sanded flat through the thickness so my limit should be a bit higher. Jetijs bent bar design has much more contact surface area so he should have a much higher limit. Of course the metal thickness plays a role too however i feel most peoples designs dont offer enough contact area to fully saturate the thickness of their metal. And getting absolutely perfect contact is very difficult without a machine shop. And of course if you design a bad charging coil or use to low of a power source you could be under charging it, but i dont think that has been the issue here.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cloxxki
    replied
    Originally posted by teslaproject View Post
    Cloxxki

    No, I can tell you with certainty that once the PMH is 'locked' and field is in motion, you CANNOT up the ante and try rev the field. You don't have to take my word for it but do some research on the simpler Leedskalnin PMH or build your own. You just have to understand the physics of it and after sitting down for some while, much of the mysticism flies away. Look at it like a electromagnet. I assume you know about permeability, inductance and saturation. If this is the case you will then realise that the PMH (in any shape or form) has it's limits and once 'energised' (or saturated) cannot be powered any higher. These are simple facts.

    Regards

    TP
    Thanks for pointing the way TP. I have a long back start in physics, but trying to catch up.
    From what you say (and will blindly trust until I've been educated better), greater effects will only be possible with an updated design of different parameters your listed. I'll wrestle with that idea for a while. Thanks again, J.

    Leave a comment:


  • teslaproject
    replied
    Originally posted by Cloxxki View Post

    What I wonder now. David hasn't had to re-energize his device for several days he says. Would there be a way to energize it to a greater degree, or is there only so much a locking magnet can take? Like a maximum capicity? If the device could handle higher current, it migh give off greater visual effect?

    Anyway, the aluminum bottom piece and the remaining galvanization on the pipes where they don't touch, seem like possible clues to me. The aluminum might function as a mirror for the waves? Sorry if that comes across stupid.

    .
    Cloxxki

    No, I can tell you with certainty that once the PMH is 'locked' and field is in motion, you CANNOT up the ante and try rev the field. You don't have to take my word for it but do some research on the simpler Leedskalnin PMH or build your own. You just have to understand the physics of it and after sitting down for some while, much of the mysticism flies away. Look at it like a electromagnet. I assume you know about permeability, inductance and saturation. If this is the case you will then realise that the PMH (in any shape or form) has it's limits and once 'energised' (or saturated) cannot be powered any higher. These are simple facts.

    Regards

    TP

    Leave a comment:


  • Cloxxki
    replied
    Originally posted by sturgeon View Post
    There is something strange about the way the rock is moving from 4.50 in this video;

    YouTube - potatoheadist's Channel

    As David is saying, it feels as if it has given up its mass, the rock looks as if it has very little mass. Too twitchy for something that heavy surely?

    Cheers,

    s.
    I think I see what you're saying. To turn the rock THAT quickly as it just rolls out of his hands, would require MORE inout at regular conditions, that gravity would normally be able to exert.

    Me, I don't doubt David, even if the cam doesn't like to pick up what he is seeing. We should be BAFFLED, even if all of this is totally real, that the waves at times actually pass through our visible spectrums. If the visual spectrum were an octave on a paione, just the keys between two closest C's, then the total optical spectrum would form a keyboard wrapping from the earth, around the sun and back. at least, according to Richard Hammond in an awesomelt filmed recent BBC series "Invisible Worlds".

    I'll rate it as sheer luck, that David's device is able to any degree, to show visible to the human eye distortions, let alone make them show up on Youtube.

    What I wonder now. David hasn't had to re-energize his device for several days he says. Would there be a way to energize it to a greater degree, or is there only so much a locking magnet can take? Like a maximum capicity? If the device could handle higher current, it migh give off greater visual effect?

    Anyway, the aluminum bottom piece and the remaining galvanization on the pipes where they don't touch, seem like possible clues to me. The aluminum might function as a mirror for the waves? Sorry if that comes across stupid.

    Brain fart. What about trying a christmas tree ball in the field? What materials do those come in? If the air inside could be heated, who knows... Just dangle it from a thin somewhat fire proof piece of fabric cord, or a bit of thin metallic wire made into a spring barely strong enough to suspend the ball.

    I hope soon someone will be able to up David's invitation.
    Last edited by Cloxxki; 05-16-2010, 10:26 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • sturgeon
    replied
    There is something strange about the way the rock is moving from 4.50 in this video;

    YouTube - potatoheadist's Channel

    As David is saying, it feels as if it has given up its mass, the rock looks as if it has very little mass. Too twitchy for something that heavy surely?

    Cheers,

    s.

    Leave a comment:


  • rave154
    replied
    David,

    thanks for making that last video, 2gig !.i know the hassle of making and formatting and then of course uploading big video files is and i hate it, so thanks for going to that length.

    when you had the camera in the over head view with the quartz, i "think" i could see what you were talking about, however, it might have been the spinning pipes sections playing tricks on my eyes....

    in order to counter this, could you cut out a piece of paper or thin card, outside diameter the same as your rig, inner diameter the same as your rig.and stick it on top of the pipes, so that when you look down, all you will see is white ( white of the cutting board & white of the paper on top of the pipes )...this way there will be less "normal stuff" to interfer with the camera optics.

    do you own a chess/checkers board by any chance?

    once you have covered the rig as suggested above, you could start it spinning, hold the rock in one hand as normal...then with the camera in a top down view, slowly bring the chess board in so that it half covers the rig, that should give a nice contrast for any effects to show up on the camera.

    if no chess board, then quickly draw some dark,straight, thick'ish lines on a piece of nice white paper...for the same contrast effect.

    Thanks for your efforts

    David. D

    Leave a comment:


  • david lambright
    replied
    Originally posted by cody View Post
    David i dont understand what i am doing wrong. My ring is locking together fairly strong now but i still dont see anything. What do you suggest?
    try holding a neo magnet near the plane...afoot or so away till you feel like "vibrations"...then try the steel etc,,,,,,,,,,david

    Leave a comment:


  • CatLady
    replied
    Originally posted by broli View Post
    David I'll try to be very polite about this...

    DO NOT DISASSEMBLE IT!!!

    Whatever you do do not disassemble a working setup EVER. Only misery ensues out of it trust us. You are better off building a secondary setup. Before you send this out to people make sure you have trusted people confirming these effects either on video or on this forum.
    I couldn't agree more!

    I couldn't help but think of this after reading that:
    Jonny 5IVE Says "NO DISASSEMBLE"

    It's nice to see everyone looking out for each other here.

    Leave a comment:


  • david lambright
    replied
    disassemble.....

    Originally posted by broli View Post
    David I'll try to be very polite about this...

    DO NOT DISASSEMBLE IT!!!

    Whatever you do do not disassemble a working setup EVER. Only misery ensues out of it trust us. You are better off building a secondary setup. Before you send this out to people make sure you have trusted people confirming these effects either on video or on this forum.
    do not fret...i only took the rotor off of the sander......it still works ...the demo is after the dis assembly i wont hurt it , though i have ....just to be sure.......david

    Leave a comment:


  • nat1971a
    replied
    also something that you may not be aware of on the model t is that the flywheel with the coilpack rotates while the magnets are fixed and are stationary on its mounting plate.This also fits the story about the cow magnets being inserted via the bell housing...

    Leave a comment:


  • david lambright
    replied
    generator disassembly and demo

    the video is uploading now...check out u-tube in about 40 minutes..... hope this helps.......david

    Leave a comment:


  • broli
    replied
    David I'll try to be very polite about this...

    DO NOT DISASSEMBLE IT!!!

    Whatever you do do not disassemble a working setup EVER. Only misery ensues out of it trust us. You are better off building a secondary setup. Before you send this out to people make sure you have trusted people confirming these effects either on video or on this forum.

    Leave a comment:


  • cody
    replied
    David i dont understand what i am doing wrong. My ring is locking together fairly strong now but i still dont see anything. What do you suggest?

    Leave a comment:


  • david lambright
    replied
    i will do whatever it takes...

    just got in ..my rig;..a craftsman sander model#315 with the stator removed...the rotor is intact..the aluminum counterweight is used,the offset bearing is removed ..so basically i use this for bearings...the disc is cutting board?..11.5 cm dia. by 1.75 cm thick..the pipe is galvanized sch.40 actual dia. is 4.25 cm and 3 mm wall thickness...i will try all your methods testing etc. i will go over what ive done and will disassemble in a video...you guys are so close...gonna go make a video ..i will be here all night...but this wave form is what you all have been searching for, be patient, you will not fail......david

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X