gravity waves found

[sucahyo]

I can only see glow preceede and folowing the magnet. Here is a modified video showing whats changed/move.

YouTube - motion detector of david lambright experiment

[john_g]

beautiful work...my last video shows a lot more...i hate to ask but could you enhance my last vid ....it shows lots more.....excellent stuff....david

Hi David

Glad to help and will do this evening - just about to start work. Can you give me some time slices as I can only work on a frame at a time which is time consuming.

Regards

John

[david lambright]

tomorrow

bruce should get his mail tomorrow...i hope he has been following these past few days...we will see what he sees, and feels......david

[Harvey]

Light Beam with a Curve | Physical Review Focus

[witsend]

here ia a link to annotate my last video...YouTube - do you see it now? any one wants

Hi Dave. INDEED I do see it. BETTER AND BETTER. I also realise now why you were anxious to get comment on this from other witnesses. I get it you see the same colours as the camera is showing us. This rather rules out the argument that the colours are due to camera distortions - unless, of course, our eyes are somehow 'imposing' a colour. Strange then that we 'imagine' the same thing the camera 'sees'. And then - we would be expected to entirely discount the 'evidence' of our eyes in any context at all. Bit harsh. I'm sure you guys see clearly. I think I'm in a minority with my level of myopia. To my way of thinking that's just common sense. I suppose it could be termed inductive reasoning. Not sure.

This is really getting interestinger and interestinger. How's that for a new term? Personally I'm not averse to inventing new words. LOL. It's only when one changes the properties of known physic's terms that there's a problem. I\m of the opinion that it would be more respectful to our Giants to acknowledge the sense of their discoveries. And - in terms of light - the ONLY thing that is known to bend light is gravity - thus far. I still say you've got a gravitational effect.

Thanks for the explanation re the 'repulsion/attraction' bit. That's also comforting to learn.

With very much gratitude for all your very hard work and VERY WELL DONE INDEED DAVID. You have clearly got something here. I would earnestly propose you try and get this to an academic forum. Who knows? There may be someone there with enough curiosity. Try the astrophysicists. They're renowned for using both Classical and Quantum disciplines. And they've got to resolve 'dark energy' somehow. Perhaps this will be the kind of evidence they're looking for.

EDIT - May I add - that it is possible to distort the path of light through artificial means. It is NOT the same thing as the light that literally 'bends' around solid objects in space as seen and photographed - often during an eclipse. And I do not think that any of us can accuse David of introducing any artifice to show any light 'distortions'.

Second edit. The following an extract explaining a variant of the Bessel Beam effect.

As with the Bessel beam's diffraction-free "propagation," light doesn't actually propagate along the curved path. The beam is the pattern created by interference of light from the 500,000 carefully-phased pixels of the SLM. Still, Mordechai Segev of the Israel Institute of Technology in Haifa is impressed. "It's a beautiful piece of work," he says. Segev envisions using similar phasing tricks in situations where multiple light beams are needed to create a specific light effect at a precise distance from the source. "If you engineer the phase the right way, you will only have white light where the pulses meet. Imagine if you did something like that in the atmosphere," where Airy-like beams could improve LIDAR, a type of laser-based radar used to study the atmosphere.
--Mike Wofsey
Mike Wofsey is a freelance science writer and Ph.D. student in theoretical physics at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa.

[Harvey]

Now that I have uploaded over 75 videos to You-Tube over the years I can see the differences between what I see as reality, what my camera records and the end results that You-Tube gives the public. Unfortunately, You-Tube compression not only reduces the quality even in HD (as 720P is less than 1080P) but it also introduces pixel extrapolation in the compression processing.

Here is an example of what I am talking about:
YouTube - Optical Compression Evaluation of Light in Magnetic Fields

Be forewarned that if you are already familiar with these optical aberrations, watching this video will subtract 9 minutes from your life that you will never get back

@David,
Yes - I have watched all of your videos, most of which I have watched more than once in an effort to see what you see. With one son in the filming industry I have watch a fair quantity of footage and have seen a lot of different things that look like one thing but turn out to be another. So it certainly adds to my discernment when evaluating various videos.

One thing I did pick up very clearly from closely watching this video:
YouTube - potatoheadist's Channel

[Mark]

Has anyone been able to replicate Davids observations yet? Or has the person who received Davids device observed anything?

[teslaproject]

Hoffman Box

Hi TP. I actually tested this. I put my cell phone inside a glass - covered it with foil and then dialled the number from the land line. You're absolutely right. No signal. Took it out the glass to check that it was working. It was. Put it back in the glass in case I dialled incorrectly. - NO RING. LOL

Something's not quite right with the levitating glass experiment - somewhere. But it looks good.

Well done Wit !! you have just proven to yourself the efficacy of a Faraday Cage or Hoffman Box. Fact is, you could have constructed the shield from quite coarse metal flyscreen (with thousands of holes) and it would have just as efficiently blocked the waveform...hence the reason why you are safe when looking through glass door of microwave which is a far more powerful radiation. Manufacturer's use a metal screen sized sufficiently to shield the radiation whilst allowing you 'visual access' to what is cooking inside.

Anyhoo...back to Dave's thread and on topic

Regards

TP

[david lambright]

Hi David,

It is my understanding that the night vision mode of these cameras simply use a different amplification algorithm for the existing sensors which have IR capability, but it is the same photoreceptor used for normal color reception. So it would seem that if there was a fair amount of color energy present, it would bleed into the receptor and be processed.

This can be especially true where an IR lamp is used to illuminate the subject and the subject contains IR fluorescent pigment (like some LCD displays do).

Here is a company that specializes in IR ink:
IR Inks & Powders

I hope this helps to clear up why night vision can produce some color in the final image and why the human eye can see color when illuminated by IR light.

Cheers,

are we talking about the same vid?...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlNhLiuGrzg...a

[david lambright]

john

Hi

I have posted up the swf with the hue and contrast changes I mentioned a few posts back. Still not quite sure what it shows, but there appears to be some sort of movement.

PMH swf - EnergeticTube.com*-* Where technology goes LIVE!

Regards

John

beautiful work...my last video shows a lot more...i hate to ask but could you enhance my last vid ....it shows lots more.....excellent stuff....david

[Harvey]

can any one else see it??

Hi David,

It is my understanding that the night vision mode of these cameras simply use a different amplification algorithm for the existing sensors which have IR capability, but it is the same photoreceptor used for normal color reception. So it would seem that if there was a fair amount of color energy present, it would bleed into the receptor and be processed.

This can be especially true where an IR lamp is used to illuminate the subject and the subject contains IR fluorescent pigment (like some LCD displays do).

Here is a company that specializes in IR ink:
IR Inks & Powders

I hope this helps to clear up why night vision can produce some color in the final image and why the human eye can see color when illuminated by IR light.

Cheers,

[Adie123]

at 37 seconds a rod or orb move from left to right, to the right of you.

Probably an insect, although it appears from nowhere which seems strange. Theres also one at 27 seconds, just to the right of the one you mentioned. This one curls unlike the one at 37 seconds.

p.s. heya all. my first post and this thread is the reason for my registering. Would love to see something come of this topic. Its very intriguing what dave has found.

[IndianaBoys]

Hi

I have posted up the swf with the hue and contrast changes I mentioned a few posts back. Still not quite sure what it shows, but there appears to be some sort of movement.

PMH swf - EnergeticTube.com*-* Where technology goes LIVE!

Regards

John

John,

I got this message after clicking the link:

Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' (2)

Not sure if it is from my end?

IndianaBoys

[SkyWatcher]

Hi folks, thanks for the nicer words, whether something works or doesn't work or is a hoax and i was unaware, what really matters is not the technology, it's how we treat each other and create peace and harmony. Notice, it's not how much technology we have, it's the wisdom that goes with it that makes the world worth living in. By the way, i did see in that video david lambright, at 37 seconds a rod or orb move from left to right, to the right of you.
peace love light
Tyson

[john_g]

Hi

I have posted up the swf with the hue and contrast changes I mentioned a few posts back. Still not quite sure what it shows, but there appears to be some sort of movement.



Regards

John