Eccentric Transformer Theory -

[boguslaw]

Len'z here ,Len'z there ...everywhere there is Len'z rule.
What is that ? What is the reason of that ?

[Armagdn03]

Len'z here ,Len'z there ...everywhere there is Len'z rule.
What is that ? What is the reason of that ?

Well, actually you are going to be surprised. But I have great interest in alternative science text's. I have gone down the rabbit hole and back with modern theory and got lost as the so called professionals. I have found two authors which have had the best insight i have come across into natural phenomenon and I still refer to each almost constantly. The best description I have ever read, actually comes from a text called the "Alchemanual" by scribe Aaity Olsen. She is a wonderful older woman with whom I have kept up a bit of email correspondence.
Let me take a small portion of it to explain.

"Heinrich Lenz, working in the nineteenth century, perfected experiments combining magnetic field motion and electric induced currents. He succeeded in showing mankind how to induce a current in a wire by moving a magnet through a wire loop. His work with small magnets led to the design of giant
generators, such as you may see installed on the great dams on lakes around the world. The falling motion of water turns the giant magnets which then produce currents in conducting cables. A simple natural phenomena lights up the cities of today with electricity. The electro magnetic relationship is the work horse that powered the industrial revolution and then went on to power the electronic communication systems that make your civilizations flourish.

(Heinrich Lenz states his observations as follows: The direction of an induced current is such that its own magnetic field opposes the original change in magnetic flux that induced the current.)

It worked! A magnetic field induced a current in a wire. But surprisingly, the direction of current flow did not uphold the "right hand rule." Lenz did not know why or how it happened, but no matter, he had current when and where it was needed. We will now show you why this is true."


This is the effect, then it goes on to explain the cause. This is above the heads of a lot of people because they will not have the terminology down, however the entire manual concerns the interaction of two halves of the same coin, the S and T field, or the kinetic and potential expressions of the universe.

If you imagine a particle "flowing" along, it will create around it a loop of flux by the left hand rule. It will leave a wake behind it and traveling with it that will spin in a direction that is opposite to flow of the oncoming force. There is really a magical synergy that is taking place here, and the Alchemanual describes it brilliantly. Let me take one more snippet from this article...


"This is the phenomena noticed by Heinrich Lentz but for which he had no substantial explanation. The events were chalked up to the idea that nature always tries to conserve energy, and that in fact, no elemental energy is ever gained or lost. Nature certainly wishes to conserve energy. Nature also wishes to make more energy at every octave level."

I the second person to which I am in awe and in debt to is Walter Russell.I wish I had written down the following quote so I do not butcher it, but I will give it a go either way.

"Conduction dissipates energy, induction creates energy"
Walter Russell.

Doesn't get much shorter and sweeter than this. Russell was a fantastic artist along with his slew of other talents. He drew many many scientific photos and texts which have incredible insight. Here are a few select ones of which we are particularly interested.



This photo shows the mathematical progression of energy. Note that each successive circle, is an overtone to smaller circles. Each two small circles makes a larger one. Each larger one is paired with another of its own size, in turn creating one larger yet. The pattern is of doubling.

You will also notice a numbering system, 0,1,2,3,4,4,3,2,1,0

There are 10 numbers but the zeros and 4s are considered to be one and the same since they mark the same spots as peaks and troughs of a wave. This 8 segment cycle marks the octave divisions of the wave into doubling and halving ratios as shown. Each number refers to a new octave within its larger parent octave.



Here is again the same info with another view. Notice that each successive stage of the spiral is divided and seperated with a square or box to separate it. Each successive square is double the size of the last, and vice versa. It is shown again on this in a little half diagram off to the right of the page, where a circle is drawn with different surface tensions, each drawn with a radius double that of the last.

and there is obviously the musical connection.



Here is where it gets interesting! Consider again my eccentric transformer transmitter. We can imagine a bubble of field around it. It follows the inverse square law. Much like our earth has a gravitative field which follows the inverse square law. As we double our radius from the center the field decreases by 1/4. These divisions are invisible to us, until we enter a similar object into the picture to interact with the inverse squared field. Then as my graphs in the first post show, each the transmitter and the new object (reciever) will talk to each other, find locations where they mathematically prefer to be (hmmm kinda like the mathematical probability of an electrons position creates the so called electron cloud) Now we see a stratificatio take place!

The earth is similar to this. It has a radial potential and magnetic circulation in the same geometrical relations of my transmitter. Its electrical and gravitational field decreases inversely with distance just like gravity, only when matter comes into the equation (the matter that makes up our ground water and sky) does the stratification take place. Look at the equation for gravity, it needs interaction between the "transmitter and receiver" or two masses.

This leads to an very interesting view on gravity which is shared by my two favorite authors. My conclusions are the following. The sun creates an inverse squared field, which "stratifies" or has bands or clouds of area where matter is most likely to settle, which is very much akin to the uncertainty principle and electron clouds, where we are dealing with potential zones rather than only point particles. These occur in many levels and we call them valence shells, transitory shells, Orbits (for our solar system) etc. They are bands which alternate predominance of kinetic predominance, with potential predominance. "Elements" or matter will also have an inherent ratio of kinnetic to potential energy. Look up Electronegativity. The elements Separate itself out into the zone or area which is most like its own potential. This should also bring to mind Archimedes' principle, which I will re state using electrical terminology from Walter Russells book "Genero Radiative concept"

weight or particle interaction, buoyancy:

"Weight is the sum of the difference between the two pressures that act on every mass."

"Weight is the measure of difference in electric potential between a mass and the volume it occupies."

"Weight is the measure of unbalance between any mass and its displaced environment."

"Weight is the measure of the force that a body exerts in seeking its true potential."

"Weight is the sum of the difference between the inward pull of gravitation, and the outward thrust of radiation."

Tesla stated near the end of his life that he had worked out a dynamic theory of gravity. And that it all had to do with essentially density as density is a property of 3 dimensional space which is our canvas. Look again at the quote ""Weight is the measure of difference in electric potential between a mass and the volume it occupies." We concede that matter and energy are one in the same per the equivalence therum, therefore one could take this quote to realize that the electric potential of a mass and the volume it occupies is dealing primarily with a density, or an energy density which must have its on inherent potential (again look up electronegativity, electropositivity).

Here is the framework for electromagnetic interactions which give way to gravity. I assert gravity is not real, and that we have made it up out of convenience.

One can actually take a look at Walter Russells periodic table, for which he recieved many accolades



and with existing knowledge figure out the density to charge ratio which will determine its position within the earths gravitational field, or in other words, determine its true potential zone. Placed in any other potential zone we either experience negative gravity (buoyancy) or gravity.

also...

There is opportunity here to bring up a very fundamental philisophical line of thought that is incredibly important. If the universe is all that is and there is nothing outside per say, then all movement is contained within. If all movement is contained within, and all movement has an equal and opposite reaction than the sum of all energies always equals zero. if you were floating in the dark of space, and all you had was a medicine ball. You could flail, and gyrate, and move, but you would never get anywhere. You would supposedly create lots of movement, but the sum of it would always be a net of zero. You might even think to throw the ball, now it will head off in one direction with a quanta of energy, and you the other direction with a quanta of energy, both equal and opposite, so both add to zero. This shows that energy really can never be gained nor lost, but simulated. This means that from rest all things come and to rest all things return, and that mathematically the sum all all is nothing.

[Armagdn03]

Parametric power multiplication invention
(WO/2008/097768) PARAMETRIC POWER MULTIPLICATION



makes one think...now back to reality...

[boguslaw]

Sorry,I still do understand Len'z rule.
Isn't that exact copy of Newton third law ? Or maybe Newton third law is internally because of Len'z law rule acting on gravity ? Of course that depends on theory that gravity is strongly related to magnetism.

[Armagdn03]

I could give you a "simple" answer but I think I might be cheating you. It is equivalent to newtons third law. But id recommend you do your own exhaustive mental search into what it is and can do.

[boguslaw]

I could give you a "simple" answer but I think I might be cheating you. It is equivalent to newtons third law. But id recommend you do your own exhaustive mental search into what it is and can do.

I haven't done deep research yet, but what I've learned so far seems to show that whenever we have electro-magnetic fields whatever we do with electric side is reflected with magnetic and vice versa.
What about EM radiation ? IS it connected with transmitter and depends on Len'z rule ?

[Armagdn03]

That is the purpose of this very thread, to describe Lenz like reactions with EM radiation rather than the concentric setup which is the standard.

[dragon]

insightfull !

That is the purpose of this very thread, to describe Lenz like reactions with EM radiation rather than the concentric setup which is the standard.

Wow !!! All I can say is Thank you ! Your are truly insightful.
________

[nilrehob]

Now I begin to see this in all kinds of patents and setups!
At least I think i do...
Cool!

Now I just have to find myself an experiment to prove it with that i'm capable of performing...

/Hob

[Armagdn03]

User Tak22 From overunity.com forum has sent me some very interesting information on a gentleman by the name of William Barbat of which the rex research page is linked to below:


William Barbat: Self-Sustaining Electrical Generator; United States Patent Application # 0070007844


The patent application shows a prior art which is a decent list of overunity devices which actually tend to fit nice and easily with eccentric transformer theory. The use of radioactive material is considered, and thought to be an ill resolution to the problem due to cost and amounts available at the time of the devices conception.

I have seen this effect many times in my studies but people seem to get major parts of the understanding of it wrong or half right! It is important not to just witness a phenomenon, but to describe it to the best ability possible.

quote:
"In order for the electrical output to exceed the electrical input, the output coil is situated in such a manner that it receives more of the magnified inductive-photon energy than that which is directed back against the sending coil to act as a back-force. This "energy leverage" causes the electrical energy output to exceed the input. "

This is eccentric transformer theory at work, but he has neglected to show the relationship between transmitter and magnifying coil in geometric space. He notes the relationship vaguely but I would say that this is of KEY importance, due to the interference pattern created by the receiver and transmitter, there will be areas of EXACT distance that will provide the best possible outcome, and this fact more than others is of grave importance. Moving from this distance in one direction may cause decrease in output and de-tuning of the primary causing increased draw on the input, moving in the other direction causes decrease in output. These are both disadvantageous and will make or break so called energy "production"

Also there is also a lot of gobledigook about low mass electrons etc, which play no role in this device. For example "By way of example, the energy-magnifying coil can comprise a superconducting material, wherein the "condition" is a temperature (e.g., a cryogenic temperature) at which the superconducting material exhibits superconducting behavior characterized by production of low-mass electrons."

Also, it is known that resonance in certain structures acts much like room emperature super conductor, none of this cryo stuff is necessary. The only problem with the resonance concept is that you must now deal with emission of both inductive and capacitive forms, and you must not let them interfere with the process. Thus you may cancel one or the other out, or make its effects be minimized.


I will be creating an inductive transformer today utilizing my concepts, and hopefully show a second half to this puzzle.

Thanks for the info Tak22

[nilrehob]

Yes, that is one of the patents that came to mind,
and also some of Don Smiths devices:
YouTube - Donald L Smith Device 1 Of 5

/Hob

[Armagdn03]

Yes, that is one of the patents that came to mind,
and also some of Don Smiths devices:
YouTube - Donald L Smith Device 1 Of 5

/Hob

Hello, yes Don smith is very very close in many of his descriptions. However I feel that while he had a correct concept, he never fleshed it out to the point to where he could build a working device. Again the geometric relations are ignored! the math is ignored! and its pre algebra! I believe this is why don smith never had a working device, however his ideas were sound.

Think about this. Every particle is essentially a coil. It has an inductive and capacitive properties, and is touching every other particle around it, there is no empty space (don't argue this point, the space around a nucleus has an energy density and therefore due to the mass equivilance therum is in itself a tenuous form of matter). If one particle were to expand or contract or vibrate as it were, this wave would spread through adjacent particles. This is so called Light. Each particle reacts by in deforming a bit causing an internal current. The particle which initiates is the transmitter, the many many particles which receive are the many many receivers. Think about mirrors, incident light reflection and Snells law. 180degree phase shifts occur on reflections exactly the same as EM radiation does with the eccentric transformer concept. It is now widely established that light, or photons are high freq em radiation of the same structure as radio waves. We are playing with 100% natural forms of energy propagation. Where signals transmitted are mirrored off into infinity by the infinite amount of coils in our existence (particles). Each of these particles which receives and reacts to the light, then transmit their own signal! This in turn is spread out through the many particles, complex interference patterns occur.

It is commonly thought that light hits a mirror, What is not absorbed is reflected. This is not the case. All particles must be thought of in their fundamental properties. A mirror is a highly overtoned set of particles all in alignment. When Em radiation hits the surface, it is absorbed, or affects the surface in the same way my receiver does. This then reflects the signal at
a 180 degree phase shift, both in light and mirrors and systems like mine. The particles which re emit the light do so with the the impregnation (bandwidth and fundamental freq)

For example think of a source of white light as a coil with many many harmonics, each represent a color. All colors combined look like white light, or in this case white em radiation or radio waves. The reciever only is sensitive to a certain bandwidth, and so only selects one frequency of the many to respond to. Then with a 180 degree phase shift (lenz law) emits its own signal due to its excitation. If the frequency it is sensitive too is "green" then it will respond to green only out of the spectrum that hits it, and re-emmit green which is what we see.

Permanent magnets can also act like individual particles since their microscopic constituents act as a macroscopic whole. If you induce a change in field on one side of a bar magnet, you will get an equal and opposite response at the other end of the bar magnet, but since it is happening on the other side of the magnet (opposite pole) it is essentially reversed...or a 180 degree phase shift has happened between the input signal and output signal, or so called reflected wave occurs.

As you can see eccentric transformer theory is much more than a free energy system, and is more of a way of understanding natural phenomenon which sets us free from many of the misunderstandings of modern science.

I work very hard at constructionist work. Gone are the days of the Renaissance man, and we praise the specialist..too bad. But one day we will erase the boundaries between the sciences and the arts, step out from our Tower of Babel and start noticing that which ties all together instead of what separates. This is my goal, and what my theory pays into, I hope that others will add and start making connections as well.

[boguslaw]

Great that you find it!
The mystery lies is in unidirectional energy flow.No Len'z rule at all.There is simple no connection between transmitter and collector, no electromagnetic fields, no magnetic induction, no electrostatic induction, almost nothing
Former is only sending while later is only collecting.

[gotoluc]

Hi Andrew,

did you see the YouTube video that Don Smith demonstrates his device in front of a live audience?

Link: YouTube - Donald L. Smith 1996 Tesla Symposium Part 19

The demo start around 4 minutes.

His device worked to power the 1000w load to around 70 volts but seems to have some technical issue and they were out of time to fix it.

Luc

[boguslaw]

Hi Andrew,

did you see the YouTube video that Don Smith demonstrates his device in front of a live audience?

Link: YouTube - Donald L. Smith 1996 Tesla Symposium Part 19

The demo start around 4 minutes.

His device worked to power the 1000w load to around 70 volts but seems to have some technical issue and they were out of time to fix it.

Luc

He he , he probably run flat internal batteries ;-)