Gravity - just pure plain GRAVITY

[Aaron]

aether

Ok, that is funny. I suppose You are talking about different kind of Luminiferous aether? If not, then I somehow missed a disproof of Michelson-Motley experiment.

If you do your homework, you'll find it. DeMeo and many others have show the obvious blunder of the experiment for years. They were always looking in the wrong direction, period.

It is Michelson-Morley instead of Motley.

[Stealth]

Lots of interesting theories have been proposed here, as well as some interesting experiments. If a spinning mass causes vortices in the fabric of space(aether), then these vortices displace the aether. This force then acts upon matter in its field of influence as it surrounds and engulfs matter to pull from the near side as well as push from the far side to accelerate matter toward itself. It also exerts more force on soild matter, and matter which consists of dense moleular construction. In this respect it acts somewhat like magnetism. Gravity exerts its force on all but the gaseous elements. If this is how it works, then we should be able to design a machine to capture this energy. Good Luck. Stealth

[morpher44]

NASA and antigravity

Superconductor rotated in a strong magnetic field?
Podklentnov failing to publish...
Reporters ... start digging... This is another cool story.

NASA's Antigravity Machine - Popular Mechanics

[Aaron]

rotating mass

A rotating magnetic field will pull the aether towards it stronger than if there was no magnetic field.

A rotating sphere without a magnetic field will cause a similar effect even without a magnetic field.

Read some of Floyd Sweet's papers for some valuable insights.

Also, here is a conventional explanation of what a rotating mass does. They admit light moves faster when moving in the direction of rotation, it is obvious why this proven effect happens with the aether/fluid model but they obfuscate the self-evident nature in these explanations in my opinion.

Lense-Thirring precession - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Frame-dragging - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[CloudSeeder]

Rotating plates mimicking the effects of a Black Hole?

zzzzzzzzzzz zzzz

[sucahyo]

Something that I have been thinking lately is about insect flight which has still remained a mystery in conventional science. Aerodynamics cannot explain how a bee flies?

This remind me of Viktor Grebenikov who made a flying platform by mimicking the design of the underside of bug wing.

[CloudSeeder]

$.50 cents on the dollar for Energetic construction!

zzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzz

[Vortex]

It has been shown that temperature does influence gravity in experiments.
Ask Yourself: Why Is That?

It has been shown that the flame of a candle can be moved by a magnetic field.

Temperature raises/lowers energy level/frequency
How does the heating Philosopher's Stone, White Gold, ORMUS ..
change the weight. is it related to gravity or something different?

Why would temperature effect gravity?

just thinking
randy

[Vortex]

If you do your homework, you'll find it. DeMeo and many others have show the obvious blunder of the experiment for years. They were always looking in the wrong direction, period.

It is Michelson-Morley instead of Motley.

... the wrong direction .. as in misdirection?

YouTube - Extended Michelson-Morley Interferometer experiment. English version
But what does these mean?
Gravity effects light?
Light effect gravity?
OR is it, None of the above?

[CloudSeeder]

Eliminating Outer Space in front of the spaceship? Self-generated wormholes?

The idea of eliminating the aether from

[CloudSeeder]

A horizontal Earth-to-Space portal => Space Elevator energy no Space Elevator weight

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[Aaron]

moving candle flame

It has been shown that the flame of a candle can be moved by a magnetic field.

That has been online for years but to date, I think zero people have replicated it. It may be a fraud or there is something else he isn't saying.

[Aaron]

light and gravity

... the wrong direction .. as in misdirection?

YouTube - Extended Michelson-Morley Interferometer experiment. English version
But what does these mean?
Gravity effects light?
Light effect gravity?
OR is it, None of the above?

Could be misdirection, lol

When light is "moving" towards a mass, the downward push of the aether, the medium that "propagates" light, pushes the light's path down towards the mass and causing it to be on a different trajectory when it is past the mass. I believe it is the simplest explanation for "bending" of light near large masses.

[Aaron]

there is no distance traveled

The idea of eliminating the aether from one side of a spaceship -creating a negative area stronger than a vacuum- on the surface sounds like a good idea.

Speed is the rate of change of distance with time.

With the aether deflected around the shell instead of resisting the mass of the shell, there is no speed as there is no distance traveled to get from point A to point B.

The aether is what creates space with dimension for distance/speed/time to exist. And if not traveling through the aether, a distance is not traveled.

[Tehnoman]

HOW doesn't deserve the time of day [..]

That could be a matter of opinion or taste, but after a lot of thinking about reality, phenomenology and physics I have reached to conclusion that HOW is all that we have.

Main idea is logical chains, questions and answers. What is lightning? Lightning is electrical discharge blablabla... What is electrical? Electrical is something caused by movement of electric charge. What is electric charge? Have no idea, something that creates electric and magnetic field.

IS answers stop at last element of chain, where HOW is only left over. Therefore I conclude, that we actually don't know what lightning IS but only HOW lightning works.

But that is a bit off topic, and You folks may or may not disagree with me. As I said - matter of opinion.

If you do your homework, you'll find it. DeMeo and many others have show the obvious blunder of the experiment for years. They were always looking in the wrong direction, period.

It is Michelson-Morley instead of Motley.

I have to confess - I haven't. Haven't done a lot searching for ether proofs, because as I mentioned before - can't stop thinking that people would have found these proofs and ether would be living subject in my study program. Oh well.

About that video - One thing that comes to my mind is acceleration created on interferometer in Earth's radial direction. As we all know, GR postulates that acceleration equals gravity. And gravity relates to time flow. And from time difference there could be some discrepancies in interference pattern. But that is only general assumption, to understand it better, more detailed analysis must be made.

Of course, Morley, stupid typo.

Btw, theory is good, but experiment is the best. I can't understand, why there are no schematics for levitating capacitors with such detailed knowledge about ether and gravity.

Best of wishes.