The German 1966 Friedrich Luling Magnet Motor finally explained

[Ufopolitics]

The Luling Magnet Motor was finally built in 1966, even though the German Inventor has been working on its development since 1954, where He discovered a way to NEUTRALIZE Magnetic Field Forces...
Friedrich Luling planned to install his motor on an Automobile...after showing it in the UFA-Wochenschau Expo
Like it always happens...the Motor never made it anywhere...and Luling died shortly after his discovery-Invention

Go to minute 1:54 to start Luling Motor, and the reason I put this link is because the CC English Translation is much better than the short video we are all familiar with.


Many people have tried to Replicate this Motor unsuccessfully...

On this Thread I will be discussing and showing the Insides of this Incredible and Robust Motor.

[Ufopolitics]

First, something very important to have very clear in our minds about this Motor...

Neutralization of the Magnetic Field Forces does not means that the Forces are "no longer there", Nor are they "Blocked"...But they are just "Momentarily Neutralized" until We "Switch or Turn it Off" ...
Meaning, We can turn the Rotor with one finger (Just like Luling does on Video) without feeling ANY CLOGGING or ANY IMPEDING REPULSE FORCE and without STICKING at the Attract side...

And it does not matter the Magnets Shape or Strength or Size, etc, etc ..as long as they are equally of the same Force/Type in our Setup...

The fact is that when we turn off the neutralization at the RIGHT ANGLE, We get a very strong Accelerating Force from either side, Repulse or Attract, depending on the side we decide to use as our "Turning Switch Side".

Below is the simplest and Basic way to explain Magnetic Neutralization with just Two Sets of Magnets, One on left as Repulsion and one on the Right of picture as Attraction.

If We achieve the RIGHT AIR GAPS on both sides, We can turn this Rotor in both directions without feeling any clogging nor any stick forces.

Apparently it looks so simple right?

But it is NOT!!...It requires your setup to be very ROBUST, meaning, No Shaft Play...No Shaft Wobbling, And the Magnets must be very, very secured to Stator and Rotor!!

The best way is to get Magnets that have already a built in Hole to be attached with screws to both parts!!

And the GAP REGULATION must be VERY ACCURATE!!...So I highly recommend to build a way to screw gap adjustment and then lock it!!

[Ufopolitics]

The Luling Motor video has been uploaded for a very long time

https://www.filmothek.bundesarchiv.d...88?set_lang=en

...and many many have tried to replicate it without any success...
Actually Stefan from OU, has made his own translation video...created a Thread in OU about it...have searched for the Patents in EU and nothing...
It is unbelievable that no one has noticed something "interesting" about this Motor characteristics, by just watching the video...

All replications and "Simulations" have used gears, pinions, pulleys and belts, cams and lobes, etc,etc to do the timing on their replications...no success.

[Ufopolitics]

PHYSICAL VECTORS OF FORCE AT PLAY ON THIS SETUP:





If we look at above Graphic, We will notice that the way Vectors of Force are displayed (which is the right way, and correct me if I am wrong!!) they do not actually "match" with Academia on Vectors of Force "Cancelling to Zero"...
Normally They taught Us that Vectors must be ---><---- to Cancel to Zero right?
Plus Vectors of Force must be like this: --->---> or like this <---<--- to be added...

Only way I could put it is by separating Rotor Vectors from Stators Vectors or:

Rotor being like: --->---> and Stator: <---<---
So, if We add "separately" Rotor + Stator We will get a Zero Value or:

--->---> + <---<---= 0

But that IS NOT THE ORDER it is being displayed in Reality on this setup according ON ITS LINEAR ALIGNMENT or:

<------> + ---><---=?


...unless Math allows Us to combine them to make them look like I wrote above by separating Rotor from Stator....

And please feel free to correct me any time...Thanks

Point is that whatever way to "calculate it" be.., and no matter what...the final result is that we get Zero Force or Neutralized Forces...

[Ufopolitics]

Hello again,

Of all replications in YT, only one guy in Germany, uses air or a Pneumatic System to do the switching ON-OFF of Neutralization:

And He achieves a pretty constant rotation, but weak...just because His Armature does not have magnets...meaning He is only using attract forces from magnet to steel, which is not strong, not enough for a higher speed and torque like original Luling Motor develops...
Also means He is not using the main part, which is the Neutralization of Magnetic Forces...where at least Two Magnets should be mounted on Armature-Rotor.

On video below He shows some of the internal components, clearly seen that armature is just plain steel mass and Stator have Two Magnets.

[Ufopolitics]

Why use Air to run Luling motor?

[Ufopolitics]

Hello to Everyone and Happy Four of July!!!

HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY!!!



And FINALLY, at a very great timing.... here is the Video of a Luling Simplest Model...but RUNNING!!!

FIRST TIME IN 55 YEARS THAT LULING REVEAL HIS MAGNET MOTOR TO THE WORLD...IT IS FULLY REVEALED AND BUILT IN A VERY SUCCESSFULL YET SIMPLE MODEL.

Enjoy!!

PD: I am showing a PREMIERE NOW, where you could chat with me live...

Regards


Ufopolitics

[ewizard]

Awesome work I'm guessing that with enough magnets and rotors it would be able to power a small compressor to provide it's own air.

[Ufopolitics]

Awesome work I'm guessing that with enough magnets and rotors it would be able to power a small compressor to provide it's own air.

Hello Ewizard,

Yes, of course!!...More Magnets and more Modules...set with "Firing Order" every certain degrees of rotation...just like the ICE System does.

And, actually I am not worried about running "out of air"...actually, there is no need to have a compressor if we have a Closed Pressurized and well sealed Air System...a High and a low Air Pressure Tanks, a purge valve or a small pump with the proper pressure sensor will do the recycling job...whenever Low pressure tank reaches certain pressure...

Regards old friend!!


Ufopolitics

[BroMikey]

Not bad ufo go go go

Hello to Everyone and Happy Four of July!!!

HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY!!!



And FINALLY, at a very great timing.... here is the Video of a Luling Simplest Model...but RUNNING!!!

FIRST TIME IN 55 YEARS THAT LULING REVEAL HIS MAGNET MOTOR TO THE WORLD...IT IS FULLY REVEALED AND BUILT IN A VERY SUCCESSFULL YET SIMPLE MODEL.

Enjoy!!

PD: I am showing a PREMIERE NOW, where you could chat with me live...

Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

But you used Magnets on the rotating Anker instead of pure Iron?

Semi

Hello Semi,

-You have mentioned that he died, shortly after his discovery-Invention.
How and where did you get this Information? Do you have a source which can
tell me more about him?Regarding your "Secret" Photo:
to my emails.


Mr. Klug does not use Neutralization of the Magnetic Field Forces...reason why, his motor runs too slow, and very weak.
I have commented on his video related to this error in the building, plus I have also linked my video so he could see what I mean.
He did not respond to my comments either.

3-If I understood it right, your recent published video is based on the first motor

I like your thinking very much.

Yes, that is correct, my replica is based on that running motor, but it is not his first motor...actually that was the more perfectioned model, He called 4X4 and he labels it Nr 3, Baujahr 1962 (see attached image)
I believe he calls it "Number 3" because it is the Third in the production...and "4X4" because he uses Four (4) Modules which contains Four Rotors (Ankers) and Four Plates.

4- But you used Magnets on the rotating Anker instead of pure Iron?

Neutralize Magnetic Fields.see also attached image of a frame from video.


5- Also you didn't short the outer, fixed Magnets with a shield,
you "just" moved it away so that the Anker can pass without attraction?

Ok, No, I did not short the Stator with a steel solid arc...just because there are Two Ways to brake Neutralization...

sticking point"you "just" moved it away so that the Anker can pass without attraction?"
The Anker (Rotor) does not pass without attraction!...I just weakened

[Ufopolitics]

Hello,

Here are some images attached on my answers *not included above, and the "edit" option does not allows for uploading...or just don't work at all.

[Duncan]

Hi UFO interesting footage and great research It is clear you want to stay true to the original if only for vindication of the man's original work 'quite right too' the genius's that have simply 'disappeared' are to many to mention. They were all doing just what we are – researching mostly with good intent .

To deviate just a little from your original German developer simply to point at another researcher specifically focused on 'magnetic neutralisation' - I Offer Art Porters work which he calls 'Gap power' I'm sure your familiar UFO however here's one of the guys first video's explaining first principles if only for others

http://youtu.be/tM_HRwqKzFk

His web site of course goes much further and needs research . It does strike me UFO that with the correct timing and perhaps stepper motors [or gearing] to spin the magnets in sync with the rotor then these two researchers work could well compliment , making a moderately easy build powerful self runner.

As you point out to neutralize the magnet if only for a fraction of a milli second is the important thing – to physically turn it in that time/space would be a huge advantage!

It is I suggest far easier for electrically based guys to neutralize using amp/turns – volts and amps are well understood. How to treat the bemf not so much, although plenty do it now!

Compliments and kind regards UFO – Duncan

[Ufopolitics]

Hi UFO interesting footage and great research It is clear you want to stay true to the original if only for vindication of the man's original work 'quite right too' the genius's that have simply 'disappeared' are to many to mention. They were all doing just what we are – researching mostly with good intent .

To deviate just a little from your original German developer simply to point at another researcher specifically focused on 'magnetic neutralisation' - I Offer Art Porters work which he calls 'Gap power' I'm sure your familiar UFO however here's one of the guys first video's explaining first principles if only for others

http://youtu.be/tM_HRwqKzFk

His web site of course goes much further and needs research . It does strike me UFO that with the correct timing and perhaps stepper motors [or gearing] to spin the magnets in sync with the rotor then these two researchers work could well compliment , making a moderately easy build powerful self runner.

As you point out to neutralize the magnet if only for a fraction of a milli second is the important thing – to physically turn it in that time/space would be a huge advantage!

It is I suggest far easier for electrically based guys to neutralize using amp/turns – volts and amps are well understood. How to treat the bemf not so much, although plenty do it now!

Compliments and kind regards UFO – Duncan

[bistander]

From post:

FREE ENERGY # 24 Working Magnetic Overunity Device - Magnetic Neutralization - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com
FREE ENERGY # 24 Working Magnetic Overunity DeviceThis is an invention by Art Porter. This device working by permanent magnet and electromagnet.He called th..

Hi Ufo,

Interesting contraption in that video. But why, when they can't figure out how to measure input power, do they assume it is over unity?

I can think a of methods fairly easy and accurate to do it and think you probably can also. Do they purposely seek out four dumb guys to ask so they can claim difficulty with a simple electrical measurement?

Their method for output power is a bit cumbersome but doable. Using a generator with known efficiency would be easier and enable them to loop it, if it was O.U.
Regards,
bi