Originally posted by vidbid
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Donald Smith Devices too good to be true
Collapse
X
-
@Garsony
Thank you for offering your input.
What is needed here is accurate translations of Dynatron's videos for English speakers who don't speak Russian.
If Dynatron would be so kind as to show us the results of his experiments with that transformer, it would be greatly appreciated.Regards,
VIDBID
Comment
-
Zatsarinina Transformer by Sergei Borisovich Zatsarinin
@Ganzha,Originally posted by Ganzha View PostI think when we use HV devices we are getting extra power during the process, some extra power getting outside direct into our HV devices but this energy is not usual electricity, so we dont know about that and thinking that impossible, even when could mesure that in Neon transormers output more that input!
If we got Zazarinin transormer we can start new experiment more effective - to know that we could get or even "extract" cold electricity by this strange "transformator"! I mean we got new knowledge that should or may help to build successful replication and even to invent our own!
Thanks for offering your input.
It would be interesting to see a closeup scope shot on the output of that Zatsarinina transformer in KaVcr's video.
ZATSARININA TRANSFORMER PDF
Google TranslationAttached FilesRegards,
VIDBID
Comment
-
-
This is one of his lasts comments:Originally posted by vidbid View Post@Garsony
Thank you for offering your input.
What is needed here is accurate translations of Dynatron's videos for English speakers who don't speak Russian.
If Dynatron would be so kind as to show us the results of his experiments with that transformer, it would be greatly appreciated.
Привет, транс там ненасыщаемый, ни в каких документах и петентах не найдете вы работы транса на радиантном электричестве.
разница состоит в том, что на обычном токе максимальный магнитный поток через магнитопровод проходит, при максимальном токе вторички, а для транса с х.т. в первичке все наоборот. максимальный магнитный поток на холостом ходе и чем больше мы нагружаем вторичку, тем больше разгружаем магнитопровод. никакого подмагничивапния магнитопровода нет, поскольку и в первичке и во вторичке синусоидальные колебания с неизменным периодом независимо от нагрузки..Это нигде не написано, это результаты моих полуторамесячных экспериментов с трансформатором изоляции.
Поскольку первичка с масляниками составляет колебательный контур, ток в такой системе отстает от напряжения на 90 градусов (90 градусов надо еще проверить), соттветственно вся реактивная мощность никогда не может быть снията на вторичке транса, а только процентов 20 от колебательной мощности, поэтому габаритная мощность магнитопровода должна превышать расчетную выходную мощность раз эдак в пять....
Другими словами, с двухкиловатного железа удавалось выдавить около 500 ват. на холостом ходу железо уже не вытягивало синус и обрезало верхи синуса, по мерое увеличения нагрузки, появлялся синус и так вплоть до того момента, когда происходит пороговый свал индуктивности (8 вольт 70 ампер в случае с 2 киловатным магнитопроводом), частота колебаний- около 80 герц.
Comment
-
Thanks for offering your input.Originally posted by Farmhand View PostIf there is no gain in energy it is just a novelty. What are the in/out
measurements and why is there none ? I also got a waveform from a copper
tube inside a coil and I can light stuff from a core of a transformer as well.
Is the energy input by the function generator ?
But- Is it useful ? Is it free energy ? Most of us don't speak anything but
English so we don't know what his claims are. Can you elaborate ?
Cheers
Interesting questions.
When dealing with longitudinal wave energy, we're dealing with a form of energy that has a velocity faster than light. 291,000 miles per second or (π/2)c. Reference Eric Dollard at time index 4:34/9:38.Regards,
VIDBID
Comment
-
@GarsonyOriginally posted by Garsony View PostThis is one of his lasts comments:
Привет, транс там ненасыщаемый, ни в каких документах и петентах не найдете вы работы транса на радиантном электричестве.
разница состоит в том, что на обычном токе максимальный магнитный поток через магнитопровод проходит, при максимальном токе вторички, а для транса с х.т. в первичке все наоборот. максимальный магнитный поток на холостом ходе и чем больше мы нагружаем вторичку, тем больше разгружаем магнитопровод. никакого подмагничивапния магнитопровода нет, поскольку и в первичке и во вторичке синусоидальные колебания с неизменным периодом независимо от нагрузки..Это нигде не написано, это результаты моих полуторамесячных экспериментов с трансформатором изоляции.
Поскольку первичка с масляниками составляет колебательный контур, ток в такой системе отстает от напряжения на 90 градусов (90 градусов надо еще проверить), соттветственно вся реактивная мощность никогда не может быть снията на вторичке транса, а только процентов 20 от колебательной мощности, поэтому габаритная мощность магнитопровода должна превышать расчетную выходную мощность раз эдак в пять....
Другими словами, с двухкиловатного железа удавалось выдавить около 500 ват. на холостом ходу железо уже не вытягивало синус и обрезало верхи синуса, по мерое увеличения нагрузки, появлялся синус и так вплоть до того момента, когда происходит пороговый свал индуктивности (8 вольт 70 ампер в случае с 2 киловатным магнитопроводом), частота колебаний- около 80 герц.
Thanks for that translation.Regards,
VIDBID
Comment
-
Hi,Garsony!
As far as I understood you are following Dynatron's way exactly.
Could you please say a little about your transformer 25 kwa ?
Does it work correctly with Don's device?
How many output power you got now?
Can you show the fotos of the Donald's device and transformer?
Do you have russian nick?
Best regards,
Sergey.Last edited by usu; 05-06-2012, 06:57 AM.
Comment
-
I follow Don device.Originally posted by usu View PostHi,Garsony!
As far as I understood you are following Dynatron's way exactly.
Could you please say a little about your transformer 25 kwa ?
Does it work correctly with Don's device?
How many output power you got now?
Can you show the fotos of the Donald's device and transformer?
Do you have russian nick?
Best regards,
Sergey.
This is standard North American type transformer 25KWA, 630-volt primary and 240-volt secondary with center tap (120+120V) I have no result with this transformer yet. I don't have a Russian nick.
Comment
-
Thanks!Originally posted by Garsony View PostI follow Don device.
This is standard North American type transformer 25KWA, 630-volt primary and 240-volt secondary with center tap (120+120V) I have no result with this transformer yet. I don't have a Russian nick.
What about photos?
Best regards,
Sergey.
Comment
-
I will be more then happy to show you video when I get some hot at output. I don't see any point to show you huge cold sparks on output of secondary coil, but i can do it if you really want it.Originally posted by usu View PostThanks!
What about photos?
Best regards,
Sergey.
Best regards..
Comment
-
I understood.Originally posted by Garsony View PostI will be more then happy to show you video when I get some hot at output. I don't see any point to show you huge cold sparks on output of secondary coil, but i can do it if you really want it.
Best regards..
Thanks!
Sparks aren't interesting to me.
Best regards,
Sergey.
Comment
-
Garsony!Originally posted by Garsony View PostI will be more then happy to show you video when I get some hot at output. I don't see any point to show you huge cold sparks on output of secondary coil, but i can do it if you really want it.
Best regards..
One more question.
Have you ever tried to contact Smith directly with questions?
I imagine that he doesn't make a secret of his work.
Best regards,
Sergey.
Comment
-
I also think to same.Originally posted by boguslaw View Post100% perfect ideas. The only possible way of obtaining free energy is by resonance and breaking back emf so called Lenz law.I see no other way.
melnichenko showed to us how is possible to overcome backemf.
then there is thane heins with really nice theory about how to avoid backEMF.
Nature is always trying to cancel disturption and kill the dipole.
Permanent magnet is dipole, and poles trying to cancel each other by magnetic field,there is a steady static flow as some people mentioned.
If we create a sharp pulse, nature will create a opposite one, they will cancel each other.We cant break this, it is nature law. bu we can send the second pulse by other path or way.And it is looking that magnetic filed is like current.It will always take the most easy way, the way with the lowest resistance.So for backEMF we can create a special path and guide backEMF away from primary coil. Then there will be just reactive power in primary coil and smal lossed which depend on DC resistance i think.
i will modify some of my test setups to check if its true or not.
Comment

Comment