The American Ruling Class

[aljhoa]

Law
Statements of law were, in the past, considered to be free from claims of misrepresentation because it is equally accessible by both parties and is "...as much the business of the plaintiff as of [the defendants] to know what the law [is]."[11]. This has since changed and it is now more recognised that statements of law should be treated as akin to statements of fact rather than occupy a special isolation[12]. As stated by Lord Denning "...the distinction between law and fact is very illusory."[13].

Statement to the Misled
An action in misrepresentation can only be brought by a representee. This means that only those who were an intended party to the representation can sue. This principle can be seen in Peek v Gurney (1873) LR 6 HL 377, where the plaintiff sued the directors of a company for indemnity.

Types of misrepresentation
Four types of misrepresentations are identified with different remedies available:
Fraudulent misrepresentation occurs when one makes representation with intent to deceive and with the knowledge that it is false. An action for fraudulent misrepresentation allows for a remedy of damages and rescission. One can also sue for fraudulent misrepresentation in a tort action. Fraudulent misrepresentation is capable of being made recklessly.

In India, the federal laws defines misrepresentation under "Misconception Of Fact". This is dealt with under the Indian Penal Code in Section 90, which states:
Consent given firstly under fear of injury, and secondly under a misconception of fact, is not consent at all.
Misrepresentation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Al

[dutchdivco]

I'm with ya, so far

On the issue of not being able to plead 'ignorance' in order to 'get out of' a contract, any contract signed under coercion is invalid.Any contract in which deciet or deception is used by one of the parties, is invalid.Seems like this would apply to many of the contracts people have 'unknowingly' signed, with this U.S. Corporation.Not wanting to 'jump ahead', Jim

[rickoff]

On the issue of not being able to plead 'ignorance' in order to 'get out of' a contract, any contract signed under coercion is invalid.Any contract in which deciet or deception is used by one of the parties, is invalid.Seems like this would apply to many of the contracts people have 'unknowingly' signed, with this U.S. Corporation.Not wanting to 'jump ahead', Jim

Yes, any contract that one is forced or coerced to sign, can be invalidated provided the signer can prove that he or she was forced or coerced to do so. That would not apply, of course, to the many contracts that we have willfully signed.

I would agree that we have been deceived by the state corporations, and by Corporation U.S., but we would never stand a chance of being allowed to prove that deception in any existing court, whether state or federal. Once we reestablish our original jurisdiction state and federal governments, and those governments reestablish a lawful judicial system, the case can finally be made on behalf of all the people, the corporations' hold on us will be legally broken, and we will be able to reassert our individual sovereignty.

[Joit]

‪USA and Russia Unite To Fight Financial Terrorists In 1863‬‏ - YouTube
‪Tiny Tim Geithner-You will never Audit the Fed‬‏ - YouTube

[aljhoa]

‪USA and Russia Unite To Fight Financial Terrorists In 1863‬‏ - YouTube

Nothing about the banking empire that dwarfed the Roths?! The American banking empire that overshadowed the Jewish empire of Roths. This video gets my thumbs down. The Roths had nothing to do with the Fed reserve. This video is just antisemitic.
tempss 5 months ago



Webster Tarpley exposes czar John P. Holdren
This is the trailer for an interview with Dr. Webster Tarpley. In this interview, Dr. Tarpley reviews the writings of John P. Holdren, the current Whitehouse science advisor. This interview conclusively exposes scientific elite's true agenda, world-wide genocide and the formation of a global government to rule.
‪Webster Tarpley - Elite's Global Extermination Plan (Interview Trailer)‬‏ - YouTube

‪Webster Tarpley(P1)Elite's Global Extermination Plan‬‏ - YouTube
While there is nothing I like about the Obama administration, Webster Tarpley is a Zionist disinformation agent who uses half truths to spin hate at the Anglo-sphere.
kmg501 1 month ago

Al

[Joit]

Alhoja
Lol, the bad antisemitic World.
But it seems like this Guy 'tempss' does not really Think about, when he states Rothschild have nothing to do with the FED.

He should inform hisself better about History, especially the Banking System from the Rothschilds and they History, it seems he is pretty clueless,
especially when Rothschilds entered 2006 the Chinese Financial Market,
but , yeah right, they do not have something to do with the FED. NOT.
Webster is may not the only Disinformations Agent out there, beside naive Peoples, what thinks anything is OK.

But beside, i found another Story about the Rothschilds here.

Log in

The Rothschilds have been in control of the world for a very long time, their tentacles reaching into many aspects of our daily lives, as is documented in the following timeline. However, before you jump to the timeline, please read this invaluable introduction which will tell you who the Rothschilds are as oppose to who they claim to be. The Rothschilds claim that they are Jewish, when in fact they are Khazars. They are from a country called Khazaria, which occupied the land locked between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea which is now predominantly occupied by Georgia. The reason the Rothschilds claim to be Jewish is that the Khazars under the instruction of the King, converted to the Jewish faith in 740 A.D., but of course that did not include converting their Asiatic Mongolian genes to the genes of the Jewish people.

You will find that approximately 90% of people in the world today who call themselves Jews are actually Khazars, or as they like to be known, Ashkenazi Jews. These people knowingly lie to the world with their claims that the land of Israel is theirs by birthright, when in actual fact their real homeland is over 800 miles away in Georgia.

So, next time you hear an Israeli Prime Minister bleating about the so- called persecution of the Jews, consider this, every Prime Minister of Israel has been an Ashkenazi Jew. Therefore when all these Prime Ministers have curried favour with the West for their re-establishment of a Jewish homeland, they have knowingly and deliberately lied to you, as they were never from that region, and they well know it, because it is they who call themselves Ashkenazi Jews.

In some Cases Lies stay Lies, so as Liars stay as Liars, no matter if you call it antisemitic or whatever.

But the main Point from the Video above is actually, that they install her System at any Cost.
They initiate Wars, when someone dont agree, kill Presidents or Politicans and Peoples.
So, you may can change the System once for one Generation, what last 60 Years,
but then they come back and set it up again.
And i actually cant estimate, how far the Mafia Connections are involved there, they may do the dirty Work,
when it is about to kill someone, like it was at the Case from Kennedy,
and dont think, payed Killers are stupid, when it is about, to give out a Statement about, what they did.
But so far it is about the Money and Control they are may all in the same Boat.
Groups like Mafia similar Structures are the first ones, what have the Money to buy big Companys and take the Power over, legal or illegal.

[rickoff]

Part 3(a) of a Historical Review - Where it all went wrong.

As I stated in Part 2 of this Historical Review, things went along rather nicely up until the Civil War, but that's where it all began to go astray. Here is what happened:

1. Congress proposed and ratified a constitutional Amendment in 1865 to abolish slavery. Section 1 of the Amendment reads as follows:

United States

an act to protect all Persons in the United States in their Civil Rights, and furnish the Means of their Vindication.Persons

That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens, of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding.

subject of the United States. This was correctly not included, because the People were sovereigns, not subjects. But in 1868 a new Amendment was proposed that would redefine the meaning of US citizen. This later became known as the 14th Amendment, although for the reason stated earlier, it was actually the 15th Amendment. Section 1 of the Amendment stated,

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Take special note of the words which I emphasized in bold text. There are huge problems with this Amendment:
First of all, as discussed beforehand, the People are sovereign. The People are not subjects of, nor subject to the jurisdiction of the federal government, or any government body for that matter, even though they are born in the United States. This Amendment actually turned the relationship between the People and the government upside down. The 14th Amendment made it possible for the People to voluntarily become subjects, and this is what we have unwittingly done through contracts with Corporation U.S. While the 13th Amendment ended involuntary servitude and slavery, voluntarily servitude remained completely legal, and the Fourteenth Amendment is exactly that - if one accepts to be a Citizen of the United States as defined by the 14th Amendment, then one voluntarily subjects himself or herself to the federal government, the new slave Master. Same applies to the several States, in that one voluntarily subjects himself or herself to the State government through certain contracts, registrations, and licenses. As a 14th Amendment Citizen, one is only entitled to whatever the State or federal government grants to him or her, and only has privileges, not rights. Privileges are not unalienable rights, and they can be taken away at any time by the grantor of those rights. Prior to the 14th Amendment, the People were recognized as sovereigns equal to a King or Queen, with a sovereignty superior to that of the government, and subject only to the common law of the other Kings and Queens. The People are superior to the government, while the government is superior to "citizens" as redefined under the 14th Amendment. The inverted relationship defined in the 14th Amendment is absurd and unconstitutional. Before the 14th Amendment, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution for the United States used the term "Citizen" as a person having unalienable rights and who is equal to all other persons. The Declaration of Independence stated that the purpose of government, which is instituted by the people, is to secure these unalienable rights, and that the government derives "their just powers from the consent of the governed." So in reality, that consent is a privilege that we the people grant to our lawful government for as long as it faithfully performs the limited tasks we delegated to it, but is a privilege that we may rightfully take away from government "whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends," and "it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government."

The second problem with the 14th Amendment is section 4, which states,

The People of the South have rejected the constitutional amendment, and therefore we will march upon them and force them to adopt it at the point of the bayonet, and establish military power over them until they do adopt it.

And that is exactly what happened. The so-called 14th Amendment was improperly and unconstitutionally ratified in 1868 under duress. The state of Martial Law that was imposed by the Lincoln administration still remains in effect to this very day and, as I mentioned earlier, is the basis for Presidential executive decisions which allow the President to bypass Congress.

You may want to review the lower section of Part 2allThe Federal Reserve Bank. After a meeting held at Jekyll Island in 1913, the families agreed to fund the government with notes of credit (Federal Reserve Notes) if the government would enact a Federal Reserve Act making the 7 family banking cartel the central bank of the United States and giving them authority to print their notes as legal United States tender. This hideous Act would probably never have passed both houses of Congress had it been properly voted on, but to ensure its passage the vote was hastily called and taken on December 23rd, when most of Congress was absent and on Christmas vacation. Furthermore, while Congress had the Constitution granted right to produce coins or paper currency, the Constitution did not grant Congress the authority to delegate or assign that right to a non-governmental entity.


- continued in Part 3(b)

[rickoff]

Part 3(b) of a Historical Review - Where it all went wrong.

As you can see, 1913 was a very destructive year, not only because of passage of the Federal Reserve Act, but also because this was followed up by passage of the so-called 16th and 17th Amendments, which as I pointed out in Part1 were never properly ratified. These three outrageous changes, which were only made possible by the fact that the bankers had the upper hand and had the politicians in their pockets, were clearly designed to create wealth and opportunity for the banking elite, while at the same time further enslaving the nations citizens to endless debt. These changes accomplished the following:

• We the People in their property, wages, salaries, or earnings. It is interesting to note that in the US Supreme Court decision inBrushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 the justices rejected any claims that the 16th Amendment changed the constitutional limits on direct taxes by stating that it,

  "created no new power of taxation" and that it "did not change the constitutional limitations which forbid any direct taxation of individuals."

If you have followed along this far in this review of historical facts, you will understand how, where, and when things went wrong, and who was responsible. Of course the ultimate responsibility and blame lay with the People of this nation, for they either failed to understand what was transpiring, lacked the vigilance to keep a watchful eye on Congress, lacked the courage to demand that Congress abide by the Constitution, or, more likely, failed in all three of these essential duties.

These hideous Acts and unconstitutional Amendments set the stage, and made it possible, for what would follow later on. In 1917, Corporation U.S. entered World War I and passed the Trading With The Enemy Act, and in 1933, after Corporation U.S. went bankrupt, they adjusted the Act to recognize the people of the United States as enemies of Corporation U.S. As I reported earlier, this Act is still in effect. You may, or at least shouldBank of International Settlementspost #1981post #1981

[rickoff]

nearly all the original jurisdiction States have already successfully elected an original jurisdiction Governor. If your state does not currently have an elected original jurisdiction Governor, please think seriously about running for Governor yourself, or becoming an Elector and convincing a friend or family member to run for Governor. Even if your state already has a lawfully elected original jurisdiction Governor, you still need to get involved with ensuring that he or she is properly re-elected or succeeded by an earnest Governor, and that proper Senate appointments are made. And to ensure that everything remains on track and that the o.j. government does not fall into the hands of traitors and tyrants, or once again cease to exist, we must remain involved and ever vigilant for the remainder of our lives, and teach our children and grandchildren that this is also their duty to carry forward.

Unlike the situation with the State corporation officers, one not need be a person of wealth or influence, a lawyer, or even of superior knowledge, to become an original jurisdiction Governor. The most important factor at this time is to simply have actual and eligible persons so elected by eligible Electors (voters). It doesn't require a horde of voter turnout to elect a Governor, either. In fact, if just one eligible Elector casts a vote for an original jurisdiction Governor, and there is no other eligible candidate running who receives more votes, then that single vote will elect a lawful Governor! As you might imagine, one could register as a candidate and vote himself or herself into office, and this has in fact been done successfully. Naturally, to assure success in the government restoration effort, it would be wise to garner as many votes as possible, and that is why a coordinated effort is needed. You can safely bet that Corporation U.S., as well as the corporation States, are already aware of this plan to take our nation back, and therefore it is quite probable that they will attempt to seat their own hand-picked original jurisdiction Governors who would then attempt to thwart the legitimate movement's efforts. As they say, there is safety in numbers, and obtaining the largest number of eligible Electors to vote for a true candidate will be imperative.

Once all the governors are in place, they can, according to the Constitution, appoint United States Senators, who will in turn have the power to lawfully confirm an Electoral College vote for President and Vice President of the United States of America, and the framework for restoring our constitutional original jurisdiction government will be in place. We can accomplish all of this by 2012 if we simply make a determined grassroots effort. Remember, phase 1, the election of original jurisdiction State Governors is already nearly completed! If you are ready and willing to help move this effort ahead, please Click Here To Help!

The qualification for being an eligible Elector can vary from state to state, but would be spelled out in the various State constitutions that applied before the time of the State becoming a sub-corporation of Corporation U.S. (between the years 1962 and 1972) Generally speaking, the qualifying factors are:

• A minimum age requirement, which is 18 for most states.
• A requirement that one must be a United States citizen.
• A State and municipal residency requirement, which determines who may vote in a State election, and the location where they may vote.
• For purposes of ensuring a properly seated original jurisdiction Governor, an Elector should also be a landowner or Real Estate owner in their State of residence, as there is then no way their vote can be contested.

What Governor Madsen is doing out there in Colorado is legal, lawful and correct; and, if they accomplish what they have set out to do we will recognize that President of The United States of America as the President of The United States of America, Commander in Chief of the military and give them full military support.

I don't think that anything more needs to be said about the validity of this plan. What it will accomplish, if we pursue it, is aptly stated by Eric Madsen as follows:

In actuality, of course, that is just a short preview of the many positive changes that will take place once our lawful constitutional government is restored. The only question that must be asked is whether or not we are ready and willing to jump in, get involved, and ensure that it happens - and happens as rapidly as possible. I, for one, am willing to do whatever it takes, and I hope you will join me.

Best regards to all,

Rick

[Joit]

Another Video about the Exploitation at Capitalism,
actually shows how much they have allready implemented into the System,
and shows, there are Brains out there, what knows exactly, what they do.
‪Marxist and Austrian Class Analysis | Hans-Hermann Hoppe‬‏ - YouTube

And well, for blaiming the Peoples what did or what happens,
the simple Citizens dont have any Control about, what Politicans do, did they ever have? They only can put her Trust in it, that they do something right, in the sense from, at the Concern of the Peoples.
Therefor, more Case 3 is True, you even can see how hard it is today, to bring Peoples Politic closer, or to get them to think about, or even, understand.
And when some greater Minds criticise the System, they get even today mostly Shut down, so far as it can be done inconspicuous.
Brings up the Question, who really needs a Gouvernment.


And again sorry for dutchvico, since he cant watch Videos.

[aljhoa]

"Spin" by Brian Springer
One of the most important films
of the last 25 years
"Spin" "Spin" by Brian Springer
or
‪Media Spin by Brian Springer (Part 1)‬‏ - YouTube


6 Brainwashing Techniques They're Using On You Right Now
6 Brainwashing Techniques They're Using On You Right Now | Cracked.com

eHarmony Video Bio
61,440 likes, 17,359 dislikes
‪eHarmony Video Bio‬‏ - YouTube

Al

[aljhoa]

Fund-Raising Reports Reveal Presidential Candidate Haves -- and Have Nots
By Kathleen Ronayne and Tarini Parti on July 15, 2011 11:33 PM


Fund-Raising Reports Reveal Presidential Candidate Haves -- and Have Nots - OpenSecrets Blog | OpenSecrets


The Federal Reserve Bunk
By Harry V. Martin

CONCLUSION
No Congress, no President has been strong enough to stand up to the foreign-controlled Federal Reserve Bank. Yet there is a catch - one that President Kennedy recognized before he was slain - the original deal in 1913 creating the Federal Reserve Bank had a simple backout clause. The investors loaned the United States Government $1 billion. And the backout clause allows the United States to buy out the system for that $1 billion. If the Federal Reserve Bank were demolished and the Congress of the United States took control of the currency, as required in the Constitution, the National Debt would virtually end overnight, and the need for more taxes and even the income tax, itself. Thomas Jefferson was concise in his early warning to the American nation, "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
The Federal Reserve Bunk

Federal Reserve Act
Section 31. Reservation of Right to Amend
1. Reservation of Right to Amend
The right to amend, alter, or repeal this Act is hereby expressly reserved.
FRB: Federal Reserve Act: Section 31


Al

[aljhoa]

5.23. In designating the natives of the States, the following forms
will be used.
Alabamian Louisianian Ohioan
Alaskan Mainer Oklahoman
Arizonan Marylander Oregonian
Arkansan Massachusettsan Pennsylvanian
Californian Michiganian Rhode Islander
Coloradan Minnesotan South Carolinian
Connecticuter Mississippian South Dakotan
Delawarean Missourian Tennessean
Floridian Montanan Texan
Georgian Nebraskan Utahn
Hawaiian Nevadan Vermonter
Idahoan New Hampshirite Virginian
Illinoisan New Jerseyan Washingtonian
Indianian New Mexican West Virginian
Iowan New Yorker Wisconsinite
Kansan North Carolinian Wyomingite
Kentuckian North Dakotan

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2008_style_manual&docid=f:chapter5.wais

A national government is the government of the people of a single State, or nation, united as a community by what is termed the social compact, and possessing complete and perfect supremacy over persons and things, so far as they can be made the lawful objects of civil government. A federal government is distinguished from a national government by its being the government of a community of independent and sovereign States, united by compact. The thirty-ninth number of the "Federalist," furnishes the following distinction between a national and federal government:

http://foundinglaw.com/pages/files/PIQUA%20BRANCH%20v.%20KNOUP.pdf

Certificates of Non Citizen Nationality
Section 308 of the Immigration and Nationality Act:
Unless otherwise provided in section 301 of this title, the following shall be nationals, but not citizens of the United States at birth:
(1) A person born in an outlying possession of the United States on or after the date of formal acquisition of such possession;
Section 308 of the Immigration and Nationality Act:
Certificates of Non Citizen Nationality






Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided whether United States territories were subject to the provisions and protections of the United States Constitution.
Instead, the United States Congress had jurisdiction to create law within territories in certain circumstances, particularly dealing with revenue, that would not be allowed by the U.S. Constitution for proper states within the union. It has become known as one of the "Insular Cases".
Downes v. Bidwell - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


182 U.S. 244 (1901)
DOWNES
v.
BIDWELL.
No. 507.
Supreme Court of United States.
Downes v. Bidwell, 182, U.S. 244 190 - Google Scholar

Al

[Farmhand]

What about the Central Banks in other countries

Hi Rick and guys, I am always interested in the information presented here about the Central banking system, for you guys in the U.S. it is the Federal Reserve for us in Australia it is the Reserve Bank of Australia.

My concern is that even if the U.S. gets rid of the Federal Reserve, how would that affect the buisness between the U.S and other countries that are still saddled with the central banking system, seems to me if the U.S. abolished the federal reserve and all the other countries still have thier Central banking system run by the same folks who run the Fed there would be problems.

It appears to me that the only way would be if all countries work together to abolish the whole system or at least a fair proportion of other countries would also need to abolish the central banking system or the U.S. would be all on it's own. And with the U.N. the I.M.F. and the world bank all tied up in the mess it would seem the system is booby trapped. If an attempt is made to disarm it might explode with the rest of the tied in entities/organisations coming to the aid of the fed in some twisted way.

Any thoughts on that scenario.

Seems to me if the Fed were abolished the U.N. the I.M.F. and the World Bank folks might get upset and try to do something about it.

Cheers

[Joit]

Still wonder about, where this Guys do come from, when they did take over Englands Economy with the Event of Napoleon 17xx, and later the rest from other from the other Countrys.

Or is it in the meantime a common Agreement, how you can easy control Masses of Peoples.

For now any Election is nothing more then, you can elect the one,
from which Guy you wanna get controlled.

Another Video from a Bohemian grove meeting, where you see, what sick Peoples that are.
‪Dark Secrets inside Bohemian Grove ( Alex Jones )‬‏ - YouTube