Tweet
I would like to start this out by giving my sincerest appology to Aron for my rather rude behavour a month or so ago. I would like to say that I am a passionate man who believes that he can make a difference in this world. That being said it is time to begin.
This is all my opinion and I challenge anyone who reads these to refute any and all of that opinion.
Firstly lets look at the Human condition as we see it today and in the past. Today we are mostly consumers. We consume everything and anything we want. Look at our situation with gas and that should be the biggest indication of our direction we have been going in. We are the quintisential insashiable energy consuming animal. We are addicted to energy at any cost. As evident from the many results of that addiction, like global warming to name the worst. We know what is causing it and choose to ignore it because it would mean we would have to give up the things we enjoy the most, energy. We drive knowing full well what damage it is causing and purposely ignore the facts. Now this should be a no brainer. We could change the way we do things tomarrow by reinvigorating our lives and economy by just saying we can't do that and make real changes tomarrow. Like electric cars and such. There are a ton of cars today that will outperform gas engines but there they sit going no where. We have no excuse. We do this because we think we have no choice in the matter and we actually do have a choice. But we are led to believe we have no say in it. If we stopped buying gas the companies would go bankrupt and we could continue with the choice we needed to make. The businesses that would fall would have no choice but to change or be replaced, including our governments. Util we realize we have the power we are doomed and this world is as doomed as we are.
Now on to the subject of OU and "Free-energy". Both are farces and I'll explain why I come to that conclusion. It is well known that energy is not created only released or changes from one form to another. Some others think that there are truely open systems and to an extent that could be true but in the whole aspect that could be further from the truth. Everything in nature is cyclic for lack of a better word and that agrees with my first statement of energy is not created. In the grand scheme of things the "Whole" aspect has been thrown away to focus on the vision or resolution of your view. Nassim Haramein is my favorite theorist to date. He is on youtube with a bunch of lectures about his theories.
We are not understanding that if we channel this life giving energy, that makes everything move, we are creating a vacumm of that energy. It has been said that this energy flows like a fluid and when you poke a hole in the bottom of any container eventually it creates a vortex as the fluid drains. That vortex has many things going on. Importantly the thing that happens is that there is a void of the fluid going down to the hole. This makes a vortex and at the boundries of this phenomenon is the effects that create the vortex.. It's form so to speak. This is exactly what Tesla and Ronald Brandt experienced with trying to use this energy. At a distance it was manifesting strange and weird phenomena. Sometime this phenomena is very dangerous depending on the amount and frequency of the creation event.
Lets look at Tesla's experiences on this subject. The whole reason Tesla was looking into this was that people were getting killed while connecting the power to grids from the generator. This was the weirdest thing because the amount of energy shouldn't have been enough to affect someone outside of touching the conductor while connecting the supply. A one hertz pulse of over a million volts was detected and it puzzled Tesla to the point of examining this event. At first Tesla used copper wire and passed a million volt pulse thru it vaporising the wire. When Tesla did this it sent a shockwave hitting him and causing stinging on his face and hand the most. He thought this had something to do with minute particles of the wire exploding out from the point it vaporized. What he found out was that the event was not blockable by any material. That the event was radiant (went out from the start).
This event in my opinion is exactly what you are seeing in every pulsing experiment to date. Even pulsing a coil and recycling the results is forming a pump and manifesting electricity from the sqeezed point because this event is the basic structure of electricity. It forms vortexes that are squeezed in between the magnetic ring (the hole in the tub analogy). Thats why strange events are being manifest and reported from just about any of these experimentors. Depending on weather you tip the valance and draw more then the fluidic nature of this energy can replace do you see the resulting manifestations. Since we can not see the energy or even measure it, we have no idea where that valance point is.
It could be the whole reason why this stuff was thrown out by previous inventors and shoved to ground because it would manifest strange anomalies that were unwanted or interfered with the operation of any device including itself. It could be the reason Tesla didn't fully come out with anything after the Wardencliff incident because he knew there was something amiss or not right with the outcome.
The hearsay with Ronald Brandt is another story which is supported by Bedini's finding in that the actual batteries are changed and maybe not for the better after running on the Tesla switch and Bedini methods. Brandt's experience was one of the batteries being fluffy ie the material had less of this natural energy in them and didn't equalize back. When changed into a normal system the alternator couldn't feed enough charge back to the material of the battery and burned out in the process. My question is this did the batteries loose mass then? Were they lighter then before the month of use. Bedini was reported as saying that the batteries that were used in the test of the switch brought to him were changed and didn't accept a charge till the energy returned to the batteries 3 days later of constant charging.
The same thing could be said about any battery on a Bedini charger. Does thier mass change? Do they get lighter because they are depleted of this natural energy after long periods of being charged by this method? If this happenes to the local mass of the batteries what is it doing to the environment, including yourself, outside of the batteries?
Discuss....
This is all my opinion and I challenge anyone who reads these to refute any and all of that opinion.
Firstly lets look at the Human condition as we see it today and in the past. Today we are mostly consumers. We consume everything and anything we want. Look at our situation with gas and that should be the biggest indication of our direction we have been going in. We are the quintisential insashiable energy consuming animal. We are addicted to energy at any cost. As evident from the many results of that addiction, like global warming to name the worst. We know what is causing it and choose to ignore it because it would mean we would have to give up the things we enjoy the most, energy. We drive knowing full well what damage it is causing and purposely ignore the facts. Now this should be a no brainer. We could change the way we do things tomarrow by reinvigorating our lives and economy by just saying we can't do that and make real changes tomarrow. Like electric cars and such. There are a ton of cars today that will outperform gas engines but there they sit going no where. We have no excuse. We do this because we think we have no choice in the matter and we actually do have a choice. But we are led to believe we have no say in it. If we stopped buying gas the companies would go bankrupt and we could continue with the choice we needed to make. The businesses that would fall would have no choice but to change or be replaced, including our governments. Util we realize we have the power we are doomed and this world is as doomed as we are.
Now on to the subject of OU and "Free-energy". Both are farces and I'll explain why I come to that conclusion. It is well known that energy is not created only released or changes from one form to another. Some others think that there are truely open systems and to an extent that could be true but in the whole aspect that could be further from the truth. Everything in nature is cyclic for lack of a better word and that agrees with my first statement of energy is not created. In the grand scheme of things the "Whole" aspect has been thrown away to focus on the vision or resolution of your view. Nassim Haramein is my favorite theorist to date. He is on youtube with a bunch of lectures about his theories.
We are not understanding that if we channel this life giving energy, that makes everything move, we are creating a vacumm of that energy. It has been said that this energy flows like a fluid and when you poke a hole in the bottom of any container eventually it creates a vortex as the fluid drains. That vortex has many things going on. Importantly the thing that happens is that there is a void of the fluid going down to the hole. This makes a vortex and at the boundries of this phenomenon is the effects that create the vortex.. It's form so to speak. This is exactly what Tesla and Ronald Brandt experienced with trying to use this energy. At a distance it was manifesting strange and weird phenomena. Sometime this phenomena is very dangerous depending on the amount and frequency of the creation event.
Lets look at Tesla's experiences on this subject. The whole reason Tesla was looking into this was that people were getting killed while connecting the power to grids from the generator. This was the weirdest thing because the amount of energy shouldn't have been enough to affect someone outside of touching the conductor while connecting the supply. A one hertz pulse of over a million volts was detected and it puzzled Tesla to the point of examining this event. At first Tesla used copper wire and passed a million volt pulse thru it vaporising the wire. When Tesla did this it sent a shockwave hitting him and causing stinging on his face and hand the most. He thought this had something to do with minute particles of the wire exploding out from the point it vaporized. What he found out was that the event was not blockable by any material. That the event was radiant (went out from the start).
This event in my opinion is exactly what you are seeing in every pulsing experiment to date. Even pulsing a coil and recycling the results is forming a pump and manifesting electricity from the sqeezed point because this event is the basic structure of electricity. It forms vortexes that are squeezed in between the magnetic ring (the hole in the tub analogy). Thats why strange events are being manifest and reported from just about any of these experimentors. Depending on weather you tip the valance and draw more then the fluidic nature of this energy can replace do you see the resulting manifestations. Since we can not see the energy or even measure it, we have no idea where that valance point is.
It could be the whole reason why this stuff was thrown out by previous inventors and shoved to ground because it would manifest strange anomalies that were unwanted or interfered with the operation of any device including itself. It could be the reason Tesla didn't fully come out with anything after the Wardencliff incident because he knew there was something amiss or not right with the outcome.
The hearsay with Ronald Brandt is another story which is supported by Bedini's finding in that the actual batteries are changed and maybe not for the better after running on the Tesla switch and Bedini methods. Brandt's experience was one of the batteries being fluffy ie the material had less of this natural energy in them and didn't equalize back. When changed into a normal system the alternator couldn't feed enough charge back to the material of the battery and burned out in the process. My question is this did the batteries loose mass then? Were they lighter then before the month of use. Bedini was reported as saying that the batteries that were used in the test of the switch brought to him were changed and didn't accept a charge till the energy returned to the batteries 3 days later of constant charging.
The same thing could be said about any battery on a Bedini charger. Does thier mass change? Do they get lighter because they are depleted of this natural energy after long periods of being charged by this method? If this happenes to the local mass of the batteries what is it doing to the environment, including yourself, outside of the batteries?
Discuss....
Comment