Originally posted by Kevin
View Post
The original article seems to have been written by someone who is either vegetarian or vegan.
I was able to read the article without being baited by all their inflammatory anti-meat language.
I do not give a flying Big Mac about whether someone eats meat or not...to each their own. BUT....
I still want to know if the "facts" that were quoted about meat production (not just farts, but production of feed for the animals, running of plants/farms, transportation of meat, etc.) being less economical than production of other foods are accurate.
Almost all the posts here are talking about meat eating vs. vegetarianism/vegan. I DON'T CARE...SIDE ISSUE in this subforum.
Is the production of meat like one person riding in an SUV that gets 8 mpg?
Is the production of meat a disproportionate contributor to pollution and use of this planets resources than the production of other foods?
For you meat eaters (and I am one also) set aside your personal concerns regarding the answer to the above questions. The truth is the truth...what is it?
Even if meat is 10x more expensive to produce than alternatives, I am still going to eat meat...BUT, I would like to know. Maybe I would eat a little less...maybe I would devote personal energy to finding ways to produce meat that is more resource efficient.
But without verifying the facts about the energy used to produce meat in comparison to the energy used to produce other foods....well, all this other stuff is like a Jerry Springer show.



for the info, I will look it over!
Comment