Energy from the vacuum 7 Tesla's Impluse technology questions...

[theremart]

After watching this video for the 2nd time now, I am trying to establish a standard in my mind as to how to handle negatively charged batteries, and what is a negatively charged battery?


Where is John measuring on the video that developed scope shots that are dropping below the line, is he measuring AC with the scope? From what I can tell looks like he was connected to E ( for ground ) on the collector and C, but not sure. I have not seen those wave forms before... He terms this as negative energy, charge.


Fixing a "battery that does not accept a charge" on the video John has a garden tractor battery that does not work well accepting a charge on the window charger. I am wondering if this is the same battery that they were using before that had just put out over 60 amps till fully depleted?


Still trying to get my brain around the concepts presented...

[Joit]

I did see something strange last day.
I had a Coil running with Spikes,
one end was still connectet to Minus from a 12V batt with the Meter on it and Minus from a 9V batt
I did power the Coil with a 9V batt, and the Meter shows at the 12V Batt still spikes with 120 Volts,
means it did get load or get a charge, because the Value was positive.

[Raui]

1) Basically its his term for the battery that has been charged with his motor. The reason he calls this negative energy is that on a scope you see a huge negative spike. I remember seeing a very good picture of this I believe over at overunity by the member "NRGFromTheVacuum".

2) Not having experimented with a bedini motor with a scope I couldn't say for certain. However by knowing what I do about radiant energy its a sharp transient of dc potential on a scope so I'd say its dc.

3) I couldn't answer that one for you.

My answer maybe wrong but they are all my interpretation.

[Sephiroth]

I haven't seen part 7 yet

(I want to use a crying smiley after that but there isn't one)

*cry* *cry* *cry* (use your imagination)

but did it look similar to this?



I personally think this is a glitch with my scope so don't get excited over it...

[dambit]

After watching this video for the 2nd time now, I am trying to establish a standard in my mind as to how to handle negatively charged batteries, and what is a negatively charged battery?


Where is John measuring on the video that developed scope shots that are dropping below the line, is he measuring AC with the scope? From what I can tell looks like he was connected to E ( for ground ) on the collector and C, but not sure. I have not seen those wave forms before... He terms this as negative energy, charge.


Fixing a "battery that does not accept a charge" on the video John has a garden tractor battery that does not work well accepting a charge on the window charger. I am wondering if this is the same battery that they were using before that had just put out over 60 amps till fully depleted?


Still trying to get my brain around the concepts presented...

Hi Mart,

From what I can tell, the scope is connected accross the usual points. Collector and emmitter. The waveform that can be seen when he is using the window motor converted to run off of a monopole circuit is different, IMO, because the window motor has north and south poles whereas as normal monopole motor only has the north poles. The multiple spikes preceding the ontime are what I see when I use the wrong polarity magnets. This is my conclusion.

As far as the battery goes, they say it's the same one. I believe them but because there was a cut in the scene I'm can see why some people aren't sure.

I have converted my small solid state household battery charger to use this "impulse technology" and it seems to work fine so far. I have noticed that the waveform I saw during my temporary setup has changed since I rewired to a dedicated setup. I'm not sure why but I'm looking into it. I have also used one strand from my large solid state charger and set that up to use the impulse charging (temporarily). I have noticed that even though all of the other strands are wired normally on separate transistors, none of their neons light up when the modified strand is connected to a battery and they are not. I noticed this in the dvd also. I would have thought that only the modified strand would act as a node and the others would function as normal. I guess not.

Cheers,

Steve.

[theremart]

Testing out the demonstration of the video.

Hi Mart,

From what I can tell, the scope is connected accross the usual points. Collector and emmitter. The waveform that can be seen when he is using the window motor converted to run off of a monopole circuit is different, IMO, because the window motor has north and south poles whereas as normal monopole motor only has the north poles. The multiple spikes preceding the ontime are what I see when I use the wrong polarity magnets. This is my conclusion.

As far as the battery goes, they say it's the same one. I believe them but because there was a cut in the scene I'm can see why some people aren't sure.

I have converted my small solid state household battery charger to use this "impulse technology" and it seems to work fine so far. I have noticed that the waveform I saw during my temporary setup has changed since I rewired to a dedicated setup. I'm not sure why but I'm looking into it. I have also used one strand from my large solid state charger and set that up to use the impulse charging (temporarily). I have noticed that even though all of the other strands are wired normally on separate transistors, none of their neons light up when the modified strand is connected to a battery and they are not. I noticed this in the dvd also. I would have thought that only the modified strand would act as a node and the others would function as normal. I guess not.

Cheers,

Steve.

>RE: Collector to Emmiter.
Ok, I did not notice a change in the wave form when I switched to using a using the bridge as mentioned in the video.....

> Neon light up...
Yes I noticed what you did about the neon not lighting up. As I have tried to extract the energy from the third coil of a trifilar I found the charge rate dropped straight off that is what I see as a problem with adding different nodes. I noticed in the video John removed the node to see the increase in battery charge.

> RE: battery
I don't believe John was playing tricks on us, but the trouble with the video you don't have time frames of how long things take with the joined scenes. It would not surprise me to see that battery would not charge well after having the abuse it was put thru.

I did laugh when the 680 ohm resister did not work as I tried that resistor when i first setup the Bedini exactly to schematic and found it would not work. I was very disappointed that I could not see the scope to see what a tuned Bedini looks like when they did the window motor when he converted it to a monopole

[theremart]

Strange things...

I did see something strange last day.
I had a Coil running with Spikes,
one end was still connectet to Minus from a 12V batt with the Meter on it and Minus from a 9V batt
I did power the Coil with a 9V batt, and the Meter shows at the 12V Batt still spikes with 120 Volts,
means it did get load or get a charge, because the Value was positive.

Hi Joit...

I got something like that with the Imhotep relay... It amazed me how much voltage was in the cap, but I found a site the other day which showed me there is something like 10,000 F in a AA battery. That has changed my whole view of cap voltage. When I think of how many charges / discharges are needed on my Solid state Bedini to charge a battery that makes alot of sense.

[theremart]

RE: spikes...

I haven't seen part 7 yet

(I want to use a crying smiley after that but there isn't one)

*cry* *cry* *cry* (use your imagination)

but did it look similar to this?



I personally think this is a glitch with my scope so don't get excited over it...

you have the same type of scope I do, I have to hit it every now and then to get the picture straight. My 25 mhz scope does not give me the full details of what is going on, I noticed that Bedinis is a 200 mhz scope... so I imagine I am not getting the full picture.

Your scope pictures look much better than mine....

I have been very focused on getting better amp hours out of the batteries, I guess to me that is the bottom line, not the fancy 'h' wave but how to get the charge rate and load results out. Still working on that.

As to answering your question, it has the wave from drop down way low on the screen, I don't know how he had the scope setup to see that.

[theremart]

Thoughts...

1) Basically its his term for the battery that has been charged with his motor. The reason he calls this negative energy is that on a scope you see a huge negative spike. I remember seeing a very good picture of this I believe over at overunity by the member "NRGFromTheVacuum".

2) Not having experimented with a bedini motor with a scope I couldn't say for certain. However by knowing what I do about radiant energy its a sharp transient of dc potential on a scope so I'd say its dc.

3) I couldn't answer that one for you.

My answer maybe wrong but they are all my interpretation.

I am jealous of "NRGFromTheVacuum". he does good work and seems to understand and be able to make work what he says. I am wondering how he has learned as much as he has. He does quality work.

I am getting that from the last video, that John when he says things it relates to the scope shots.... as his diagrams on the black board as to his comments it is sorta like entering his world to understand his terminology at times

[Raui]

I am jealous of "NRGFromTheVacuum". he does good work and seems to understand and be able to make work what he says. I am wondering how he has learned as much as he has. He does quality work.

I am getting that from the last video, that John when he says things it relates to the scope shots.... as his diagrams on the black board as to his comments it is sorta like entering his world to understand his terminology at times

While I believe he does great work and I admire this alot I don't think there is any reason to be jealous of him. I think that his name is an inclination of how he got his knowledge and thats from the very series we are talking about. If you look at his youtube account he quotes a large amount of stuff from Tom Bearden and where does Tom Bearden openly talk about his theories ? The Energy From The Vacuum series.

Research is probably the best way to get knowledge on these phenomenon, he does just this and thus benefits a lot more than most because they don't experiment with the knowledge in the literatures and movies out there.