Diy magnetic field scope/a scanline e-beam plane imaging tool.

[Ufopolitics]

A Russian Experiment demonstrating the Same Magnetic Spins...

Hello to All,

This morning I had one new comment on my CRT 1 You Tube Video...with a link to an Experiment done in Russia...

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0g1bHp6-uA[/VIDEO]

Titled: Магнитное поле и Эл ток (Magnetic Field and Electric Current)

He is running a Current (Amperage) on the thin wire...and it "automatically" wraps, winds itself (...or could we also say "magically"?) around magnet... exactly in the spinning direction specified here and revealed by CRT Tool shown...Interesting test, I believe.


Regards



Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

But I have given you and all all my best test results showing OU indications. With good intentions. True technical OU or not? It is the audience task to solve the inaccuracies I can't see. But not any from the audience seems to be interested. But in your case and mine, it has something to do with phase angles.

Regards / Arne

Seaad,

I am sorry but your attempts were not "ready to use" applications...and that's what normal people wants, reason why you did not get any attention.

Whenever you prepare a "Plug and Play" OU Device, where it is proven to power loads above their consumption (Input)...only then you will have the whole WORLD ATTENTION...but just be careful, as also all the paid shills will come over to screw you up.

What I am doing here is showing how to use a very useful tool that will help you to visualize your Field behavior, magnitude plus all different pulses required.

But like in any teaching of "how to" we have to start from the first things first...just like 1st grade, 2nd, 3rd...etc,etc...until you become an "advanced user".

comprende?

Good!!


Now goodbye


Ufopolitics

[seaad]

Even if the caveman burnt out his family he still could produce fire without knowing the principle it works on. Not the principle of how to prevent proliferation. (OU-growth uncontrollably)

But I have given you and all all my best test results showing OU indications. With good intentions. True technical OU or not? It is the audience task to solve the inaccuracies I can't see. But not any from the audience seems to be interested. But in your case and mine, it has something to do with phase angles.

Regards / Arne

[Ufopolitics]

The caveman didn't understood how the chemicals in the fire was working either but he got fire.

That's a perfect example...look how many cavemen burnt out his caves with their families inside by playing with fire without the proper knowledge...

And even further on, in other times...some people were under the belief that the flames from the fire would release their demons and rise them to the skies, "purifying" their poor souls by the fire...

And now you want me to give it to you without even knowing about it?

Got to be kidding right?


Go find some sweet stuff to eat, Ant...

[Ufopolitics]

What? These equipments (vehicles) are currently and have been powered by electric motors. Here's one of the largest surface vehicles which was powered by eighteen 1000 hp electric motors. The 13,800 volt feed line could have been to a non-carbon source. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Muskie

Yep, got off topic. I'm fine taking discussion over to citfta's thread.

Regards,

bi

That was VERY FUNNY Bistander!!

Big Muskie was powered by electricity supplied at 13,800 volts via a trailing cable, which had its own transporter/coiling units to move it. The electricity powered the main drives, eighteen 1,000 horsepower (750 kW) and ten 625 horsepower (466 kW) DC electric motors. Some systems in Big Muskie were electro-hydraulic, but the main drives were all electric.[3] While working, Big Muskie used the equivalent of the power for 27,500 homes, costing tens of thousands of dollars an hour just in power costs and necessitating special agreements with local Ohio power companies to accommodate the extra load.

So it weights around 27,000,000 Pounds or 12,000 Tons (very "lightweight!!)

And the 13,800 Volts are taken to the "monster Frankie", sorry Muskie...VIA A TRAILING CABLE!!

I imagine building up that much power with batteries (yeah, deep cycle) we would need an entire city right?..so vehicle won't be able to carry that many batteries...it won't even move...

WOW!, VERY IMPRESSIVE AMUSEMENT MACHINE...

It reminded me of the old Kid Toys when there were no R/C yet...and they needed a cable from the control to the small car...

PERFECT EXAMPLE OF HOW ADVANCED WE ARE IN ELECTROMAGNETISM AND ELECTRICAL POWER!!

When did you say it would go on production?





Ufopolitics

[bistander]

What?

Yeah, sure...SO MANY BEAUTIFUL "PROTOTYPES" ...that would never make it to the Market...same ol story...for another 200 years more.
...

What? These equipments (vehicles) are currently and have been powered by electric motors. Here's one of the largest surface vehicles which was powered by eighteen 1000 hp electric motors. The 13,800 volt feed line could have been to a non-carbon source. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Muskie

Yep, got off topic. I'm fine taking discussion over to citfta's thread.

Regards,

bi

[seaad]

Help Help I'm poisoned . . . . Oooh . I'm so dizzy it's only spins

"If you do NOT understand what is BEING explained here...then HOW COULD YOU EVER UNDERSTAND OU?"
Because YOU are understanding what you yourself are writing. Then, Why don't we see any OU-unit from you?

The caveman didn't understood how the chemicals in the fire was working either but he got fire.

[Ufopolitics]

And now it's XXX turn to make a kick off.
But no OU in sight.

Have fun
Regards / Arne

If you do NOT understand what is BEING explained here...then HOW COULD YOU EVER UNDERSTAND OU?

So, shut up, and read first!

[Ufopolitics]

I see displacement. Remember that the force is on the beam, not the scanline.

Got to go. See ya

bi

That WAS NOT THE ONE I WAS REFERRING TO, OF COURSE ABOVE IS A DISPLACEMENT SINCE IT IS GOT NO CENTER POINT OF ROTATION!!.

I AM STRICTLY REFERRING TO THE SPINS FROM FRONTAL NORTH-SOUTH TO CRT HORIZONTAL SCANLINE.

Please do not play "retarded" here.

The MAGNETIC FORCE acts on the SCANLINE PLANE, NOT JUST TO THE BEAM ITSELF, BUT TO ADVANCED RASTERED PROJECTIONS OF THE BEAM...OR VERY HIGH SPEED "BEAM SAMPLINGS", WHATEVER WAY YOU WANNA PUT IT.

If the Beam would NOT be moving that fast, then we will NOT see SUCH SMOOTH SINES HERE, BUT VERY SHARP/STEEP UP AND DOWNS...LIKE NOISE SIGNALS, MAYBE FOLLOWING SAME SHAPE.

But that is NOT the case.

Besides the fact OF A SMOOTH SIGNAL CONFIRMS that Magnetic Forces are applied to DIFFERENT SPATIAL POINTS (MULTIPLE) OF THE RASTERED SCANLINE PLANE.

Ever build planes and deflect them based on spatial points-which defines spatial curves- with the help of integers to calculate their true shapes?

Here the same thing applies.

Definitively I will have to send you to check if you have ADHD


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Still do not see a SPIN??!!

Let me know whenever you do...

Now, honestly Bistander,

If you still don't see a spin on previous images...then let's take this topic over to the Open Thread and allow others to tell me it is not a spin.

Or maybe Citfta can explain your suggested "Orthogonal Lorentz Forces" with all required Graphics and calculations (since you could not do it) to this specific magnetic rotations...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Displacement

...

...

I see displacement. Remember that the force is on the beam, not the scanline.

Got to go. See ya

bi

[Ufopolitics]

And now it's XXX turn to make a kick off.
But no OU in sight.

Have fun
Regards / Arne

No ANTS HERE PLEASE!!


HEEEEELP, bring the PEST CONTROL!!!

[seaad]

And now it's XXX turn to make a kick off.
But no OU in sight.

Have fun
Regards / Arne

[Ufopolitics]

Do not see it yet?

So, YOU do not "SEE" a CLEAR SPIN on the CRT whenever we approach a NORTH or a SOUTH?

Really?...SO, please allow me to explain it in FIRST GRADE SIMPLE GEOMETRY like to an ELEMENTARY SCHOOL KID:



So, above we have a BLUE LINE "L", which could be a simple LEVER.

Then we have a PIVOT POINT IN the RED CIRCLE, located EXACTLY at CENTER of BLUE LINE "L"

Now we will apply FORCES "F1"+"F2" to BLUE LINE "L" In such fashion that FORCES "F1" PLUS "F2" follow OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS as seen above...

Both FORCES "F1" PLUS "F2" are EQUIDISTANT TO CENTER PIVOT POINT IN RED CIRCLE, This DISTANCE IS NAMED "D1"...which establishes what is known as a RADIUS DISTANCE BETWEEN POINTS WHERE FORCES "F1" PLUS "F2" ARE ACTUATING.

AFTER FORCES "F1" PLUS "F2" ARE APPLIED OVER BLUE LINE "L", and according to simple PHYSICS LAWS...BLUE LINE "L" TAKES THE POSITION L'...

So, my dear Elementary School Student Bistander, from First Grade Class of Simple Geometry...we then can conclude that :

WE HAVE ROTATED OR SPUN (PAST TENSE OF SPIN) THE BLUE LINE "L", DUE TO THE FORCES "F1" PLUS "F2" FROM THE CENTER POINT IN THE RED CIRCLE.

Now in case you still have not seen any Spins or Rotations on above Image...I took the time to make same image but with a BLACK BACKGROUND, in order to stand out all the components in the explanation...Yes, I know I am a good teacher...



And by now...if you still do not see any spins in BOTH IMAGES above, My dear Student....then I will have no other recourse but to submit you to the Psychology Dept. of the ELEMENTARY SCHOOL to run some tests...JUST BECAUSE YOU MAY HAVE A SYNDROME OF ATTENTION...OR WHAT IS CALLED ADHD

Even though I hope to see you soon in my next class...


Be a good kid and stay out of trouble.


God Bless You


Ufopolitics

Still do not see a SPIN??!!

Let me know whenever you do...

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufo,

Many of the vehicles in groups 2, 3 & 4 do use electric motor propulsion systems. And electric powered aircraft is rapid developing. I have seen where NASA has worked on an electric 747.

Yeah, sure...SO MANY BEAUTIFUL "PROTOTYPES" ...that would never make it to the Market...same ol story...for another 200 years more.

NASA?...PLEASE DON'T BRING NASA HERE!!!....SIMPLY: SPACE X A "NEW IN TOWN" PRIVATELY OWNED CORPORATION by ELON MUSK, a guy that just "walked in" have achieved what NASA with all the MONEY IN THE WORLD PLUS ALL THE TIME THEY HAVE BEEN "ESTABLISHED"...BIG MONEY they have stolen from Government Funds PLUS ALL CONTRIBUTORS...HAVE NEVER BEING ABLE TO LAND BACK THE FIRST STAGE PROPULSION ENGINES WITH THEIR HUGE TANKS AND SOOO SYNCHRONIZED LIKE SPACE X DID!!!

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0-pfzKbh2k[/VIDEO]

THEN LANDS MAIN ROCKET IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SEA...

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEr9cPpuAx8[/VIDEO]

ALL NASA HAS DONE IS BLOW THEM OUT IN THE SKY BEFORE LEAVING EARTH ATMOSPHERE

NASA HAS DEVELOPED -OVER SO MANY YEARS- A "BEST" COST OF AROUND 10,000 USD per POUND to be "LIFTED" THEN SENT to SPACE...WHILE, SPACE X IS DOING IT FOR 1,000 USD/POUND...!!

What about high speed rail. The fastest trains in the world are electric. And that power could easily be generated by hydro or renewable sources not using carbon emitting technology.

High Speed Rails (TRAINS) are BS to bring it into this conversation...and you know exactly why.

High Speed Rails Vehicles require SUPER MEGA CONSTRUCTIONS, in order to Provide POWER ON THE TRACKS THROUGH ALL DESTINATIONS...LAUGHABLE PROJECTS, REALLY!!

Oh, but surely they could run over and over without any "recharge" right?
B.S...They feed off the track lines...or just like the San Francisco Old Cable Trolleybuses built near the Western Cowboys Stories...?

Counting that as an "ACHIEVEMENT"?...PLEASE, DO NOT INSULT MY INTELLIGENCE BISTANDER!!

All that was is Pathetic and Ridiculous!!

I am actually attempting to help you. Pointing out a flaw or discrepancy in your theories could be constructive criticism leading to deeper uderstanding. But taking a defensive posture is only human nature.

Thanks but nope thanks!

I do not need your "kind" of help Bistander, where you completely refuse to see a ROTATION or a SPIN, where CLEARLY THERE IS ONE.

BTW, I've said before. Show me an over unity machine and I'll replicate it. I've built and tested many energy machines which I knew would work. I avoid building stuff I know won't work.

Regards,

bi

That's a very comfortable position you have MAN!!!

Wait till someone BRAKES HIS BACK, WASTES HIS MONEY, TESTING, BUILDING, TESTING AGAIN, HAVING FRUSTRATIONS BACK AND FORTH...SO, THEN VERY EASILY, YOU, MR BISTANDER, JUST "STEPS IN" AND "REPLICATE IT SUCCESSFULLY"....

REALLY?

NOPE!!...IF YOU HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO WRITE A DENIAL UPON ANY STATED CLAIM, THEN YOU MUST BUILD IT TO PROVE IT EITHER RIGHT OR WRONG, BESIDES HELPING THE OTHER MEMBER TO ACHIEVE IT RIGHT!!!....

THAT IS WHAT IS NEEDED HERE!!!

UNLESS YOU ARE A PAID SHILL, TO JUST CONSTANTLY INTERFERE WITH ANY NEW THEORIES AND DESTROY THEM FOR A FEE.

And I honestly believe-and hoping- you are NOT one of those DISGUSTING HUMAN BEINGS.


Regards


Ufopolitics