Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

An Inquiry in to the Alien Reproduction Vehicle

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bugfly
    replied
    Originally posted by Gambeir View Post
    Eloquently stated Bugsfly. It's the slowing of this energy field via a focused organized array of crystalline lattices which produces results.
    Not quite. An open circuit differs from a closed circuit only in that it can not provide current. For example if You have closed circuit with capacitor then it is not a closed circuit. Current cannot flow through it. The alternating current that can flow in this case is not a current in the full sense of the word. The current is something closed at the level of the crystal lattice, and not at the level of transients...

    Leave a comment:


  • Gambeir
    replied
    Originally posted by robur View Post
    Somewhere before you have mentioned High Spin Elements.
    That you named a Aluminum. Copper, Bismuth.

    Not just those

    It is:
    Aluminum
    Copper
    Bismuth
    Gold
    Zinc
    Magnesium


    Lesser effect give:
    Lead
    Tin
    Silver
    Silicone

    No effect or next to nothing are Ferro-Magnetics

    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    If arrange them according to their effectiveness - it is as follows:

    1.Bismuth

    2.Magnesium

    3.Gold

    4.Copper

    5.Aluminium

    6.Zinc

    7.Tin

    8.Lead

    9. Silicone

    10.Silver

    -----------------------------------------------------------------

    Now

    Most of the elements we know are Para magnetic or Diamagnetic
    With exception of those:

    Iron Ferromagnetic
    Cobalt Ferromagnetic
    Nickel Ferromagnetic

    And chromium which is: Chromium Antiferromagnetic

    Mercury should be on the list too, but because it exists in a unique liquid state - it needs a very special set-up in order to be successful applied. So I will not include it in this explanation.



    Now the Magnetic properties of the listed Elements as follows:


    1.Silicon Diamagnetic
    2.Copper Diamagnetic
    3.Zinc Diamagnetic
    4.Silver Diamagnetic
    5.Tin Diamagnetic
    6.Gold Diamagnetic
    7.Lead Diamagnetic
    8.Bismuth Diamagnetic
    9.Magnesium Paramagnetic
    10.Aluminium Paramagnetic


    Now the crystal structure chart


    1.Silicon Tetrahedral Packing
    2.Copper Face-centered Cubic
    3.Zinc Simple Hexagonal
    4.Silver Face-centered Cubic
    5.Tin Centered Tetragonal
    6.Gold Face-centered Cubic
    7.Lead Face-centered Cubic
    8.Bismuth Base-centered Monoclinic
    9.Magnesium Paramagnetic
    10.Aluminum Face-centered Cubic

    Please note that from materials listed only Bismuth is Base-centered Monoclinic
    Only other 2 known elements with this structure are:
    Oxygen Base-centered Monoclinic
    Fluorine Base-centered Monoclinic

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------

    Now

    When arranging your dialectic device if we consider TT Brown set-up as an example - you would want to arrange your 2 metals to differ in magnetic property and also in crystal structure.

    In some set-ups, however 2 metals in question can have the same crystal structure and only differ in magnetic properties

    I will not go into Dialectric charts today - will take too long and I want some sleep.

    As example of your set-up you could have Aluminum and Bismuth
    Gold and Bismuth
    Zync and Tin
    Please continue Robur; I know this is the sort of serious understanding accomplished through extensive study and long hours and I very much want to hear all you're willing to share.

    A Zinc Magnesium alloy appears to be the material used in the so-called capacitor plates of the ARV/Flux Liner. While recovery of UFO debris that crashed on Hill 611 in Russia contained a matrix of fine gold wire substrate sheathed in quartz.


    It appears to me these are different operating systems because of the materials used. The material recovered form Hill 611 suggests an operating system which is based on Woodward Effect, or so called mass cancellation, while the ARV/Flux Liner appears to be either working as described by Mark McCandlish as a form of Miguel Alcubierre's space warp drive, or by or through another alternative means.
    Last edited by Gambeir; 11-18-2018, 09:12 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • spacecase0
    replied
    Originally posted by lotec View Post
    Ive heard that ARV has a homo polar generator. I always wondered what would happen if power was taken from all points of the circumference, causing the disk to be saturated radially with current. At what point would the flux curl around, and where would the magnetic poles form? Would that interact with gravity in someway? Or would that make make a bunch of counter rotating mono poles?
    I have thought lots about this topic
    many formats that could have been done, including putting something like an iron segmented disk (like spokes) in the middle of aluminum, but no matter how they set it up, I bet the field ends up being a vertically pointed field that is rotating (just like in the MAGVID method 2)

    Leave a comment:


  • lotec
    replied
    Ive heard that ARV has a homo polar generator. I always wondered what would happen if power was taken from all points of the circumference, causing the disk to be saturated radially with current. At what point would the flux curl around, and where would the magnetic poles form? Would that interact with gravity in someway? Or would that make make a bunch of counter rotating mono poles?

    Leave a comment:


  • robur
    replied
    Gone by request
    Last edited by robur; 07-26-2020, 02:55 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gambeir
    replied
    Originally posted by Bugfly View Post
    Ok. I Got it...

    3:06 - 3:20
    Well, it seems then Ken talking about inertia, his inertia means something that is not fully a manifestation of inertia ...
    Inertia is the response to our impact, all conservative forces are inertia.
    So this is not what I was talking about.
    In any case, the main thing that became clear about what Ken says.
    A dielectric field is another geometric organization of the electric field.
    So the electric field is what flows in a closed circuit where there is a current.
    And dielectric field is something that flows in an open circuit.


    Regards
    Bugfly
    Eloquently stated Bugsfly. It's the slowing of this energy field via a focused organized array of crystalline lattices which produces results. Magnets are but one lens to focus these energies, they can act as a guide to understanding, and whereby this concept leads to other outcomes, and those outcomes have been explored but are largely un~recognized, because underneath our worldly conception of reality is the real reality of human suffering for profit, de-population, and ultimately for absolute mind control as the final objective.

    Not all crystals are equal, some are opposite crystals, left handed crystals as they say. One might suppose, with some creative deduction, that the certain disease's are more related to this quality than anyone is yet willing to acknowledge, at least officially so. The connection of crystals involvement in the formation of misfolded protien's involved in a plethora of both fatal and non fatal neurodegenerative diseases has been all but ignored, however there is an obvious connection to the involvement of crystals in the formation of these misfolded protiens, and it is almost certain that to be able to understand the connection requires the comprehension of the Aether. The Aether as an energy source, and as applied to crystals, is critical to comprehending the role of crystalline lattice structures, biological or inanimate, as the critical enabling tool that has almost certainly lead to previously unheard of weaponized diseases ranging from HIV to what today is now an Alzheimer's epidemic.


    Richard Rhodes: Deadly Feasts

    Complete summary of Richard Rhodes' The Making of the Atomic Bomb. eNotes plot summaries cover all the significant action of The Making of the Atomic Bomb.

    This gripping study of ``mad cow disease'' by Rhodes (The Making of the Atomic Bomb, 1987, etc.) weaves careful research and powerful stories into a chilling narrative that often reads more like science fiction. Indeed, Kurt Vonnegut's Cat's Cradle gets credit for prescience at one point: The plot of that novel involves an aberrant form of ice crystal that freezes the oceans and brings about the end of life on earth. For ice crystal, read ``prion,'' the term coined by Stanley Prusiner, a California biochemist/neurologist, to describe a proteinaceous infectious particle that is thought to work by triggering the aberrant folding of a normal brain protein. The end result is fatty deposits in the brain, holes where nerve cells used to be, and, eventually, death. There is no cure. The scary thing about the TSEs (transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, a generic term used to refer to several diseases generating this damage in humans and animals) is that they can be passed within, and sometimes across, species by the consumption of suspect tissues. (Many kinds of animal feed include ground-up animal parts.) Normal chemicals and heat treatment that inactivate DNA do not, for some reason, destroy TSE agents. Rhodes faults the British for being terribly slow to get started slaughtering infected herds and for failing to insure that farmers complied with new regulations for feed preparation. He goes on to assert that there is enough evidence to suggest that Americans may also fall victim to cross-species brain diseases: the animal TSEs exist here, and we are regularly exposed to a variety of products (milk, meat, gelatin) that may carry infection. Rhodes's argument, that suveillance and protection are needed as much as research, is persuasive. A powerful and alarming book. (First serial to Washington Post magazine; Book-of-the-Month Club/Quality Paperback Book Club alternate selection; author tour)
    Last edited by Gambeir; 11-18-2018, 02:46 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gambeir
    replied
    Originally posted by robur View Post
    I looked the first page of this thread to see what this 1 is all about.

    That thingy called The Flux Liner

    I have sent you a PM, GAMBEIR about yesterday may be you didn't see.

    I have with help of a friend conducted some tests on this subject.
    I would like to show you videos, but I am a little vary on putting them on open forum.

    May be you could reply me on PM?

    My tests in the area currently stuck
    IF Possible I would of liked to find another tester
    But I understand this is p[probably impossible
    I've been researching electret's which is the reason for the slow reply. I just checked back in this AM and saw your message. I wouldn't say that I'm at the point of experiments but I am certain that you're heading the right direction whatever those might be.

    Now when I first encountered the word electret I really had no idea what it was. I had never heard of it or if I had I had quickly forgotten about it.

    Michael Faraday suggested the possibility to polarize a dielectric material so as to produce 'a Dielectric Body which retains an electric moment after the externally-applied electric field has been reduced to zero in 1839, and to whom we credit the invention of an electret, but it was Oliver Heaviside whom named the material "electret" as an analogy to a magnet but Faraday's suggestion of the the possibility and Heaviside's renaming of the material was to remain a scientific concept until 1922 when a Japanese Navy Captain named Motoaro Eguchi, a professor of physics at the Higher Naval College of Tokyo produced the first real electret.

    How to Make an Electret; the Device That Permanently Maintains an Electric Charge
    by C. L. Strong (*1960)

    Leave a comment:


  • Bugfly
    replied
    Originally posted by aljhoa View Post
    "Capacitor manipulates" dielectric field
    Ok. I Got it...

    3:06 - 3:20
    Well, it seems then Ken talking about inertia, his inertia means something that is not fully a manifestation of inertia ...
    Inertia is the response to our impact, all conservative forces are inertia.
    So this is not what I was talking about.
    In any case, the main thing that became clear about what Ken says.
    A dielectric field is another geometric organization of the electric field.
    So the electric field is what flows in a closed circuit where there is a current.
    And dielectric field is something that flows in an open circuit.


    Regards


    Bugfly

    Leave a comment:


  • aljhoa
    replied
    Originally posted by Bugfly View Post
    Hello aljhoa!

    The green one is dielectric.
    It is polarized and thus creates its own internal electrical field E2.
    So E2 is a dielectric field? Am I wright?



    "Capacitor manipulates" dielectric field, see:

    @5:56 - 🔷 DIELECTRICITY 🔷 Is the nature of dielectricity a conspiracy or human ignorance?

    @5:02 - Yes, little Timmy, the ETHER DOES EXIST, and proof of same is Everywhere around you

    Al

    Leave a comment:


  • Bugfly
    replied
    Originally posted by robur View Post
    First - in the the Alex's device I don't see any dialectic what so ever. Just bare metal disks.
    Hello robur!
    You mean Dielectric field may be! If I understood Ken Wheeler correctly, then this is nothing more than an internal electric field. All elements of the circuit have an internal electric field. For example, the power source has an internal electric field directed against the electric field that it creates itself. From the point of view of the dielectric located between the plates of the capacitor this is also internal electric field of this dielectric. The dielectric was polarized and an internal electric field appeared inside it. I think your misunderstanding is due to the fact that here in Russia this is called the internal electric field. And we call a dielectric a non-conductive substance. An internal electric field appears wherever there is a change in the density of the medium. The central metal disk consists of metal, not air, so it is polarized and has an internal electric field.

    As for the self-sustaining process of flight. I think this is not a problem, the problem will be exactly where to get energy to maintain this process. If there is too much energy, you can always create a scheme in which exactly the same scheme is duplicated. And you will stop one scheme by the another, if you need it. So I think control is not a problem.

    Regards


    Bugfly

    Leave a comment:


  • Bugfly
    replied
    Hello aljhoa!
    Very interesting illustrations of the process of magnetism.
    But the concept of dielectric field is new to me, I did not understand it, maybe this is a problem of terminology.
    I will try to explain how I imagine it. Watch this video: https://youtu.be/KBJl1qiYOgo
    The polarization of a dielectric can be represented as a counter-electric field.
    Look at this picture:

    Here is a capacitor, between the plates of which there is an electric field E1.
    Now we put a dielectric between the capacitor plates:

    The green one is dielectric.
    It is polarized and thus creates its own internal electrical field E2.
    So E2 is a dielectric field? Am I wright?
    It's just in Russia we have other terms for this case, so I did not get it.
    It is interesting, while I was trying to figure it all out, I found that the tesla coil field is a toroid:

    2:54 - 3:33
    If we compare it with the solenoid field: https://youtu.be/kpAb8vfah0c
    It is very different, as if the magnetic circuit would be closed with iron filings like here:

    But what has changed?

    0:37 - 5:37
    The only difference is that we have a constant potential difference between adjacent turns, while in a conventional solenoid, the potential difference between adjacent turns constantly changes from turn to turn.
    As if something is decreasing while while something else is increasing at the same time from turn to turn. And in the tesla coil this to things remains constant from turn to turn.
    Ken Wheeler explained that the reason for this difference is just dielectric field which is a separate entity. I think this is a strange approach. The inertia and all its manifestations are on the other side in the counter-space. We cannot influence it directly, only indirectly. Thus, we need to look for something in our space, and not to climb into counter-space. For example we need to understand how the magnetic flux closes in the circuit and toroid appears. This close circuit, the toroid. Of course I could be wrong...

    Regards


    Bugfly
    Last edited by Bugfly; 11-17-2018, 01:28 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • robur
    replied
    Gone by request
    Last edited by robur; 07-26-2020, 02:55 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • robur
    replied
    Gone by request
    Last edited by robur; 07-26-2020, 02:55 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bugfly
    replied
    Hello Ufopolitics!!! I think You wright!
    The rotation of the opposite flows of so called Edward Leedskalnin northern and southern magnets is carried out in the same direction and their inertial counterparts rotate in the other direction. Unfortunately, I have no experiment in this case, but there is some mythological explanation. I hope you have nothing against esoteric myths. I must say that I personally do not consider all these myths as something divine.
    These are all symbolic messages to us so that we can develop. It has nothing to do with god, etc. Maybe at the initial stages of the development of society it was the only way to weave this information into the culture of people. Religions began to appear. But now only idiots build cults around this. Cults only hinder the understanding of the information that is hidden in them, because their main task is not understanding, but the development of a cult organization.
    Anyway, here is a myth for our case: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samudra_manthan
    The Asuras demanded to hold the head of the snake, while the Devas, taking advice from Vishnu, agreed to hold its tail.




    Asuras represent real space, and in fact what is happening in it. Thus the part of the serpent Vasuki located between the twist around the mountain and the asuras is in the real world and it is visible. Devas represent counter-space, and in fact what is happening in it. Thus, the part of the serpent Vasuki located between the twist around the mountain and the devas is in counter-space and it is invisible.
    But then the fun begins. Look at "Trishula" a Shiva trident.

    Complete with a trident usually goes drum a shiva damaru.


    Now let's put together all that i said before and we will got this:



    Obviously damaru is a magnetic field of the solenoid.
    And the Vasuki serpent or trident is the galaxy spiral arms.

    Now we just need to understand how the galaxy spiral arms are arranged.
    But it is still very difficult...

    Regards


    Bugfly

    Leave a comment:


  • aljhoa
    replied
    Originally posted by Bugfly View Post
    It is already obvious that these two streams of northern and southern magnets actually rotate.
    Their mutual rotation leads to the shrink of the coin.
    "Collapsing supefluid" compresses electromagnet's center.

    🔷 DIELECTRICITY 🔷 Is the nature of dielectricity a conspiracy or human ignorance?


    Al
    Last edited by aljhoa; 11-16-2018, 08:09 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X