An Inquiry in to the Alien Reproduction Vehicle

[robur]

Gone by request

[aljhoa]

I think it could only exist if Einstein is right and that space can be warped, but what if instead of warped space the truth was that the speed of counter-space is instantaneous? Spooky action at a distance, or just the speed of counter-space? So the Gate might be real, but the warped space isn't, it's just a porthole to instantaneous speed. The warped space idea is probably just another movie prop created to lend support Einsteinian Physics and to keep us all bamboozled; that's what I think.

PS: They tell us things and so what is that Star Gate depicted as being on the inside? It's a fluid isn't it? Can it all be so accidental?

∴ "Super-fluid cavitation hammer", "Rede October - sub" or ΔP are AV propulsion modes in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:L...not-small).png

Al

[Gambeir]

What about?





Al

I think it could only exist if Einstein is right and that space can be warped, but what if instead of warped space the truth was that the speed of counter-space is instantaneous? Spooky action at a distance, or just the speed of counter-space? So the Gate might be real, but the warped space isn't, it's just a porthole to instantaneous speed. The warped space idea is probably just another movie prop created to lend support to Einsteinian Physics and to keep us all bamboozled; that's what I think.

PS: They tell us things and so what is that Star Gate depicted as being on the inside? It's a fluid isn't it? Can it all be so accidental?

[Gambeir]

[sinergicus]

nice effect on tesla slayer circuit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BL6-2DOn_8

[aljhoa]

What about?





Al

[Gambeir]

The establishment always maximizes it's successes and minimize it's failures.

Quantum electrodynamics is a dubious proposition because spectral evidence is not science. One could more convincingly argue that an invisible hyper-velocity energy field is responsible for seemingly mystical physical alterations in our own energy field: The aether is ΔP super-fluid, but to recognize that means there's no such thing as virtual quantum anything, and rather that the truth is the existence of an unrecognized, unexplored, and officially denied energy field.

The Alexey device must be connecting with the superfluidity of counter-space, or else it has to be creating a so-called false mass, or creating a magnetic field capable of repelling itself from the Earths' gravitational field which would seem to indicate a possible creation of room temp super conduction, but it seems to me that it has to be one of the three or a combination thereof. It's this possible connection with counter-space that makes me think of holes, but the hole isn't in counter-space, rather the hole is a hole connecting to counter-space and superfluidity of that energy field. So the Nobel Laureate has stated it in reverse and which frankly is exactly what I've come to expect out of the officially approved educators.

[aljhoa]

was this post

If there was a "hole/void" in the super-fluid/aether,
you would not be "flying" approximately 600 miles per second.

Al

[spacecase0]

Where did you see a hole in Aether in the first place?

was this post

or a void/bubble creating ΔP super-fluid

Robert B. Laughlin, Nobel Laureate in Physics, endowed chair in physics, Stanford University, had this to say about ether in contemporary theoretical physics:
""

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_theories

Al

[robur]

Where did you see a hole in Aether in the first place?

[spacecase0]

Pray for the day they face a firing squad for crimes against humanity is all I can say.

the last thing the control grid wants to do is to put me on the other side while annoyed with them.
would think it is about the same way the other way around.
just for a moment, really think about what is possible.

[Gambeir]

seems to me that we are in the middle of terminology hell
I have tried to clear up the meanings of the words, but Wheeler refused to answer me as far as definitions...
(in my opinion, a book without defining special terms is written in code, one that may never be decoded)
so we are left with his references to tesla and others in that thought line.
if that is true, then counterspace is a field format that would otherwise be a particle of some sort, but the fields are not strong enough to actually manifest in this reality.

a void in the aether would be something else entirely

Yea, well it going to take time to get this assimilated and right now we have active aggressive counter measures trying to keep people in the dark. It's like Tesla, we all know Tesla but google likes to pretend that it's either Elon Musk or a car, so that's the kind of communist corporatism that we are living with right now. Pray for the day they face a firing squad for crimes against humanity is all I can say.

Anyways there's no hole in the Aether, it's more like connecting to the Aether by artificially tearing/peeling away the electro-magnetic forces which perturb the Aether. At least that's the way I'm seeing this right now.

[Gambeir]

or a void/bubble creating ΔP super-fluid

Robert B. Laughlin, Nobel Laureate in Physics, endowed chair in physics, Stanford University, had this to say about ether in contemporary theoretical physics:
"…studies of radioactivity began showing that the empty vacuum of space had spectroscopic structure similar to that of ordinary quantum solids and fluids. Subsequent studies with large particle accelerators have now led us to understand that space is more like a piece of window glass than ideal Newtonian emptiness. It is filled with 'stuff' that is normally transparent but can be made visible by hitting it sufficiently hard to knock out a part. The modern concept of the vacuum of space, confirmed every day by experiment, is a relativistic ether. But we do not call it this because it is taboo."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_theories

Al

Yes, that is how I'm seeing it but I hate to agree at all with the analogy due to comparison to the Aether being like glass when the only quality it shares with glass is an invisibility.

Now from what I've observed, and from what I can remember, the UFO flying Block Building had dull glowing circular lights on the bottom which were very large in diameter, and appeared to have concentric ring patterns, like maybe 4 concentric rings of pale yellow color. What it reminded me of was atmospheric plasma actuators (Glow Discharge Panels).
How to build your Glow Discharge Plasma Panel

However, considering materials which might be exposed to UV radiation, such as aluminum in the Alexey Device, then a fluorescence otherwise invisible to the naked eye does occur when the radiation is exposed to ultraviolet light, and thus a fluorescence of color becomes visible to the naked eye. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorescence

Considering the array of lights displayed by UFO's this is maybe something to consider which appears to be related to a great deal of inquiry in to so called Electroluminescent materials: All this quantum nonsense is making people forget common sense. All kinds of natural phenomena exhibit what might otherwise be mistaken for quantum light effects. So before anyone goes leaping after these catch word explanations like quantum this or that think twice because the odds of that being correct are astronomically high given the known probably that an down to earth explanation probably already exists.

Example: Optoelectronic materials
Electroluminescent materials: Metal complexes of 8-hydroxyquinoline

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127518305033

Fran De Aquino has shown weight loss with UV radiation involving aluminum foil and black light and has talked about "bubbles of localized space-time" that can exist in variance to the surrounding fields, but the problem with Aquino's work is it's all Einsteinian based and really if you take what he says and just apply Wheelerism instead what you're really talking about here is an altered local medium which obviously would be a sort of bubble. Any how I didn't observe any time variant problems with the Alexey so that seems to indicate something right there.

[spacecase0]

seems to me that we are in the middle of terminology hell
I have tried to clear up the meanings of the words, but Wheeler refused to answer me as far as definitions...
(in my opinion, a book without defining special terms is written in code, one that may never be decoded)
so we are left with his references to tesla and others in that thought line.
if that is true, then counterspace is a field format that would otherwise be a particle of some sort, but the fields are not strong enough to actually manifest in this reality.

a void in the aether would be something else entirely

[aljhoa]

If you use the rising bubble analogy as porthole to envision the cause and effect, then what might be happening is a tearing away, or peeling back of what I can only describe as interference of disorganized energies found in disorganized matter, so that the center aligns with counter-space, more akin to how a magnets crystals are aligned, creating a more direct connection to counter-space as well as removing weight: Maybe exposure might be a better way of seeing it. If that's the case then the faster you can accomplish this peeling the more powerful the effect should be.

Actually Bugsfly has suggested this by stating that in the Alexey Device it's the spinning magnets which prevent the shrinking from injected HF/HV energy via the Tesla Coil (Z-Pinch Effect). I would say that from what we have so far this is a reasonable idea that makes a lot of sense.

or a void/bubble creating ΔP super-fluid

Robert B. Laughlin, Nobel Laureate in Physics, endowed chair in physics, Stanford University, had this to say about ether in contemporary theoretical physics:
""

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_theories

Al