Magnetic field of a bifilar pancake coil

[Allen Burgess]

Quadfilar with 2" Neo sphere spinner in the air core.

This Quadfilar coil powered very strong Neo spheres; The 1" sphere at "Pre Mach" velocity. These repeated magnet spins must have had a deep effect on the orbital alignment of the electrons. The altered copper atoms in the wires may have even transmuted the element into a higher isotope:

[Allen Burgess]

5 Teslas & 68 Megaohms.

68 million Ohms and 5 Teslas of magnetic force inside that single solid copper conductor. That's what these measurments are telling us! The coil may be radioactive and emitting Gamma radiation. I'm locking the coil in the trunk of my car down in the parking lot to be on the safe side!

[Allen Burgess]

Transmutation of elements.

Dr. Mehran Tavakoli Keshe stated that he transmuted 5 metric tons of gold for Muammar Gaddafy; Staring with spin coils of Tungsten wire, it should be possible to restructure the electron shells to transmute the conductor to the near element of Platinum with the correct spin frequency and Neo sphere Gauss.

[Allen Burgess]

New material strength.

We could pull a freight train with a thin length of this super strength wire. Imagine the farads of capacitance a dielectric of this new material would yield, coupled with a nano carbon super conductor.

[mikrovolt]

Allen,
The reason for starting a separate thread would respect the original
posting Evostar began discussing What Tesla had said about his patented pancake coil whereas the subject of variant bifiiar coils
might be too divergent here, a more generalized discussion of variant bifilar might work out as new topic.
That way the material that he worked on will be easier for someone to follow later.

Inductors should be measured within a reasonable range for a given frequency.
Also the meter is going crazy with big bifilars because it is not a complex inductance meter.
Using Wheatstone's inductance bridge would need a design modification where the reference inductor is bifilar.
As the video showed the Gauss was strong over a frequency range. That formula may need to be derived.
Proving what you are saying and having the right setup may actually show you are correct for these inductors.

However Tesla's bifilar pancake function is mathematically different as stated in his patent.

Some here are already aware of the variant differences so
we must be reasonable as guest on this thread to be careful using meters based on standard inductance configuration.

Remembering what happens on the overunity forum further speculation is not fair to the author and likely
to lead to some awkward reply and then any retaliation would be considered bad behavior. kss my ask for example
Shooting oneself in the foot is not preferred over moving to a new thread, in line
with any new EQ emotional intelligence guidelines what board member Paul Babcock stated that those should be warned then
if they persist should be removed. This discussion happened just before the last convention and a policy may have been
adopted by Aaron for here also. So we simply apologize and move new thread rather than offend as off topic, please.

[Allen Burgess]

Lorentz's force law.

@Mikrovolt,

Thanks for your input. The inference that my comments are off topic on a thread that focuses on the magnetic field of a bifilar coil I find mistaken. The value of the "Negative Henry" in measuring magnetic force grew controversial. My original position remains unchanged.

Take a look at this description of "Lorentz's Force Law" as it applies to the 10x magnetic force increase on your larger bifilar coil:

The Lorentz force equation; F = Field strength in Tesla x Length of wire effectively in the field in meters x Current flowing through the wire in Amps.

You imply in your video that the custom circuit you designed and offer for sale (Spooky2) is the "secret" behind the 10x magnification of the larger bifilar coil and not the simple arithmetic I outlined above. There's no "Hocus Pocus" involved with the law I printed above. Your motive for ridiculing me is therefore somewhat spurious.

[mikrovolt]

Allen I have known you some time now and have been peaceful with you
I recall many of your posts and comments. Also want to see your work with
those coils continue. Making improvement and not getting booted.

Sorry I have no intention of any ridicule at all in fact I would like to see
you succeed in solving the phenomena. You may have to refresh my
memory on the math that it works for that type of bifilar.
I would like to see that put into an inductance bridge design.
That way people can see the math agrees.

The video and the spooky2 is not mine. I am glad you responded
to that post. You can accomplish the same thing by starting yours
or mine I am interested in making use of that increased magnetic
field strength per watt and missed the part about the spooky2 claim !
also like to solve what is really going on with negative inductance.
I am agreeable with going further on that. Hopefully on a different thread
That is why I posted the video because it supports bifilar as an improvement.

I also have posted a lot videos in hopes of picking up the forum.
Feel free to private message me anytime I feel we can work
out any issues as often our work does feel personal but the goal
is the same. I pick up on most implications that
you have posted over the years. Right now I really need
some cooperation and resolve. Thanks Joe

[Allen Burgess]

New threads.

@Mikrovolt,

I really don't understand your urgency about starting new threads. What's the problem with using this thread? I'm testing a bifilar coil for a magnetic field; Why do you feel that's an inappropriate subject for this thread when it's spot on?

Evostars just wound a bifilar coil with the same speaker wire I used on my spiral coil. I just asked him to make some inductance measurements. Why do you want to start acting pushy with me?

[Bob Smith]

Allen, I believe your quadfilar coils have serious merit and deserve their own thread. I think this is all Mikrovolt is saying. I've been intrigued since seeing your quadfilar coil self-powering LEDs on YouTube, and would like to know more (in fact, I went out and bought a four stranded spool of speaker wire to try it out).

I think this thread would benefit from your findings, but things will move ahead more clearly if the discussion stays focused on flat series wound coils as per Evo's original design.

Again, let me emphasize that I feel your quadfilar coil findings have merit very worthy of their own thread. As things become more politically uncertain, many of us would welcome the chance to find a source of ambient energy to help power out homes or at least lights, should the grid experience trouble. I for one would like to see your quadfilar research get some serious consideration in a dedicated thread.
Saludos,
Bob

[Allen Burgess]

Bob Smith reply

@Bob Smith,

Thanks Bob, I value you opinions very highly. I think the new thread would be bettor suited for the Overunity web site where I contribute as member Synchro1.

One last parting observation: I believe that the copper wire has transmuted into the element Molybdenum. I plan to place two segments of wire, one copper and the other the silver grayish wire from the Quadfilar, into a crucible and raise the temperature to the melting point of copper; If they both melt, that will tell us I'm wrong; If the copper segment melts and the grayish wire doesn't, we'll know transmutation occurred.

[Allen Burgess]

Speaker wire pancake bifilar coil.

@evostars,

Your speaker wire coil is not a pancake bifilar with one wire over the other instead of alongside. Take a minute to examine how the speaker wires lay flat in my spiral configuration. This video gives us a view of the spiral quadfilar without the electrical tape:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XMfCpUzq_g

[jim glinski]

Tesla bifilar coil

In the patent he said some thing I didn't understand about the energy in the coil it was a big number but confusing he talked different than most .any idea about what he was saying ??also I read in one of Rex's papers when he use paper .about a company in Utah Borden I think it was a research place .well they showed a graph with two pancake coils one was bifilar coil the results were that at resonance the bifilar coil showed 8 times more energy output than the standard pancake coil for the same in put ....there's the point I saw a patent a about a motor made of disk neos in a circular layout .like Muller's but even magnets moving and even magnets stationary they were north facing north ...I think ?...and a small pancake coil on the stationary neos .it ran at 20,000 rpm and on a small 9 volt battery .what if it had these bifilar coils instead ...what 8 to 10 times less energy needed to run it ??. Might be worth a build !!.. Hay if you can explain that big number to me I would be great full. Jim

[jim glinski]

Eroor

That's Gordon Utah dam Ai

[jim glinski]

That's Flynn's patent .

[evostars]

@evostars,

Your speaker wire coil is not a pancake bifilar with one wire over the other instead of alongside. Take a minute to examine how the speaker wires lay flat in my spiral configuration. This video gives us a view of the spiral quadfilar without the electrical tape:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XMfCpUzq_g

tesla claims in his patent 512340:
1. A coil for electric apparatus the adjacent convolutions of which form parts of the circuit between which there exists a potential difference sufficient to secure in the coil a capacity capable of neutralizing its self-induction, as hereinbefore described.

2. A coil composed of contiguous or adjacent insulated conductors electrically connected in series and having a potential difference of such value as to give to the coil as a whole, a capacity sufficient to neutralize its self-induction, as set forth.

So its about the voltage difference created between the windings. By series connecting two coils.

If you take a single pancake coil (unifilar)
And place a second pancake coil on top (also unifilar)
And connect them in series, the inside of the top, to the outside of the bottom,
There will be a voltage difference between both coil windings.
If 100V is applied, the top coil will have 100 volt on the outside and 50 volt on the inside.
the bottom coil will have 50 volts on the outside, and 0 volt on the inside.

So between the outside windings of the the top and bottom coil, there is a voltage of 100V and 50V. giving a difference of 50V.
In other words, we have increased the capacity of the combined coil.

The difference:
the dielectric plane is in between the two coil layers. right between the north magnetic field component, and the south magnetic field component.
And it is much easier to roll.