BEMF current reversal.

[Allen Burgess]

woopyjump schematic.

Hello Allen,
I tried to find Woopyjump' s schematic on his YouTube channel to try what they did and if my setup was different. I haven't rewound a transformer yet but would give that a try. Not sure about Marc's experiment but, the energy to power the pulsing relay and led came from somewhere. I wish he had shown resting voltage of the battery first. Just my thinking which gets me in trouble a lot.

Any help is appreciated,
wantomake

@wantomake

This is the best I can do: He sawed those laminated U cores from a microwave transformer core cut in half. The Ohmic resistance of his seconday appears to be 420 times that of his primary at 4.8 henries. His primary has 5 micro henries of inductance, and the capacitor 1 micro farad of capacitance.

[Allen Burgess]

Transundulationisem.

Higg's Boson, and Quantum impact:

[wantomake]

Schematic

@Itseung888,

You've been an enourmous help. Thank you!

Your scope shots of kdaveem's simple circuit show an increased negative BEMF spike with the magnet in adjacency to the coil.

The circuit in this Marc Belanger video below resembles Woopyjump's because the BEMF secondary winding is a higher voltage wrap. I wonder if Marc's output could be improved with the addition of a magnet placed inside the core of the primary winding?

Over unity created with transformed back EMF:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIk_24tOAf4

Hello Allen,
I tried to find Woopyjump' s schematic on his YouTube channel to try what they did and if my setup was different. I haven't rewound a transformer yet but would give that a try. Not sure about Marc's experiment but, the energy to power the pulsing relay and led came from somewhere. I wish he had shown resting voltage of the battery first. Just my thinking which gets me in trouble a lot.

Any help is appreciated,
wantomake

[Allen Burgess]

LED Lattice vibrations.

From March 9, 2012:

"MIT physicists have been testing a light-emitting diode that has an electrical efficiency of more than 100 percent. You may ask, "Wouldn't that mean it breaks the first law of thermodynamics?" The answer, happily, is no.

The LED produces 69 picowatts of light using 30 picowatts of power, giving it an efficiency of 230 percent. That means it operates above "unity efficiency" -- putting it into a category normally occupied by perpetual motion machines.

However, while MIT's diode puts out more than twice as much energy in photons as it's fed in electrons, it doesn't violate the conservation of energy because it appears to draw in heat energy from its surroundings instead. When it gets more than 100 percent electrically-efficient, it begins to cool down, stealing energy from its environment to convert into more photons.

In slightly more detail, the researchers chose an LED with a small band gap, and applied smaller and smaller voltages. Every time the voltage was halved, the electrical power was reduced by a factor of four, but the light power emitted only dropped by a factor of two. The extra energy came instead from lattice vibrations".

LED Lattice vibrations may be excited by the "Aurora Effect" from the colliding magnetic fields of a violent backspike and a permanent magnet field. Above "unity efficiency" has been demonstrated by these diodes because they draw heat in from the environment to convert to power; This means the LED's will convert heat from the pulse coil to electrical power like a Peltier module. Exciting a full jacket of LED's with the broadcast electron lattice vibrations, with the field collision magnified negative backspike, coupled with the recycling of the BEMF to source, may generate a COP>1.

[Allen Burgess]

LED'S as photovoltaic cells.

LED'S convert other kinds of electron radiation to electricity as well:

"Quantum physics gets it’s name from the quantization of particle energies. In quantum physics particles can only have very specific values for the energy, and they must all be multiples of ћ (h-bar) However, in every-day life these energy levels are so close together that you don’t really notice the difference".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-rfjUQdboc

It would make an interesting experiment to produce a backspike in a magnet core coil and see if a voltage appeared in an LED taped to the side!

[Allen Burgess]

Colliding magnetic fields.

"At the region where magnetic fields from the Sun and Earth meet, field lines buckle, break, and snap together again, powering dramatic events like auroras in the process".

Based on Itseung's test results from the simple kdaveem circuit; An air core coil should generate a larger negative backspike with a diametric cylinder magnet positioned inside the core. This should trigger an "Aurora Event" when the collapsing magnetic field from the coil collides with the PM field from inside the core.

A ring of crystal alternator diodes circling the coil should be able to collect and rectify this kind of "Aurora Energy".

A jacket of LED'S surrounding the coil may be able to harvest and rectify this kind of "Aurora Energy".

[Allen Burgess]

All we are seeing in that video is someone that doesn't understand about battery chemistry. If you listen closely he says he pulled the battery down with two tail light bulbs connected in parallel. And he says he pulled the battery all the way down to 9 volts. Anyone that has worked with batteries for any time at all will tell you after you take a heavy load off a battery the battery will try to recover back to it's normal voltage. He could leave off the circuit and just hook a meter to the battery and see the same thing.

If you want some proof of this just try that same circuit with a battery that has not been just discharged to a low level. Charge a battery and then let it sit overnight or for at least a few hours then try that circuit and you will see the battery slowly going down. That circuit may help keep the battery from going down as fast but it will go down and not up.

Carroll

PS: And to answer your question you are sure to ask, yes I have tried that circuit and gotten the results I just posted. Try it for yourself and see.

@Citfta,

I didn't post that video to get your opinion on battery chemistry. I inquired to Itseung about the effect placing a magnet in the primary core would have on the BEMF. Why not just put me back on your ignore list Mr. know-it-all?

[citfta]

All we are seeing in that video is someone that doesn't understand about battery chemistry. If you listen closely he says he pulled the battery down with two tail light bulbs connected in parallel. And he says he pulled the battery all the way down to 9 volts. Anyone that has worked with batteries for any time at all will tell you after you take a heavy load off a battery the battery will try to recover back to it's normal voltage. He could leave off the circuit and just hook a meter to the battery and see the same thing.

If you want some proof of this just try that same circuit with a battery that has not been just discharged to a low level. Charge a battery and then let it sit overnight or for at least a few hours then try that circuit and you will see the battery slowly going down. That circuit may help keep the battery from going down as fast but it will go down and not up.

Carroll

PS: And to answer your question you are sure to ask, yes I have tried that circuit and gotten the results I just posted. Try it for yourself and see.

[Allen Burgess]

Magnet and large negative spike.

@Itseung888,

You've been an enourmous help. Thank you!

Your scope shots of kdaveem's simple circuit show an increased negative BEMF spike with the magnet in adjacency to the coil.

The circuit in this Marc Belanger video below resembles Woopyjump's because the BEMF secondary winding is a higher voltage wrap. I wonder if Marc's output could be improved with the addition of a magnet placed inside the core of the primary winding?

Over unity created with transformed back EMF:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIk_24tOAf4

[ltseung888]

Stefan states that "Negative current comes back to the power supply".

Is it that reverse direction negative current is interpolated as equivalent to positive current traveling in the other direction?

No. Current can flow back in two ways.

1. The resulting voltage is opposite and higher than the voltage of the battery. This is the normal case of recharging the battery.

2. The resulting voltage is in same direction of the battery (can be lower or higher). However, the current flows in opposite direction to the voltage. This is the strange phenomenon of negative energy.

[ltseung888]

When a coil is pulsed with just a single pulse it goes pos,(magnetic field builds then collapses) then goes neg (magnetic field builds then collapses) we call this ringing but whats really happening.
Why does it go pos then neg then pos an so on, what energy is collapsing into the coil to make it change polarity (opposites attract)
When neg electrons are moving through the wire the magnetic fields (eddy currents) are pos when they collapse the coil goes pos, pos energy is moving through the wire,then the magnetic fields ( eddy currents) are neg, then when that field collapses neg energy is once again moving through the wire and this continues, each building field is smaller than the last but the polarity changes with each expanding and collapsing field.
Think about that, the coil is pulling energy from the ambient.

Think about that, the coil is pulling energy from the ambient.

Now consider the case of having ferromagnetic material in the core of the coil. The tiny magnets or dipoles will be aligned. These dipoles themselves have energy. The resulting energy is the sum of the alignment energy plus the energy already available in the dipoles???

Have we solved the mystery of lead-out energy machines???

*** Even in the straight line repulsion case, we did not always get the same waveform. One explanation was that the swinging back to randomness would take time. If another pulse were applied, it would be like pushing the swing at the wrong time. Getting a different waveform would not be a surprise.

https://youtu.be/Y2K2b4i_FYo

[Dave45]

When a coil is pulsed with just a single pulse it goes pos,(magnetic field builds then collapses) then goes neg (magnetic field builds then collapses) we call this ringing but whats really happening.
Why does it go pos then neg then pos an so on, what energy is collapsing into the coil to make it change polarity (opposites attract)
When neg electrons are moving through the wire the magnetic fields (eddy currents) are pos when they collapse the coil goes pos, pos energy is moving through the wire,then the magnetic fields ( eddy currents) are neg, then when that field collapses neg energy is once again moving through the wire and this continues, each building field is smaller than the last but the polarity changes with each expanding and collapsing field.
Think about that, the coil is pulling energy from the ambient.

[ltseung888]

Stefan Hartmann's measurements of JL Naudin's Newman motor:

"Now, the new enhanced commutator V1.4 shows some interesting results. The I/O current flow from the power supply has been measured accross a 100 ohms resistor between the points A-C. You may notice that there are LESS POSITIVE CURRENT PULSES THAN NEGATIVE CURRENT PULSES as shown in the picture below. Today my power supply is not able to convert these negative spikes of current in reusable power, this will be done soon with a new enhanced power supply circuit. This negative current COMES BACK TO THE POWER SUPPLY and this can explain why the original Newman machine has been able to keep its battery charged. The negative current is FREE NEGATIVE POWER and you may notice in the pictures E and F that the negative current spikes in most case are bigger than the positive current spikes".

Researchers, Look for Negative Energy with your DSO. Display Current and Voltage simultaneously.

[Allen Burgess]

Current reversal.

Stefan states that "Negative current comes back to the power supply".

Is it that reverse direction negative current is interpolated as equivalent to positive current traveling in the other direction?

[Allen Burgess]

Stefan Hartmann's measurements of JL Naudin's Newman motor:

"Now, the new enhanced commutator V1.4 shows some interesting results. The I/O current flow from the power supply has been measured accross a 100 ohms resistor between the points A-C. You may notice that there are LESS POSITIVE CURRENT PULSES THAN NEGATIVE CURRENT PULSES as shown in the picture below. Today my power supply is not able to convert these negative spikes of current in reusable power, this will be done soon with a new enhanced power supply circuit. This negative current COMES BACK TO THE POWER SUPPLY and this can explain why the original Newman machine has been able to keep its battery charged. The negative current is FREE NEGATIVE POWER and you may notice in the pictures E and F that the negative current spikes in most case are bigger than the positive current spikes".