Reed switch oscillator running electric motor.
This video demonstrates the "Proof of Concept" of the "Reed Oscillator Booster" running an electric motor at 34:50:
This electric motor is very feeble, and runs by outdated bare wire "Commutator Contacts". The inventor runs the motor first from an ordinary 9 volt battery, then a second time from his "Reed Oscillator Booster" to compare the difference. What he dosen't demonstrate is the difference in power consumption. The increased acceleration with the booster is only drawing a tiny fraction of the power from the 9 volt power battery then it draws from the unassisted one. The booster is transforming the voltage 50 times higher, while only drawing milli watts of power. The point is, he's running the electric motor on high voltage sine wave and not amperage. His circuit is nearly identical to the one member "Wistiti" replicated from the "Simplefix2969" schematic.
Imagine just taking the two output wires from "Wistiti's Reed Booster" and connecting them to the thread spool power coil wires of my Reed switch oscillator motor with the diametric tube spinner mounted on the precision ceramic bearings. We would be running close to 300 volts of oscillating low amperage A.C. current into the tiny air core power coil. The nearly frictionless diametric rotor would speed up like crazy as a synchronous motor. Think about what's going on here; It would be more like running a motor on Radio Waves, then D.C. pulse. VLF (Very Low Frequency) 3 Hz - 30 KHz is a broadcast band. Think about what's really accelerating Herr Segelohrenbob's "Reed Oscillator Booster Motor".
I believe this is an overunity motor circuit, because the rotor is basicly powered by a resonant sine wave from an LC tank; The rotor spontaneously tries to catch up to the oscillating resonant frequency of the LC tank, on it's own, with no symmetrical input!
This video demonstrates the "Proof of Concept" of the "Reed Oscillator Booster" running an electric motor at 34:50:
This electric motor is very feeble, and runs by outdated bare wire "Commutator Contacts". The inventor runs the motor first from an ordinary 9 volt battery, then a second time from his "Reed Oscillator Booster" to compare the difference. What he dosen't demonstrate is the difference in power consumption. The increased acceleration with the booster is only drawing a tiny fraction of the power from the 9 volt power battery then it draws from the unassisted one. The booster is transforming the voltage 50 times higher, while only drawing milli watts of power. The point is, he's running the electric motor on high voltage sine wave and not amperage. His circuit is nearly identical to the one member "Wistiti" replicated from the "Simplefix2969" schematic.
Imagine just taking the two output wires from "Wistiti's Reed Booster" and connecting them to the thread spool power coil wires of my Reed switch oscillator motor with the diametric tube spinner mounted on the precision ceramic bearings. We would be running close to 300 volts of oscillating low amperage A.C. current into the tiny air core power coil. The nearly frictionless diametric rotor would speed up like crazy as a synchronous motor. Think about what's going on here; It would be more like running a motor on Radio Waves, then D.C. pulse. VLF (Very Low Frequency) 3 Hz - 30 KHz is a broadcast band. Think about what's really accelerating Herr Segelohrenbob's "Reed Oscillator Booster Motor".
I believe this is an overunity motor circuit, because the rotor is basicly powered by a resonant sine wave from an LC tank; The rotor spontaneously tries to catch up to the oscillating resonant frequency of the LC tank, on it's own, with no symmetrical input!
Comment