Oscillating Reed Switch Pulse Motor.

[Allen Burgess]

SPDT Reed switch schematic.

Look at the SPDT schematic below. There's one input and two outputs. Instead of turning off, this switch directs current to a seperate load in the otherwise "Off Position". Two reciprocating power coils would allow us to widen the diameter of the magnet rotor. The larger rotor would generate additional magnetic flux. Both coils would be hot wired through this switch. A hot wire would need to travel between the SPDT Reed switch second contact and the second coil. Both coils would share the same battery and negative electrode. Positioning of the two coils would need to be adeptly controlled to maximize precision timing and performance. This "Oscillating Reciprocator" version should really sizzle with the frictionless bismuth axle!

[Allen Burgess]

SPDT Reed Switch.

This SPDT Reed switch has a normally closed position, unlike the SPST Radio Shack Reed switch which is simply normally open. This SPDT is very easy to burn out if you're not extremely careful. It's on all the time on one side untill the south pole of a magnet disengages it. I burned a handful of these switches up in no time before I realized what I was doing wrong. The contact will weld shut in short order if it's allowed to act as a continuous conductor with 12 volts of input power for any length of time.

This switch can run the twin coil magnet motor at a reasonable speed if positioned away from the power coil. A variable resistor, or potentiometer can be installed between the battery and the switch to help protect the contacts. Probably best to give the twin reciprocating power coil and magnet rotor a test run in the conventional mode before trying the high speed coil attachment oscillator configuration.

[Allen Burgess]

Ossie Callanan.

Quote from Ossie Callanan:

"As you can see, the trick is to place the reed switch so that it runs along the length of the solenoid coil and so it's located in the coil's magnetic field. This couples the coil's magnetic field to the reed switch as well as the magnetic field of the passing rotor magnet. This provides a magnetic feedback and turns the reed switch into an oscillator. So when the magnet passes the reed oscillates with the coil's field and causes very many pulses, typically 20 to 50 pulses per magnet pass. Amazingly, unlike the clamping diodes in the SSG, this is not wasteful. This reed switch oscillation actually reduces the input current. Instead of the reed remaining closed for the whole of the pulse duration, it switches on and off and so, less input power is drawn from the driving battery. I run the motor so that when the coil is energised, the magnet is attracted to the coil. Here is a trace across the charging battery":

[Allen Burgess]

Protecting the SPDT Reed switch.

Below we see the "Simple Motor" schematic for the the Reed switch transistor motor:

This version uses a PNP transistor. The Reed switch triggers the PNP Darlinton transistor at the base and the switch is protected with a ZNR surge absorber. The SPDT Reed switch would require two ZNR surge absorbers, one between the input contact and each output contact, both connected to each base of the two PNP Darlington transistors. The circuit is also protected from high voltage power coil backspike by a tiny ceramic capacitor across the power coil electrodes. Two surge absorbers for the SPDT Reed switch and two tiny ceramic capacitors , one for each power coil would be enough to protect the Reed switch and the transistors. Ossie says the Reed switch oscillates 20 to 50 times per magnet pass! Ossie includes a diode and a charge battery in his oscillator circuit. This wouldn't be hard to include!

The conceptualized SPDT circuit is similar to Ossie Callanan's circuit above, because the oscillating Reed switch is triggering the transistor bases; But it's very different because the SPDT Reed switch would be running twin reciprocating power coils. This is a totally new concept, heretofore never attempted nor succeeded at!

[Allen Burgess]

Biasing magnet.

Quote from Ossie Callanan:

"Using a very small and weak magnet, you can now control and adjust the reed switch. This allows you to adjust the switching so that the circuit oscillates continuously but still powers the passing rotor magnet".

Rather then reposition the Reed switch and coil as I do, Ossie adjusts the Reed switch and controls the oscillation with a weak biasing magnet pictured below. Ossie reports a COP>10, collecting oscillating Reed switch radient backspike power in his charge batteries!

[shylo]

Hi Allen, the quotes from Ossie ,are they recent or is this from the past?
The reason I ask, is because this is very similar to what I'm seeing with my test rig.
But my switches are mechanical, I don't use reeds (I don't have any).
I'm sure if I could switch more I could collect more.
Thanks for posting.
artv

[Allen Burgess]

Ossie Callanan quote from 2007.

@Shylo,

Switch more and collect more:

This quote is from Ossie Callanan dated 2007:

"I believe I may have this radiant energy system worked out to the point where anyone can build it and when you build all of it, it can provide you with free and continuous energy. There are two sides to the circuit and just having either side is no good, you must have both. One side is the pulse-charger side, and the other is the battery and accumulator-converter side. At present, I am charging batteries at a performance level between COP=2 and COP=10 and battery swapping is not a problem.

First we need to focus on the charger side of the system. Basically, you must build a charger which produces large amounts of radiant energy in the form of radiant pulses. Radiant energy pulses are Back-EMF pulses provided that they have very fast rising edges and falling edges and occur at high frequencies. They are not transistor transients or switching transients! A spark-gap produces classical radiant energy pulses. They are chaotic events but they are radiant energy events nevertheless. Switching a coil on very rapidly using a transistor will produce one radiant energy pulse from the coil’s Back-EMF, but one pulse on its own is no good. You need thousands or better still, millions of those pulses for them to be of any practical use.

John Bedini's Simplified School Girl motor (the “SSG”) only produces a very small amount of radiant energy when you have the base of the transistor tuned so that you get the longest self oscillating pulse train per magnet pass. It is not very efficient as the base-clamping diode wastes this energy, passing it back through the base resistor-bulb circuit but that circuit it is necessary so that you can synchronise the operation and provide a driving force to the passing magnet. Without the base-clamping diode, you get an oscillator and the motor won't turn - catch 22. But still, even when tuned with the base-clamping diode in place, the self-oscillating pulse train is usually at most 3 to 6 pulses which is not very much and so, not much radiant energy is produced. For all those people trying to tune the motor for only one pulse per magnet pass, they are wasting their time and only building a pulse motor and not an efficient radiant energy generator.

The SSG is not a very powerful or good radiant energy generator and apart from being educational, it is really a waste of time unless someone can explain to you how to tune it to get the greatest possible amount of radiant energy from it with a long pulse train, and then tell you what to do with that radiant energy. John Bedini's method of using a bulb in the base-feed circuit is to keep the motor tuned to a particular number of pulses in the pulse train per magnet pass or for the longest pulse train as the motor increases speed, also, the battery's impedance changes the speed as well. The two-strand coil where one coil is used just as the transistor trigger, along with the wasted energy in the base circuit, add to the overall inefficiency and make construction more difficult.

In saying that about the SSG I would like to show you now a very simple and basic pulse oscillator or motor driver circuit that you can build with off the shelf parts, one which will produce very large amounts of radiant energy when adjusted correctly".

http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Chapt6.html

[Allen Burgess]

Halbach array

This plastic circular Hallbach magnet array holder is for sale either as a 3D file or molded for $10. and $14:

This array of 10 mm magnet cubes should spin around a thick bismuth axle with no problem! The diameter of the array holder is 58.68 mm's, so the diameter of the bismuth axle would need to be around 1 1/2". Successfully spinning this array as a levitating ring around a bismuth rod would constitute a major breakthrough in "Spin Technology"!

EdgarInventor

+zebok3 Yes, both on Laser-cut acrylic: Make your own toys - Halbach 12 Magnet Laser cut, as a stream for your 3D printer, https://www.myminifactory.com/object...net-array-6518, or already 3D printed on Sculpteo: 'Frame for the Halbach 12 Magnet Array' | 3D Printing | Sculpteo

[Allen Burgess]

Arc segment magnets.

A couple of opposing radial polarized arc segment magnets glued to the outer perimeter of a stack of Hallback arrays, might be all that's needed for a levitating, frictionless, bismuth axle diametric rotor:

[Allen Burgess]

Bismuth rotor.

Attaching the diametric arc segment magnets to a tube positioned between the circular Hallbach arrays would add their magnetic repulsion to the bismuth axle along with the circular Hallbach arrays. This tube could extend beyond the ends of the Hallbach arrays and have sintered radial polarized ring magnets attached whose magnetic strength would help repel the bismuth axle also and act as levitator magnets for the over head coils; So we wind up with six major internal fields, and four major external fields. The diametric arcs for powering in the center, and the radial polarized monopolar fields for precision levitator positioning on the ends; All focusing their combined fields inward to the repelling bismuth axle along with the unidirectional Hallbach rings. The central tube can run through the inside of the Hallback array frames and and the radial end rings and be perfectly balanced, with the diametric arc segments glued to the center. We'd see four rings and the two arc magnets in the center, and two electromagnetic coils suspended close overhead at the ends. This entire rotor and axle can sit safely inside a clear plexi-glass enclosure, sealed for air evacuation. The oscillating power coils can run from outside the protective safety housing along with the levitator coils, magnetically positioned by biasing magnets.

The abundant "Overunity" output would come from harvesting the "Radient Spike" like Ossie Callanan demonstrated and would be entirely "Lenz Free".

[Allen Burgess]

Multiple pulses.

Quote from Ossie:

"Switching a coil on very rapidly using a transistor will produce one radiant energy pulse from the coil’s Back-EMF, but one pulse on its own is no good. You need thousands or better still, millions of those pulses for them to be of any practical use".

Maximizing "Radient Output" is a function of the number of pulses. This leaves us with two variables: Pulses per magnet pass and RPM. The "Oscillating Reed Switch" increases the number of pulses per magnet pass; The rotor speed the number of magnet passes per second. The frictionless rotor should multiply Ossie's COP>10 by many times!

Quote from Ossie:

"My prototype motor uses four of these circuit's, positioned 90 degrees apart around the rotor, and all connected in parallel. You can use just one reed switch to switch all four transistors and coils but it is more load and the reed switch does not hold up for very long".

Four power coils and one Reed switch which sticks?

How about four power coils and two oscillating SPDT Reed switchs for a twin reciprocator?.

[Allen Burgess]

Ossie's REAC. (Radiant Energy Accumulator-Converter).

A Working Radiant Free Energy System Part*2 - By Ossie Callanan
*
Before I get into the radiant energy accumulator-converter, I just want to highlight how important it is to build and play with the circuit I described above. Only after adjusting and watching the input current and how the charging battery charges can you truly see how these radiant energy pulses are affecting the charging battery. In terms of why it works or how it provides so much radiant energy you have to understand that if the reed switch stays closed, which will happen when they get*worn and sticky, with the 9mH (bought off the shelf) crossover choke solenoid coil I use, the transistor is turned fully on and at virtually it's lowest resistance and so the current draw is about 6-8 AMPS for a single coil circuit!!! It seems this is a key requirement for generating these radiant energy pulses with a transistor. You have to switch the transistor fully on at maximum current for the coil and input voltage. This is another thing the SSG does not do well. But yet, in this circuit, when the reed switch is adjusted correctly, you can get the input down to just a few milliamps if you want!
*
OK, now to the radiant accumulator-converter. The requirement for this appears to be because the charging battery is not very efficient at absorbing all of the radiant energy pulses. John had related this as being due to impedance matching but I am not sure of this at this stage but impedance*may be*a factor. Because the charging battery does not absorb much of the radiant energy by itself, you MUST have an accumulator-converter to absorb and convert the radiant energy for the charging battery to use. Ok, that said, what is a radiant energy accumulator-converter?
*
A Radiant Energy Accumulator-Converter (REAC) is nothing more than a dipole! But the larger the dipole the better! The dipole can be a battery but that is silly when we are already charging a battery. Well in that case, it is a special battery. It is a battery that is mostly composed of potential but little current. The higher the potential the better the accumulation/conversion but some current is still required to be able to pass the energy back and charge the charging battery.
*
There are a number of traditional dipole's that fit what is needed. There is a simple long and raised wire antenna and ground, but this will not provide enough back current to charge our battery. There is an earth battery setup, but unless you want to put in the effort and amount of materials to raise the voltage and still have some required current this requires a lot of work and materials. Finally, I found the best compromise to be "old, dead, sulphated lead acid batteries". At this stage of my research the condition of the battery does not really matter as long as it is dead and sulphated. As long as they are old and dead such that they can barely light up a 12V 100ma light bulb, they will do just fine. Gee I am glad I never threw away my old dead batteries that*kept*piling up.
*
Go down to a battery recycler or junk yard and you can buy pallet loads of old and dead UPS batteries for only a few dollars. When I say pallet load, I mean pallet load. The bigger the bank of these you get the batter. Connect them both in series and parallel such that if they where good, you would get anywhere from 48-120 volts. When connecting in parallel make sure that each*12 volt segment has an approximately even capacity in A/Hs. You can put this bank under your house or table or even bury them in the ground. It is no problem as you will never have to do anything to them again (as long as they are sealed)... They will NOT keep running down. They are already run down; all you need them for is to*use their potential*and their dipole and their hidden capacity. The very small amount of current they will provide for the size of the bank due to the crystalline resistance of the sulfation is all that is needed to provide the free energy that the will convert the radiant energy pulses and feed it back into your good charging battery. I believe that these sulphate crystals may indeed be the main component that is doing the radiant energy conversion for us. Now for how to connect up your REAC. See the following diagram: (See below)
*
You must connect the REAC directly to the charging battery as I have shown above. Amazingly, there is a great voltage different when you measure the voltage directly across the charging battery compared to the voltage measured across the REAC whilst the reed motor is running. This is even with thick cables connecting them but distance does affect it as well. You must have two separate sets of cables. One set going directly from the radiant energy charger to the charging battery and the other set from the charging battery to the REAC.
*
I have run the above setup for over one month now. Following is a picture of my dead batteries that I use as an REAC. (See below)

Using my good 33 A/H UPS batteries, I can charge them up from 10 volts to 14 volts in*about 6 hours with the radiant energy reed motor running 4 coils drawing only 600ma. I can then swap the source battery with the charging battery and keep doing this until I have both batteries charged in about 24 hours. I have done this very many times and it appears to be improving over time.
*
But one thing I want to make clear if you*think that I am somehow just using the stored energy in the REAC bank. If I do not use my reed motor, then the charging battery will not charge. If I try*replacing*the reed motor*with a regular battery charger, the battery will take as long to charge as a normal battery charger would to charge it. When using the reed motor, the REAC is converting most of the radiant energy and providing the energy back to the charging battery. There you have it, a fully working radiant free energy system. Enjoy!
*
Regards,
*
Ossie Callanan
*

[Allen Burgess]

9mH power coils.

"Steel core Inductor 9mH 14 AWG Audio Coil crossover subwoofer 500W 0.31 DCR PAIR".

These are the (Off the shelf) factory wound coils Ossie uses, around $39. a pair off ebay: Four of these coils drew about 600 milliamps with the "Oscillating Reed switch".

solinear:

"The problem that you'll run into with the iron core (the neo mag grabbing it) will be more problem than it's worth to increase the efficiency of the EM by that small amount. This is why electric motors rarely use ferrous cores - they're more trouble than they're worth".

[Allen Burgess]

Plasma in a Reed switch.

Woopyjump video:

"So it seems that in a vacuum (the reed switch ) that is is possible to get a very nice plasma (and of course the reed is not switching at all)!

I believe that switching the Reed switch in the microsecond range with a frictionless rotor and oscillating switch does not involve the Reed switch contact switching at all, but a "Magnetic Plasma Reaction" like the one we see in this video by Woopyjump:

Regards Allen,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58SzOsmyBgc

[Allen Burgess]

Plasma Reed.

Here's the German experimenter, Herr Segelohrenbob: Woopyjump refers to his "Plasma Reed" videos. The Reed switch contacts are not doing the switching; The "Magnetic Plasma" is doing the switching, not the mechanical contacts:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJulY-COfPo&list=PLWdWBXGOdcpQSBeNDZjZJWxEFgdMve3ss&index=3