through following directions. Then we can add an attraction side fork
for the number 2 step in this process of moving forward. The question
arises as I have spun my 2 poled cell. How might the other side (Repulsion)
look compared to the attraction? The answer comes back like this.
This answer comes from common deductive reasoning some might
call speculative.
(1st) We must consider what we have been directed to do "UNDERSTAND"
understand what is going on with the first and second step. We see powerful
forces generated by neo magnets set to cancel each other. Always keep
this in mind. Next we divert the attraction side stator magnet pole with
what we call a ramp. This field is derived from the stator magnet, inducing
a rotor magnet into the direction of rotation for a time period until released.
The induction ramp accelerates the rotor magnet and does so without
any reversing effects by passing the ball so to speak. Passing the rotor
magnet through the window of the fork and allowing it to go free just
in time for the cancellation process.
So whatever is added to the repulsion side to create balance must also
release it's effects just in time for the repulsion side cancellation.
So I ask you this, as I asked myself the same question, what might the
repulsion side induction ramp look like? Or maybe you are thinking
that the repulsion side is left empty?
Or maybe it is not a ramp at all?
We know that the system cancellation has been referred to as
BALANCING the cell, so in order to achieve balance we might be
doing the same thing on the repulsion side as we have
been instructed to do on the attraction side? Or almost?
If this is true (Only a speculation) then a single cell needing to be
balanced might have the same induction ramp on the repulsion side to
aid the POWER STROKE. Then the repulsion ramp window would act
the same way to release the rotor magnet just in time to go through
the cancellation process once again.
Since the repulsion side is pushing the rotor magnet away from the
stator magnet a north pole rotor magnet would need a south field
induction ramp. So the forks would go on the back? I don't know if
that make sense. If so this would make a repulsion ramps shape
different. Or would the forks be closer to the stator magnets south?
All healthy questions.
However since repulsion forces are slightly weaker than attractive
forces the feeler gauges would need to come out. Another idea would
be to compensate for the weaker forces by a slight increase in mass
for repulsion ramps. Or changing the angle on the repulsion side to
a closer position as compared to the gap on the attraction side.
Again the feeler gauges come out.
As I said all speculation, but this is the way I think things through.
Balance must be maintained as well as induction.
As I see it now on the attraction side a north pole rotor magnet
is temporarily induced in the direction of rotation by a south field then
that field goes back to it's origin (STATOR MAGNET) for cancellation.
In the case of the repulsion side you can also deduct many things.
Starting with the fact that no physical space has been allotted for
a ramp to be mounted after the cancellation process. This leaves us only
a space to work with before the cancellation process takes place just as
we see with the attraction side.
The $50,000 question is what might the third step look like with these
facts in mind? What it looks like to me is the same process in the reverse
format.
Just kidding around. I am only having fun speculating. For those of you who do not understand, this is called
deductive reasoning.
Mikey's Mental Pinball.
Either way this is an exciting moment in history if you ask me and we
will have to leave the next directive to our highly favored MadMack.
I'll try to make heads or tails out of this
it worked in 1918 
Leave a comment: