Tweet
If possible......could you "quantify" "a good output..."
Regards
Regards
-
-
Uh, yeah. I just gave THREE examples of coils that speed up under load in my last post.Originally posted by Mario View Post
That is exactly the purpose of all my testing. With the size magnets and size rotor I have, and at a given RPM of 1850, what is the best coil that will produce the most energy for my setup with the LEAST amp draw on the motor. That is what I am working on, so that when folks put together the:
1. Rewound pulse motor design of Matt's
2. Run circuit schematic to recover better than 80% of what is used to run the motor
3. Generator design specs
4. Flywheel specs
Folks have enough information to replicate and get a machine that easily produces more than it takes to run. I have already posted ALL of that information, but we are constantly improving it. Even a two coil build IS COP>1 with iron cores. Not necessarily with air cores yet, which is what I am working on.
DaveComment
-
Dave, sorry. I misread and didn't realise the three examples were about air cores… Well, this means I'll have to investigate further.Originally posted by Turion View Post
I was kind of surprised of how many amps would flow through a small shorted air coil I used for testing..
@Erfinder
I can't quantify how much power yet. First I want to be able to test an AIR coil that speeds up under load or when shorted… or at least doesn't slow down.
MarioComment
-
I understand. If you don't mind my asking, why are you looking for acceleration under short or load with an air core coil? I'm sure you have found by now that there is no easy way of going about doing it. The main component which facilitates the effect (iron, and its relation to the induced current) is missing. It is far easier to build an air core generator which has very little effect on the prime mover, in other words little to no drag, not to forget, and this is my opinion, it is more practical to build a reduced drag air core gen than it is to make one which simply accelerates when you load or short it, but to each his own. You have your reasons for wanting air cores to deliver the acceleration effect in addition to "useful" electrical output.
RegardsComment
-
Steve, I agree. In fact what I'm looking for is a coil (possibly air core) that doesn't affect the prime mover when loaded with a certain load. When that is found and working, when shorted, it probably would accelerate the prime mover, but acceleration ain't the main goal of courseOriginally posted by erfinder View Post
About the "flux resonance" in a coil with core we were talking about in the kromrey thread. I've replaced one of my two coils with a much narrower coil that I can slide back and forth along the iron core. For this I also removed one of the rotors and used only one for starters.
I had the normal and the narrow core on a scope channel each (the bigger one as a reference) to see if there is a phase shift on the smaller one when moved away from the inducing magnet. (Like Naudin shows).
With no load on the smaller coil there is no shift whatsoever. When loaded with a 1 ohm resistor there is a very small shift as I move it towards the centre of the core, but of course the output (amps) falls drastically.
I want to give it a try with another core that's a bit wider but still movable to see what that will show, for now the result is that it helps to have the coil a bit away from the magnet, but at a substantial cost in output power.
MarioComment
-
Wrong...Originally posted by erfinder View Post
I wish I could discuss it more but Iron is just one way.
MattComment
-
It's easy, really easy to say someone is wrong without knowing what it is that motivates them. This exchange would be different if we spoke, you would understand where I am coming from, appreciate what I am saying if you have seen what I have seen......I am sure you are probably as tired as I am of that line.....everyone who thinks they have seen something and it turns out they have seen nothing....I am not one of them...Originally posted by Matthew Jones View PostWrong... I wish I could discuss it more but Iron is just one way.
Matt
I have no doubt that you have found a way to get acceleration using air core coils, so have I. The point is Matt, after experiencing it myself using several different methods, I no longer see any value in acceleration under load, with or without iron, you might, and I tip my hat to you for that. I want more than what I hear folks chatter about on these platforms, and in this particular instance, I want more than the ability to speed up when the gen is loaded, in addition to that, I want more than the "law" dictated output.
To each his own.
RegardsComment
-
:-)
Matt,
This is me keeping my mouth shut!!!!
Dave
Man, that is hard!Comment
-
I have found that I get over twice the current through a air core coil vs welding rod core.About half the voltage but over twice the current when I remove the iron core. ALso my coils have very little air in the core but mostly copper and I have seen the 0 Lenz effect On some of my no iron coils.Hopefully Matt and Dave will have some more awsome stuff to show us.Comment
-
Sorry, the blanket statement above and specifically the words "Main component" are WRONG!!!.Originally posted by erfinder View Post
Current makes the magnetic field. Voltage only makes the magnetic field fast. The order in which current and voltage show up and do their job is the "Main Component". Everything else is just a material. Iron is just a material.
You have to be careful with blanket statements.
MattLast edited by Matthew Jones; 08-18-2015, 08:01 PM.Comment
-
Experience and more importantly time have revealed to me that in this work no one knows anything, no one can be certain of anything, we have no foundation, and if for a second we think we do, we should take the time to analyze our environment and respect the fact that we are hopelessly and utterly out of our minds, collectively spinning out of control at thousands of miles per hour through space.Originally posted by Matthew Jones View Post
It's very unfortunate that like you, many feel the need to correct their fellow researcher when they catch what they feel is a mistake in their logic. Here is what I think, we are not reading from the same page, we are not in the same book, not in the same library. We don't want the same things, being on this platform at the same time implies that we are in some way, unbeknownst to us presently, aligned, and until we really begin listen to one another, we will not find what it is which unites us. I choose my words carefully, always have, and always will, what I said, I meant, had we had that private conversation you would understand fully why the statement was formulated as it was. I set the stage when I put pen to paper, you have no idea where I am going with my statement.
From my perspective, your "corrections" are error ridden as well, however, it's not my place to point them out to you, and all who visit this thread and read our exchange, that's not what these platforms are "supposed" to be used for. I am here to share my ideas, not to be corrected by those who have no immediate interest in what I do, or even comprehend what I am after. Nor am I here to correct others, as I stated before, no one here knows anything so any attempt at correcting anyone for any reason is pointless.
Before I give you the floor, I will say that there is a purpose served by correcting others, when one corrects another, it makes one feel better about one's self, makes one feel like they have saved the person being corrected from the grips of death itself, it also gives one an ego boost, momentarily elevating one to the position of alpha. I have no problem sitting on the bench, see, I am honored to be on the team. I have no problem being a pawn, but understand that without the board, the game cannot be played, I therefore choose to be board. I am almost certain you will disagree with most if not all that I have said, I will lose no sleep over it. Just know, its more profitable for all when we "enable" our fellow researchers to share freely, allow them the opportunity to correct themselves. Our time could be better invested in exchanging ideas, not facts. Libraries are packed with books containing "facts" we don't need to cram down each other's throats, that which all who can read, can find for themselves.
I mean you no disrespect, and hope that you will let this issue go, for its a waste of both of our time.
RegardsComment
-
I think your making a mountain out of molehill, it wasn't meant to be personal but if thats the case then sorry for making any effort to expand the conversation. I really didn't want fracture an ego today.
The fact is you can use any material with any amount of permeability and to say IRON is the one sole material that allows the delayed or advanced Lenz effect to happen is just wrong. Deal with it.
And personally I could care less about you, I worry more the guy who's reading and getting mislead and closed in box, which is exactly what those blanket statement do especially if someone value's your opinion or admires your work.
Go Ahead and point out my errors, I can handle it.
MattLast edited by Matthew Jones; 08-20-2015, 11:02 AM.Comment
-
Hi guys,
I just want to share the following thought. See the attached graph showing the performance curves of a conventional generator versus the Kromrey generator.
The peak power of the two is 500W (as per patent test). As you can see with decreasing rpm the kromrey basically stays constant in output to a certain point (D), while the normal generator behaves linearly, meaning its output is proportional to rpm.
On my setup I have a variac driving the motor so that I can vary the speed. I have personally measured that when I reduced the input power to 50%, the kromrey output still was at 93% of full power. So why should we waste almost 50% input if the output stays constant at a much lower speed? It seems that for a given kromrey setup there is a fixed maximum output.
All this just to say that maybe instead of trying so hard to find solutions for the right coils that won't slow down the prime mover we should determine the points A and B (graph) and spend the lowest input power for maximum output power.
This quest has already many unknowns and I don't want to throw in more, but I think it's worth considering.
Btw, with air coils this graph isn't valid, or at least, the output doesn't seem to stay as constant as with iron cores.
MarioComment
-
Hi Matt and Steve (Erfinder),
I would like to ask you both to reconsider the case and to continue correspondence in this thread / topic with each other, because all the readers miss a lot if you stop. Both of you started with the wish of sharing (at least this was my impression) and if you watch this present situation from outside, this is exactly what oil barons would love to find: gifted people engaged in alternative energy search have come to an argument which may put an end to the good exchange of ideas, experiences etc, no need for MIBs, ego solves it instead.
Afterall, both of you wrote that no harm was meant to each other, nothing was meant personal. So why not continue?
Greetings, GyulaComment
-
I have every intention of continuing. In fact with example. Soon!
As far as his Majesty goes, I can't understand why we can't have a little back and forth without getting his feeling hurt and psycho analyzing everything, but that tends to be the persona of the day. "Came in last place and I didn't get a trophy"
LOL
See ya soon.
MattComment
Comment