BiTT OverUnity Transformer Bi-Toroid Thane H. Bill A.

[justanerd]

Question please ?!?

Has the good Dr Lindemann made any comments about this "BiTT" ? I value and Appreciate his commentary, as I am stuck on the Lockridge device in building a self-powered generator, and see this as a "God send" for keeping my home warm for the little ones, and at little cost. Thank You Kind Sirs !!

Respectfully,
...Chris (mobility impaired, coma surviving, handicapped Grandpa)

[kEhYo77]

Hi guyz.

Here is an idea I'm am currently working on.
I have got big ferrite U cores to try it out, two "I"
cores are coming within days.
The basics are in the picture. What is not included
are optional "U" core pieces coming out of middle
core section on the sides, Forming BiTT routes for
"Cout" CEMF flux.

It has to work!
What are your thoughts on that?

kEhYo

[BroMikey]

BiTT-MEG-SFT

What do I think? I think it is a great layout. It helps me to see more clearly. I need to keep thinking on this and when someone else comes along and shows their experiment it gives me more to go on.

So the Cout coil must be switched off during the charge up phase of C1 , C2 when the magnet hits them.

So it looks like the magnet is the input?

And the switch? I need more time to think on how to switch the Cout coil off.

Humm... no input just a magnet.

Thanks for stirring the thought process.


Mikey

Hi guyz.

Here is an idea I'm am currently working on.
I have got big ferrite U cores to try it out, two "I"
cores are coming within days.
The basics are in the picture. What is not included
are optional "U" core pieces coming out of middle
core section on the sides, Forming BiTT routes for
"Cout" CEMF flux.

It has to work!
What are your thoughts on that?

kEhYo

[ldrancer]

you guys haven't got intellectual property. as i invented the brain and thinking and you're trying to steal from me.

[kEhYo77]

@Mikey

Thanks, yes the force of the magnet is the main EMF here.
The "Cout" coil can be decoupled from the load with a single mosfet
placed after the rectification diode bridge, before an output capacitor
or even better with a mosfet H-bridge which will provide a function
of coil shorting at the same time.

kEhYo

[BroMikey]

Disconnect

Okay good then I was right the magnet start the whole process.I had to be sure. Excellent. Did you ever make one of those switching Mosfet circuits for it? If so I would be interested to look at it as I alway enjoy circuit diagrams, especially when the pickup/feedback/reed switch control is shown.

What is a good switching speed?

Mikey PS happy experimenting

@Mikey

Thanks, yes the force of the magnet is the main EMF here.
The "Cout" coil can be decoupled from the load with a single mosfet
placed after the rectification diode bridge, before an output capacitor.

[kEhYo77]

Maximum switching speed depends on the core material and in case of a ferrite
core can be quite high. What needs to be done to determine the optimal frequency is to measure the time of Cout coil response to switching flux with
an oscilloscope and go from there.

kEhYo

[Dog-One]

Output Switch

It has to work!
What are your thoughts on that?

I like it!

What you may have to do though is to add some sort of output switch. Why?

Because what I think may happen is as the control coils start the transition, the back EMF from the output coil will try to hold the magnetic field where it is and not let it swing. So what you will want to do is pop open the switch for just a brief period to allow the swing to start, then close the switch again to pick up the output power.

I could be wrong and hopefully I am, but I've seen back EMF tangle with the operation of many good ideas.

[ldrancer]

intellectual property is a scam to keep people from sharing ideas, just like crying over p2p which is person to person communication, using your internet connection saying that its warezing or something is just a scam. thats mine this is mine. when noones making money off of it its not a scam.

[kEhYo77]

I like it!

What you may have to do though is to add some sort of output switch. Why?

Hi Dog-One.

I have thought of that, it is mentioned in the picture description.

[BroMikey]

Joule Thief

Hi Guys

Isn't that why all these joule thief style toggling methods are limited? You understand my statement? You know how a lot of experimenters use a single feedback winding or even a tiny toroid to keep the transistors switching, right? But the fear is that at certain frequencies LOCK UP may smash the semiconductor.

Of course I am only repeating for clarity.


Some have various names they put on the energy creeping down the wire that acts as a gas to throw a wrench into the works. Is this correct?

I think if this is the area of discussion then this must be why more advanced electronic schemes are employed, such as the DARLINGTON toggle that can ensure that LOCK UP does not occur.


Like right now, I am looking at my old Solid State School Girl circuit (SSSG) that I changed out the standard transistors for MOSFET's, right? Yes I did and I am wondering if these MOSFETS will be more apt to LOCK UP than the transistors.

I think it will work, I have 12 mosfets set up in banks of 3. So I have 4 banks of 3 FETS each. I am thinking that I will have more duty control and freq. if I use a high grade TL594 going to a TC4420.

I saw Peter L. Mosfet circuit from years ago, it is really simple and it uses the small feed back wire to toggle MOSFETS.

Just thinking out loud guys don't mind me

Anyway I am showing you where I am today.

Mikey

Hi Dog-One.

I have thought of that, it is mentioned in the picture description.

[ldrancer]

someone with a few hundred thousand should, be able to protect their stuff anyway. and someone who spends a few hundred thousand, should be able to prove they invented anything anyway. usually people with a few hundred thousand to steal something with, can't prove anything. anyway. it should be pretty simple . but ****ty courts makes this not easy to do. someone who can't prove they build something shouldnt be bothering with it anyway as they can't make anything. only the inventor if it was an actual invention and not theft would be able to prove what they build. if you get a paper that you don't prove as ive already asked on here, what good is that? it only has you sign off your invention to a big group of people who are like sharks in a pit. waiting to send lots of people to off you or whatever else, steal your stuff, break it. or whatever.

but if your looking, .. to help out people, the best way would be to tell people. not an office that probably has a direct line to a pit of sharks. you know, the patent office.

[BroMikey]

Circuit 4 You

Here is a multi-channel circuit with 3 of the same circuits all connected together if you want extra fun. This is not a theory, this is a real functioning black box. Mine uses 20 and 10 turn pots/has a huge heat sink/ 2 fets per channel/ 3 toggle switches to turn on and off each channel.

It operates within a half of a HZ. It runs on 12vdc. Pulsing a squarewave from 1 percent duty.

Freq's are 0-10khz 12-30khz 20-50khz

Don't burn down the house

If anyone has a real circuit please post it. This circuit was built by a friend of mine who worked 35 years in the electronics field, he is a genius and pro circuit trouble shooter/ builder.

Coils and magnets are nice but without the circuit you are going to have trouble.


Mikey

[BroMikey]

Pulsing with a TL594

Here is another copy of that real non theoretical circuit WITH REAL values.

Don't nobody have a heart attack now, I did say WITH REAL values. Ya know ones that work?

This circuit is not a fake/lie. I know it is hard to believe. I understand.

No missing wires or mystery components.

When you get done building it , the circuit will actually work.

That is a very important fact, especially after you spend hundreds of dollars to build it.

My circuits are not a hanging mess of bread board spaghetti with no power handling.

If you build a 3 channel circuit like this with regulator AND put some real solder on all

of the connections, box it up, big sink, nice controls, nice switches, then you will have a circuit.

[BroMikey]

BiTT

Hi all!

I recently discovered one Bulgarian experimenter that built MEG like
device ..........

Valeri generously agreed to answer my questions ............


3. He said that nanocrystalline material is not absolutely necessary

for the effect to be observed. Such materials can improve efficiency,

but nothing unique happens inside the core. For example, one of his

prototypes with measurements published on the Website works at 50Hz

(!!!) with regular transformer steel core and exhibits COP up to 5.4.

Thanks. I have been reading your materials again. The efficiencies are better at higher freq. The 5.4 Cop prototypes often run very little power for practical use. This is why they stay proto. Proof that it works only prototyping.

We need ferrite rings, nice big magnets, the top and bottom circles could be made from PERMALLOY Sheeting, similar to the tape we are use to.

Stack laminating more material in the center could give the thicker measurement needed at a proper perm.

This is a pricey geometry.