Tesla book,Just Found!: Tesla on the true nature of light, agrees with my conclusion!

[TheoriaApophasis]

Well, I JUST FOUND this, and am both pissed I didnt find this passage from Tesla MUCH EARLIER,


but ALSO VERY VERY HAPPY that Tesla agrees with me, that Light CANNOT BE merely a transverse EM phenomena.

Its just *#()@! impossible.


Also found a WONDERFUL new quote (new to me) from Tesla:

- Nikola Tesla






TESLA ON LIGHT, basically the VERY SAME THING I concluded in my book, that light is ABSOLUTELY not merely transverse EM phenomena, rather has a Z-axis radial dielectric component.

He KEEPS saying light is a LONGITUDINAL disturbance, with OBVIOUS resultant transverse ATTRIBUTES.

ALL of this is the very same thing I concluded before finding this passage from Tesla, that ALL transverse components of light are merely attributes of what is a RADIAL (or Teslas longitudinal, same thing!!) Ether modality.


IN short, all the BS which conclude that LIGHT is transverse EM, is pure twaddle, it cannot be, we are taking the attributes of LIGHT, the E and M components and concluding THAT is light, but its not, its merely the attribute OF light, but NOT LIGHT ITSELF










from the book TESLA SAID:




download it here:
Library Genesis: Nikola Tesla, John T. Ratzlaff - Tesla Said

[TheoriaApophasis]

From Living Energies by Callum Coats (pg. 24-25):


The "Z-axis dielectric radial" component explains many things about light that might be considered "anomalous".

ALL spiral or transverse movements, of ANY variety MUST NECESSITATIVELY have either a fixed inertial 'point' ....OR a longitudinal (or as I said radial, same thing) source.



Ive suspected for what seems half my life, ....that light as merely electromagnetism was absolutely logically both INSANE and Impossible.


Now Ive got Tesla backing me on my premise.


Ive been thru this book BEFORE, somehow I missed this passage until now.


"Doh"

[TheoriaApophasis]

Yes. and now distinctions have to be clearly drawn between inertia, acceleration and movement which Ive been working hard on.


Im so glad I found that Tesla passage on LIGHT.


His CANDLE analogy is important as well.



Some initial stuff on inertia (get it, initial on inertia, ha) Ive been composing: (still very rough).

copyright 4th edition 0971254184 ISBN:

[Ernst]

The book you linked contains 100 non-searchable articles of Tesla, and calls itself the most comprehensible etc...

Here you can find almost 200 articles in searchable format with HQ images (the best I could find on the web).

The article you refer to is from 1934-04-08; "Tesla Sees Evidence Radio and Light Are Sound" by Orrin E. Dunlap, Jr. Published in the New York Times.

And for those who are interested, this is the work of de Volson Wood that is being referred to.

Enjoy!

Ernst.

[TheoriaApophasis]

The book you linked contains 100 non-searchable articles of Tesla
Ernest T. Bass.

Yes, I have no issues READING, I dont need a word searcher for everything.


There are countless books on what Tesla said, it is merely one.

I have nearly 13 TERABYTES of books and articles. Thanks for the link (on books I already have)

[TheoriaApophasis]

This is such an incredibly important point, not only philosophically (because it is "like a finger pointing to the moon"), but also technologically...

NIKOLA TESLA on Longitudinal power of light

as both meant and implied that LIGHT/ EM cannot be transverse EM phenomena as its power-carrier.


New York Times April 8, 1934 Section X, p. 9
Tesla sees evidence radio and light are sound (-like)
- N. Tesla

[ldrancer]

hey so how much is ac current linked to the other type of electricity that tesla was sending?

[ldrancer]

what ever then. yea lets discuss magnetism and the sun more.

COULD SOMONE JUST RELATE TO ME THE AC DISCOVERY TESLA DID AND ILL DO MY OWN RELATIONS AND ANYONE ELSE CAN JOIN IN ON THE CONVERSATION< because I DONT KNOW HWERE ELSE TO DISCUSS THIS. maybe i should go find a chat room about teens. thatd be a great place to go. you know, since i dont know where to go to discuss this,elsewhere, so we'll just all go , there. teen chat. sounds good.

i know, that tesla's new procedure for powering things, came from the smae type of idea as ac, as in it in some way somehow must mimicked nature.

in what way are they similiar his new technology as in how ac was discovered? thats my question. or is teslas new technology so ****ing advanced, he didnt know you dont know and im wasting my time on this forum?

[boguslaw]

the question is why nobody sees the connection ?

"She moves and yields, the day of toil now done,
there she hurries and explores new fields of life.
Ah, that no wing can lift me from the ground
to closely follow her and soar!
A beautiful dream! Though now the glories fade.
Alas, the wings which lift the mind so lightly
can find no bodily counterpart!"
"As I uttered these inspiring words the idea came like a flash of lightning and in an instant the truth was revealed. I drew with a stick on the sand the diagrams shown six years later in my address before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, and my companion understood them perfectly. The images I saw were wonderfully sharp and clear and had the solidity of metal and stone, so much so that I told him: "See my motor here; watch me reverse it." I cannot begin to describe my emotions. Pygmalion seeing his statue come to life could not have been more deeply moved. A thousand secrets of nature which I might have stumbled upon accidentally I would have given for that one which I had wrested from her against all odds and at the peril of my existence."
Nikola Tesla "My Inventions"

[Bob Smith]

what ever then. yea lets discuss magnetism and the sun more.

COULD SOMONE JUST RELATE TO ME THE AC DISCOVERY TESLA DID AND ILL DO MY OWN RELATIONS AND ANYONE ELSE CAN JOIN IN ON THE CONVERSATION< because I DONT KNOW HWERE ELSE TO DISCUSS THIS. maybe i should go find a chat room about teens. thatd be a great place to go. you know, since i dont know where to go to discuss this,elsewhere, so we'll just all go , there. teen chat. sounds good.

i know, that tesla's new procedure for powering things, came from the smae type of idea as ac, as in it in some way somehow must mimicked nature.

in what way are they similiar his new technology as in how ac was discovered? thats my question. or is teslas new technology so ****ing advanced, he didnt know you dont know and im wasting my time on this forum?

LDRancer
You might find more info if you look up Tesla's "impulse electricity." Eric Dollard speaks about it. This is the new form of electricity that Tesla was using to power his motors. There may not be much out there, but EPD does talk about it. I'd suggest you start a new thread to see if others can help you explore it.
Bob

[Bob Smith]

the question is why nobody sees the connection ?

"She moves and yields, the day of toil now done,
there she hurries and explores new fields of life.
Ah, that no wing can lift me from the ground
to closely follow her and soar!
A beautiful dream! Though now the glories fade.
Alas, the wings which lift the mind so lightly
can find no bodily counterpart!"
"As I uttered these inspiring words the idea came like a flash of lightning and in an instant the truth was revealed. I drew with a stick on the sand the diagrams shown six years later in my address before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, and my companion understood them perfectly. The images I saw were wonderfully sharp and clear and had the solidity of metal and stone, so much so that I told him: "See my motor here; watch me reverse it." I cannot begin to describe my emotions. Pygmalion seeing his statue come to life could not have been more deeply moved. A thousand secrets of nature which I might have stumbled upon accidentally I would have given for that one which I had wrested from her against all odds and at the peril of my existence."
Nikola Tesla "My Inventions"

Boguslaw,
I guess this is the crux of the issue for many of us. Ken has postulated and corroborated thru Tesla's writings that transverse EM impulses are at the heart of light, constituting the Z-axis of light waves. If I am correct in interpreting the poem you quote, even the TEM impulses lead us back to the ether, and are but one manifestation of its rich and wondrous capabilities.

There are the stories of light emanating from the ground where Stubblefield placed his earth batteries; there are glowing UFOs; and of course, the bright white glow of bulbs lit with cold electricity. I would argue that these phenomena are evidence of the relationship between TEM impulses and light. Perhaps light is another manifestation of that "sea of energy" surrounding us (as Moray said), and the question is how to tap into light's longitudinal EM component as a source of continuous power. I don't have answers, just musing in response to the great quote you've posted.
Bob

[Phat]

Mixing Theory

Could this explain Radiant Heat transfer?

Primer Field theory explains everything about light. It's said that Radiant Heat travels in transverse form, like light and sound.

Heat is kinetic energy correct? The description of Radiant Heat consist of the concept that it does not effect the temperature of the medium, only an object within distance. Like a camp fire to air. Another action at a distance?

I must bring up the subject that Radiant Heat is also said to dissipate per area. But wait, energy will just dissipate, where does this energy dissipate if there is no object, only medium. That ruins the "Law of Energy Conservation"

Another question would be is Radiant Heat energy just a by product of light. Being that the light is more intense closer to the source is in exact relation to Radiant Heat.

[TheoriaApophasis]

our idiot school system NEVER TAUGHT US important stuff like :


1. acceleration and inertia are ONE THING, motion and force are the OPPOSITE




we never learned anything simple and important in school OR COLLEGE.



Also we were taught BULLSHIIIT like "gravity is a warp of spacetime"



space and especially time have NO capacity to acceleration ANYTHING or ACT on anything. They are NEITHER Forces NOR Fields,.......*#(@(@& PERIOD



Humans are still in the dark ages.

[BroMikey]

Right On

Amen Theo

If we had been taught better from a young age things might had been different. That was the plan by the way to control the opposition.

Glad to see you are still kickin

Mikey (PS you ready to Tango?)

our idiot school system NEVER TAUGHT US important stuff like :


1. acceleration and inertia are ONE THING, motion and force are the OPPOSITE




we never learned anything simple and important in school OR COLLEGE.



Also we were taught BULLSHIIIT like "gravity is a warp of spacetime"



space and especially time have NO capacity to acceleration ANYTHING or ACT on anything. They are NEITHER Forces NOR Fields,.......*#(@(@& PERIOD



Humans are still in the dark ages.

[Dog-One]

Figures...

1. acceleration and inertia are ONE THING, motion and force are the OPPOSITE

So the first chapter in a high school physics book, the most fundamental of the whole thing, is wrong?

Well, that's just fricken great.

No wonder my stuff doesn't work.