My patent refused...

[Ernst]

While testing with my first magnifying transmitter (partial) set up, we noticed an increase in energy in the system. This principle we tried to put into a patent which we consequently registered. The Dutch patent system registers any patent with the correct lay-out, but within 6 (or 9 month, I forgot) you need to make an extra payment to verify if your patent concerns something new and something that can be build.
We just got the result of this verification:
- German patent DE 102008029441 A1 describes a very similar principle, so what I describe is not considered new.
- I wrote that part of the output energy can be used to power the system. Their response to this: "That would make it a perpetuum mobile, and break the laws of thermodynamics, so it can not be build"


First....
The German patent does indeed describe the same principle but with a very complicated system and at wrong frequencies (Schumann). The explanation given in that patent is wrong and if you would build according to that description it will not work.
He probably noticed that later on, because he stopped to pay the annual patent fee and the patent's current status is "disposed".
Second...
A petrol engine uses part of the produced energy to generate electricity for the spark plug, so that must be a perpetuum mobile too, then! Impossible to build.

So much for the Dutch patent office.
Well, not that it bothers me in any way. The main reason to patent it was to make sure that no one else could patent it and that has been accomplished. The owner of the German patent can no longer file claims because he stopped to pay the annual fees.
So this part is free now.
But this is only a small detail, the second patent which is still being scrutinized will blow your mind (but first theirs). Details on that one will be released next year.
We're building the prototype so there will not be any "Impossible to build" comment.
The building (small tower) is done, I am working on grounding, spark gap and coil designs.
We will put up some pictures soon...


Ernst.

[Hrothgar]

Bummer

You've got to be tricky with the terminology. Even on the meg patent they claimed it used the magnets as fuel. Even though the process itself doesn't harm the magnet anymore than sitting on the shelf.

[boguslaw]

I thought,magnifying transmitter have been totally understood already,hmm.... Something missing still.The inertia you must use, that's sure. Use the force.

[wrtner]

What is the number of your application? What is it called? You will need an "inventive step" and "novelty".

[MasterBlaster]

I thought,magnifying transmitter have been totally understood already,hmm.... Something missing still.The inertia you must use, that's sure. Use the force.

Patent US1119732 - Apparatus for transmitting electrical energy. - Google Patents

[Ernst]

Ok, I'll explain. The German patent gives a completely wrong explanation, and also a rather complicated one, as is his apparatus. It is much simpler, and can be achieved much simpler.
First the two keys:
1891-05-20: Experiments with Alternate Currents of Very High Frequency and Their
Application to Methods of Artificial Illumination
1905-01-07: The Transmission of Electrical Energy Without Wires as a Means for
Furthering Peace

In yielding this knowledge, nature has revealed one of its most precious secrets, of inestimable consequence to man. So astounding are the facts in this connection, that it would seem as though the Creator, himself, had electrically designed this planet just for the purpose of enabling us to achieve wonders which, before my discovery, could not have been conceived by the wildest imagination. A full account of my discoveries and improvements will be given to the world in a special work which I am preparing. In so far, however, as they relate to industrial and commercial uses, they will be disclosed in patent specifications most carefully drawn.

Tesla does not at this time want to reveal what he has really found, what this most precious secret is. He therefore adds a bit of misleading information:

the entire distance of about twenty-five thousand miles, equal to the circumference of the globe

. Some people have fallen for this and have not found their way out (yet) .
In his later articles Tesla specifically explains that the impulse travels through the centre of the Earth, he then also describes how the effect of this impulse travels over the outside of the Earth with a varying velocity, because it is the spherical projection of the pulse through the centre of the Earth travelling at a fixed velocity.
This means that there is a true cause for electrical effects, as he described before "the equalisation of ether stresses". This runs through the centre of the Earth, causing charge movement in the outside layers of the Earth which again cause electrical and magnetic effects outside the Earth.

continued in next post...

[Ernst]

This has a very important consequence....
1900-06-00: The Problem of Increasing Human Energy - With Special References to the
Harnessing of the Sun's Energy.

Though we may never be able to comprehend human life, we know certainly that it is a movement, of whatever nature it be. The existence of movement unavoidably implies a body which is being moved and a force which is moving it. Hence, wherever there is life, there is a mass moved by a force. All mass possesses inertia, all force tends to persist.

The same text slightly edited:

Though we may never be able to comprehend electrical currents, we know certainly that it is a movement, of whatever nature it be. The existence of movement unavoidably implies a body which is being moved and a force which is moving it. Hence, wherever there is an electrical current, there is a mass moved by a force. All mass possesses inertia, all force tends to persist.

All mass possesses inertia, for that reason it takes energy to put it in motion which is released/converted when the motion is arrested.
But a force does not possess this inertia, so strictly speaking it does not take energy to put it in motion.

again:
1900-06-00: The Problem of Increasing Human Energy - With Special References to the
Harnessing of the Sun's Energy.

The ideal development of the war principle would ultimately lead to the transformation of the whole energy of war into purely potential, explosive energy, like that of an electrical condenser. In this form the war-energy could be maintained without effort; it would need to be much smaller in amount, while incomparably more effective.
---//---
The apparatus will be one of specifically great power, but only a few individuals will be required to operate it. This evolution will bring more and more into prominence a machine or mechanism with the fewest individuals as an element of warfare, and the absolutely unavoidable consequence of this will be the abandonment of large, clumsy, slowly moving, and unmanageable units. Greatest possible speed and maximum rate of energy-delivery by the war apparatus will be the main object.

Guess what that means.
The greatest/fastest change of potential will put the most electricity in motion. Like using a hammer instead of just pushing a nail into the wall.
This can be accomplished by a using a spark gap with highly charged caps of relatively great capacitance. This is used to create resonance in the Earth.

Next key:
Tesla views the Earth as a highly (negatively) charged sphere floating in space. What does such charge 'normally' do? It WANTS to escape. So if we create a standing wave IN the Earth (NOT in the surrounding atmosphere) we create 2 high voltage spots on the Earth's surface; one where our machine is located and one on the opposite side. Electric charges moving between them (wanting to escape) will form a 'cloud' slightly outside the Earth at these two high voltage points. This causes the air to be more conductive at those points which is a property that can be verified (I have verified this).
I am not sure but this is I think what Tesla tries to explain in his fountain patent. The rotation caused by the primary/secondary coils pulls up some of the Earth's electric charge.

Finally:
By creating a high voltage (high power) discharge, we "suck up" some of this escaped charges (see "pinch effect"). So the receiving terminal receives more charge than was released from the "sending" terminal. More charge at the same voltage allows for more current, so we have gained some energy here.

Well, for the sake of brevity I left out small details which you can surely add by yourself.
The effect can be seen in some of my video's, though the explanation that is given there is not 100% correct, nor complete. What is written here is, to the best of my knowledge, the correct explanation. (still not 100% complete though )

The German patent describes apparatus that may under the right circumstances create the same effect. But in a very complicated manner. And since his explanation is wrong he provides the wrong parameters to get it to work.

Enjoy!

Ernst.

[TheoriaApophasis]

But a force does not possess this inertia, so strictly speaking it does not take energy to put it in motion.

Ernst.

[Ernst]

Just noticed that the important part of the first quote was still missing.
It continues:
1891-05-20: Experiments with Alternate Currents of Very High Frequency and Their Application to Methods of Artificial Illumination

Returning to the subject, and bearing in mind that the existence of two electricities is, to say the least, highly improbable, we must remember, that we have no evidence of electricity, nor can we hope to get it, unless gross matter is present. Electricity, therefore, cannot be called ether in the broad sense of the term; but nothing would seem to stand in the way of calling electricity ether associated with matter, or bound other; or, in other words, that the so-called static charge of the molecule is ether associated in some way with the molecule. Looking at it in that light, we would be justified in saying, that electricity is concerned in all molecular actions.

Now, precisely what the ether surrounding the molecules is, wherein it differs from ether in general, can only be conjectured. It cannot differ in density, ether being incompressible; it must, therefore, be under some strain or is motion, and the latter is the most probable. To understand its functions, it would be necessary to have an exact idea of the physical construction of matter, of which, of course, we can only form a mental picture.

But of all the views on nature, the one which assumes one matter and one force, and a perfect uniformity throughout, is the most scientific and most likely to be true. An infinitesimal world, with the molecules and their atoms spinning and moving in orbits, in much the same manner as celestial bodies, carrying with them and probably spinning with them ether, or in other words; carrying with them static charges, seems to my mind the most probable view, and one which, in a plausible manner, accounts for most of the phenomena observed. The spinning of the molecules and their ether sets up the ether tensions or electrostatic strains; the equalization of ether tensions sets up ether motions or electric currents, and the orbital movements produce the effects of electro and permanent magnetism.

About fifteen, years ago, Prof. Rowland demonstrated a most interesting and important fact; namely, that a static charge carried around produces the effects of an electric current. Leaving out of consideration the precise nature of the mechanism, which produces the attraction and repulsion of currents, and conceiving the electrostatically charged molecules in motion, this experimental fact gives us a fair idea of magnetism. We can conceive lines or tubes of force which physically exist, being formed of rows of directed moving molecules; we can see that these lines must be closed, that they must tend to shorten and expand, etc. It likewise explains in a reasonable way, the most puzzling phenomenon of all, permanent magnetism, and, in general, has all the beauties of the Ampere theory without possessing the vital defect of the same, namely, the assumption of molecular currents. Without enlarging further upon the subject, I would say, that I look upon all electrostatic, current and magnetic phenomena as being due to electrostatic molecular forces.

The bold part is the most relevant in this.
Another quite relevant quote I should add:
1900-06-00: The Problem of Increasing Human Energy - With Special References to the Harnessing of the Sun's Energy.

[boguslaw]

Ernst

Thank You. I completely agree with you, except maybe ...leave fountain patent alone, I don't see it's related here.
The other problem is the practicality of such big voltages.I would say, don't mess with weather, or may somebody blame you for the next tornado

[aljhoa]

Proper angle gyro in a butt "stops" recoil.

Al

[mikrovolt]

I am sorry Ernst.
A lot of good people getting screwed.
Some companies tried 3 times to obtain patent rights and almost 17 years later
the too big to fail are laughing.

It is a shame everyone else is too small to succeed.

[Ernst]

Just wait and see, Microvolt.
I have got another one in my sleeve...

The promised pictures are still not officially online, but here is a preview.
My micro Wardenclyffe which will operate on 2 MV (or there about).



Ernst.

[boguslaw]

Just wait and see, Microvolt.
I have got another one in my sleeve...

The promised pictures are still not officially online, but here is a preview.
My micro Wardenclyffe which will operate on 2 MV (or there about).



Ernst.

Ernst
Wow ! That's incredibly big device ! How did you managed to get support from the people ? I'm trying trying and even my family is ignoring me and think only about theirs prosaic earthbounds needs and took so much of my time to accomplish them, to support to help... yet give no time for my ideas..."blind, faint-hearted, doubting world!"

[aljhoa]

Just wait and see, Microvolt.
I have got another one in my sleeve...

Invention Secrecy Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Government Secrecy Orders on Patents Have Stifled More Than 5,000 Inventions | WIRED


Al