This should be explained...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Two circles Paradox
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by veproject1 View PostThis should be explained...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW-0bZwoGwQ
360 degrees is 360 is 360
the two circles are incommensurate with each other, this was a key point of study of the pythagoreans ages ago.
larger circle has area of PHI , smaller is area of 1
its a math proof that 1 is Phi, and Phi is 1, I have a discovery i found on incommensurability in Platos Republic , its hidden, in 509d - 511
The incommensurate super proof of the universe the Pythagoreans discovered was (and it was hidden, I discovered it 12 years ago and wrote a small article on it) is 1/ Phi^-3
That video is nothing, I have a REAL brain warper you should see, Ive given it to some math professors, and it puzzles them.
none of them are trained in the irrational incommensurability of Phi
-
This video fools only fools.
Imagine the inner circle were a wheel that would roll on the top wire, then it would travel a smaller distance in one rotation. So instead of drawing circles, use actual wheels and see what happens: the smallest wheel travels the shortest distance making the combined structure roll in a circle instead of a straight line.
Exactly the same thing can be seen when you make a cylinder roll (all wheels equal -> straight line) or a cone (bigger to smaller wheels -> rolls in a circle).
In other words: There is slippage between the circles and the wires.
Ernst.
Comment
-
Of course it could be "explained"...anyone with some fundamentals on Geometry could do it.Originally posted by veproject1 View PostThis should be explained...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW-0bZwoGwQ
[IMG]
[/IMG]
You are using a White Circle of Radius R, adding the groove depth where you roll circle, and Circumference C...You have rolled Circle through Distance D, where Radius lines, line up with cords dots.
And what we have is simply that C=D...
Whatever Circles you PAINT within White rolling disc(using same center of course)...will line up all the way to Center of Circumference, just because you are rolling within the measure of the OUTER Circumference C.
Confusion generates by painting the circles aligned with Main Circle...
[IMG]
[/IMG]
I could also paint my Grandmother's face ...and it would line up as well...did she had the same face length?
Now, besides this video...I got a question:
Do you think you are "Educating" ppl by showing this?...or better, creating confusion with this kind of videos?...Entertainment...maybe...but never education.
A waste of time to gain some views IMO.
UfopoliticsLast edited by Ufopolitics; 08-15-2014, 04:44 PM.Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci
Comment
-
Silly simple. These are both traveling with reference to the OUTSIDE circumference of the wheel. All points of different radial distance from center reference the outer circumference which is the part in contact with the table plane. Not a paradox I am afraid.Originally posted by veproject1 View PostThis should be explained...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW-0bZwoGwQ
Comment
-
Originally posted by Armagdn03 View PostSilly simple. These are both traveling with reference to the OUTSIDE circumference of the wheel. All points of different radial distance from center reference the outer circumference which is the part in contact with the table plane. Not a paradox I am afraid.
Yes yes, BUT IT IS SOMETHING PEOPLE SHOULD THINK about .
not that its obviously a simple answer, but the nature of divergence, that if mercury and Pluto were in line, for both to go 360 degrees around the sun is nothing for mercury, but would require enormous speeds for pluto.
humans need to do MORE thinking about the FECAL MATTER that is the necessitated product of radiative fields, and how all that factors into charge and discharge
DIELECTRICITY
MAGNETISM
SPACE
TIME
if humans can mentally master those 4, nothing is impossible.
Comment
-
Far from a paradox lol
The bottom line is farther away.
The big circle "dot" has to travel farther to reach the bottom line.
The small circle "dot" has to travel less distance to reach the top line.
That is what makes they're diameters appear to be the same.
(like everyone here has said)
Nothing complex in that. Cool illusion though.
You could easily add a third smaller circle on the higher line and make it look more distorted.
Comment
-
what gets me is the middle, it is a circle, has to be to measure it so it is also spinning, and i dont get what everyones so confused on. measure it, it has to do it, and everything aroudn it does too. you could keep going out. then peoples heads would start exploding. with uaawwwhhaagghhuu aaaaa.
you take a line pointing out and turn it in any direction where the line starts has to turn. thats the point of it. wherever the arrow goes it goes around the same. cut the line down to as small as you want. spin it, it goes around the same amount. you can measure it from any point. that measurement is how far around it went and your only using average. so its the math problem answer your showing for units. so it doesnt really matter.Last edited by ldrancer; 08-19-2014, 06:17 AM.
Comment
Comment