Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Utterly NEW type of homopolar motor just invented off my book, video

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Utterly NEW type of homopolar motor just invented off my book, video

    Youtube user TinManPower


    He calls it the "Magnetic vortex Aqua motor"




    He gives me credit for the idea/inspiration at 2:05 in the Video !!


    I CAN SEE 'HIDDEN' APPLICATIONS FOR THIS!!!!!!!




    Sweet stuff !


    Hes made 4 VERY NICE VIDEOS based upon reading my book about magnetic vortex (see his 4 most recent videos!!)





  • #2
    Very cool!
    Just finished watching three of the 4 videos. Fascinating stuff. In the 3rd video, around 10:30 you can actually see the narrower (centripetal?) vortex within the wider (centrifugal?) vortex at the top of the magnet. These videos strike me as a kind of proof for what you've been saying, TA, about the structure of the magnet's fields.

    Yes, application -- if the vortices are always there at both ends of the magnet (made more visible through Tinman's setup), then each end has its own demonstrable gyroscopic action, does it not? If this is the case, if one were to turn a cylinder magnet like the one TM is using vertically, you'd have your gyroscopes at each end. In this sense, would they not be counteracting the force of gravity on the magnet, much as Eric Laithwaite demonstrated with the weight spinning at the end of the bar?
    Bob

    But wait... Does the force of the dielectric plane at the magnet's center (besides pinching the magnetic lines of force between the 2 ends) determine the rate of the vortices' spin? If so, can we stimulate the dielectric plane to make these vortices at each end faster, thereby increasing the magnetic vortices' gyroscopic effects???
    Last edited by Bob Smith; 07-20-2014, 11:09 PM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Bob Smith View Post
      Very cool!
      Just finished watching three of the 4 videos. Fascinating stuff. In the 3rd video, around 10:30 you can actually see the narrower (centripetal?) vortex within the wider (centrifugal?) vortex at the top of the magnet. These videos strike me as a kind of proof for what you've been saying, TA, about the structure of the magnet's fields.

      Yes, application -- if the vortices are always there at both ends of the magnet (made more visible through Tinman's setup), then each end has its own demonstrable gyroscopic action, does it not? If this is the case, if one were to turn a cylinder magnet like the one TM is using vertically, you'd have your gyroscopes at each end. In this sense, would they not be counteracting the force of gravity on the magnet, much as Eric Laithwaite demonstrated with the weight spinning at the end of the bar?
      Bob


      Ive got 12 diff. methods (fluids, suspensions, charged graphite, bismuth dust.....CRT, etc etc etc) of showing Centrifugal and Centripetal magnetic reciprocation.
      But even 10000 proofs would never convince anyone firmly living in the CULT OF QUANTUM

      (Eric Dollard calls it "Quantum Mysticism")

      Everything "there" is ruled by Unicorn magic particles (muons, gluons)
      and magic "Pixie dust discharge particles" (electrons)

      Even Tesla USED the term "electron" but he OUTRIGHT denied such nonsense was a particle.

      GR and QM is just rehashed ancient GREEK ATOMISM
      In "their world", its full of a pantheon of pixies , unicorns, and other mystical particles that make their equations 'balance out'

      Originally posted by Bob Smith View Post
      But wait... Does the force of the dielectric plane at the magnet's center (besides pinching the magnetic lines of force between the 2 ends) determine the rate of the vortices' spin?
      Several things do, composition (neo iron boron), how its compacted, geometry of the magnet, how its charged (when created) etc.

      NO, the precession rate
      (under PERFECT conditions), that is uniform, I talk about that precessional rotation etc in the book.
      Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 07-21-2014, 01:30 AM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Thanks TA!
        Time for me to read the rest of your book.
        Bob

        Comment


        • #5
          Has this been tried in a fluid other than water?
          it should be noted that water is a unique substance.
          It is not simply H2O.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by indio007 View Post
            Has this been tried in a fluid other than water?
            it should be noted that water is a unique substance.
            It is not simply H2O.

            I have tried it this morning in another liquid ( I will not state what), and get the same results. However I only used 12V DC battery , ......he is using 30V and 1.3 A (If I recall correctly) in his tank.

            Yes, I know enormous amounts about H2O, Including some thing I hope one day soon to publish. Im pretty sure I own every book on the "unique" properties of water ever written.

            The 108-36-36 geometry was the "divine incommensurable" to the Platonists and Pythagoreans, of which, this is also the H20 molecule

            Comment

            Working...
            X