This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied






    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by sadang View Post
    Sorry! My mistake! I fixed the Youtube link and now it works fine!
    Sweet work!!



    Ive got 12 diff testing methods that have NOTHING to do with zapping a magnet or CRT tubes.

    I have and use suspensions, ferrofluid lenses, lasers with beam splitters

    Well, I wrote the last section on the missing secret of TEM, which is NOT (entirely) electromagnetic, but has a Z axis radial dielectric. I wrote that section for a reason based upon Heavisides implications on the genuine nature of light. However even he didnt ever "get it".


    We have established a "device" using 3 to 6 wavelength lasers (I will not specify) but here is ONE channel at a wavelength of 635 nm , and only snapshots off a video,.....NO VIDEO will be posted (I will not post it until things are locked in).

    Nobody here can/will figure out how the device works since it uses a good bit of equipment ;D, splitter, a special lens, XXXXX, and yes, (obviously) a special spinning prism

    But, suffice to say, I can reproduce (obviously using lasers) the magneto-dielectric field of a strong magnet in some amazing details.

    It still blows my mind to see a laser, a single channel form a vortex as it 'paints' the field within which the magnetism of the magnet displaces the dielectric component of light, or along the dielectric where the magnetism is torn asunder in the light

    This is ONE device out of 5 nobody ANYWHERE (except for 3 of us) has ever seen before to show magnetic field reciprocation, and using ALL channels, easily shows the dielectric, the centripetal and centrifugal 'working' together as you twist the magnet, and move the broadcast beams.

























    On another note, see what I inspired this guy to do::::::::::


    See HIS videos here that I inspired:

    See last 7 videos he made











    etc


    Leave a comment:


  • sadang
    replied
    Sorry! My mistake! I fixed the Youtube link and now it works fine!

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by sadang View Post
    Hi Ken,
    - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYQG...1SxT_I40ruVosd

    I declined to comment on videos or to add a description specific, as must further deepen some aspects of your theory.

    Thanks,
    SaDAng


    Tried to watch, but your youtube link and that video are dead says "not available"

    Leave a comment:


  • sadang
    replied
    Hi Ken,

    Here are the new set of movies (8 to 21) I made using the my delta CRT monitor. These are the last movies I make to prove the CW and CCW vortexial movement of magnetic field, because I understood this aspect some years ago. In the further experiments I would like to deepen the study of "dielectric inertial plane". However for this I have to continue reading your book.

    - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYQG...1SxT_I40ruVosd

    I declined to comment on videos or to add a description specific, as must further deepen some aspects of your theory.

    Thanks,
    SaDAng
    Last edited by sadang; 07-26-2014, 08:11 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by tachyon View Post
    seriously its because of the hydrogen bonding I MUST SAY , north increases south decreases

    Ive read that article, its half right. MANY factors are in play actually.


    the magneto-dielectric dipole geometry OF H20 is incomensurable with the geometry of magnetic precession

    There is both molecular geometry at play, and H20 charges and how theyre ordered, both in SPACE and in CHARGE

    also :

    H2, has a charge of one, but mutually a spatial molecular domain of PHI

    Oxygen. has, roughly, a charge (magneto-dilectric) of Phi, and a spatial of 1

    Leave a comment:


  • tachyon
    replied
    seriously its because of the hydrogen bonding I MUST SAY , north increases south decreases
    Last edited by tachyon; 07-25-2014, 10:50 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    the "FIELD OF DIELECTRICITY" (meaning magnetism) - J.C. Maxwell



    RESULTS, time after time, the SAME:


    I have much much more on this to follow in "different arenas"


    (Yes, I know Rawles and Davis reported on this 30 some years ago in their 3 books)


    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by tachyon View Post
    north increases hydrogen bonding south decreases hydrogen bonding that's why you see this difference the weaker the hydrogen bonding the easier the biological reactions happen

    http://www.iasj.net/iasj?func=fulltext&aId=17177


    I came to a somewhat likewise conclusion in a diff. way from recent tests, since H2O is both 1 and phi on both "ends"

    H2, has a charge of one, but mutually a spatial molecular domain of PHI

    Oxy. has, roughly, a charge (magneto-dilectric) of Phi, and a spatial of 1


    Thats reciprocal incommensurability

    Leave a comment:


  • tachyon
    replied
    north increases hydrogen bonding south decreases hydrogen bonding that's why you see this difference the weaker the hydrogen bonding the easier the biological reactions happen

    Last edited by tachyon; 07-25-2014, 06:33 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Smith View Post
    TA,
    Don't know if you've seen this, but you may find it of interest:
    Source and further info: NVtronics.org • View topic - Primeval Code
    B

    That would explain rapid change in creature evolution since the earth flips its poles something like every 62,000 years (or something close to this) like clockwork.

    Ill take a look

    Kind regards

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by thx1138 View Post
    The following images aren't proof of anything. They may be balderdash. You should, however, find them interesting. They are Julia Set fractals of Golden Ratios. Maybe it will trigger something for you. You'll no doubt recognize the numbers.

    We might look at that 11.803 degree angle of precession as mother nature's spoon stirring the pot of the universe. It represents the instability built into nature that allows creation to be filled not with stasis, but with the never ending variations of our existence.

    thats only a hair over 1 degree off from the center-point to edge of the gyromagnetic precessional angle SEE PAGE 29


    Love fractals, I have all the programs I can get and mess with them to help think




    You said:
    went through the Pythagoras, Plato and the Golden Ratio once


    That book is VERY incomplete, that book was only written , tiny that it is, was only published to prove a serious discovery I made, with all intents (and still do) to finalize it some day. I have 100s of pages of notes to use to create that work,.........time time time.
    Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 07-25-2014, 05:58 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • thx1138
    replied
    Theo: I read your magnetic secrets book twice, went through the Pythagoras, Plato and the Golden Ratio once and came back here and saw the pictures of the shells you posted earlier. After that boiled around in my mind a while a few things came together for me. Thank you.

    The following images aren't proof of anything. They may be balderdash. You should, however, find them interesting. They are Julia Set fractals of Golden Ratios. Maybe it will trigger something for you. You'll no doubt recognize the numbers.

    We might look at that 11.803 degree angle of precession as mother nature's spoon stirring the pot of the universe. It represents the instability built into nature that allows creation to be filled not with stasis, but with the never ending variations of our existence.
    Last edited by thx1138; 01-03-2015, 01:57 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Smith
    replied
    Originally posted by TheoriaApophasis View Post
    that was a 2 day old pic of the alfalfa sprouts, NOW, the difference on the most recent batch is rather enormous.
    LOTS OF NORTH POLE seeds didnt spout AT ALL, and theyre puny and sickly.
    The South pole are happy and BIG and green, and fluffy and healthy.

    Ive got the reason why N and S affects genetic growth SO differently.. (at least in seeds and growth in plants), its hyper-logical, and you'll LOVE the answer when you read it.
    TA,
    Don't know if you've seen this, but you may find it of interest:Source and further info: NVtronics.org • View topic - Primeval Code
    B

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by Dog-One View Post
    Please give him all the assistance you can. This is powerful research that we can all learn a bunch from.


    Ive already offered to help how I can, Ive already told him I would put his name and PIC in the next book,


    but he didnt want the PIC, But I was going to use snaps of his work, and then give him a big reference and hopefully that funnels people and / or cash to him.

    I dunno why he didnt want a picture credit etc, ....but its whatever he wants.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X