E=mc^2

[Aaron]

[Aaron]

[Aaron]

[Aaron]

[BroMikey]

Keeping up to speed

Nice work Eric

This is my kind of preaching and will take some time to assimilate.

Deepest regards, Mike

[Ernst]

Let him go back to Kansas. Have some primary education perhaps.

Eric could save himself a lot of time if he would just give a list of his source material.
Would save me time too, reading through his fantasies, misinterpretations and mathematical incompetence.

It's a computation for 1/2 the energy of a 2 body problem i.e. a collision
It's the energy of one of the objects.
I want to know how Einstein gets C^2. He just randomly throughs it into the second law of motion so he can equate the V^2 with C^2. He wants to clamp velocity to the speed of light. So he goes ... SQRT of 1-V^2/C^2 . Circular reasoning if you ask me. there is no logical reason to use C^2 at all.

Really now????

You guys really understand everything! Don't you? I'm speechless.

If there is another forum where there actually IS some intelligence, let me know.
Time to go.

Ernst.

[Aaron]

@Ernst

Let him go back to Kansas. Have some primary education perhaps.

Eric could save himself a lot of time if he would just give a list of his source material.
Would save me time too, reading through his fantasies, misinterpretations and mathematical incompetence.


Really now????

You guys really understand everything! Don't you? I'm speechless.

If there is another forum where there actually IS some intelligence, let me know.
Time to go.

Ernst.

All you do is talk, talk, talk... why don't you post something you built based on your understanding of this science? You don't even know the proper definition of energy so you are one of the few here demonstrating the lack of understanding and incompetence.

[BroMikey]

Turning Tail to run

All you do is talk, talk, talk... why don't you post something you built based on your understanding of this science? You don't even know the proper definition of energy so you are one of the few here demonstrating the lack of understanding and incompetence.

See what happens Aaron when these university level folks get presented with real hard data that they never thought was there? Bye Bye he says cause were stupid.

This reminds me of the little boy who wanted to know of the worlds secrets in a single setting yet he's not really young enough to study the real science being all burnt out since grade school mind-washed gov/religion.

Like you said these folks will defend insanity with a passion, otherwise they would have to apologize to the entire staff plus all their buddies who pride themselves with higher learning.

This is their response like you see now, total and complete rejection of any materials that our not given in their college.

Can you imagine Tesla following the cronies of his day?

Either way this is a wonderful work that is something intelligent for us all to consider. A truth investigator will consider every possible side of any coin, not just throw it out cause it came from Eric.

The truth is that I don't study these big words all of the time and they are not on the tip of my tongue yet I do know good sound doctrine when i hear it.

I do know many of these terms as presented by Eric, then all of the dark energy doc's that mainstream forwards are all thrown into a big pile to burn by these types of individuals who refuse new information.

Well it is not new, but for the sake of friendly fire we will say it is new to them. Poor things won't open the door.

Regular mainstream science is an insult to clear thought and is best suited for grade schoolers. Then maybe by 6th grade even a 12 year will find the contradictions though he may be a afraid to go against his entire school, his fearless leader called teacher running the risk of belittlement and driven out labeled as trouble maker.

It is time for Eric to head to the principles office to be scolded for his insolence. Eric reminds me of me.

Mike

[Aaron]

Skepticlowns

See what happens Aaron when these university level folks get presented with real hard data that they never thought was there? Bye Bye he says cause were stupid.

This reminds me of the little boy who wanted to know of the worlds secrets in a single setting yet he's not really young enough to study the real science being all burnt out since grade school mind-washed gov/religion.

Like you said these folks will defend insanity with a passion, otherwise they would have to apologize to the entire staff plus all their buddies who pride themselves with higher learning.

This is their response like you see now, total and complete rejection of any materials that our not given in their college.

Can you imagine Tesla following the cronies of his day?

Either way this is a wonderful work that is something intelligent for us all to consider. A truth investigator will consider every possible side of any coin, not just throw it out cause it came from Eric.

The truth is that I don't study these big words all of the time and they are not on the tip of my tongue yet I do know good sound doctrine when i hear it.

I do know many of these terms as presented by Eric, then all of the dark energy doc's that mainstream forwards are all thrown into a big pile to burn by these types of individuals who refuse new information.

Well it is not new, but for the sake of friendly fire we will say it is new to them. Poor things won't open the door.

Regular mainstream science is an insult to clear thought and is best suited for grade schoolers. Then maybe by 6th grade even a 12 year will find the contradictions though he may be a afraid to go against his entire school, his fearless leader called teacher running the risk of belittlement and driven out labeled as trouble maker.

It is time for Eric to head to the principles office to be scolded for his insolence. Eric reminds me of me.

Mike

Mike,

Well, you can see how a couple of them jumped to every possible explanation in order to get around the plain and simple fact that their definition of energy is completely contradictory to the very unit of measurement of energy, the joule being actual work and not potential work.

When we have that kind of intellectual dishonesty, there isn't much that can be done with a mentality like that as their ego is more important than swallowing their pride and admitting that they've believed in many irrational things dealing with basic science but never were able to think properly in order to see it - oh well!

Eric Dollard has built many Telsa/Alexanderson type transmission systems with electrostatic longitudinal propagation that is INSTANTANEOUS from one end to the other meaning that all the BS about light speed limits, etc... are all garbage. That kind of propagation does NOT even have a velocity so it is not traveling faster than the speed of light, it is INSTANT at the receiving end. None of these "rocket scientists", physics teachers, etc... are even qualified to discuss the matter because they're out of their league and for Eric's explanations to be dismissed in such a pathetic fashion just makes me laugh.

Regardless of how Eric explains himself, he is demonstrating, indisputably, many WORKING MODELS that all these cynics combined have ever accomplished collectively in their entire lives - they have NO room to talk because they're not qualified to analyze any of it!

Documentation beats conversation any day of the week and these cynics have NEVER built anything other than what fits inside of their claustrophobic self-limited pre-conceived reality of how things are supposed to be.

That is why some of us have results that they will never have because their arrogance and smugness in all of their delusions keeps them trapped in ignorance.

[indio007]

Really now????

You guys really understand everything! Don't you? I'm speechless.

If there is another forum where there actually IS some intelligence, let me know.
Time to go.

Ernst.

Not really sure which part you have a problem with.

I am aware that 1/2 is derived using the chain rule of calculus but that is hardly a physical rationale.

The equation for the kinetic energy of an inelastic collision

KE = 1/2 mv2 + 1/2 mv2

Now let me ask this. Can the force exerted by a moving object be measured without a collision?

You can scour the internet for the reason for using 1/2. You will not find a answer other than the rules of calculus told me so. Wikipedia asserts 1/2 is a constant if you can believe that. It is a fudge factor is you ask me and has been embroiled in controversy. Incidentally 1/2 is called a coefficient in that article.
The problem lies with integrating a composite function at zero.
Don't let 0 x n = 0 stop you.

then again maybe your problem is with my opinion of Einstein....
C^2 was pulled out of his butt. There was no experiment that lead to "If we use C^2 our mathematical model works!"

It was more like. "I feel like limiting V^2 to C^2. We shall now look for phenomena that fits my model!"

If you think V isn't clamped to C check this

V=5
C=3

Using the formula SQRT of 1-V^2/C^2

1-25/9 = 1-2.77 = -1.77

What is the SQRT of -1.77?

Oh ya ... there isn't one!
Therefore no massive object can go faster than C because our mathematical rules say no.

[BroMikey]

It's a Pack Mentality

Mike,

Well, you can see how a couple of them jumped to every possible explanation in order to get around the plain and simple fact that their definition of energy is completely contradictory to the very unit of measurement of energy, the joule being actual work and not potential work.

When we have that kind of intellectual dishonesty, there isn't much that can be done with a mentality like that as their ego is more important than swallowing their pride and admitting that they've believed in many irrational things dealing with basic science but never were able to think properly in order to see it - oh well!

Eric Dollard has built many Telsa/Alexanderson type transmission systems with electrostatic longitudinal propagation that is INSTANTANEOUS from one end to the other meaning that all the BS about light speed limits, etc... are all garbage. That kind of propagation does NOT even have a velocity so it is not traveling faster than the speed of light, it is INSTANT at the receiving end. None of these "rocket scientists", physics teachers, etc... are even qualified to discuss the matter because they're out of their league and for Eric's explanations to be dismissed in such a pathetic fashion just makes me laugh.

Regardless of how Eric explains himself, he is demonstrating, indisputably, many WORKING MODELS that all these cynics combined have ever accomplished collectively in their entire lives - they have NO room to talk because they're not qualified to analyze any of it!

Documentation beats conversation any day of the week and these cynics have NEVER built anything other than what fits inside of their claustrophobic self-limited pre-conceived reality of how things are supposed to be.

That is why some of us have results that they will never have because their arrogance and smugness in all of their delusions keeps them trapped in ignorance.

Aaron

Most people who live in America today that are blonde hair and blue eyes think they are smarter than the rest. The minorities are the underclassmen or underdogs.

The group think tank has produced a pack animal thought process that helps to herd the masses so as to control their minds to get them to do what THEY want them to do.

It is that simple trust me.

For instance when the next generation of children reach the right age THEY (the planners) start placing truck driving adds before and after the cartoon shows. Then produce shows with truck drivers in the cartoons.

The control frec's are at it 24/7. In this way THEY can produce a flock of truck drivers to fill their needs.

I know this is a crude example but this holds true on many levels of programming of the pack dog schools.

Crazy like wolves and willing to go to any means to intimidate like their training has burned unto their souls. Once folks are indoctrinated there is little hope if any of an outside force interacting with their known set of rules.

However like coyotes the pack animal training makes sure that large numbers are in their favor before they move in for the kill. In this setting the kill is getting rid of outside evidence that puts buck shot through their paper thin coverings.

The pack must first spend large amounts of time frightening those to be devoured long before 10-12 pack animals that are all twice as big as the prey move in.(ya know mr big stuff thinks he is twice as exceptable with his line of bull)

So the picture here shows a group of boys who grew to be men under the control of gov/relig. It reminds me of the dark ages and that period of the crusades.

It is a prefect picture of herd dog society that is all around you now.

It is not enough to kill the prey, the pack must thoroughly destroy the confidence of the surrounded. Instill fear, belittle, threaten and so on and this is what identifies the oppressor. This is our schools way.

The pack leader will stoop to new lows of intellectual dishonesty as you put it. The pack dog has no principles fairness or morality. These are trained to bully and only group thought qualifies for protection.

This is how most house holds are run today in America as their children can lie cheat and steal and if it is their son, it doesn't matter.

So there is more here than a science book at stake, it is complete lack of good values.

Eric is so far out there we are going to have to see his work for quite some time before we will ever catch up.

What Eric has done so far has thrilled me to watch. I remember the seeming ly insignificant videos where Eric sets up a receiver and demonstrates. My heart is filled with wonder and I know it is beyond what others can show.

Bravo

Mike

[cikljamas]

Now we are dug in deep!

Listen this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9YHgl9fRSo&t=3m36s

And this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9YHgl9fRSo&t=7m30s

Light is refraction of upper atmosphere by Peter Lindemann:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Stoc91H2snE&t=3m20s

So Peter says this: "You can't see the stars and The Sun out of atmosphere", but what about The Moon? Did N.A.S.A. inside informers lie about The Moon in the context of "certain complications" asserting that The Moon is exception of (by Eric D. & Peter L. and others) postulated theory of luminiferous ether and it's function of refraction of radiation that comes from the direction of the Sun and the Stars but not from the direction of The Moon too?

Peter asserted that above upper atmosphere Sun could blind you if you gazed in the direction where the Sun is located although you wouldn't be aware that you are looking in the direction of the Sun because Sun is invisible up there...

So, those guys who had desperately gazed and gazed (who knows how often and for how long they had stared "in the wrong direction") all around upper atmosphere sky, looking for the Sun and Stars and Moon (which they had not been able to see up there), have been certainly horrified after they had realised that mother Earth is all that anyone could possibly see up there ..., but they have not been blinded anyway rendering their fruitless Sun&Star&Moon necked eyes surveying mission above the upper atmosphere...

That is why (their eyes have not been injured) i have to ask next question: what is the real temperature in outer space or in Jupiter or in Uranus or in Pluto?

And now, sorry, but i have to refer one more time to this:

As shown in the above diagram, the new moon occurs when the moon is positioned between the earth and sun...Most people will be mystified if you ask them where to look for a full moon or a new moon. If you understand the geometry of the illumination, the answer is obvious. A new moon must rise and set with the Sun. A full moon must rise around sunset and set around sunrise.

So, New Moon you can exclusively see between 9 a.m. and 3 p. m.
It means you can't see New Moon in the night, right?
If so, someone has to be able to explain these photographs:
PanSTARRS comet: Remarkable time-lapse video captures comet's trek across skies of Georgia | Mail Online

So, we should not be able to shut pictures like this one:


But, since there is whole bunch of pictures like this, our deluded scientist tried to explain it by totally preposterous theory so called "the reflection of a reflection"!?!?!? Bear in mind that we "can't see" New Moon in the night sky!!!

Many have laboured hard to make it appear that these phenomena are the result of what they have assumed to be light reflected from the earth--"Earth light," "the reflection of a reflection." The sun's light thrown back from the moon to the earth and returned from the earth to the moon! It seems never to have occurred to these "students of imagination" that this so-called "earth-light" is most intense when the moon is youngest, and therefore illuminates the earth the least. When the operating cause is least intense, the effect is much the greatest.

How about this:

"In the lunar eclipses of July 17th, 1590; November 3rd, 1648; June 16th, 1666; and May 26th, 1668; the moon rose eclipsed whilst the sun was still apparently above the horizon. Those horizontal eclipses were
noticed as early as the time of Pliny." 3
On the 17th of January, 1870, a similar phenomenon occurred; .and again in July of the same year. 4

Now we have another exotic explanation of insane scientist so called "refraction of the earth's atmosphere":

The only explanation which has been given of this phenomenon is the refraction caused by the earth's atmosphere. This, at first sight, is a plausible and fairly satisfactory solution; but on carefully examining the subject, it is found to be utterly inadequate; and those who have recourse to it cannot be aware that the refraction of an object and that of a shadow are in opposite directions. An object by refraction is bent upwards; but the
shadow of any object is bent downwards, as will be seen by the following very simple experiment. Take a plain white shallow basin, and place it ten or twelve inches from a light in such a position that the shadow of the edge of the basin touches the centre of the bottom. Hold a rod vertically over and on the edge of the shadow, to denote its true position. Now let water be gradually poured into the basin, and the shadow will be seen to recede or shorten inwards and downwards; but if a rod or a spoon is allowed to rest, with its upper end towards the light, and the lower end in the bottom of the vessel, it will be seen, as the water is poured in, to bend upwards--thus proving that if refraction operated at all, it would do so by elevating the moon above its true position, and throwing the earth's shadow downwards, or directly away from the moon's surface. Hence it is clear that a lunar eclipse by a shadow of the earth is an utter impossibility.

Cheers!

[indio007]

Just thought I'd throw this out there...
The Tragic Story of How Einstein’s Brain Was Stolen and Wasn’t Even Special – Phenomena: Only Human


The myth of Einstein is in it's death throes.

[thx1138]

Regardless of how Eric explains himself, he is demonstrating, indisputably, many WORKING MODELS...

I've seen quite a few of Eric's videos but the ones I've seen have all been about transmission rather than generation.

or the energy of vast reservoirs was to be transmitted economically to any distance. Though there were other possible sources of economical power, only the two solutions mentioned offer the ideal feature of power being obtained without any consumption of material. After long thought I finally arrived at two solutions, but ."

[BroMikey]

Eric Live

Hey guys I found this link about what Eric Dollard is working on.

Eric Dollard - History and Theory of Electricity - YouTube

I hope this helps.

Mike

Hey Eric that was a great talk thanks so much I needed that.

Hi All

I just have to say that Eric has aged well and is a sweet gentle person that is impossible to hate unless you hate truth you can't dislike Eric. Then on top of that he is funny as he expresses the facts of these great mens lives, how they were severely treated.

Eric is teaching me things that I never knew about all of the other figures who didn't suit the money peoples profile so their children picked up on it and were the kind who have been getting away with murder since birth. Same today.

These children stoned one great thinker everyday and eventually he couldn't get out of his house and died.

I just wanted to cry. This reminds me of the way so many men have been threatened over ideas living in dread for fear of losing their lives. Some still alive who can still fear and the others are not feeling anything as they are 6 feet under.

All of the intricate details about how the big money folks used the inventor or Engineer then cast them aside so easy.

Eric is so careful with everyone's feelings as he delivers the truth without offending those listening to where they would want to get up and chase him with a sword.

That will be the method of delivering the facts in a time to come. Either way many still do not believe these facts all written in many books and they are all somehow pushed out of the gov/relig/schools that are funded by the big money folks.

Their is nobody like Eric Dollard. Good going Eric a very real and heart rendering take. Funny too.