Exxon CEO proclaims --
'What good is it to save the planet if humanity suffers?': Exxon CEO | The Hook
He sounds like an uneducated half-wit in my opinion and if this is any indication of the level of intelligence of corporate America they are most definitely screwed. As well the shareholders basically voted 3 to 1 against making any effort to reduce there carbon emissions.
I think the sheer level of ignorance, extremism and igotism here is simply mind boggling. In my opinion these people are clinically insane and we should make no mistake that they will do whatever it takes to maintain their sacred profit margins.
My choice is to never buy another product from nor relating to this company ever again...period. Check the label then just say NO.
AC
'What good is it to save the planet if humanity suffers?'
Billions of poor people will remain in poverty longer if humankind attempts to cool the climate by lessening its dependancy on oil, the CEO of Exxon Mobil said this week.
"What good is it to save the planet if humanity suffers?" asked Rex Tillerson at the oil company's annual meeting in Dallas, Texas.
Exxon Mobil earned $44.9 billion in profits during 2012, and was recently deemed by Forbes to be the planet's fifth largest corporation (a slip from last year, when it was ranked number one).
At the annual meeting this week CEO Tillerson opposed a resolution from environmental shareholders demanding the company set goals for shrinking its carbon footprint.
The resolution was defeated nearly 3-to-1 in a shareholder vote, reported the Associated Press.
Shareholders also voted down a resolution officially banning discrimination against homosexuals -- one Exxon's board deemed redundant because the company broadly opposes discrimination already.
Tillerson is considered slightly more moderate on environmental issues than his predecessor, Lee Raymond, who publicly disputed the science behind climate change.
Still, Tillerson last summer argued that humankind will "adapt" to global warming, and that there are "much more pressing priorities."
Such comments were the reason environmental author and activist Bill McKibben called Tillerson the most "reckless man on the planet" in a viral Rolling Stone essay.
"What good is it to save the planet if humanity suffers?" asked Rex Tillerson at the oil company's annual meeting in Dallas, Texas.
Exxon Mobil earned $44.9 billion in profits during 2012, and was recently deemed by Forbes to be the planet's fifth largest corporation (a slip from last year, when it was ranked number one).
At the annual meeting this week CEO Tillerson opposed a resolution from environmental shareholders demanding the company set goals for shrinking its carbon footprint.
The resolution was defeated nearly 3-to-1 in a shareholder vote, reported the Associated Press.
Shareholders also voted down a resolution officially banning discrimination against homosexuals -- one Exxon's board deemed redundant because the company broadly opposes discrimination already.
Tillerson is considered slightly more moderate on environmental issues than his predecessor, Lee Raymond, who publicly disputed the science behind climate change.
Still, Tillerson last summer argued that humankind will "adapt" to global warming, and that there are "much more pressing priorities."
Such comments were the reason environmental author and activist Bill McKibben called Tillerson the most "reckless man on the planet" in a viral Rolling Stone essay.
I think the sheer level of ignorance, extremism and igotism here is simply mind boggling. In my opinion these people are clinically insane and we should make no mistake that they will do whatever it takes to maintain their sacred profit margins.
My choice is to never buy another product from nor relating to this company ever again...period. Check the label then just say NO.
AC
Comment