nay sayers ... 100,000 Euro's Bonus payment

[Duncan]

Now here's an interesting proposition for nay sayer's and the hoards of diss info agents ... There's a brave man who's put 100,000 Euro's into escrow, all you have to do to get rich quick and take the pot is demonstrate the over unity devices or his principles on which they are founded and which he demonstrates are false. And over unity has not

http://papimi.gr/osc.htm

regards Duncan

[Ufopolitics]

Excellent!!

Hello Duncan and MANY Thanks for broadcasting this great work my Friend!!

I love this paragraph...

The principle of least action is considered as the most advanced method in Theoretical Physics in this case. However, for conservation of energy, the symmetry with respect to time is required. However, as we have already shown in an elementary way, there is no symmetry in time for the energy increases with time. So one of the basic requirements of this Principle is not fulfilled in this case. Tautologically, therefore, the Principle of least action is trivial here and can not offer more than we have shown for the non conservation of energy of the above system.

No Symmetry=Asymmetry...



Warm regards


Ufopolitics

[Duncan]

Hi .. Its a pleasure to amplify this man's concepts UFO. in simple terms open circuit = no lenz law
That's how this page reads to me
http://papimi.gr/university.htm
key to Lockridge, Don Smith in fact the world as we know it
thanks for your endorsement but the thanks are really due to the Doctor and his determination to smash the status quo

[Ernst]

The man certainly got some nerve!

But he is wrong, I have emailed him already. But I do not want to claim his money.
Come on, he is old already, let him enjoy his remaining days.


Ernst.

[Duncan]

[Ernst]

Ok, I will give him one week then, wrong or right, I'll post my thoughts here.


Ernst.


PS. PM me if I forget, I have many other things on my mind as well.

[Duncan]

Ok, I will give him one week then, wrong or right, I'll post my thoughts here.


Ernst.


PS. PM me if I forget, I have many other things on my mind as well.

Super Ernst .. cant say better than that ! as you say the guys got nerve and is prepaired to stand on his conviction, 100,000 Euro's is an awful lot of money particularly considering the situation Greece finds her self manovered into right now.
we'll see good luck .. may the best man win !

[Ernst]

You will not have to wait 1 week. The prof is very anxious to loose his money

CAN YOU TELL ME TO WHICH CASE OF MY WORK YOU REFERE EXACTLY IN ORDER TO EXAMINE IT, AS I WOULD LIKE TO SEE QUANTITATIVE ARGUMENTS, AND NOT QUALITATIVE: SUCH AS BIGGER, SMALLER.

NOTE: THE INFLUENE OF AN ELECTRON BY A SURFACE IS NOT INVERSE SQUARE
DISTANE DEPENDED, THEREFORE, DO NOT MAKE THE MISTAKE TO SAY IT IS INVERSE SQUARE DEPENDED.
INDEED, THE INFLUENE OF A CHARGED POINT ON ANOTHER CHAGED POINT, DEPENDS ON INVERSEB SQUARE LAW,
BUT NOT THE INFLUENE OF A POINT LIKE ELETRONE BY A FINITE MACROSOPIC OBJECT OR BY A MACROSCOPIC SURFACE!
ANXIOUS FOR YOUR RESPONSE,
SINERELY YOURS,
Dr. PTP

I explained my view briefly in a few words, but that obviously did not convince him. Just moments ago I sent a much more detailed explanation, which I will attach in a next post here.

Let's wait and see.

Ernst.

[Duncan]

out of his corner .gloves off ... Bless

I wait with baited breath ! it rather sounds as if this could develop into a quite convoluted mathematical exchange ....I'm sure every one wants the Prof to be proved right including you...deep down ... It would change the world for the better,
As I say I can't see the flaw in his substitution but that means nothing as I'm really just an electrical nuts and bolts guy and most of his sub atomic stuff is out of my grasp
.

[Allcanadian]

@Duncan
Hmm that is interesting and the first thing that came to mind when looking at the diagram was that we have been using a similar process for a very long time. Deep space probes are routinely brought close to other planets to "accelerate" them because it would be impossible to carry the required fuel on board to reach a realistic velocity. They generally use the Gravitational force of many planets to slingshot the probe to reach extremely high velocities.

Now if we can slingshot a probe with a supposedly static force to gain velocity then why not an electron?. It is also interesting to note many inventors have used the term "ricochet" ie( rebound, bounce or skip off a surface) to describe the effects in their devices.

I would imagine Prof Pappas challenge would be like a call to arms to egomaniacs around the globe, lol. It will be interesting to see where this leads.

AC

[Ernst]

I noticed that he suspended his offer for 24 hours to review my claim.
So in that case I can show it to you all too.

Here is a link to the document that I have send. Hardly anything mathematical, just logic.

Enjoy!

Ernst.

[Duncan]

That's great Ernst .. I note that's how he operates ... only one contestant at a time.
Its really the only way he can do it and be fair. It obviously costs him a deal of time and effort to drive his key board. who knows you might be a richer man I don't think so but then who am I to judge ...we'll see
I'm glad your communicating though ... that's obviously what the prof intended ..and if ... if the Prof is right you have great graphics skills to tell us all about it

[Duncan]

Just been having a look at your expanation to the Prof Ernst .. perhaps a little off the mark but dont all the force vectors change if there's spin involved ? Just curious

[Ernst]

They do!
Thought you said you were "really just an electrical nuts and bolts guy"?

Anyway, this change is irrelevant here as the vectors I drew in the pictures are as we have learned from experience and many, many experiments. It could be that the 'modelled' electron spin has an actual reality. In that case the vector without spin would be pointing in a different direction. But we have never seen an electron without 'spin', so there is no way of knowing....


Ernst.

[Duncan]

They do!
Thought you said you were "really just an electrical nuts and bolts guy"?

Anyway, this change is irrelevant here as the vectors I drew in the pictures are as we have learned from experience and many, many experiments. It could be that the 'modelled' electron spin has an actual reality. In that case the vector without spin would be pointing in a different direction. But we have never seen an electron without 'spin', so there is no way of knowing....


Ernst.