44% Overunity and Scalable

[Dave45]

Duncan posted this in another thread.
Experiment on the Linear Increase in Efficiency with Multiple Moving Magnets over Pulsed Inductors - YouTube

[Dave45]

[Dave45]

[wayne.ct]

Better than that!

According to the presentation it is not 44 percent over unity power out over power in. It is 44 TIMES as much power out vs. power in. That is 4400 percent over unity! Download the video before it is deleted ! ! ! I did.

[Duncan]

yeah now its posted front page .. I suggest everyone copy the video as a matter of course, I don't think It'll be left in peace to long

[Dave45]

Lets build it, thats what we're here for eh.
I saved the vid as well.
If we can just scale it up the charge batteries

[Duncan]

Much more research and info ..

Obviously quite a lot to digest with this subject. Researching Jeff Cooks work a little more brings up these earlier and (some) obviously related demonstrations. Its a pity the Zeta Launcher didn't make it to market . A lot of young brains would have been thinking a lot about what's going on there. Anyway In no particular chronological order here are some of the doings, experiments and companies of Jeffrey N Cook. On the grounds that if you really do intend some sort of build here any snippet of information gained from the man himself or his previous work becomes valuable.
There is a huge amount in pdf form written by Jeffrey N Cook himself available on the experiment you have just watched including blow ups and much better pictures and modulation information here at the world science data base (I think I'd be inclined to save that also) …

World Science Database

The Jeff Cook Effect - YouTube

Jeff Cook Effect - Wizard Wand - YouTube

Jeff Cook Effect Spinning.wmv - YouTube

Ring Magnet Angular Velocity Video.wmv - YouTube

Levitating magnet over coil without spinning.wmv - YouTube

http://www.rexresearch.com/cook-magn/JCookCnstrxn.pdf

Zeta Launcher - YouTube

Pebblebrook Toys: Why the Zeta Launcher Project at Kickstarter was Cancelled

I hope some of its of interest , I'd like to partake in a build of this interesting set up but at the moment I'm involved in another build that's important (to me at least) still if you guys go ahead I'll hope to join you ASAP Best wishes Duncan

[SilverToGold]

Duncan, Maybe it's just me but I can't view any of those videos. Other YouTube videos will load up but none of Jeff's that you just posted.

Can you still see them from your computer??

[SlickDick]

Duncan, Maybe it's just me but I can't view any of those videos. Other YouTube videos will load up but none of Jeff's that you just posted.

Can you still see them from your computer??

I FWIW from western europe, can view al videos posted by Duncan.

Maybe its blocked from your country, or there is a network problem.

[SilverToGold]

Thank you, working now.... not sure what the issue was but thanks for your help.

I FWIW from western europe, can view al videos posted by Duncan.

Maybe its blocked from your country, or there is a network problem.

[SilverToGold]

So here's the abstract and details of the experiment if anyone is interested in reproducing it.

http://www.worldsci.org/pdf/abstract...racts_6483.pdf

So 4400% OU calculated.... he apparently stopped at 2 motors and calculated the estimated OU at 4400%.

[Duncan]

suggestions and observations

First may I suggest Dave that in the interests of accuracy you correct your introduction to reflect the true nature of Jeff's results that is a COP of 44x or 4400% I think you'll find a lot more people will be interested in verifying that statement, silver to gold.... I am not at all sure if "estimated" is the right term here as it seems to me that the results are actually measured by Jeffery with instrumentation and a load resistance, It seems to me from what Jeffery says that any number of motors could be added making the "estimated" energy from the machine ... at least in theory unlimited. (size permitting).
Also Dave you have probably noticed that Jeffery has been kind enough to provide contact details, he seems a straight up sort of guy ... perhaps you could write a nice email to him, he might be more than happy to help with reproduction of his work on this thread. correct the error first though he might take a dim view of a mere 44% after all his hard work to prove otherwise given actual inductances, coil sizes and motor type's along with the modulation.
reproductions would be very much easier with just a few of the specifics Jeffery has obviously spent many years investigating and developing.
best wishes Duncan

[Dave45]

Tried to edit title but no luck, maybe admin can edit.

[Dave45]

Im working on another project and with work and all Im not sure when I will get around to this but it is definitely on the list.
My time is limited right now, I hope someone gives it a go.
dave

[SilverToGold]

Hi Duncan,

My mistake, I thought he calculated that from extrapolating the two motor test but looking back at it, he got 4400% with just 2 motors! How much larger would it have been with all five?

I would have liked to have seen a scope shot of the input voltage and current. Just to make sure his meter was reading it correctly.

So from my understanding:

1) The more magnets, the higher the efficiency of each individual motor.
2) The more magnets, the efficiency increases EXPONENTIALLY.
3) The more magnets, the less power the input coil uses.
3) Connecting the motors in series without a capacitor causes strange behaviors to occur in the motors.

The motors he were using are also have pretty poor efficiency. I wonder if this system could be looped to run itself?

silver to gold.... I am not at all sure if "estimated" is the right term here as it seems to me that the results are actually measured by Jeffery with instrumentation and a load resistance, It seems to me from what Jeffery says that any number of motors could be added making the "estimated" energy from the machine ... at least in theory unlimited. (size permitting).