Here's looking at Euclid (Bogart)

[Michael John Nunnerley]

Love it

Duncan you should write a book, I really enjoy your posts

Mike

[ewizard]

<snip <<

1/ consider what t.p.t.b would do with such a state of affairs today ..after all if you want to upset a pimp take his cash
2/what caused the flashes and bangs .. here's a hint http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73rghTkRMU0
3/Who solved the abortion ? how?
4/ what would be the "damage limitation" today ?

That youtube is saying it is 'Private' ?? Can't view it. If it's yours can you make it viewable?

[ewizard]

It would seem that Google has managed to save digitally one of Steinmetz's books which was reprinted from a 1915 publication in 1971 and then again in 2003:Here a $65.00 book no less but pages are missing in this preview. However it seems a number of copies of this are for sale in links from that page.

It seems Scribd also has a number of his books in PDF available for download free (although you usually need to upload a bit there to get free downloads). I just grabbed a 700+ page book by Steinmetz that seems to be an original 1920 publication by McGraw-Hill

If anyone would like that book I put it up here so you don't need Scribd credits to get it: 93071273-transient-electric-phenomena-and-osscillations-charles-proteus-steinmetz-1920(3).pdf
Also will be getting more shortly.

Next one up is by Steinmetz copyright 1900 thanks to University of California San Diego. Title : Theory and Calculation of Alternating Current Phenomenon - 562 pages (scanned).

Also will have Electric Discharges Waves and Impulses and Other Transients by Charles P. Steinmetz Copyright 1911 Link to download this one: Electric-Discharges-Waves-and-Impulses-Charles-Proteus-Steinmetz.pdf

Seems there are quite a few more even available and all of these look like scans of original books so apparently the 'PTB' didn't get them all. These scans look like they are of very old books and so far I don't see anything blacked out or edited. Maybe some valuable info can be had from these.

It seems quite a lot of his books are available at Internet Archive: Digital Library of Free Books, Movies, Music & Wayback Machine

Internet Archive Search: Charles Steinmetz

[ewizard]

In scanning through some of Steinmetz's works I found a section on Mass and Energy in his "Radiation Light And Illumination A Series Of Engineering Lectures Delivered At Union College Third Edition (1918)". It seems he is still of the mindset Einstein shared that nothing can go faster than the speed of light. For a minute in reading his work it sounded like he was going to counter that concept but his end conclusion seemed to be the same as Einstein. The idea that some things can go faster than the speed of light seems to be one of the reasons people are saying lately that Einstein was wrong. Not sure that has anything to do with anything but so far I haven't found any secrets countering the mainstream thinking. I've read at least three pages.... Oh well only a couple thousand pages to go

[Duncan]

bombed

Im having a deal of difficulty keeping my computer on line right now... I'm reduced to a borrowed notebook and dialup ... Ill make some sort of plan! I thought my comp was pretty bomb proof .. guess not! .... back soon

[Duncan]

Parallel resonance................ Series resonance
Part 1 of 6: Eric Dollard Tesla Longitudinal wave Energy SBARC Ham Radio with Chris Carson - YouTube

http://www.radio-electronics.com/info/antennas/dipole/half_wave_dipole.gif

[Duncan]

[Duncan]

http://www.energeticforum.com/water-fuel/6431-none-electrolytic-splitting-h2o-4.html#post111774

[citfta]

ELI the ICE man

Hi Duncan,

In your post #22 you talked a lot about lead and lag which reminded me of the little ditty we learned in electronics class about ELI the ICE man which is of course a way to remind us that voltage leads current in an inductor and current leads voltage in a capacitor. And since I am also a Ham operator I understand fairly well the concept of SWR.

From your discussion if I understand you correctly you are saying we should be connecting with the aether or whatever you want to call it with a capacitor instead of an inductor. We should be trying to transmit maximum current and minimum voltage. Of course what we are really trying to do is receive the maximum energy and not transmit but I am just trying to follow your analogy. And you also are stating we will get more energy from the ground than from the aether.

If I have made any mistakes in my post please correct me as I am seriously trying to follow and keep up with what you are posting. And also thanks for taking the time to try and explain this subject in a way that more of us can understand. I get totally lost trying to follow Eric although I have great respect for him. I barely passed college calculus and that was way too many years ago.

Respectfully,
Carroll

[Duncan]

[QUOTE=citfta;231962]Part 1 of 6: Eric Dollard Tesla Longitudinal wave Energy SBARC Ham Radio with Chris Carson - YouTube
You don't know the frequency combination which automatically produces limitless power .. yet
against amazing odds it is sometimes stumbled upon by accident . Here is an example from one our members who watched in amazement as it happened in front of him.

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/12934-actually-radiant-energy.html#post215834

[Duncan]

The Science of Music by Eric Dollard (3 of 12) - YouTube

[iflewmyown]

Good morning Duncan, or good afternoon to you. I am trying to follow as best I can. I was schooled in industrial control electronics many many years ago. Since then I have worked in several fields just not long in that one. Last year I spent 6 weeks and a lot of money chasing a free energy rabbit out of the Canary Islands. This year I am staring at a half finished 30' dia. grid tied wind turbine in my pasture and hoping for a free energy solution that does not involve climbing a high tower and welding over my head. My patient wife has helped chase many rabbits for over 25 years but she thinks rightly that the wind is a sure thing. Please hurry for all our sake.
Garry

[Zardox]

Hi Duncan
I am loving the ride. I am pondering the importance of the X6 frequencies. Is it really that simple?
I can't quote biblical passages as you have done but I remember one about a man who when finding a gem of such great quality that he sold all he had to obtain it. I am thinking that this thread might turn out to be that gem.
I have played guitar for going on 40 years. I play by ear and no nothing about music other than what I like. I only bring this up to point out that by bending strings you can create whatever tone your mind can concieve of within the range of that instrument of coarse. The same would apply to any stringed instrument. Also wind intruments that use ones breath has virtually infinite variables to its range. Maybe I am missing the point that you and EPD are making regarding the old organs being the only instruments capable of making the pure tones but I am willing to learn.

[Duncan]

www.northcountryradio.com/PDFs/070302007.pdf

[boguslaw]

oooouch, sorry Duncan, I'm a little bit handicapped and my brain does not allow me to read complex English statements..what is your point exactly , please ?