Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Alternatives to Gaussian Units

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Alternatives to Gaussian Units

    Recently, Eric Dollard, also known as T-Rex on these forums, has posted information regarding dimensional relations. This text can be seen on the new Aether Force website (link).

    Next down the line is the removal of mass from the dimensional relations for Magnetic Force, and Dielectric Force.* (*Note: These are tentative relations) In addition the Magnetic force and the Dielectric force must be expressed by the same dimensional relation. Also, the Magnetic force and the Dielectric force are considered to be equal and opposite in magnitude when a certain condition exists. This is the condition when the actual, or forced ratio of magnetic induction, phi, to dielectric induction, psi, is equal to the natural, or characteristic, ratio of magnetic induction, phi, to dielectric induction, psi. Here relates to what is known as the Natural, or characteristic impedance of the Electro-Magnetic system,

    Weber per Coulomb, or Ohm

    This has yet to be proven, however by intuition it must be correct.

    Magnetic force is the product of the following,

    (1) Magnetic Permeability, Mu,

    (2) Magneto-Motive Force, i,

    (3) Displacement Current, I,

    These are defined by the dimensional relations,

    (1) Mu, Centimeter

    (2) Ampere, i, Weber per Henry

    (3) Ampere, I, Coulomb per Second

    And also

    (4) Henry, L, Centimeter Square
    There are in fact many possible options when choosing a different system of units. Many of these exist under the CGS system, though Dollard does rejects these others:

    Centimetre-gram-second system of units - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Centimetre-gram-second system of units - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Below is a table of various possible alternative unit systems, which are based on setting various values, such as inductance or capacitance, to have "numeric" quality, rather than "substantial" quality (i.e. in other words, regard such as "dimensionless").


    http://xda.xanga.com/a82e14eb09132285062518/w227495072.png


    Eric Dollard's tentative relations do indeed eliminate mass from the dimensional relations, as he claims (see column with label "E. Dollard's Anti-Rltvy." in the above table). Above table shows how dimensions of mass are replaced with dimensions of "charge squared" in E. Dollard's relativity.

    Repeating the first line from the first quotation in this post:


    Next down the line is the removal of mass from the dimensional relations for Magnetic Force, and Dielectric Force.
    The blue column in the above table is the set of tentative relations that I proposed, based on setting resistance, reactance, and impedance, and their inverses conductance, susceptance, and admittance to also be numeric. This also makes the units of quanta, which are magnetic flux and charge, to have the same dimensions.

    The story and recent mathematical exposition regarding a vision of Felix Klein (Indra's Pearls) may give a clue as to the fractal nature of the electromagnetic field (quantum fractal plasma):

    Indra's Pearls - Academic and Professional Books - Cambridge University Press



    Indra's Pearls



    These circles can represent the cross-section of flux tubules. Their radial motions (along the span of each meridian or longitude) can correspond to the longitudinal magneto-dielectric forces (divergence operations on vector fields), while the angular motions (along the span of each parallel or latitude) can correspond to the transverse electromagnetic force (curl operations on vector fields).

    The flux tubes may possess properties of both quantum of charge and quantum of magnetic flux simultaneously.
    Last edited by kmarinas86; 05-17-2013, 05:49 PM.
Working...
X