@inventionmaster:
I hope you come through with "real" proof and information to share with us for duplication.
Too many of us have been burned with the likes of "Mylow", "Inventacom", etc, etc.
Some of us want to give you time to come up with solid "PROOF" but . . experience has already set the stage to look really close for "bad" indicators.
truesearch
I hope you come through with "real" proof and information to share with us for duplication.
Too many of us have been burned with the likes of "Mylow", "Inventacom", etc, etc.
Some of us want to give you time to come up with solid "PROOF" but . . experience has already set the stage to look really close for "bad" indicators.
truesearch
but at least everyone will see that it works
even though it shakes at full speed
.
Many of the 'laws' of physics are flawed. The 2nd law of Thermodynamics (LOT) has been proven wrong a number of times both through experiment and proven wrong mathematically. It works for most situations but not all. The 'laws' are just theories that fit most situations. I can't argue with Wikipedia? ROTFLOL ! There are many falsehoods on Wikipedia. I've seen the TRUTH censored from Wikipedia - they would not even allow people to change it anymore on a particular subject. The PTB won out. Most of the time anyone can change the Wikipedia. Just making that statement about Wikipedia shows your lack of knowledge. BTW I won't continue to discuss this further with you. So you can bash on if you want but I won't waste my time beyond one response on anyone stuck in the matrix.
Comment