Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera

[hanon1492]

Sketch of replication with pulsed currents

Hi all,

This is the sketch for the first trial of my Figuera Generator. I will use two inducting coils and a collector coil. I will use a relay with two output for pulsating the current between both coils (another option instead the relay is a doorbell...). Maybe I will use two electrical sources in parallel (one pulsating and one fixed) to avoid reach zero current at the switching times. I am waiting for the coils to start experimenting...!!

[kEhYo77]

Hi hanon1492

Looking at your configuration I do not see much resemblance to Figueras' patent. The main differences are the coil arrangement and input signal to coils.

There must a symmetric transition in current rising/falling in both coils, look at the current traces I provided previously.
The other VERY important aspect is the core configuration. It doesn't hit you at first sight but it is more like Thane's BiTT:

When EMF from one coil induces current in the output coil the CounterEMF is produced in opposition to this force but instead of actually opposing the flux from this primary it is being deflected to the mirroring primary that provides a path of lower reluctance and what is more, attracting this CEMF flux being magnetized in some degree... Ingenious design!

[hanon1492]

Hi KEhYo77,
This is just my first trial. I will get pulsated currents intermittent in each coil by using a relay with two output. Later on, I will use a similar scheme but with an alternating current ( changing polarity) in each coil (I think I can do it with one relay and 2 transistor and 2 diodes). Finally I will try the rotating comutator with resistors described in the patent (more difficult to build) in order to have a triangular shape in current to each coil. I will go step by step.

Anyway I think that the really important is to change the magnetic field, and the shape of the current profile is secondary.

[Duncan]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73rghTkRMU0your electrical home: Phasor Diagrams for Transformer on LoadHow Radio Waves Are ProducedAll About Circuits : Free Electric Circuits TextbooksStanding Wave Ratio explained - YouTube
We in the single dimension of electrical and electronics can grasp the concept of power factor 1 or power factor zero however we very rarely go there unlike Thane heins or hector perez torres who aim there arrows unerringly right at this Bulls eye.
But what of the Radio guys in the other dimension ? You have just seen how Radio Hams and the like are taught and trained to tune to an SWR of 1 .or a PF of one if you wish to view it that way .
The Antenna the cable and the transmitters are all designed to operate so, and they have been for a hundred years or more.
However there was a better way! A way that gained energy ! A no loss system with a different resonance that moved its arse much faster than light.
a system tuned to 0 power factor or an SWR of infinity. This system would require the isometric to be drawn 30 deg in the opposite direction if it were to be shown.
This is the system Tesla developed, It is the system that PJ Morgan and t.p.t.b had to destroy. It is the system Marconi superseded with an inferior system. It is one of the very last examples of this system that EPD was trying to defend here

http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Eric_Dollard_Document_Collection/Bolinas%20Incident%20by%20Eric%20Dollard.pdf

It is this resonant system and its wave that Eric and Chris Carson are describing Here
Part 1 of 6: Eric Dollard Tesla Longitudinal wave Energy SBARC Ham Radio with Chris Carson - YouTubehttp://panacea-bocaf.org/files/RE-OU-v6_1.pdf by another group of determined COP>1 researchers
if I can get my building work done I might even be able to join you
Best wishes Duncan






.

[hanon1492]

[Duncan]

great find Hanon ... well done !

[Duncan]

Berlin

[hanon1492]

from the web page you have indicated this ...
"I am a direct descendant of Clement Figuera..."

I talked to the author of the original report and he said me that this person was a joker. There is no way in following that clue. I think that Figuera went to London but not to disclose his invention but for other business subject.

For me, what it is really an amazing fact is that the 1908 patent was written few days before his death. Between 1902 and 1908 nothing, and prior to his death a new patent appears. Was he under an undisclosure agreement? Maybe he know that his death was close and he decided to tell the final generator arrangement in the 1908 patent ..who knows.

[Duncan]

Hanon yeah amazing all right .. I was thinking along the lines of the death being about as natural as Stans Opie & Anthony: Stan Meyer's Water Car - YouTube
or any of the other multitude of alternative energy researchers who have been culled... The snuff list associated with alternative energy is impressive

[john_g]

Rough Translation

Hi All

A rough translation of the drawing:

[kEhYo77]

@ john_g

IMHO the drawing taken from that page might be just a rendition of the apparatus from someone who hasn't seen the actual patent as it differs dramatically in the arrangement of input/output coils...

..might be misleading

[john_g]

@ john_g

IMHO the drawing taken from that page might be just a rendition of the apparatus from someone who hasn't seen the actual patent as it differs dramatically in the arrangement of input/output coils...

..might be misleading

Hi KEhYo77

You could well be correct, it certainly is different - but maybe just another part of that elusive jigsaw.

[Duncan]

@ john_g

IMHO the drawing taken from that page might be just a rendition of the apparatus from someone who hasn't seen the actual patent as it differs dramatically in the arrangement of input/output coils...

..might be misleading

It seems Clemente had quite a few patents to his name only two of which remain partially readable it could be we are looking at an incarnation of the other one here?

[magnetO]

educational question to Bi-Directional MOSFET.

And here is a solution to my problem!
I think I've got enough transistors (16!), ....

Hi kEhYo77,

may I ask you, what a Bi-Directional MOSFET is?

In the ellipse E of my attachment there I can see one (single) switch.

Is that switch the half of a Bi-Directional MOSFET (and on the right side is second half)? Or is the content of ellipse E already showing a full Bi-Directional MOSFET?

What is the purpose of using a Bi-Directional MOSFET? Carrying current in either/both direction? Or something else?

May you please give me an idea what your thoughts are.

Thank you
Best Regards
magnetO

[hanon1492]

Multiplying effect of electromagnetic induction

Hi,
In the attached pdf I have estimated the induced current created by induction caused by a varying magnetic field. As you can see it may have a multiplying effect in the produced current