Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    @Wonju:

    The SureStep (microstepping drive) http://www.automationdirect.com/stat...estepdrive.pdf is a real beauty. This is what they used when I came up with the LMD18245 in the 1990ies. Now is the time of the ICs for a fraction of the cost.

    For high Wattage one still has to use these cumbersome boxes.

    But yes, the SureStep will do, but is it really worth while to spend the money? I advise against becoming too serious when doing OU experiments.

    I will go for the "DRV8834 plus SMD adapter board" in connection with a LaunchPad carrying a MSP430G2452 microcontroller. That stays will below 50 Euro.

    To solder that together will cause some anxious fiddling, but what the hell, it is only a hobby.

    Greetings, Conrad
    Last edited by conradelektro; 11-06-2012, 10:44 PM.

    Comment


    • #62
      You can find in eBay Stepper motor drivers with similar capabilities for about $50. That is a good deal!

      Ok. Now I want to see results! I already have the driver and I just finished dismantling the iron core of a transformer. My plan is to modify the E and I segments of the iron core to have about 3 sets of 4 electromagnets per set. That is, I will have 4 electromagnets per row - instead of the 7 shown in the patent.

      Good luck to all! And, please, post any result from the testing. Thanks!

      Wonju

      Comment


      • #64
        Conrad,

        I am under the impression that you have not read the Figuera's document completely. The document clearly states (and it is also shown on figure 21) that the two voltages applied to the primaries must be 90 degrees out of phase.

        Regards,
        Wonju

        Comment


        • #65
          Originally posted by wonju View Post
          Conrad,

          I am under the impression that you have not read the Figuera's document completely. The document clearly states (and it is also shown on figure 21) that the two voltages applied to the primaries must be 90 degrees out of phase.

          Regards,
          Wonju
          Could you post images of your setup made from iron transformer cores ? Did you cut E elements into C ones or did you used something else ?

          Comment


          • #66
            Hi, I am going to build this device.

            I have found this dual H-Bridge driver:

            L298NArduino DDS Sinewave Generator example

            BTW. The core I'm using can be found in some PC power supply.
            Attached Files
            Last edited by kEhYo77; 11-07-2012, 09:29 PM.

            Comment


            • #67
              Originally posted by wonju View Post
              Conrad,

              I am under the impression that you have not read the Figuera's document completely. The document clearly states (and it is also shown on figure 21) that the two voltages applied to the primaries must be 90 degrees out of phase.

              Regards,
              Wonju

              Comment


              • #68
                Originally posted by boguslaw View Post
                Could you post images of your setup made from iron transformer cores ? Did you cut E elements into C ones or did you used something else ?
                boguslaw,

                I am doing exactly the same thing as KEhYo77. I am converting the 'Es' into 'Cs' and using the 'Is' for the secondary coils. I am also planning to do a simpler version. It is my belief that this apparatus could work with one set of air gaps only. That is, I think the system could work fine with either, the top gaps or the bottom ones. This system can be easily built by using the center column of the 'Es' for the secondary coil and the end columns for the two primaries. The 'Is' can be placed on top of the center column of the 'Es' to create the air gaps.

                I cannot upload the sketch because I reached the limit.

                Wonju
                Last edited by wonju; 11-07-2012, 09:40 PM.

                Comment


                • #69
                  Originally posted by wonju View Post
                  ....
                  I cannot upload the sketch because I reached the limit.

                  Wonju
                  Hi wonju,

                  You may wish to consider using ImageShack® - Online Photo and Video Hosting and embed the link into your posts, then the upload limit is solved for ever.

                  Gyula

                  Comment


                  • #70
                    Hi KehYo

                    well done man go on

                    Hi conrad

                    Thank's for your infos on the drivers, very helfull and i will study and probably ask questions in due time.

                    Hi Wonju

                    Your last post is intriging , i post here a pix of how i see your proposal, am i right on the track?
                    i mean you wind the center pod as the secondary and the 2 outer pods as the 2 primaries (left config )
                    but in this case there would be a direct magnetic connection between the primaries and the secondary?

                    Than i am something confused now, on the question of the 90 degrees between the to primary's voltage. Because so far i get 180 degrees shift between primary voltage 1 and primary voltage 2 , and i have some problem to see how it could be an 90 degrees with the Figuera back and forth way on the resistors.
                    Please explanation is necessary on this point Thank's

                    I am trying a lot of different coils resistance and inductance, space between gap, stack of resistors, gap and direct contact difference, so as usual the practice is the truth (good or not )
                    So i am pleased that very soon a bunch of replications will come to share the experience.

                    good luck at all

                    Laurent
                    Attached Files

                    Comment


                    • #71
                      @kEhYo77,

                      It sounds interesting. Please, let us know how it goes. I would like to see a graph of the output voltages.


                      @gyula,

                      Thanks for the info. I will try it.


                      Wonju
                      Last edited by wonju; 11-07-2012, 11:59 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #72
                        Originally posted by woopy View Post
                        Hi Wonju

                        Your last post is intriging , i post here a pix of how i see your proposal, am i right on the track?
                        i mean you wind the center pod as the secondary and the 2 outer pods as the 2 primaries (left config )
                        but in this case there would be a direct magnetic connection between the primaries and the secondary?
                        What I mentioned is in the wish list. Do not lose focus of our main task, which is to replicate Mr. Figuera's apparatus. Once we have the performance data of the original apparatus, then, we can compare it against any other variant. It could be the case that Mr. Figuera already tested different variants and disclosed the most efficient one in his patent. I apologize for the confusion.

                        Than i am something confused now, on the question of the 90 degrees between the to primary's voltage. Because so far i get 180 degrees shift between primary voltage 1 and primary voltage 2 , and i have some problem to see how it could be an 90 degrees with the Figuera back and forth way on the resistors.
                        Please explanation is necessary on this point Thank's
                        Recall that two signals are 180 degrees out of phase when one is the reflected image of the other. This is not your case. Your experiment shows the two primary signals shifted at about 90 degrees.

                        I am trying a lot of different coils resistance and inductance, space between gap, stack of resistors, gap and direct contact difference, so as usual the practice is the truth (good or not )
                        So i am pleased that very soon a bunch of replications will come to share the experience.
                        As I said above, our main task should be the replication of the original apparatus, especially the one related to the electromagnets. Mr. Figuera stated that the electromagnets can be placed very close together. you have being doing an excellent job! Just keep going in the same direction.

                        Thanks again! Woopy

                        Wonju

                        Comment


                        • #73
                          Originally posted by wonju View Post
                          The attached document explains how Mr. Figuera's "infinite energy machine" works.
                          It is amazing how we keep recycling old concepts over and over again. And then, we even claim that we are the inventors.
                          Thank you for sharing, keep up the good work!

                          Cheers

                          Comment


                          • #74
                            Testing The Electromagnets

                            Originally posted by woopy View Post
                            Hi KehYo

                            well done man go on

                            Hi conrad

                            Thank's for your infos on the drivers, very helfull and i will study and probably ask questions in due time.

                            Hi Wonju

                            Your last post is intriging , i post here a pix of how i see your proposal, am i right on the track?
                            i mean you wind the center pod as the secondary and the 2 outer pods as the 2 primaries (left config )
                            but in this case there would be a direct magnetic connection between the primaries and the secondary?

                            Than i am something confused now, on the question of the 90 degrees between the to primary's voltage. Because so far i get 180 degrees shift between primary voltage 1 and primary voltage 2 , and i have some problem to see how it could be an 90 degrees with the Figuera back and forth way on the resistors.
                            Please explanation is necessary on this point Thank's

                            I am trying a lot of different coils resistance and inductance, space between gap, stack of resistors, gap and direct contact difference, so as usual the practice is the truth (good or not )
                            So i am pleased that very soon a bunch of replications will come to share the experience.

                            good luck at all

                            Laurent

                            Comment


                            • #75
                              Wonju

                              I saw there is (a bit damaged) available text of Figuera patent. Am I correct ? Translation to english may help in understanding details.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X