Mr Lester J Hendershot's magnetic generator.

[ChrisW]

Terminology

Greetings, all...

Graham, good catch in that photo! That does indeed appear to a wave-wound coil. I don't know if "wave-wound" is the proper term for that type of coil, and getting the terminology right appears to be much of the problem in Hilton's book.

As a case in point, as you pointed out from page 62, was his use of the term "counter-wound." I came upon that as well, but my own translation of it was that he meant bifilar, with the wires on one end connected together, such that the coil becomes nearly non-inductive. This, as opposed to bifilar, with the end of the first wire connected to the start of the second wire, resulting in a HIGHLY inductive coil.

So yes, I would agree that Hilton is likely not a well-versed technical writer. As such, the use of one's knowledge and intuition is a key factor in understanding the device.

By the way, since the device DOES utilize both the electric and magnetic components, I'm using bifilar coils for all but the "basket-weave" coils. For the latter, I've decided to use 3 layers for each (8A and 8B) simply because the "one turn" description in the patent application hardly seems appropriate.

Do bear in mind, Graham, that Hilton likely did his best to document Hendershot's work, and as such, we should be grateful, as all other available descriptions are sadly lacking in detail. Thus, Hilton's work is all we've got to go on. It's up to us to find the mistakes and correct them.

I expect to have the resonator strip assembly completed today, and initial set-up underway by the weekend. Stay tuned!

Chris

[GSM]

Barry Hilton's notes in The Hendershot Mystery link I posted above state that the primary Mk1-2 generator coils (as in the plane) were honeycomb, a form of axial wave winding.
They were not.
From a better screenshot they clearly appear to be basketweave as was continued throughout the Mk3 constructions; ie. minimum self capacitance for a given current generated field.

Also, could it be that the twin L13-14 cored coils were within the co-axial 8A-B windings, as per the Fluxgate video linked in the last post by Wings, and thus more closely aligned with the dip angle of the Earth's magnetic field away from the equator ?

Why is there such published error ?

I have already stated that both circuits published on page 57 are seriously incorrect and thus this page of Barry's notes should be binned -
and now I am stating that page 58 should be binned too !

It has become MY PERSONAL OPINION that Barry's publication is so full of errors it will PREVENT constructors from replicating a functioning Hendershot device.

Why does Barry so clearly publish instruction to reverse wind the foil core-cap foil-paper layering when compared to the definitive illustrations published by Mark Hendershot here -

http://www.hyiq.org/Library/Downloads/From_The_Archives_Of_Lester_J._Hendershot.pdf

Also, on page 62 Barry writes
"Coils wound in a counter-rotational manner are normally regarded as non-inductive coils, whilst those wound in a compatible rotational manner are generally considered inductive.

What absolute rubbish.

Sorry folks, this guy is either fabricating untruthful text as he writes, or NOT a competent technical author, or both, and thus his writing must be read with discernment by anyone seeking correct information which might present a useful basis for construction.

Cheers ............. Graham.

[wings]

for information only in the case of
... a simple fluxgate

Fluxgate

[GSM]

I have been informed that Ed Skilling gave a conference lecture in 1981 (USPA) reporting that the device only works in surroundings of extreme low air humidity.
I note the word *works*, and no matter what earlier disinfo had been circulated, they could not have been using *radium* by the time Skilling took an interest !
No other details known.

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/11952-wardenclyffe-teslas-true-intention-5.html#post213153

Maybe if I constructed my 'iron light' on plate glass, then nothing could be said to be hidden.

Cheers ........ Graham.

[boguslaw]

Read between words. Very interesting. Are we approaching big breakthrough in all aspects of free energy generation systems ? Are we prepared ?

"In 1919 Hubbard represented the apparatus as being capable of extracting electrical energy directly from the air, but he admitted yesterday that this had been merely a subterfuge to protect his patent rights, and that, as a matter of fact, it had been a device for extracting electrical energy from radium, by means of a series of transformers which stepped up the rays.

He declined to go into detail in regard to the exact manner in which he managed to extract power from radium -- but said that, so far as he had been able to determine, there was no great difference between the Detroit machine and his.

"I never heard of this Lester J. Hendershot, the Pittsburgh electrical engineer who is demonstrating the motor", Hubbard said, "but it must be remembered that I worked on the invention for two years in Pittsburgh -- in 1921 and 1922. It was a Dr. Greenslade who represented the people who were financing me at the time -- but, of course, if the people who bought out most of my interest in the invention were to bring it out as their own machinery, they would probably do it through a man with whom I had never worked. I was employed by the radium Chemical Company at the time I was working in Pitsburgh". "

[wings]

old documents

[GSM]

Chapter 5, page 56 of the download PDF (linked a few posts above) shows the Mk3C circuit drawn by Patent Attorney Edward O'Brian.

It is clear that Mr O'Brian was not intending to create a technical translation, yet he still managed to accurately commit to paper the full nature of the jumble of wires and components presented to him on that non-running Mk3C board.

Downloaded page 56-58 notes, and the redrawn circuit diagram plus the 'modified' circuit diagram appearing on the page 57, do not come anywhere near clarifying Hendershot's, Aho's or Mr O'Brian's work.

Actually, if you have printed-off page 57 then you should bin it and replace it with a copy of the circuit linked below. Though do first satisfy yourself that my drawing is the same as that on page 56, for not only will this new drawing clarify that that original board was not the 'hotchpotch' claimed by the author of 'The Hendershot Mystery' notes, but also that the original page 56 drawing is likely a good representation of construction layout.

Cheers .......... Graham.

[john_g]

Telephone Bell Ringer

Hi All

I've uploaded a video showing a telephone bell ringer connected to a oscilloscope - which may give some clues as to why this may be useful. I forgot to mention in the video the replacing of the ball arm with a spring weight/ pendulum. Coils are 500 ohm each at 10,000 winds approx. By flux switching a current is generated.

Some old phones used bi filer winding, so maybe, although not borne out by the Hendershot diagram, an initial pulse of current started the armature oscillating, going through a few cycles (collecting generated current) before again being re-energized.

Anyway - just a thought.

Video at:

bell ringer - YouTube

Regards

John

[GSM]

Coupling between Current and Dynamic Magnetization from Domain Walls to Spin Waves ?:

http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/dissertations/2012-0709-200441/lucassen.pdf

I have been going through and adding all of the links from this thread to my Hendershot folder. The drawings in the first section of that link are good Wings, especially on page 10 (p16 of 86 in .pdf)

It seems Hendershot stopped using coffee tins as an internal core for his Mk3 because they stopped working due to 'corrosion'. However the download PDF notes clarified this was not just corrosion, but pin holes right through the tin.

I do hope everyone is thinking hard about Hendershots designs.

Cheers ........... Graham.

[citfta]

Pdf document

Hi Boguslaw,

The application I think they are talking about is near the end of the Pdf that is linked to in post 111. The Pdf is about the mystery of the Hendershot device.

Carroll

[boguslaw]

Sorry, I have to ask : where can I find " published final Patent application" ?

[john_g]

Graham and Chris

Sad to see you both go, but many thanks for your wisdom.

For general interest here is a picture of an early telephone set around the time of Hendrshot.



Regards

John

[ChrisW]

Bravo!

Dearest Graham, and all,

To you, Graham, I exclaim "Bravo!" Your sentiments were well expressed, clearly and succinctly. My deepest and sincerest thanks for starting this thread, as it was the impetus needed to think through the entire process, to return to the Mark I, to put myself in Lester's shoes and walk as he walked. Like so many others, I too, at first, started right in with the Mark III, with no understanding of the Mark I and its foundational design. For those who will blaze this path, YOU CANNOT REACH THE MARK III WITHOUT FIRST UNDERSTANDING THE MARK I.

To the parasites who would attempt to enslave us through their fakery and psychopathic wet dreams of world domination, I would say this: YOU HAVE ALREADY FAILED. No amount of brainwashing, indoctrination, chemical adulteration of the air, food and water supplies, will EVER suppress the human spirit. We are NOT our bodies of flesh. YOU know it and WE know it. You may destroy our vehicles, but you will NEVER destroy US. In the end, yours will be an empire of dirt. Long may you reign over it.

To all, the cat is now out of the bag. Take what I have learned and shared with you and BUILD it. Persevere. You WILL succeed. When you do, don't thank me, thank Lester Hendershot. Put the name Hendershot on your device so that his name will be remembered. Share then your knowledge with those who are deserving of it, do not cast your pearls before the swine. Last, a quote from the Desiderata: Walk placidly amid the noise and the haste, and remember what peace there may be in silence.

I too, shall now bow out of this thread. To all, be strong, be brave, be the light that burns through the darkness in the days ahead.

In love and light,
Chris

[GSM]

Hi All,

Hendershot did understand - (like Tesla did, others and some subscribers here too) - until maybe he thought -
"I give up trying to start a business. With my physical strugglings and all this wheelchair push-pulling - like my Mk3 generator is perfected and I'm going to share it with all my fellow humans."
Thus, and VERY sadly .......... his-story ......... was made !

The worst part about all of this are those dark forces who beleive they are 'it', whilst actually they are mere parasites. It is they who paranoiedly suppress the whole of humanity by ensuring that our children do NOT become properly educated, and watch us to ensure we do not remain free to develop beyond the limitations agreed between their cabalistic dictatorships.
___________________

Yes Hendershot was THE No.1 exponent of NMR generators.

And that was 50+ years ago !!!!!

He knew he could offer the future which all mankind still so desparately needs .... and yet .... his knowledge 'died' before he could share it after he filed for that last circuit Patent.

The same will happen today to anyone who attempts to start explaining Hendershot or similar technology, though Hendershot's was not only the first, but the best too.

Through his deep natural intuition and endless cups of coffee Hendershot demonstrated a degree of success not achieved by Tesla, Hubbard, Moray or any other lone inventor since then.

Henderhot's success through all versions of his generators came via the analogue characteristics of his resonant magnetic 'buzzer'. Characteristics which cannot become obvious to those who are not 'hands-on' innovators, and characteristics which simply cannot be replicated via the supposedly equivalent delay-lines of flip-flop oscillating digital switches and power controlling circuitry; nor currently be demonstrated operating with his novel coilpacitors by even the most powerful of computer simulators either !!!!!

In spite of confusing published notes, I can see from the re-wiring within his already published final Patent application, that Hendershot had indeed worked out exactly what both he and his circuit were doing.

Every clue to replicate has already been published in 'The Hendershot Mystery' booklet, though definitely not the real modus operandi. Also, had I known at outset what I know now, I would not have written all that I have in this thread, for Hendershot's little generator boards are so far beyond what I first imagined; and TPTB know this too !!!!!

Sadly I simply cannot allow myself to risk being drawn to suggest any more answers, for I have no wish to be tagged as one who might contribute to the downfall of present day societies via promoting the construction of free energy generators, and this is why I will not be posting any more upon this, nor upon other lesser potential equipments either.

After so much taxing effort in gaining this 'sorted' knowledge I will be having much more time to share and enjoy what is left of my life endeavours with my family, friends etc.,
and hopefully my Internet Domain Name Server connection will not, as it has been recently, mysteriously repeatedly dropped out without any traceable faults being identifyable by my ISP. As if - LOL !

So, and as we all keep paying our taxes, I wish every one of you success in your own individual investigations .... and .... a fond farewell.

Adios amigos !

____________________
He who believes - needs to talk: He who knows - knows not to. GSM.
.

[citfta]

Hi Graham,

It was late when I was typing that post. I should have said page 37 of the Pdf which is actually page 33 of the original document. It is labeled figure 3.8. It looks like there is a little dot where the wire number 5 touches number 2 the "resonator". The dot made me think it might be a contact rather than an actual connection. Earlier in the document the writer mentions this and says he thinks it is a mistake and so he redrew it to the top. I am not so sure about that. If the resonator actually moves and I think it does then it could be like a buzzer contact but I have only just started trying to figure all of this out so I may be way off base in my ideas. Sorry for the confusion on the page numbers.

Later,
Carroll