Resonance frequencies

[jaggedE]

does anyone know where i can get the resonance frequencies of the following elements or a method of determining them.

aluminium, copper, chromium, iron, tin, cobalt, nickel, bismuth, nitrogen, oxygen, rhodium, silver, gold, platinum, palladium, zink, calcium, potassium, sodium, zirconium and boron.

it would be very helpful for my research.
thanks,

JaggedE

[MonsieurM]

check here

WebElements Periodic Table of the Elements

Explore NMR (Nuclear magnetic resonance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ) properties of the chemical elements through this periodic table

just click on the element of interest

[Dave45]

I would think the resonant frequency would depend on the mass of the element involved.
Two bells made from the same material but different sizes would have a different resonant frequency.

[jaggedE]

check here

WebElements Periodic Table of the Elements



just click on the element of interest

correct me if im wrong but as far as i know nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) only exists when inside a magnetic field, when stanley myer fractured water i dont think that was in a magnetic field, unless the frequencies were correlating to the magnetic field of the earth, which would vary in intensity from location to location, disabling his ability to drive from the east coast to the west coast of america, since his equipment would have to change its frequency depending on the variation in intensity of magnetic field.

secondly supposing i provide it with a magnetic field to begin with, which is not such a great problem, it says the frequency is relative to hydrogen, meaning the frequency of hydrogen needs to be determined first. how would i go about doing that?

I would think the resonant frequency would depend on the mass of the element involved.
Two bells made from the same material but different sizes would have a different resonant frequency.

again correct me if im wrong but when myer was fracturing water he had varying amounts of water in his cell, according to what your saying with a change in volume of water the frequency should also change. furthermore there are huge distances between atoms of any element, effectively making them so many individual particles to resonate and the total quantity of the element becomes irrelevant. the total quantity of element comes into play only when your trying to break a structure made of the element say a glass, and not the element atoms from each other.

[Duncan]

Resonant ?? to what

Hi JaggdE what a bag of worms you’ve opened here … It would seem to me that Stan wasn't using a single Resonant frequency but rather mixing frequencies (heterodyne) and doing it in a cumulative way, and filtering Here is the relevant section of MJN amplifying the subject long ago.

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/6431-none-electrolytic-splitting-h2o-4.html#post111774

These few clips I uploaded a while ago might also be of interest the first is a simple Santilli demonstration

VTS_03_1.flv - YouTube



These units are at least 3x Faraday and as much as 5x as these clips show they are in service and certainly in use in Swedish airports and in Greece as well as US and British Municipalities although of course they are not destined for the public domain .. If you want one your going to have to make it yourself t.p.t.b are certainly not going to kill the shee- p-eople Milch cow . and if you try to manufacture or market I would suggest things wont go very "fine and dandy" still as you can see OU is relativly simple so why make it rocket science?

Alternative fuel Magnegas - YouTube

Watch Fox News MagneGas Video Online - VideoSurf Video Search

It transpires that this technology isn’t particularly difficult in a practical way either.. as you can see, nor is it a modern conception here is Santilli's system described in a pre 1900s patent

http://www.byronwine.com/files/603,058.pdf

perhaps a little more efficient here is an aged video of Bob Boyce taking it a step further note the one "popped" Diode in BBs experimental set up (which would again give the x6 frequency relationship) .. a very lucky accident followed by speed adjustment

Bob Boyce - YouTube

Perhaps more directly related to the subject of your question here is Herman P Anderson as he talks of the “Magnetic resonant cloud” … Make of that what you will

https://vimeo.com/user10549783/herman

A variation on Santilli's simple arc system was made and demonstrated by South African François Cornish as a vehicular fuel before he joined the huge list of “disappeared” alternative energy researchers

Cornish Hydrogen Generator - KeelyNet 01/10/02

Best wishes with your endeavours and I hope the clips and observations are of interest, take particular note of Herman stressing “standing wave” At least in my mind this is heading in the general direction of Tesla and Don Smith (amplifying transmitter) particularly when the spark system becomes involved later on but perhaps you will see things differently ?

[MonsieurM]

Duncan ... you are quite correct when asking Resonant to what ? depending on you point of reference .... the answer maybe different

the link provided was just a starting point ..... to discover a pattern if there is one

[Dave45]

I was reading up on inductive stove tops they use a pancake coil, they also have a circuit that adjusts the resonant frequency to match the load, if you think about it it would have to in order to heat different sizes of mass.

I wonder ac heats the conductor (cooking pan) because it switches the fields back and forth in the conductor will dc do the same.

I scored yesterday I got two variacs for five bucks apiece at the thrift store I love a good deal.

[Dave45]

I have been working out of town for the last couple of months so I have not had any time for my projects but am buying supply's to work with when work slows down.
You will be seeing some of my work before long, as usual I have more idea's than I can ever build but I will finish a couple of my projects and be testing in the near future.
Ufo's motor has really got me interested I plan on going in this direction as well, his work is very interesting.
dave

[totoalas]

does anyone know where i can get the resonance frequencies of the following elements or a method of determining them.

aluminium, copper, chromium, iron, tin, cobalt, nickel, bismuth, nitrogen, oxygen, rhodium, silver, gold, platinum, palladium, zink, calcium, potassium, sodium, zirconium and boron.

it would be very helpful for my research.
thanks,

JaggedE

HELPFULWAVESDOTCOM

[jaggedE]

sorry everyone,
i was out of town for the past few months and couldnt respond to this thread earlier...

i went through all the links everyone has sent me and am still no closer to understanding anything. i think i need to go through all of them again a few times before it starts to sink into my head.
perhaps im starting way above by experience level, but i love challenges.


thanks all,
JaggedE

[Duncan]

jaggedE here is just a short tongue in cheek reason for me asking the question resonance with what? Resonance is such a one size fits all one dimensional term consider this simple crystal set circuit

http://earlywireless.com/images/crystal_sets_images/crysta3.gif

C1 and L1 make a resonant circuit w.r.t the frequency of the station you wish to listen to and if it were “ a perfect circuit” it would demonstrate infinite impedance to that particular frequency in this respect it is almost identical to Its mechanical equivalent …. The pendulum.
This is all standard teaching and works with the technology we have all been taught here is the tank circuit explained (pretty much)
Simple parallel (tank circuit) resonance : RESONANCE
The problem lies in the frequency which of course is related to wavelength you will notice here
How do you Convert wavelength to frequency


that in order to covert from one to the other the speed of light c must be used in other words the electric wave is considered to move at the speed of light and be cyclic but we all know the shortest distance betwixt 2 points is a straight line so the question begs to be asked “upon what does the electric wave travel” is there another resonance at a speed much faster than light where all the laws are altered ? In effect another dimension which has been hidden from us and of which we have been taught nothing ?

Here is Eric Dollard explaining, demonstrating and tuning to the resonant point much faster than the speed of light as predicted and used by Tesla, that is the linear wave
Part 1 of 6: Eric Dollard Tesla Longitudinal wave Energy SBARC Ham Radio with Chris Carson - YouTube (1 of 6)

Note Eric is using all the terms of interest to COP +1 researchers “No loss” “natural amplification”ect But this so called linear wave is not really accepted by mainstream science, It doesn’t react in anyway a classically trained electrical or electronics guy would expect . The information has been suppressed or altered and in general terms we don’t have the maths or language to deal with it.
We are lucky to have guys like Eric and Konstantin who can throw a little light into our darkness I must confess I am a little confused by the Intro which says Tesla was unaware of anything faster than light whilst Eric is showing us exactly the reverse still I'm just a nit wit compared to these two giants so I watch and try to learn a little bit

.https://vimeo.com/41021469
But if your going to start a research project on resonance I know which resonance I would be more Interested in ! The fact that there could also be a magnetic scalar wave also causes a sharp intake of breath.