Real Non-Perpetual Gravity Engines

[Aman]

Why my engine works and why it is not Perpectual?

If it does not work,it will prove the regular laws of physics absolutely wrong!
All the laws of physics used in my engine are already validated to be true!and all those theories are used in other devices

There are three types of theories which can be proposed by a scientist:
1)theories based on assumptions(assumptions made with doubtable reasons):May be wrong or right:need to be experimentally verified
2) theories based on well known and well established laws:Always right
3)Hybrid of 1st and 2nd type

My engine is based on 2nd type!
To prove my engine works I have to prove that my engine works on regular laws of physics!

Since my engine is based on regular concepts of physics,there is no doubt that it works!
To check the validity of my engine,you may check the Example showing how Gravity energy is used as fuel in my engine

Now I am going to start making a prototype!I am talking to my college professors for starting this project!And the response is positive!Real Non-Perpectual gravity magnetic engines
Example showing how Gravity energy is used as fuel in my engine

Please see the Rough *Sketch on

Explaining clearly the working principle of my Non-Perpetual gravity engine for a single cycle,with an example. | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

[Aman]

Elaboration of my idea in brief:

The criteria for resistance system in my engine is:

1) first of all it should be overcommable.
2) it should be present only downwards and not upward.
3) The resistance system should be highly/reasonably efficient(output by input)
4) Amount of overcommable resistance should be reasonably large enough.

If the resistance cannot satisfy these conditions,then it cannot be used in my engine.

The splashing of water resistance (overcomming of water resistance)is quiet similar to the Overcomming of cantilever beam resistance by the central weight loading.The machenism of failure of two column supported beam(Simply supported beam) works similarly.Let weight W be loaded at centre.The overcomeability of a good beam should be less at initial stage.Initially there will be allmost an equal and opposite reaction from the beam for the weight loading,with little energy spent for deformation.Slowly ATOMIC Dislocation takes place(slippage of atomic planes/slippage of grain boundaries)and a point reaches where stress become unbearable(stress is resistance to deformation).As the stress become unbearable,there will be minimum equal and opposite reaction for the weight loading and then the most amount of continuous gravitational energy will be used to overcome this beam resistance/stress and finally the beam breaks.This is analogous to what happens in my engine with the exception of the speed at which all this happens.This is what I learnt in Material Science subject.No good material science Professor in machenical engineering would deny this.
The speed of this similar process is actually relatively fast,occurs in extended nanoseconds time in my engine whereas in beams it is very low speed [It occurs in beams due to mainly Creep(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creep_(deformationJust wanted to share this,Please share the below very very important article with as many people as possible:

[Aman]

Notification:Error with programming in post.

Note:Sorry for the error in text.I copied the contents from my original documents and when I pasted it here,these"*" have appeared in the text.This is a error with the programming of the forum post system and not done intentionally.

A good information on Real Free energy technologies is available on:

http://free-energy-info.co.uk/