Positive Versus Negative Radiant Energy

[mbrownn]

The radiant appears at the moment of collapse and is not present through the duration of the collapse.

This is only true as far as our ability to make it do anything, having said that I believe that it must be there at all times but masked by current. I believe scalar wave experiments prove this.

[ZPDM]

@ Fhand,

Well I think we done about beat this topic about to death, yeehaw. Will say, while it was wildly offtopic, enjoyed your recent post on "how to spot a shill." I guess we're both happy knowing their days are numbered and those uh, "farging bastadges" are gonna get theirs and then some soon, right? Sorry to get so worked up but it is obviously a passion of yours and while as I said misplaced in the renewable energy part an interesting read.

You do have, I must say, a cunning circuit there with your water idea. I realize from your former post just how important experimentation, as opposed to very obvious bullsit, is to you. So I do look forward to your posting results. Even negative results help us all to learn Kimosabe.

[ZPDM]

@MB,

Wow, I've seen very pronounced temperature changes on a transisitor. While I understand your pessimism this may just be a huge, huge breakthrough you've given us all.

It may have been you arguing that the way the "BEMF gets transformed to a higher voltage is because the resistance goes away really really quickly. As Treebeard the Ent said, "That doesn't make much sense to me, then you are very small perhaps you are right." If one has a 12 volt battery and switches between high resistance and low resistance I've never heard that the voltage increases beyond 12 volts.

In any event and perhaps my fault for not being more concise, the discourse seems to be at the "Don't do what Donny Don't Does, unless Doesn't Doing Doesn't Do Donny Don't well" level. As a hunter might say, "I've shot my load" on this topic and barring changes have nothing further to contribute

[ZPDM]

@ Boguslaw,

Last thing then I really will shut up.

You ever try hooking up an Avremenko plug to just one wire of a pulsed secondary coil? As of today, I have.

[Farmhand]

Any thoughts/guidance very deeply appreciated, and by the Way

Well you did ask for thoughts.

[Ufopolitics]

Hello to All!!

Well, I think some of you guys over here knows my way of thinking...
Yes I am a very "Heretic" prospect...

But basically in my previous thread I had arguments already with Farmhand and MrBrown...I know the way they think, but, since ZPDM opened this forum, I will attempt to clear some of his questions, according to my research...

There is a Negative and a Positive Radiant Energy, however, they flow in complete harmony.
I never swallowed the "Collapse of a "Single" magnetic field story teller", ever!
There are Two Magnetic Fields acting like a Push-Pull arrangement to each others, just like a Piston on a gas engine goes up to an explosion stage (discharging), while another one is going down into suction stage (charging).

At very High Frequencies Square pulses, where there is exactly Zero Time drop down, vertically down "the hill"...I am sorry, but there is absolutely no time at all for all the process recited in that old story...

The Radiant Energy Field is MUCH Stronger than our Hot Field, in Frequency and in Motive Force, therefore in Electrical Induction.

The "Transformer Effect" applies for Hot current in a robust way, ONLY, when there IS a Heavy Laminated Steel Frame, period....Air Cores are NOT a good transmission of Hot Induced Electricity in ANY given "Conventional" Transformer, except...The Air Core "Tesla Coil".

I have measured the hot electricity secondary induction in an Air Core set-up, and it is in the Milli Volts range, while RE is at Hundred of volts...

In my latest video I showed a pretty heavy Neo Magnet suspended in the Air, levitating right in the center core of an Air Coil...aiming same direction as Hot Magnetic Field...Now, just using a common sense judgement call..
Is this a "Sign" of just "One, single Magnetic Field Collapsing"?

In previous video I show a very fast Motor Action of a permanent magnet inside the Core...Think just one single oriented collapsing magnetic field will ever do this , for God Sake?

And there is more to it...

There is a "Negative Induction" taking place there...lighting up the LED's that are Diodes, and I made sure, to connect them completely opposite to the way Hot will be induced in those tiny coils...

I have next a video coming about Secondary Negative Induction...Lighting Up High Pressure Sodium Metal Halide Bulbs and also a 400 Volts Xenon Strobe Bulb, making a very clean and beautiful plasma Arc between Cathode-Anode on all of them.

This is the way I see this...sorry about the ones who still think I am just having an "Inductive Collecting Circuit"...

Yes, I am a Heretic on this subject, and I will not stop until I bring you a Motor and a Radiant Energy generator right here very soon...

Regards to all


Ufopolitics

[Farmhand]

I never swallowed the "Collapse of a "Single" magnetic field story teller", ever!
There are Two Magnetic Fields acting like a Push-Pull arrangement to each others, just like a Piston on a gas engine goes up to an explosion stage (discharging), while another one is going down into suction stage (charging).

Not sure what you mean here, are you saying the collapsing magnetic field
creates another magnetic field as it is collapsing ?

At very High Frequencies Square pulses, where there is exactly Zero Time drop down, vertically down "the hill"...I am sorry, but there is absolutely no time at all for all the process recited in that old story...

What is the duty % of the driving pulses you are using and can you show a
wave form with the scope probe to the drain of the mosfet and the scope
(EDIT)ground to the circuit ground please ? If you are talking about 50/50 square
wave AC then the inductive collapse is met or prevented or incorperated by the reversal of
current the result being the flux in the transformer stays there I think. Which
is why an AC transformer with a core can have a very low idle input power.
The flux is retained. However to do that the primary turns need to be
sufficient to provide the required flux. There is a formula I believe.

Transformers Part 1 - Beginners' Guide to Electronics

The next step is to calculate the number of turns per volt for the primary winding. This varies with frequency, but for a 50Hz transformer, the turns per volt is (approximately) 45 divided by the core area (in square centimetres). Fewer turns are needed for a 60Hz transformer, and the turns per volt will be about 38 / core area. Higher performance core materials may permit higher flux densities, so fewer turns per volt might be possible, thus increasing the overall efficiency and regulation. These calculations must be made with care, or the transformer will overheat at no load.

For a 625VA transformer, it follows that you will need about 432 turns for a 240V primary, although in practice it may be less than this. The grain-oriented silicon steels used in better quality transformers will often tolerate much higher total flux per unit area, and fewer turns will be needed.

The Radiant Energy Field is MUCH Stronger than our Hot Field, in Frequency and in Motive Force, therefore in Electrical Induction.

What do you mean by "radiant" energy ? Where is it radiating to or from ?

The "Transformer Effect" applies for Hot current in a robust way, ONLY, when there IS a Heavy Laminated Steel Frame, period....Air Cores are NOT a good transmission of Hot Induced Electricity in ANY given "Conventional" Transformer, except...The Air Core "Tesla Coil".

Yes air cores are not the best for lower frequencies. But try to use a
laminated steel core at 3 mHz and see what happens.

I have measured the hot electricity secondary induction in an Air Core set-up, and it is in the Milli Volts range, while RE is at Hundred of volts...

What was the coupling coefficent ?

In my latest video I showed a pretty heavy Neo Magnet suspended in the Air, levitating right in the center core of an Air Coil...aiming same direction as Hot Magnetic Field...Now, just using a common sense judgement call..
Is this a "Sign" of just "One, single Magnetic Field Collapsing"?

No of course not. It's not a sign of the magnetic field collapsing, it is a
sign that the magnetic field when it is there is only ever the one polarity,
which causes repulsion.

In previous video I show a very fast Motor Action of a permanent magnet inside the Core...Think just one single oriented collapsing magnetic field will ever do this , for God Sake?

Same thing again it's the magnetic field itself that is spinning the magnet not
the collapse. There may be some eddy currents involved too.

And there is more to it...

There is a "Negative Induction" taking place there...lighting up the LED's that are Diodes, and I made sure, to connect them completely opposite to the way Hot will be induced in those tiny coils...

I've never heard of negative induction how does it work ? Please tell. Do you
mean reverse induction or induction of only the negative component of an AC
input ?

I have next a video coming about Secondary Negative Induction...Lighting Up High Pressure Sodium Metal Halide Bulbs and also a 400 Volts Xenon Strobe Bulb, making a very clean and beautiful plasma Arc between Cathode-Anode on all of them.

Again, I am not familiar with negative induction. Do you mean like this guy is
asking about on the physics forum ? Because he asked the question in December 2004 and still no reply.
Negative energy and opposite self-induction device

This is the way I see this...sorry about the ones who still think I am just having an "Inductive Collecting Circuit"...

No need to be sorry for us.

Here's some reading for you.

At no load, an ideal transformer draws virtually no current from the mains, since it is simply a large inductance. The whole principle of operation is based on induced magnetic flux, which not only creates a voltage (and current) in the secondary, but the primary as well! It is this characteristic that allows any inductor to function as expected, and the voltage generated in the primary is called a "back EMF" (electromotive force). The magnitude of this voltage is such that it almost equals (and is effectively in the same phase as) the applied EMF.

Although a simple calculation can be made to determine the internally generated voltage, doing so is pointless since it can't be changed. As described in Part 1 of this series, for a sinusoidal waveform, the current through an inductor lags the voltage by 90 degrees. Since the induced current is lagging by 90 degrees, the internally generated voltage is shifted back again by 90° so is in phase with the input voltage. For the sake of simplicity, imagine an inductor or transformer (no load) with an applied voltage of 230V. For the effective back EMF to resist the full applied AC voltage (as it must), the actual magnitude of the induced voltage (back EMF) is just under 230V. The output voltage of a transformer is always in phase with the applied voltage (within a few thousandths of a degree).

For example ... a transformer primary operating at 230V input draws 150mA from the mains at idle and has a DC resistance of 2 ohms. The back EMF must be sufficient to limit the current through the 2 ohm resistance to 150mA, so will be close enough to 229.7V (0.3V at 2 ohms is 150mA). In real transformers there are additional complications (iron loss in particular), but the principle isn't changed much.

If this is all to confusing, don't worry about it. Unless you intend to devote your career to transformer design, the information is actually of little use to you, since you are restrained by the "real world" characteristics of the components you buy - the internals are of little consequence. Even if you do devote your life to the design of transformers, this info is still merely a curiosity for the most part, since there is little you can do about it.

When you apply a load to the output (secondary) winding, a current is drawn by the load, and this is reflected through the transformer to the primary. As a result, the primary must now draw more current from the mains. Somewhat intriguingly perhaps, the more current that is drawn from the secondary, the original 90 degree phase shift becomes less and less as the transformer approaches full power. The power factor of an unloaded transformer is very low, meaning that although there are volts and amps, there is relatively little power. The power factor improves as loading increases, and at full load will be close to unity (the ideal).

Now, another interesting fact about transformers can now be examined.

We will use the same example as above. A 240V primary draws 1A, and the 24V secondary supplies 10A to the load. Using Ohm's law, the load resistance (impedance) is therefore 24/10 = 2.4 Ohms. The primary impedance must be 240/1 = 240 Ohms. This is a ratio of 100:1, yet the turns ratio is only 10:1 - what is going on?

The impedance ratio of a transformer is equal to the square of the turns ratio ...

3.1.1Z = N²
Transformers are usually designed based on the power required, and this determines the core size for a given core material. From this, the required "turns per volt" figure can be determined, based on the maximum flux density that the core material can support. Again, this varies widely with core materials.

Cheers

P.S. Here is a wave form from my inductive collapse circuit, I labeled the pic, I think it's
pretty much correct. When the switch opens the magnetic field collapse
causes the voltage to rise very quickly, so quick it shoots past the voltage of
the charging battery, then the battery takes the energy and it's voltage rises
during the transfer of energy. As you can see the mosfet turns off quick
enough to give a good ring out oscillation. "Mosfet conducting" refers the the
part to the left of the words "mosfet conducting" not the part above the
words.



..

[Ufopolitics]

Farmhand...

Not sure what you mean here, are you saying the collapsing magnetic field
creates another magnetic field as it is collapsing ?

The Hot Electricity Collapsing magnetic field does not "creates" absolutely nothing...the opposed electromagnetic field has always been there...and will keep doing so.

What is the duty % of the driving pulses you are using and can you show a
wave form with the scope probe to the drain of the mosfet and the scope
probe to the circuit ground please ? If you are talking about 50/50 square
wave AC then the inductive collapse is met or prevented or incorperated by the reversal of
current the result being the flux in the transformer stays there I think. Which
is why an AC transformer with a core can have a very low idle input power.
The flux is retained. However to do that the primary turns need to be
sufficient to provide the required flux. There is a formula I believe.

Transformers Part 1 - Beginners' Guide to Electronics

It really does not matter the "details" about the square wave, because I am talking about the Vertical drop down line as soon as T-On ends, finishes, so, no matter the dI/dt or duty cycle, this happens in ANY given square wave.
Time drop off is a straight vertically line down to zero signal on absolutely zero time.

What do you mean by "radiant" energy ? Where is it radiating to or from ?

Radiant energy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
But basically defining it in a very simple way:
Radiant energy is the energy of electromagnetic waves

Yes air cores are not the best for lower frequencies. But try to use a
laminated steel core at 3 mHz and see what happens.

Yes, thank you for accepting Air Core is not the best foe induction of Hot Electricity.
And I do not have to try any other way...I know how it works.



What was the coupling coefficent ?

No of course not. It's not a sign of the magnetic field collapsing, it is a
sign that the magnetic field when it is there is only ever the one polarity,
which causes repulsion.

¿Really?...Then try a Toroidal Permanent Magnet [so that "the magnetic field when it is there is only ever the one polarity,
which causes repulsion "(hollow center) and in the center set another smaller cylindrical magnet...and see if it "floats" or levitates...my recommendation: Do not hold your breath waiting to levitate...

Same thing again it's the magnetic field itself that is spinning the magnet not
the collapse. There may be some eddy currents involved too.

So now.. it is not about "The Collapse"...but the "Magnetic Field" itself, by just being there, present, what makes a permanent magnet to rotate?!!...Jesus Farmhand!!...you are contradicting your loyalty to Inquisition Classical Physics there man!! ...then it should be so that very simple to make permanent magnets motors, they should be all over!! ...However, Your Physics says it is not possible...how can you say that?

So, according to your two previous statements on Electromagnetic Fields...
Just the presence of a steady (not collapsing) magnetic field would lead to a direct levitation and also a rotation of any permanent magnet that we set within its "field of action"...?
Have you written this law?...never heard of such electromagnetic phenomena, have any of you guys?
Could you please, tell Us the "Details" how to achieve this incredible "dual" effect, so we could try to reproduce it...

My friendly advice is...Be careful!, you could be considered a heretic and therefore condemned to be burnt in the Purifying Fires of Heaven...

I've never heard of negative induction how does it work ? Please tell. Do you
mean reverse induction or induction of only the negative component of an AC
input ?

No, I know you've never heard of it...but you will...in time.

Again, I am not familiar with negative induction. Do you mean like this guy is
asking about on the physics forum ? Because he asked the question in December 2004 and still no reply.
Negative energy and opposite self-induction device

Again, you will get "familiar" with negative induction very soon.

No need to be sorry for us.

"Us", sounds like "just You" are a whole bunch of people...almost a Symphonic Orchestra... are you Farmhand that many people?

Cheers

Ufopolitics

[Farmhand]

I'm not going to argue with you UFO if you are going to try to twist my words.

Quote:
Same thing again it's the magnetic field itself that is spinning the magnet not
the collapse. There may be some eddy currents involved too.
So now.. it is not about "The Collapse"...but the "Magnetic Field" itself, by just being there, present, what makes a permanent magnet to rotate?!!...Jesus Farmhand!!...you are contradicting your loyalty to Inquisition Classical Physics there man!! ...then it should be so that very simple to make permanent magnets motors, they should be all over!! ...However, Your Physics says it is not possible...how can you say that?

So, according to your two previous statements on Electromagnetic Fields...
Just the presence of a steady (not collapsing) magnetic field would lead to a direct levitation and also a rotation of any permanent magnet that we set within its "field of action"...?
Have you written this law?...never heard of such electromagnetic phenomena, have any of you guys?
Could you please, tell Us the "Details" how to achieve this incredible "dual" effect, so we could try to reproduce it...

My friendly advice is...Be careful!, you could be considered a heretic and therefore condemned to be burnt in the Purifying Fires of Heaven...

I did not say that. I just said it is not the collapsing magnetic field that spins
the magnet, it is the pulsing magnetism that spins the magnet not the collapse.

"Us", sounds like "just You" are a whole bunch of people...almost a Symphonic Orchestra... are you Farmhand that many people?

I'm not the only one who said you have an inductive collapse circuit.

It is obvious to me you are only intent on confusion. I'm not concerned in the least what you think and I disregard your warning. pffft.
Why don't you threaten me instead.

Those are my opinions take it or leave it. You give yours I give mine. Simple.

No need for warnings. But make them if you want.

regards

P.S. I am one person with one account here, I use the same name on three
different forums and no other name is used by me. No one pays me a cent for
anything. I work for no man or no one

..

[Farmhand]

UFO,

And by the way "radiant" energy by my definition and that of many others is
energy that is radiated out in all directions and does not return. If you think/say
you can pick up energy radiated from elsewhere with your circuit, I won't argue.

I just want your definition is all. A clear one. If you use the word you should be
able to define what you mean by it when you use it.

regards

P.S. Can you show me where the radiant energy is in the waveform I posted ?
Or did my circuit not produce any.
..

[Ufopolitics]

Be or Not to Be...

I'm not going to argue with you UFO if you are going to try to twist my words.

Twisting your words?...I just Copy and Paste them Farmhand!

I did not say that. I just said it is not the collapsing magnetic field that spins
the magnet, it is the pulsing magnetism that spins the magnet not the collapse.

!¿pulsing magnetism?! ...That sounds like some kind of Voodoo Science there...Not objective, too "general" and not much of a scientific approach there.
If we have a stage of collapse (Off), and a stage of "On" or "Presence" of the magnetic field, because that is what it is...no more to it, it is either BLACK or WHITE, ON or OFF on square waves...and You "take off" the Collapse part...what we got left?
We got only left the ON time of the magnetic field turned ON, meaning "presence", active...etc.

It is obvious to me you are only intent on confusion.

Me bringing confusion to this topic?

You are bringing contradiction, pessimism, and ironic responses here. It is very obvious the Member that started this thread Believes in Radiant Energy, and So Do I...
Now, who is the arguing against and confusion creating party here, but You?

I'm not concerned in the least what you think and I disregard your warning. pffft.

You started by directing a Quoted Response Post to me, Farmhand, and I responded back to you.
I originally posted to the entire forum, not directed to you personally, but to all. And You took it (again) on your own, and started debating arguing with me, I was polite enough to answer back, when, simply I could have ignored you, but I have Ethics.

Why don't you threaten me instead.

Threaten You?!...Why should I do that?

I hope you took the "Fire from heavens" as a joke...it was intended to be that way, not to get you afraid of it...

Those are my opinions take it or leave it. You give yours I give mine. Simple.

Perfectly agree with you there...I do respect your opinion, as You should respect mines...However, you started by addressing directly to me your questions/doubts about my views/opinions.

No need for warnings. But make them if you want.

regards

This is not my Forum, I give no warnings , I just render my opinions...and like you've said..."take it or leave it"

Regards and over

Ufopolitics

[Farmhand]

You posted some things here that were in my opinion "unclear" so I asked some
questions and made some statements and stuff to explain my questions.

What's the big deal ?

P.S.

!¿pulsing magnetism?! ...That sounds like some kind of Voodoo Science there...Not objective, too "general" and not much of a scientific approach there.
If we have a stage of collapse (Off), and a stage of "On" or "Presence" of the magnetic field, because that is what it is...no more to it, it is either BLACK or WHITE, ON or OFF on square waves...and You "take off" the Collapse part...what we got left?
We got only left the ON time of the magnetic field turned ON, meaning "presence", active...etc.

Yes pulsing magnetism, it's on, then it's off repeatedly but the magnetic
pulses are created by a series of current pulses through the coil in the same
direction, so it's pulsing or pulsating magnetism of one polarity. It is pulsating
because there is no magnetic field for a time.

If every second current pulse was a reversed current pulse in the other
direction. and the duty cycle was somewhat less than 50% for each one then
alternating pulsating magnetic fields would be produced. It is pulsating
because there is no field for a time.

If the duty of the alternating currents is close to 50/50 the setup will idle with
low current draw and it will just have an alternating magnetic field I think. The
low idle power draw is providing of course that there is sufficient flux created.

At least that is what I think from what I have learned.

Twisting your words?...I just Copy and Paste them Farmhand!

Yes you copy and paste my words and ascribe your twisted meaning to my words like this below.

My words here.
Same thing again it's the magnetic field itself that is spinning the magnet not
the collapse. There may be some eddy currents involved too.

So now.. it is not about "The Collapse"...but the "Magnetic Field" itself, by just being there, present, what makes a permanent magnet to rotate?!!...Jesus Farmhand!!...you are contradicting your loyalty to Inquisition Classical Physics there man!! ...then it should be so that very simple to make permanent magnets motors, they should be all over!! ...However, Your Physics says it is not possible...how can you say that?

So, according to your two previous statements on Electromagnetic Fields...
Just the presence of a steady (not collapsing) magnetic field would lead to a direct levitation and also a rotation of any permanent magnet that we set within its "field of action"...?
Have you written this law?...never heard of such electromagnetic phenomena, have any of you guys?
Could you please, tell Us the "Details" how to achieve this incredible "dual" effect, so we could try to reproduce it...

Cheers

[Ufopolitics]

Last Call...

UFO,

And by the way "radiant" energy by my definition and that of many others is
energy that is radiated out in all directions and does not return. If you think/say
you can pick up energy radiated from elsewhere with your circuit, I won't argue.

I just want your definition is all. A clear one. If you use the word you should be
able to define what you mean by it when you use it.

regards

P.S. Can you show me where the radiant energy is in the waveform I posted ?
Or did my circuit not produce any.
..

My definition about Radiant Energy have always remained the same all along all posts I have written here , on my Facebook Account and in my You Tube Channel. And in my Articles on my sites. It is a very clear concept that I have expressed according to my concept, to my research, to my experiments and according to my expertise in this fields.

And by the way "radiant" energy by my definition and that of many others is energy that is radiated out in all directions and does not return.

Your definition and that of "many others" related that "It does not return"...could be yours and the others concept...But, let me just ask you a simple question...if RE "Does not returns"...really...what are we, all of Us doing here?...looking to harness some kind of energy that given the fact that "it doesn't returns"??!!

However, I do agree -like Nikola Tesla did also- that it radiates in all directions.

"Radiant energy is the energy of electromagnetic waves"
I agree with that simple concept above...as Wikipedia wrote...

My Concept of Radiant Energy:

Radiant Energy is the energy within, contained or "of" electromagnetic waves.
Electromagnetic waves exist in the Spectrum radiated in Electromagnetic Fields. However, it is also understood that Electromagnetic Waves also travel in space.
Radiant Energy is present at all times in those waves, therefore in Electromagnetic fields Spectrum and also in SPACE.

One form that Radiant Energy develops is as an inverse natural process, a response to our created, generated, pulsed electromagnetic field.
It is exactly the opposite process to ours. We create a magnetic field by sending electrical pulses. This process triggers Radiant Energy Field to manifest within our Coil. Electromagnetic waves are converted to electrical flow, and since the RE EM Field is opposed to our EM Field, then is understood RE electrical flow is also opposed to our electrical flow direction.
The Radiant Energy Electromagnetic Field exist in a permanent magnet, as it exist in a triggered/excited Coil. The difference is that a pulsed EM Field (electromagnetic field) triggers RE field to increase, gaining strength as we increase our pulses.
Radiant Energy timing IN, is at our Times Off, of the square wave form.

P.S. Can you show me where the radiant energy is in the waveform I posted ?
Or did my circuit not produce any.
..

You are showing there the wave form of Your pulsed Electromagnetic Field predominating, Farmhand...In order to read Radiant Energy Field clearly, you must block Hot electrical flow to travel to your scope terminals. Or you will have a 'mixed signal' there...of Radiant and Hot flow.

Regards and have all a very nice evening!

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Last, last call...

You posted some things here that were in my opinion "unclear" so I asked some
questions and made some statements and stuff to explain my questions.

What's the big deal ?

P.S.



Yes pulsing magnetism, it's on, then it's off repeatedly but the magnetic
pulses are created by a series of current pulses through the coil in the same
direction, so it's pulsing or pulsating magnetism of one polarity. It is pulsating
because there is no magnetic field for a time.

If every second current pulse was a reversed current pulse in the other
direction. and the duty cycle was somewhat less than 50% for each one then
alternating pulsating magnetic fields would be produced. It is pulsating
because there is no field for a time.

If the duty of the alternating currents is close to 50/50 the setup will idle with
low current draw and it will just have an alternating magnetic field I think. The
low idle power draw is providing of course that there is sufficient flux created.

At least that is what I think from what I have learned.



Yes you copy and paste my words and ascribe your twisted meaning to my words like this below.



Cheers

Jesus Farmhand...

Yes pulsing magnetism, it's on, then it's off repeatedly but the magnetic
pulses are created by a series of current pulses through the coil in the same
direction, so it's pulsing or pulsating magnetism of one polarity. It is pulsating
because there is no magnetic field for a time.

Really?...no magnetic field for a time?...and then explain to me and to All here, how come ALL the objects I levitate during my Nine minutes video do not collapse, neither vibrate but very steadily float in a very stable fashion?
If there would be a "lack" of magnetic field for just one Milli second, the whole thing will come down like an Old type writer from the 1800's...

I have not mentioned at all AC Current here...AC Sine waves or Triangular waves...I have written very clear DC Square Waves Pulsed Current.
Have no idea why you are bringing AC here...to create confusion?..not to me Farmhand...ever.

so it's pulsing or pulsating magnetism of one polarity.

...Magnetism of "One Polarity"??!!...could you explain that?...a Monopole Magnetic Field?...just one North, no South?...or is it a South without a North pole?!!

I really think you have a lot of concepts a bit confused here...or maybe forgotten.


Cheers

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

The Videos I was referring about...

For the Post readers:

Below are the direct link to the videos I was citing to Farmhand previously in our very smooth and non contradicting debate...

DEFINING RE FIELD (Part II) EM ANTIGRAVITY EFFECT - YouTube

DEFINING RADIANT ENERGY FIELD (Part 1) - YouTube

Thanks for watching

Ufopolitics